Kaos’dan düzene; “sinerjetik toplum, sinerjik yönetim ve sinerjist planlama” - örnek olay: 1999 Marmara depremleri sonrası kaos ve kendi-kendine organizasyon süreci içinde bir ilkokulun yapımı

İletişim ve bilgi teknolojilerinin sürekli geliştiği günümüz top- lumlarında, küresel etkileşimlerin artışı ile birlikte her alanda ilerlemeler, çeşitlenmeler, değişim ve dönüşümler insanlık tari- hindeki en hızlı dönemini yaşamaktadır. Her şeyin her an deği- şebildiği ve önceden tahmin edilmesinin giderek zorlaştığı “be- lirsizlik ortamında” mevcut düzen yeni ilişkilerin gerektirdiği ih- tiyaçlar ve sorunlar karşısında yeterli esnekliği gösterememek- tedir. Bu durum da toplumların kaotik olarak algılanmasına ve gelecek kestirimine dayalı olan planlama anlayışının ontolojik problemler yaşamasına neden olmaktadır. Bu makalenin ama- cı, planlama süreçleri için belirsiz ve kaotik durumların orta- ya çıkmasına neden olan toplumsal değişim-dönüşümleri an- lamaya çalışarak, doktora tez çalışmasında geliştirilen “sinerje- tik toplum modeli” ile “sinerjik yönetim ve sinerjist planlama yaklaşımları”nı kısaca özetlemektir. Modelin temelini oluşturan ve kaos içinde kendi-kendine organize olan iletişim-etkileşim kanallarıyla gelişmeye başlayan “toplumsal sinerji”; 1999 Mar- mara depremleri sonrasında yaşanan kaos ve kendi-kendine organizasyon süreçlerinde incelenmiştir. Deprem sonrasında- ki toplumsal sinerji ile Kılıçköy / Yalova’daki bir ilkokulun yapım süreci, farklı düzeyler ve farklı dinamikler arasındaki iletişim- etkileşim kanalları örneğinde açıklanacaktır.

From chaos to order: “synergetic society, synergic administration and synergistic planning” case study: the building process of a primary school in the process of self-organization after the 1999 Marmara earthquakes

In contemporary societies, through the advances in the tech- nologies of informatics and communication, global interactions are increased, and developments, variations, changes, and transformations in any field are shared more rapidly than at any previous time in human history. Existing systems have been un- able to show the necessary flexibility regarding the new require- ments and the problems of new relations due to unpredictable circumstances. This can lead to the perception of chaotic societ- ies and cause ontological problems in planning, which is based on future predictions. The main goal of this paper is to summa- rize the “synergetic society model”, “synergic administration” and “synergistic planning approaches” (developed for the dis- sertation). These concepts will help us to understand uncertain and unpredictable social changes. According to our model, “so- cial synergy”, which is spontaneously emerging and organizing via communication channels, is thoroughly examined in the pro- cesses of chaos and self-organization as experienced following the eastern Marmara earthquake in 1999. The building process of a primary school with the help of social synergy in Kılıçköy / Yalova after the earthquake is explained on the basis of com- munication channels between different levels and with varying dynamics.

PDF

___

1. Chadwick, G., (1971), A System View of Planning, Per- gamon Press, N. Y.
2. Moles, A., (1992), Belirsizin Bilimleri - İnsan Bilimleri İçin Yeni Bir Epistemoloji, N.Bilgin (Çev.), Yapı Kredi Yay., İstanbul.
3. Kauffman, S.A., (1990), “The Sciences of Complexity and ‘Origins of Order’ “Principles of Organization in Organ- isms, Proceedings of the Workshop on Principles of Or- ganization in Organisms, 8: 303 - 320, J. E. Mittenthal, ve A. B. Baskin (Derl.), Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Science of Complexity, Addison - Wesley Pub., California.
4. Gleick, J., (1997), Kaos Yeni Bir Bilim Teorisi, (Çev: F.Üçcan), Tübitak Popüler Bilim Kitapları, Ankara.
5. Fiegenbaum, M. (1981), Nonlineer Sistemlerde Evrensel Davranış”, Los Alamos Science 1 (Summer), 4-27.
6. Prigogine, I., Stengers I., (1984), Order out of Chaos, Ban- tam, New York.
7. Cramer, (1998), Kaos ve Düzen - Sırat Köprüsündeki Hayat (Çev., V. Atayman), Alan Yayınları, İstanbul.
8. Rosado, C., (2008), “Context Determines Content: Quan- tum Physics as a Framework for ‘Wholeness’ in Urban Transformation”, Urban Studies, 45(10):2075-2097.
9. Hawkins, D.R., (2006), Transcending Levels of Concious- ness: The Stairway to Enlightenment. Sedona, AZ: Veritas Publishing.
10. Bohm, D., (1980), Wholeness and the Implicate Order. New York: Routledge.
11. Mandelbrot, B.B., (1982), The Fractal Geometry of Na- ture. San Francisco.
12. Prigogine, I., Stengers I., (1998), Kaostan Düzene - İnsanın Tabiatla Yeni Diyaloğu, S. Demirci (Çev.), İz Yay., İstanbul.
13. Diker Çamlıbel, N., (2003), Belirsizlik Ortamında Plan- lama Düşüncesi “Sinerjetik Toplum, Sinerjik Yönetim ve Sinerjist Planlama Modeli”, Örnek Olay: 17 Ağustos – 12 Kasım 1999 Depremleri Sonrası Kaos ve Kendi-Kendine Organizasyon Süreci, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, YTÜ, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
14. Flood, R.L., Carson, E.R., (1993), Dealing With Complex- ity, Plenum Press, New York.
15. Lam, L., Naroditsky, V. (Der.), (1992), Modelling Complex Phenomena, Springer-Verlag, New York.
16. Webster’s II, (1994), Webster’s II - New Riverside Uni- versity Dictionary, The Riverside Publishing Company, Houghton Mifflin Company, USA.
17. World Book Dictionary, New York: The World Book Inc.
18. Haken, H., (1977), Synergetics - An Introduction - Non- equilibrium Phase Transitions and Self-Organization in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology, Springer - Verlag, Berlin.
19. Fuller, R.B., (1978), Synergetics - Explorations in the Ge- ometry of Thinking, Macmillan Pub., New York.
20. Haken, H., (1996), Principles of Brain Functioning - A Syn- ergetic Approach to Brain Activity, Behavior and Cogni- tion, Springer, Berlin.
21. Koch, C., Davis, J.L., (Der.), (1994), Large- Scale Neuronal Theories of the Brain, the MIT Press, Cambridge.
22. Barlow, H., (1994), “What is the Computational Goal of the Neocortex?”, 1-22, Large- Scale Neuronal Theories of the Brain, C. Koch, J. L. Davis (Derl.), Cambridge: MIT Press.
23. Wang, F., (1994), “The Use of Artificial Neural Networks in a Geographical Information System for Agricultural Land-Suitability Assessment”, Environment and Planning A, 26: 265-284.
24. Wyatt, R., (1996), “Evaluating Strategies by Means of an Artificial Neural Network”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 23:685 - 695.Aktan, C.C. (2003), Değişim Çağında Yönetim, Sistem Yay.
25. Domasio, A.R., (1999), Descarts’ın Yanılgısı - Duygu, Akıl ve İnsan Beyni, B. Atlamaz ve O. Deniztekin (Çev.), Varlık Yay., İstanbul.
26. Allen, P.M., Sanglier, M., (1981), “Urban Evolution, Self- Organization, and Decision Making”, Environment and Planning A, 13:167-183.
27. Allen, P.M., (1982), “Evolution and Design in Human Sys- tems”, Environment and Planning B, 9: 95 - 111.
28. Allen, P.M., (1997), Cities and Regions as Self-Organizing Systems - Models of Complexity, Gordon and Breach Sci- ence Pub., Amsterdam.
29. Allen, P.M., Engelen, G., Sanglier, M., (1984), “Self Orga- nizing Dynamic Models of Human Sysytems, Synergetics, 22: 150 - 171, Macroscopic to Microscopic Order, E. Ferh- land (Derl.), Springer, Berlin.
30. Allen, P.M., Sanglier, M., Engelen, G., Boon, F., (1985), “Toward a New Synthesis in the Modeling of Evolving Complex Systems”, Environment and Planning B: Plan- ning and Design, 12: 65- 84.
31. Khalil, E.L., Boulding, K.E., (1996), “Social Theory and Naturalism”, 1-39, Evolution, Complexity and Order E.L. Khalil, K.E. Boulding (Der.), Routledge, London.
32. Laborit, H., (1990), İnsan ve Kent, B. Onaran (Çev.), Payel Yay., İstanbul.
33. Laborit, H., (1996)., “Neurological and Social Bases of Dominance in Human Society”, 199 - 216, Evolution, Complexity and Order, E.L. Khalil, K.E. Boulding (Derl.), Routledge, London.
34. Bushev, M., (1994), Synergetics: Chaos, Order, Self - Or- ganization, World Scientific Pub. Co., Singapore.
35. Haken, H., Portugali, J., (1995), “A Synergetic Approach to the Self-Organization of Cities and Settlements”, Envi- ronment and Planning B, 22: 35-46.
36. Stern, D.I., (1992), “Do Regions Exist? Implication of Syn- ergetics for Regional Geography”, Environment and Plan- ning A, 24: 1431- 1448.
37. Healey, P., (2008), “The Pragmatic Tradition in Planning Thought”, Journal of Planning Education and Research, DOI: 10.1177/07395456X08325175, Association of Col- legiate Schools of Planning.
38. Forester, J.W., (1969), Urban Dynamics, MIT Press, Cam- bridge, Massachusetts.
39. Forester, J.W. (1971), World Dynamics, MIT Press, Cam- bridge, Massachusetts.
40. Allen, P.M., Sanglier, M., (1979), “A Dynamic Model of a Central Place System”, Geographical Analysis, 11: 256 - 272.
41. Allen, P.M., Sanglier, M., (1989), “Evolutionary Models of Urban Systems: An Application to the Belgian Provinces, Environment and Planning A, 21: 477 - 498.
42. Monod, J., (1997), Rastlantı ve Zorunluluk - Modern Biyolojinin Doğa Felsefesi Üzerine Bir Deneme, (Çev. V. Hacıkadiroğlu), Dost Kitabevi, Ankara.
43. White, R., (1977), “Dynamic Central Place Theory”, Geo- graphical Analysis, 9: 226 -243.
44. Moffat, I., (1996), “A Computational Framework for Mod- elling the Dynamics of environmental Systems”, Complex and Distributed Systems: Analysis, Simulation and Con- trol, S. G. Tzafestar and P. Borne (Derl.), Elsevier Science Pub., North Holland.
45. Semboloni, F., (2004): Optimization and Control of the Urban Spatial Dynamics, Complexus, 2004; 05: 204-216.
46. Couclelis, H., (1988), “Of Mice and Men: What Rodent Populations can Teach Us About Complex Spatial Dynam- ics”, Environment and Planning A, 20: 99- 109.
47. Phipps, M., (1989), “Dynamical Behaviour of Cellular Au- tomata Under the Constraint of Neighbourhood Coher- ence”, Geographical Analysis, 21: 197 - 215.
48. Batty, M., Longley, P., Fotheringam, S., (1989), “Urban Growth and Form: Scaling, Fractal Geometry, and Diffu- sion - Limited Aggregation”, Environment and Planning A, 21: 1447- 1472.
49. Batty M., (1995), Cities, planning, design, computation and evolution. Environment Planning B, 22: 379–382.
50. White, R., Engelen, G., (1993), “Cellular Automata and Fractal Urban Form: A Cellular Modelling Approach to the Evolution of Urban Land-Use Patterns”, Environment and Planning A, 25: 1175- 1199.
51. Benati, S., (1997), “A Cellular Automaton for the Simula- tion of Competitive Location”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24: 205-218.
52. Fischer, M.M., (1997), “Computational Neural Networks: A New Paradigm for Spatial Analysis”, Environment and Planning A, 29: 1873-1891.
53. Sonis, M., (1991), “A Theoretical Socio - Ecological Ap- proach in Innovation Diffusion Theory: Socio - Cultural and Economic Interventions of Active Environment into Territorial Diffusion of Competitive Innovations”, Sistemi Urbani, 1 - 2 - 3: 29 - 59.
54. Timmermans, H., (1990), “Theoretical Aspects of Va- riety - Seeking Choice Behaviour”, Spatial Choices and Processes, 101 - 115, M. M. Fischer, P. Nijkamp ve Y. Y. Pagageorgiou (Derl.), Elsevier, New York.
55. Tekeli, İ., (1968), Sosyal Sistemler, Sosyal Değişme ve Yerleşme Yapısı, Doktora Tezi, İ.T.Ü., Mimarlık Fakültesi, (yayınlanmamış), İstanbul.
56. Toffler, A., (1996), Üçüncü Dalga, A. Seden (Çev.), Altın Kitapları, İstanbul.
57. DİE vd. (2002), Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü, http://die.gov.tr
58. BİB (2002); http://www.bayindirlikbak.gov.tr.
59. Sayısal Grafik (2202); http://www.sayısalgrafik.com.tr.
60. Friedman, J., (1987), Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action, Princeton Univ. Press, Princ- eton, N.J.
61. Friedman, J., (1996), “The Core Curriculum in Planning Revisited”, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 15: 89 - 104.
62. Çorbacıoğlu, S., Kapucu, N. (2006); “Organizational Learning and Self- adaptation in Dynamic Disaster Envi- ronments”, Disasters, 30(2): 212-233. Overseas Develop- ment Institute, Blackwell Pub., Oxford, UK.
63. Hall, P., (1990), Cities of Tomorrow, Basil Blackwell, U.K.
64. Habermas, J., (2001), İletişimsel Eylem Kuramı, M. Tüzel (Çev.), Kabalcı Yay., İstanbul.
65. Healey, P., (1997), Collaborative Planning, Macmillan Press, London.
66. Kavrakoğlu, İ., (1994), Sinerjik Yönetim / Hızlı Gelişme ve Kriz Yönetimi İçin Bir Model Önerisi, KalDer Yay.
67. Aktan, C.C., (2003), Değişim Çağında Yönetim, Sistem Yay.
68. Diker Çamlıbel, N., (1995), Tarihsel Süreç İçinde Sosyo- Ekonomik Yapı, Yönetim ve Mekan İlişkisi, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, YTÜ, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.