Children’s Understanding and Aspirations on Built Environment: A Case Study on Khulna City of Bangladesh

This paper outlines the necessity of planning and design provisions on urban built environment from children’s understanding and aspirations’ perspective. Their understanding and aspirations are analyzed through survey and a result presentation was prepared using research tools like mind maps, place representation and annotated drawings of dream neighborhood by 271 children of class 5 and class 8 from three renowned schools of Khulna, Bangladesh. Khulna, as a divisional city, is under rapid urbanization process, therefore, facing mounting pressure to build a child-friendly and livable environment which will support its growing urban population and future generations. Thereby, identifying children’s understanding of built environment and highlighting their aspirations, this paper also provides solution measures for future planning and design within its scope. Thereafter, with a systematic review of Khulna Development Authority prepared structure plan, referring to the aspired child friendly built environment issues, it has been found that most of the planning provisions are available inside the plan document. However, zoning and development control mechanisms as well as maintenance of existing provisions lack the goodwill of respective authorities. Finally, this study reflects that children’s participation in the planning process and the level of their cognitive perception is crucial to achieve a sustainable and child friendly built environment.

Çocukların Yapılı Çevre Üzerine Anlayış ve Beklentileri: Bangladeş’in Khulna Şehrinde Bir ÇalışmaBangladeş’in Khulna Şehrinde Bir Çalışma

Bu çalışmada, kentsel yapılı çevre üzerine planlama ve tasarım kararlarının çocukların anlayış ve beklenti bakış açılarından ana hatlarıyla ortaya konulmaktadır. Bangladeş’in Khulna şehrinde bulunan tanınmış üç okulun beşinci ve sekizinci sınıflarında okuyan 271 çocuk üzerinde zihin haritaları, yer gösterimi ve açıklamalı çizimler gibi araçlar kullanılarak yapılan anketin sonuçlarına göre çocukların anlayış ve beklentileri analiz edilmiştir. Bangladeş’in büyümekte olan şehirlerinden birisi olan Khulna şehri hızlı bir şehirleşme süreci içindedir. Bu nedenle artan şehir nüfusunu ve gelecek nesilleri destekleyecek, çocuk dostu ve yaşanabilir bir çevre inşa etmek baskısı ile karşı karşıyadır. Çocukların yapılı çevre anlayışını tanımlayan ve beklentilerini vurgulayan bu çalışmada, gelecekteki planlar ve tasarımlar için çözüm önerileri de sunulmaktadır. Khulna Geliştirme (Imar) Kurumu tarafından hazırlanan çocuk dostu inşa edilmiş çevre sorunlarını ele alan sistematik bir incelemede, planlama kararlarının çoğunun plan belgesinde mevcut olduğu ortaya konulmuştur. Ancak, imar ve geliştirme kontrol mekanizmalar ile mevcut planlama hükümlerin sürdürülmesi, ilgili makamların iyi niyetinden yoksundur. Sonuç olarak bu çalışma, çocukların planlama sürecine katılımlarının ve kavramsal algı düzeylerinin sürdürülebilir bir çocuk dostu yapılı çevre elde edilmesi için çok önemli olduğunu yansıtmaktadır..

___

Ahmed, A. and Sohail, M., (2008). “Child’s Play and Recreation in Dhaka City, Bangladesh”, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Municipal Engineer, 2008, Thomas Telford Ltd, pp. 263-270.

Ahmed, I. Mahmud, A. and Islam, S., (2014). “A Study on Historical Transformation of the Urban Integration Core of Khulna City, Bangladesh”, International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies 8(4), pp. 1410-1417

Ahsan M M., (2020). “Strategic decisions on urban built environment to pandemics in Turkey: Lessons from COVID-19”. Journal of Urban Management, 9(3), pp.281-285. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2020.07.001.

Ahsan, M.M., (2017). “Role and policy challenges of local governments on environmentally induced displacement and migration in Bangladesh” Mahmut Güler and Menaf Turan (Ed.). The Future Municipalities and the New Approaches Vol.1, pp. 496-507. Istanbul: Marmara Belediyeler Birliği Kültür Yayınları.

Broberg, A., Marketta, K., and Nora F., (2013). “Child-Friendly Urban Structures: Bullerby Revisited”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, pp. 110–120.

Bryman, A., (2015). Social research methods, Oxford University Press.

Chiesura, A., (2004). “The role of urban parks for the sustainable city”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 68, pp. 129-138.

Cummins, S. K., and Jackson, R. J., (2001). “The Built Environment and Children’s Health”, Pediatric Clinics of North America, 48, pp. 1241-1252.

de Vries S.I., Hopman-Rock M., Bakker I, Hirasing R.A., van Mechelen W., (2010). “Built environmental correlates of walking and cycling in dutch urban children: results from the SPACE study”. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010; 7(5), pp. 2309– 24.

Downe‐Wamboldt, B., (1992). “Content analysis: method, applications, and issues”. Health care for Women International, 13(3), pp. 313-321.

Evans G.W et al., (2010). “Crowding and cognitive development: The mediating role of maternal responsiveness among 36-month-old children”, Environment and Behavior, 42, pp. 135-148.

Frank, K.I., (2006). “The potential of youth participation in planning”, Journal of Planning Literature, 20, pp. 351-371.

Gill, T., (2008). “Space-oriented children’s policy: creating child-friendly communities to improve children’s well-being, Children and Society, 22, pp. 136–142.

Golbeck, S.L., and Liben, L.S., (1988). “A cognitive-developmental approach to children’s representations of the environment, Children’s Environments Quarterly, 5(3), pp. 46-53.

Horelli, L., (2007). “Constructing a theoretical framework for environmental child-friendliness”. Children, Youth and Environments, 17(4), pp. 267-292.

Hsieh, H.F. and Shannon, S.E., (2005). “Three approaches to qualitative content analysis”. Qualitative health research, 15(9), pp. 1277-1288.

Islam M. Z., Moore R., and Cosco N., (2014). “Child-friendly, active, healthy neighborhoods physical characteristics and children’s time outdoors” Environment and Behavior, 48(5), pp. 711-736.

Kerr, J et al., (2006). “Active commuting to school: associations with environment and parental concerns” Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 38(4), pp. 787-794.

Kotsanas, C., Smith, K. and Macnaughton, G., (2014). Creating a Children’s Plan with Children, University of Melbourne. McTavish, D.G. and Pirro, E.B., (1990). “Contextual content analysis”. Quality and quantity, 24(3), pp. 245-265.

Moulton V., Flouri E., Joshi H., and Sullivan A., (2015). “The role of aspirations in young children’s emotional and behavioural problems”, British Educational Research Journal, 41(6), pp. 925-946, https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3188

Nordstrom, M., (2010). “Children’s views on child-friendly environments in different geographical, cultural and social neighbourhoods”, Urban Studies, 47(3), pp. 514–528.

Rahman, M.A.U., (2016). “Urban sustainability through strategic planning: A case of metropolitan planning in Khulna city, Bangladesh”, Journal of Urban Management, 5(1), pp. 16–22.

Riggio, E., (2002). “Child friendly cities: good governance in the best interests of the child” Environment and Urbanization, 14, pp. 45-58.

Rojas, J., (2013). “Children Are Natural-Born Urban Planners!,” Journal of Applied Research on Children: Informing Policy for Children at Risk, 4(2), Article 22. Retrieved from https:// digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/childrenatrisk/vol4/iss2/22 (Accessed 18 June 2020)

Save the Children and BIP., (2016). “Child-Sensitive Urban Planning”, Retrieved from: https://bangladesh.savethechildren. net/sites/bangladesh.savethechildren.net/files/library/ Roundtable%20Discussion%20on%20Child-sensitive%20 urban%20planning.pdf (Accessed 20 June 2020).

Şensoy, S A and Sarı, R.M., (2019). “Re-Design of Schoolyard for Effective Development of Child From a Universal Design Perspective”, MEGARON, 15(1), pp. 443-445.

Trochim, W. M., (1985). “Pattern matching, validity, and conceptualization in program evaluation”. Evaluation Review, 9, 575- 604.

UNICEF Bangladesh., (2020). “Children in Cities”, Retrieved from: https://www.unicef.org/bangladesh/en/children-cities% C2%A0 (Accessed 20 June 2020).

Villanueva, K. et al., (2015). “Can the Neighborhood Built Environment Make a Difference in Children’s Development? Building the Research Agenda to Create Evidence for Place- Based Children’s Policy”, Academic pediatrics, 16(1), pp. 10- 19.

Wells, N. M., (2000). “At home with nature: effects of “greenness” on children’s cognitive functioning” Environment and Behavior, 32, pp. 775–795.