Mali etki-ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: Türkiye ekonomisi üzerine bir nedensellik analizi (1980-2010)

Bu çalışma, Türkiye için literatürde bir ilk olarak 1980-2010 dönemine ait yıllık veri setini kullanarak Türkiyede mali etki ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisini incelemektedir. Analizlerden elde edilen bulgulara göre incelenen dönemde Türkiyede mali etki ile ekonomik büyüme arasında tek yönlü bir nedensellik ilişkisi söz konusu olup, bu ilişki Türkiye için ölçülmüş olan üç ayrı mali etki göstergesinden ekonomik büyümeye doğru gerçekleşmiştir.

The relationship between fiscal impulse and economic growth: A causality analysis on Turkish economy (1980-2010)

This paper, as the first study in literature for Turkey, investigates the relationship between fiscal impulse and economic growth by using an annual data for the period of 1980-2010 in Turkey. The results show that there is a one-sided causality between fiscal impulse and economic growth. It is from three different fiscal impulse indicators to economic growth, but not from economic growth to these indicators.

PDF

___

Alesina, A. ve Perotti, R. (1995), Fiscal Expansions and Adjustments in OECD Countries, Economic Policy, 21, 205-248.

Bevilaqua, A.S. ve Werneck, R.L.F. (1997), Fiscal Impulse in Brazilian Economy, 1989-1996, Departamento de Economia, 379, 1-34.

Blanchard, O. (1993), Suggesting for a New Set of Fiscal Indicators, in H.A.A. Verbon and F.A. A.M. van Windeneds, The Political Economy of Government Debt (North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers), 307-325.

Camarero, M. (1999), The IMF Fiscal Impulses and the Determination of the Real Exchange Rate of the Spanish Peseta, Applied Economic Letters, 9, 235-240.

Castro, D.F., Kremer, J. ve Warmedinger, T. (2010), How to Measure a Fiscal Stimulus, Presupuesto y Gasto Publico, 59/2010, 103-116.

Chand, S.K. (1993), Fiscal Impulse Measures and their Fiscal Impact in How to Measure the Fiscal Deficit: Analytical and Methodological Issues, (Eds) M.I. Blejerand, A. Cheasty, International Monetary Fund, Washington, 85-99.

Çanakçı, İ. (1996), Konsolide Bütçe Dengesinde Yapısal ve Devresel Gelişmeler, 1975-1996. DPT Yıllık Programlar ve Konjonktür Değerlendirme Genel Müdürlüğü, ISBN, 975-19-1627-5.

Çebi, C. (2002), Kamu Kesimi İtibarıyla Mali Etki Hesaplaması: Türkiye Uygulaması, Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası Araştırma Genel Müdürlüğü Çalışma Tebliği, No:2, Ankara.

Dernberg, T.F. (1975), Fiscal Analysis in the Federal Republic of Germany: The Cylically Neutral Budget, IMF Staff Papers, 22, 825-857.

Dickey, D.A. ve Fuller, W.A. (1979), Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427-431.

Engle, R.F. ve Granger, C.W.J. (1987), Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing, Econometrica, 55, 251-276.

Giavazzi, F., Jappelli, T. ve Pagano, M. (2000), Searching for Non-Linear Effects of Fiscal Policy: Evidence from Industrial and Developing Countries, European Economic Review, No:44, 1291-1326.

Granger, C.W.J. (1969), Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods, Econometrica, 37, 424-438.

Hamilton, J.D. ve Flavin, M.A. (1986), On the Limitations of Government Borrowing: A Framework for Empirical Testing, American Economic Review, 51, 808-819.

Heller, P., Haas, R. ve Mansur, A. (1986), A Review of the Fiscal Impulse Measure, Internatinal Monetary Fund Occosinal Paper, 44, 1-43.

Johansen, S. ve Juselius, K. (1990), Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration-with Application to the Demand for Money, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169-210.

Johansen, S. (1988), Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 231-254.

Johansen, S. (1991), Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models, Econometrica, 59, 1551-1580.

Kiss, G.P. (2011), Moving Target Indication: Fiscal Indicators, Employed by the Magyar Nemzeti Bank, MNB Occasional Papers, 92, 1-54.

MacKinnon, J.G. (1991), Critical Values for Cointegration Tests, in R.F. Engle and C.W.J. Granger (Eds.), Long-run Economic Relationships, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Maddala, G.S. ve Kim, I.M. (1998), Unit Roots, Cointegrations, and Structural Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Padurean, E., Leonida, C.L. ve Baltaretu, C. (2010), Evaluation of the Fiscal-Budgetary Policy Sustainability in Romenia, Financial Studies, 4/2010, 126-139.

Philip, R. ve Jansses, J. (2002), Indicators of Fiscal Impulse for New Zealand, New Zealand Treasury, Working Paper, No:2/03, 1-45.

Phillips, P.C.B. ve Perron, P. (1988), Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression, Biometrica, 75, 335-346.

Schinasi, G.J. (1989), International Comparisons of Fiscal Policy: The OECD and IMF Measures of Fiscal Impulse, International Finance Discussion Papers, February, No:274, 1-38.

Spilimbergo, A. (2005), Measuring the Performance of Fiscal Policy in Russia, IMF Working Paper, WP/05/241.

Şen, H. ve Kaya, A. (2012), Türkiyede Maliye Politikaları Ne Ölçüde Etkili? Bir Mali Etki Analizi, Vergi Dünyası, Sayı:368, 162-170.

Tarı, R. (2008), Ekonometri, 5. Baskı, Avcı Ofset, İstanbul.

Vladimirov, V. ve Neicheva, M. (2008), The Stabilizing Role of Fiscal Policy: Theoretical Background and Empirical Evidence, IBSU Scientific Journal, 2(1), 7-22.