Kentsel Dönüşümü Gündeme Gelen Bir Alan İçin Konut Memnuniyeti Araştırması: Türk-iş Blokları Örneği

Bu çalışmada bir işçi kooperatifi tarafından inşa edilmiş, Ankara Altındağ Belediyesi Altınpark Mahallesi sınırları içinde bulunan Türk-iş Blokları’nda konut memnuniyeti ve kentsel dönüşüme ilişkin eğilim incelenmiştir. Alan 2013 yılında riskli alan ilan edilmiştir. Dönüşümü sözkonusu olan alandan ve mevcut konutlardan hangi unsurlar dolayısıyla memnun olunup olunmadığı ve kullanıcıların kentsel dönüşümü isteyip istemedikleri yapılan saha araştırması ile ortaya çıkarılmaya çalışılmıştır. Araştırmanın veri toplama yöntemini alanda yaşayanlarla gerçekleştirilen derinlemesine mülakatlar ve anketler oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmada konuta, konut çevresine ve konut kullanıcılarına dair nitelikler açısından bir sorgulama gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bulgular yaşanılan konutlardan ve alandan memnun olanların oranının oldukça yüksek olduğunu, bu memnuniyetin yaş ve oturma süresi arttıkça arttığını göstermektedir. Nüfusun homojen ve istikrarlı oluşu konutlarını ihtiyaçlarına göre düzenlemelerine, alanda mekânsal, sosyal ve duygusal bir bağ kurulmasına imkân vermiştir. Mahalle kimliğine sahip alanın en güçlü yanları komşuluk ilişkileri, kentsel hizmetlerin erişilebilirliği, yeterliliği ve yeşil alan dokusudur. Konutlarda tesisat, alanda ise spor/kültür tesislerinin yetersizliği ve son zamanlarda gündeme gelen güvenlik ve otopark sorunu dışında memnun olunmayan bir konu yoktur. Alanda kentsel dönüşüm isteyenlerin oranı istemeyenlerin oranından düşüktür. Dönüşümün gerçekleşmesini isteyenlerin ise dönüşümden beklentileri oldukça yüksektir. Mevcuttaki mekânsal imkânların korunması kaydıyla dönüşümün alandaki ve konutlardaki tüm sorunları çözeceği, konforlu ve lüks bir yaşam sunacağı ve haksahiplerinin ekonomik pozisyonlarını iyileştireceği algısı yaygındır.

A Housing Satisfaction Study in an Area of Urban Transformation: The Case of the Türk-iş Apartment Blocks

This study investigated the housing satisfaction and the urban transformation expectations in the Türk-iş Blocks, built by a labor cooperative in the Altınpark neighborhood of Altındağ, Ankara. The area was declared “risky ” in 2013. A survey and in-depth interviews were conducted to examine the satisfaction of residents with housing and their expectations of urban transformation. The results revealed that a large number of the respondents were satisfied with their houses and living environment. Satisfaction increased with duration of time living in the area and age. Over time, the homogenous and stable population in the area has reorganized their houses according to their needs and established a spatial, social, and emotional connection to their neighborhood. The strengths of the area include its neighborhood identity, close social relations, accessibility, and sufficiency of urban services and green areas. Areas of dissatisfaction included insufficient indoor installations, cultural/sports facilities, and security and parking lot problems. Most residents did not support urban transformation plans; however, those who do support the idea have high expectations of the process. With the condition of maintaining their current spatial rights, many perceived urban transformation as a solution to the problems of the area and indicated that their economic status has improved and that life has become more luxurious and comfortable.

___

  • Adams R. E. (1992) “Is Happiness A Home in The Suburbs? The Influence of Urban Versus Suburban Neighborhoods on Psychological Health”, Journal of Community Psychology Sayı 20, s. 353–372.
  • Am´erigo M, Aragon´es J. I. (1990) “Residential Satisfaction in Council Housing”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Sayı 10, s. 313–325.
  • Awotona A. (1988) “The Perception Of Housing Condition in Nigeria by The Urban Poor”, Habitat Internetional, Sayı 12(2), s. 75-96.
  • Baiden P., Lugınaah A., Asiedu A. B. (2011) “An Assessment of Residents’ Housing Satisfaction and Coping in Accra, Ghana”, Journal of Public Health, Sayı 19, s. 29-37.
  • Baldassare M. (1982) “The Effects of Neighborhood Density and Social Control on Resident Satisfaction”, The Sociological Quarterly, Sayı 23, s. 95–105.
  • Bardo J.W., Hughey J. B. (1984) “The Structure of Community Satisfaction in A British and An American Community”, The Journal of Social Psychology, Sayı 124, s. 151–157.
  • Barrasi, C., Ferraro K.F., Hobey L.L. (1984) “Environmental Satisfaction, Sociability and Well-being among the Urban Elderly”, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, Sayı 18, s. 277–293.
  • Behring, K., Helbrecht, I. (2002) Wohneigentum in Europa, WU, Stenrot stiftung, Ludwigsburg.
  • Bonnes M., Bonaıuto M., Ercolani A.P. (1991) “Crowding and Residential Satisfaction in The Urban Environment: A Contextual Approach”, Environment and Behavior, Sayı 23(5),s. 531-552.
  • Boyle M. A., Kiel K. A. (2001) “A Survey of House Price Hedonic Studies of the Impact of Environmental Externalities”, Journal of Real Estate Literature, Sayı 9(2), s. 117-144.
  • Burby R.J., Rohe W.M. (1990) “Providing for the Housing Needs of the Elderly”, Journal of the American Planning Association, Sayı 56, s. 324–340.
  • Campell A., Converse P.E., Rodgers W.J. (1976) The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations, and Satisfaction, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
  • Caldieron J. (2011) “Residential Satisfaction in La Perla Informal Neighborhood, San Juan, Puerto Rico”, Oida International Journal of Sustainable Development, Sayı 02(11), s. 77-84.
  • Carter A. (2000) “Strategies and Partnership in Urban Regeneration”, Ed.: Urban P. Roberts ve H. Sykes (editör), Regeneration A Handbook, London: Sage Publications.
  • Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., Frıjters, P. (2004) “How Important is Methodology for The Estimates of The Determinants of Happiness?”, Economic Journal, Sayı 114, s. 641–659.
  • Dahmann D.C. (1985) “Assessments of Neighborhood Quality in Metropolitan America”, Urban Affairs Quarterly, Sayı 20, s. 511–535.
  • Diener, E., Biswas-Diener, R. (2002) “Will Money Increase Subjective Wellbeing? A Literature Review and Guide to Needed Research”, Social Indicators Research, Sayı 57, s. 119–169.
  • Donnison D. (1993) Agenda for the Future, Ed.: Campell McConnell (editör), Trickle Down on Bubble Up?, London: Community Development Foundation.
  • Duman B. (2015) “Kentsel Dönüşümde Riskler ve Beklentilere Dair İlk Tespitler: İstanbul’da Bir Saha Çalışması”, Megaron, Sayı 10(3), s. 410-422.
  • Duncan T. (1971) Measuring housing quality, Occasional Paper (20), Center for Urban and Regional Studies, University of Birmingham.
  • Enosh N., Leslau A., Shacham, J. (1984) “Residential Quality Assessment: A Conceptual Modal and Empirical Test”, Social Indicators Research, (14) 453–476.
  • Erdoğan N., Akyol A.;-, Ataman B., Dökmeci V. (2007) “Comparison of Urban Housing Satisfaction in Modern and Traditional Neighborhoodsin Edirne, Turkey”, Social Indicators Research, Sayı 81, s. 127–148.
  • Fried M. (1984) “The Structure and Significance of Community Satisfaction”, Population and Environment, Sayı 7, s. 61 – 86.
  • Fried M., Gleicher P. (1961) “Some Sources of Residential Satisfaction in an Urban Slum”, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Sayı 19, s. 539–568.
  • Galster G.C., Hesser G. W. (1981) “Residential Satisfaction: Compositional and Contextual Correlates”, Environment and Behavior, Sayı 13(6), s. 735-758.
  • Galster G. C. (1987) “Residential Segregation and Interracial Economic Disparities: A Simultaneous-Equations Approach”, Journal of Urban Economics, Sayı 21(1), s. 22-44.
  • Gans H. J. (1967) “Planning-and City Planning-for Mental Health”, Ed.: H. W. Eldredgel (editör), Taming Megalopolis, Vol 2. Doubleday, NY.
  • Hanna S., Lindamood S. (1981) “Components of Housing Satisfaction”, Proceedings of American Association of Housing Educators, 1981, s. 24-26.
  • Hashim A. H. (2003) “Residential Satisfaction and Social Integration in Public Low Cost Housing in Malaysia Pertanika”, Journal of Social Science and Humanities, Sayı 11(1), s. 1-10.
  • Hourihan K. (1984) “Residential Satisfaction, Neighborhood Attributes, and Personal Characteristics: An Exploratory Analysisin Cork, Ireland”, Environment and Planning, Sayı 16, s. 425-36.
  • Hunter A. (1978) “Persistence of Local Sentiments in Mass Society”, Ed.: D. Street (editör), Handbook of Contemporary Urban Life, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
  • Jiboye A. D. (2010) “The Correlates of Public Housing Satisfaction in Lagos, Nigeria”, Journal of Geography and Regional Planning, Sayı 3(2), s. 017-028.
  • John C., Clark F. (1984) “Race and Social Class Differences in the Characteristics Desired in Residential Neighborhoods”, Social Science Quarterly, Sayı 65, s. 803–813.
  • Kahraman Z. E. (2012) “Kentsel Dönüşümünün Kentsel Entegrasyon Üzerindeki Etkileri”, KBAM 3. Sempozyumu, Kent Bölgeler, Metropoliten Alanlar ve Büyükşehirler: Değişen Dinamikler ve Sorunlar, Aralık 2012, ODTÜ, Ankara.
  • Kahraman Z. E. (2013) “Dimensions of Housing Satisfaction: A Case Study Based on Perceptions of Rural Migrants Living in Dikmen”, ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı 30(1),s. 1-27.
  • Kaitilla S. (1993) “Satisfaction with Public Housing in Papua New Guinea: The Case of West Taraka Housing Scheme”, Environment and Behavior, Sayı 25, s. 514-545.
  • Kamp I. V., Leıdelmeijer K., Marsman G., Hollandaer A. D. (2003) “Urban Environmental Quality and Human Well-being towards a Conceptual Framework and Demarcation of Concepts; A Literature Study”, Landscape and Urban Planning, Sayı 65, s. 5–18.
  • Kasadara J.D.,JanowitzM.(1974) “CommunityAttachmentinMass Society”, American Sociological Review, Sayı 39, s. 328–339.
  • Kelekci Ö. L., Berköz L. (2006) “Mass Housing: User Satisfaction in Housing and Its Environment in Istanbul, Turkey”, European Journal of Housing Policy, Sayı 6(11), s. 77–99.
  • Kemeny J. (1995) From Public to Social Market; Rental Policy Strategies in Comparative Perspective, Routledge, London.
  • Konadu A., (2001) “A Survey of Housing Conditions and Characteristics in Accra, An African City”. Habitat International, Sayı 25, s. 15–34.
  • Kütük B. Ş., Ergan N. G. ve Sağlam S. (2013) “Kentsel Dönüşüm Projesi Alanında Yaşayanların Kentsel Dönüşüm Projesine Bakışları: Ankara Mamak Ve Hıdırlık Tepe-Atıf Bey-İsmet Pasa Kentsel Dönüşüm Projeleri Örneği”. VII. Ulusal Sosyoloji Kongresi 243-257.
  • Lawton M. P. (1980) “Housing The Elderly: Residential Quality and Residential Satisfaction”, Research on Aging, Sayı 2(3), s. 309-328.
  • Lee B. A., Guest A. M. (1983) “Determinants of neighborhood satisfaction: a metropolitan level analysis”, The Sociological Quarterly, Sayı 24, s. 287–303.
  • Loo C. (1986) “Neighborhood Satisfaction and Safety: A Study of A Low-Income Ethnic Area”, Environment and Behavior, Sayı 18, s. 109-131.
  • Lu M. (1999) “Determinants of Residential Satisfaction: Ordered Logit vs. Regression Models”, Growth and Change, Sayı 30, 264–287.
  • Middleton R. (1963) “Alienation, Race and Education”, American Social Review, Sayı 28, s. 973-977.
  • Miller, F. D., Tsemberis S., Malia G. P., Grega D. (1980) “Neighborhood Satisfaction Among Urban Dwellers”, Journal of Social Issues, Sayı 36(3), s. 101–117.
  • Mohit M. A., Ibrahim M. I., Rashid Y. R. (2010) “Assessment of Residential Satisfaction in Newly Designed Public Low-cost Housing in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia”, Habitat International, Sayı 34, s. 18–27.
  • Morris E.W., Crull S.R., Winter M. (1976) “Housing Norms, Housing Satisfaction and The Propensity to Move”, Journal of Marriage and Family, Sayı 39, s. 309-320.
  • Morris E. W., Winter M. (1978) Housing, Family and Society, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Muoghalu L. N. (1991) “Measuring Housing and Environmental Quality as Indicators of Quality of Urban Life: A Case Study in Benin, Nigeria”, Social Indicators Research, Sayı 45, s. 63-98.
  • Mustapha F. H., Al-ped A., Wild S. (1995) “A Model for Assessing the Effectiveness of Public Housing in Sana’a (Republic of Yemen)”, Construction, Management and Economics, Sayı 13, s. 457-465.
  • Okumuş D. E., Eyüpoğlu E.E. (2015) “Kentsel Dönüşüm Öncesi Kentsel Yaşam Kalitesi Araştırmasına Yönelik Yöntem Önerisi ve Ataşehir Barbaros Mahallesi Örneklemi”, Planlama, Sayı 25(2), s. 93-106.
  • Onibokun, A. G. (1974) “Evaluating Consumers’ Satisfaction with Housing”, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Sayı 40, s. 189–200.
  • Özdemir S. ve Kahraman Z.E. (2013) “Dönüşüm Potansiyeline Sahip Planlı Gelişmiş Konut Alanlarında Memnuniyet ve Beklenti: Altınpark Türk-İş Blokları Örneği”, 4. Kentsel ve Bölgesel Araştırmalar Ağı Sempozyumu: “Neo-liberalizm Sonrası Mekânsal Müdahale Biçimleri ve Yansımaları”, 28 – 30 Kasım 2013, Mersin.
  • Park I. S., Kim J. H. & Kim J. S. (2008) “The Influence of Housing Satisfaction of Apartment and Brand Image on Consumer Loyalty”, Architectural Institute of Korea Dissertations, Sayı 24(9), s. 57-64.
  • Parkes A., Kearns A., Atkinson R. (2002a) “What Makes People Dissatisfied with Their Neighbourhoods?”, Urban Studies, Sayı 39(13), s. 2413–2438
  • Parkes A., Kearns A., Atkinson R. (2002b) The Determinants of Neighborhood Dissatisfaction, ESRC Centre for Neighborhood Research, Bristol.
  • Peck C., Stewart K.K. (1985) “Satisfaction with Housing and Quality of Life”, Home Economics Research Journal, Sayı 13(4), s. 363-372.
  • Rent G.S., Rent, C. S. (1978) “Low-Income Housing: Factors Related to Residential Satisfaction”, Environment and Behavior, Sayı 10, s. 459-488.
  • Roberts P., Skyes H. (2000) Urban Regeneration A Handbook, London: Sage Publications.
  • Rohe W.M., Stegman M.A. (1994) “The Impacts of Home Ownership on the SelfEsteem, Perceived Control and Life Satisfaction of Low Income People”, Journal of the American Planning Association, Sayı 60, s. 173–184.
  • Rossi P.H., Weber E. (1996) “The Social Benefits of Homeownership: Empirical Evidence from National Surveys”, Housing Policy Debate, Sayı 7, s. 1–81.
  • Salleh A. G. (2008) “Neighbourhood Factors in Private Low-Cost Housing in Malaysia”, Habitat International, Sayı 32, s. 485– 493.
  • Saunders P. (1990) A Nation of Home Owners, Unwin Hyman, London.
  • Satsangi M., Kearns A. (1992) “The Use and Interpretation of Tenant Satisfaction Surveys in British Social Housing”, Environment and Planning C, Government and Policy, Sayı 10, s. 318–331.
  • Schorr A. L. (1963) Slums and Social Insecurity, Social Security Administration, Division of Research and Statistics, Research Report 1, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
  • Soen D. (1979) “Habitability: Occupants’ Needs and Dwelling Satisfaction”, Ekistics, Sayı 46(275), s. 129-34.
  • Speare A. Jr. (1974) “Residential Satisfaction as An Intervening Variable in Residential Mobility”, Demography, Sayı 11, s. 173-188.
  • Thomas S. (2003) A Glossary of Regeneration and Local Economic Development, Manchester: Local Economic Strategy Center, UK.
  • Torbica, Z. M., Stroh, R. C. (2001). “Customer Satisfaction in Home Building”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(1), 82-86.
  • Türkoğlu H. (1997) “Residents’ Satisfaction of Housing Environments: The Case of Istanbul, Turkey”. Landscape and Urban Planning (39) 55–67.
  • Ukoha O. M., Beamish J. O. (1996) “Predictors of Housing Satisfaction in Abuja, Nigeria”, Housing and Society, Sayı 23(3), s. 26-46.
  • Ukoha O. M., Beamish J. O. (1997) “”Assessment of Residents’ Satisfaction with Public Housing in Abuja, Nigeria”, Habitat International, Sayı 21, s. 45–460.
  • Varady, D.P. (1983) “Determinants of Residential Mobility”, Journal of the American Planning Association, Sayı 49,s. 184–199.
  • Varady D. P., Preiser W. F. E. (1998) “Scattered-Site Public Housing and Housing Satisfaction: Implications for the New Public Housing Program”, Journal of the American Planning Association, Sayı 64(2), s. 189-207.
  • Varady D.P., Carrozza M. A. (2000) “Toward a Better Way to Measure Customer Satisfaction Levels in Public Housing: A Report from Cincinnati”, Housing Studies, Sayı 15, s. 797–825.
  • Vera-Toscano E., Ateca-Amestoy V. (2008) “The Relevance of Social Interactions on Housing Satisfaction”, Social Indicators Research, Sayı 86, s. 257–274.
  • Westaway M.S. (2006) “A Longitudinal Investigation of Satisfaction with Personal and Environmental Quality of Life in an Informal South African Housing Settlement, Doornkop, Soweto”, Habitat International, Sayı 30, s. 175-189.
  • Weidmann, S., Anderson, J., R., (1985) “A Conceptual Framework for Residential Satisfaction”, Ed.: I. Altman ve Werner, C. (editör), Home Environments, Plenum Press, s. 153-178.
  • Wiesenfeld E. (1992) “Public Housing Evaluation in Venezuela: A Case Study”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Sayı 12, s. 213–223.
  • Yi C. (1985) “Urban Housing Satisfaction in a Transitional Society: A Case Study in Taichung, Taiwan”, Urban Studies, Sayı 22-1, s. 1-12.
  • Zanuzdana A., Khan M., Kraemer A. (2012) “Housing Satisfaction Related to Health and Importance of Services in Urban Slums: Evidence from Dhaka, Bangladesh”, Social Indicators Research (DOI 10.1007/s1 1205-012-0045-5).
  • Zikri M., Rostam K., Yusoff Y. M. (2010) “Residential Satisfaction with Housing in The Malaysian Context”, The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, Sayı 5(2), s. 379- 395.
  • http://www.altindag.bel.tr/gazete.asp?kategori=mansetler&ay= KASIM&yil=9 [Erişim Tarihi 3 Nisan 2014].
  • http://www.kentseldonusum.gov.tr/index.html [Erişim Tarihi 6 Nisan 2014].
  • http://www.hurriyetemlak.com/konut-satilik/ankara-altindagseyfi_demirsoy/ [Erişim Tarihi 11 Eylül 2014].