VERGİ YÜKÜNÜN VE YAPISININ EKONOMİK BÜYÜME ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİ: OECD ÜLKELERİ İÇİN PANEL VERİ ANALİZİ

Çalışmada doğrudan ve dolaylı vergiler ile vergi yükünün ekonomik büyümeüzerindeki etkisi, 30 OECD ülkesi için 2000-2017 dönemi kapsamında panelveri analizi ile araştırılmıştır. Panel veri analizi öncesi modelde yatay kesitbağımlılığının varlığı araştırılmış ve buna paralel olarak panel birim kök testiuygulanmıştır. Panel birim kök testi sonuçlarına göre tüm değişkenler düzeydedurağan bulunmuştur. Sonrasında uygun modelin belirlenmesi amacıylaF-testi, olabilirlik oran testi ve Hausmann testi uygulanmıştır. Sonuç olaraksabit etkiler modeli seçilmiştir. Uygun modelin belirlenmesi sonrası değişenvaryans, otokorelasyon ve yatay kesit bağımlılık testleri uygulanmıştır.Bu testlerin sonuçlarına göre modelde değişen varyans, otokorelasyon veyatay kesit bağımlılığı bulunduğundan Driscoll Kraay standart hatalı modelkullanılarak sorunlar çözülmüştür. Sonuç olarak modelde yer alan doğrudanvergi gelirlerinin kamu gelirleri içerisindeki payında meydana gelen artışlarınekonomik büyüme üzerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ve pozitif etkiye sahipolduğu, dolaylı vergi gelirlerinin kamu gelirleri içerisindeki payı ile vergiyükünün ise ekonomik büyüme üzerinde pozitif ancak istatistiksel olarakanlamsız etkilerinin olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

EFFECTS OF TAX BURDEN AND STRUCTURE ON ECONOMIC GROWTH: PANEL DATA ANALYSIS FOR OECD COUNTRIES

In the study, the effect of direct and indirect taxes and tax burden on economic growth was investigated by panel data analysis for 30 OECD countries within the period of 2000-2017. Before panel data analysis, the existence of horizontal cross-section dependence was investigated and parallel to this, panel unit root test was applied. According to the panel unit root test results, all variables were found stationary at the level. Then, F-test, likelihood ratio test and Hausmann test were applied to determine the appropriate model. As a result, fixed effects model was chosen. After determining the appropriate model, changing variance, autocorrelation and horizontal cross-section dependency tests were applied. According to the results of these tests, the problems were solved by using Driscoll Kraay standard faulty model since the model has changing variance, autocorrelation and horizontal cross-section dependency. As a result, it was determined that the increases in the share of direct tax revenues in public revenues in the model had a statistically significant and positive effect on economic growth, while the share of indirect tax revenues in public revenues and the tax burden had positive but statistically insignificant effects on economic growth.

___

  • Abomaye-Nimenibo, W. A. S., Michael Jack Eyo, M. and Friday, H. C. (2018). An Empirical Analysis of Tax Revenue and Economic Growth in Nigeria from 1980 to 2015. Global Journal of Human Social Science, 18(3), 8-40
  • Ahmad, S., Sial, M. H. and Ahmad, N. (2016). Taxes and Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis of Pakistan. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 5(2), 16-29.
  • Akhor, S. O. and Ekundayo, O. U. (2016). The Impact of Indirect Tax Revenue on Economic Growth: The Nıgerıa Experıence. Igbinedion University Journal of Accounting, 2, 62-87.
  • Al-Abbadi, H. A. D. and Abdul-Khali, S. (2017). The Causal Relationship between Sales Tax Revenue and Economic Growth in Jordan, International Research Journal of Applied Finance, 8(3), 170-177.
  • Alancıoğlu, E. ve Miçooğulları, S. A. (2020). Türkiye’de Vergi Geliri ile Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişki: Ampirik Bir Araştırma. International Social Sciences Studies Journal, 6(56), 718-728.
  • Babatunde, O. A., Ibukun, A. O. and Oyeyemi, O. G. (2017). Taxation Revenue and Economic Growth in Africa. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 9(2), 11-22.
  • Barro, R. J. (1990). Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98(S5), 103-125.
  • Barro, R. J. and Redlick, C. J. (2011). Macroeconomic Effects from Government Purchases and Taxes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 51–102.
  • Breusch, T. S. and Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253.
  • Charles, U. J. Ekwe, M. C. and Azubike, J. U. B. (2018). Federally Collected Tax Revenue and Economic Growth of Nigeria: A Time Series Analysis. Accounting & Taxation Review, 2(1), 24-38.
  • Çelikay, F. (2018). Vergi Yükünün Ekonomik Büyüme Hızı Üzerindeki Etkileri: Türkiye’deki İller Örnekleminde Ampirik Bir Analiz (2005-2014). İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(5), 37-55.
  • Dam, M. ve Ertekin, Ş. (2018). Türkiye’de Vergi Gelirlerinin Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerindeki Etkisinin Analizi. Vergi Raporu, 228, 19-32.
  • Das, D. (2019). Causality between Tax Revenue and Economic Growth in India (1992-2017). International Journal of Business Insights and Transformation, 12(1), 42-47.
  • Demir, M. ve Sever, E. (2017). Vergi Gelirleri Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: OECD Ülkelerine İlişkin Panel Veri Analizi. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2), 51-66.
  • Driscoll, J. C. and Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation With Spatially Dependent Panel Data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549-560.
  • Durkaya, M. ve Ceylan, S. (2006). Vergi Gelirleri ve Ekonomik Büyüme. Maliye Dergisi 150, 79-89.
  • Easterly, W. and Rebelo, S. (1993). Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Monetary Economics, 32(3), 417-458.
  • Egbunike, F. C., Emudainohwo, O. B. and Gunardi, A. (2018). Tax Revenue and Economic Growth: A Study of Nigeria and Ghana. Signifikan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 7(2), 213 – 220.
  • Eren, M. V., Ergin Ünal, A. ve Aydın, H. İ. (2018), Türkiye’de Vergi Gelirleri ile Ekonomik Kalkınma Arasındaki İlişki: Frekans Alanı Nedensellik Analizi. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 19(1), 1-18.
  • Friedman, M. (1937). The Use of Ranks to Avoid The Assumption of Normality Implicit in The Analysis of Variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 32(200), 675-701.
  • Göçer, İ., Mercan, M., Bulut, Ş. ve Dam, M. (2010). Ekonomik Büyüme ile Vergi Gelirleri Arasındaki İlişki: Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 28, 97-110.
  • Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification Tests in Econometrics. Econometrica. Journal of The Econometric Society, 1251-1271.
  • Karayılmazlar, E. ve Göde, B. (2017). Vergi Yükünün Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerine Etkisi. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(4), 131-142.
  • Katsikatsou, M., Moustaki, I., Yang-Wallentin, F. and Jöreskog, K. G. (2012). Pairwise Likelihood Estimation for Factor Analysis Models with Ordinal Data. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 56(12): 4243–4258.
  • Khumbuzile, D. ve Khobai, H. (2018). The Impact of Taxation on Economic Growth in South Africa. MPRA Paper No. 86219.
  • King, R. G. and Rebelo, S. (1990). Public Policy and Economic Growth: Developing Neoclassical Implications, Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5), 126-150.
  • Kleinbaum, D.G., Kupper, L. L. and Muller, K.E. (1988). Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods, 2 ed. Boston: PWS-Kent.
  • Koç, Ö. E. (2019). Türkiye’de Vergi Yükü Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi. Alanya Akademik Bakış, 3(3), 247-259.
  • Koester, R. B. and Kormendi, R. C. (1989). Taxation, Aggregate Activity and Economic Growth: Crosscountry Evidence on Some Supply-Side Hypothesis. Economic Inquiry, 27(3), 367-386.
  • Kolçak, M. ve Arpa, T. (2017). Vergi Gelirleri ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği (1976-2016). TURAN-SAM, 9(33), 279-289.
  • Korkmaz, S., Yılgör, M. ve Aksoy, F. (2019). The Impact of Direct and Indirect Taxes on the Growth of the Turkish Economy. Public Sector Economics, 43 (3) 311-323.
  • Lucas, R. E. (1988). On The Mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3-42.
  • Mendoza, E. G., Milesi-Ferretti, G. M. ve Asea P. (1997). On the Ineffectiveness of Tax Policy in Altering Long-Run Growth: Harberger’s Superneutrality Conjecture. Journal of Public Economics, 66(1), 99–126.
  • Nguyen, H. H. (2019). Impact of Direct Tax and Indirect Tax on Economic Growth in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(4), 129-137.
  • Oboh, J. O., Chinonyelum, O. J. and Edeme, R. K. (2018). Tax Revenue and Economic Growth in Selected ECOWAS Countries, Evidence from Sure Model, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 8(3), 310-324.
  • Ojong, C. M., Anthony, O. and Arikpo, O. F. (2016). The Impact of Tax Revenue on Economic Growth: Evidence from Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance (IOSR-JEF), 7(1), 32-38.
  • Okeke, M. N., Mbonu, C. M. and Ndubuisi, A. N. (2018). Tax Revenue and Economic Development in Nigeria: A Disaggregated Analysis. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences 8(2), 178-199.
  • Olaoye, C. O., Ogundipe, A. A. and Oluwadare, O. E. (2019). Tax Revenue and Economic Development in Nigeria. Advances in Social S c i e n c e s Research Journal, 6(9), 312-321.
  • Onwe, K., Udeh, S. N. and Ngwoke, O. M. (2019). Effect of Tax Revenue on Nigerian Economy (2005-2018). European Journal of Accounting, Finance and Investment, 5(11), 63-70.
  • Organ, İ. ve Ergen, E. (2017). Türkiye’de Vergi Yükünün Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkileri Üzerine Bir Çalışma. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 27, 197-207.
  • Owino, O. B. (2018). The Trade off Between Direct and Indirect Taxes in Kenya: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Economics and Development Studies, 6(4), 187-201.
  • Padavano, F. and Galli, E. (2001). Tax Rates and Economic Growth in OECD Countries. Economic Inquiry, 39(1), 44–57.
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels. Discussion Paper No. 1240.
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in The Pesence of Cross‐Section Dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265- 312.
  • Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A. and Yamagata, T. (2008). A Bias‐Adjusted LM Test of Error Cross‐Section Independence. The Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105-127.
  • Pokharel, B. (2018), Tax Reforms and Economic Growth with Reference to SAARC Countries: A Study Note. Journal of Business and Social Sciences Research (JBSSR), 3(1), 91-106.
  • Romero- Ávila, D. and Strauch, R. (2008). Public Finances and Long Term Growth in Europe: Evidence from a Panel Data Analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, 24(1), 172–191.
  • Solow, R. M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94.
  • Terzi, H. ve Yurtkuran, S. (2016). Türkiye’de Dolaylı/Dolaysız Vergi Gelirleri ve GSYH İlişkisi. Maliye Dergisi, 171, 19-33.
  • Topal, M. H. (2017). Vergi Yapısının Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerindeki Etkisi: OECD Ülkelerinden Ampirik Bir Kanıt. Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(3), 183-206.
  • Tosun, M. S. ve Abizadeh, S. (2005). Economic Growth and Tax Components: An Analysis of Tax Changes in OECD. Applied Economics, 37, 2251-2263.
  • Turhan, S. (1988). Vergi Teorisi ve Politikası. İstanbul : Filiz Kitapevi
  • Umutlu, G., Alizadeh, N. ve Erkılıç, A. Y. (2011). Maliye Politikası Araçlarından Borçlanma ve Vergilerin Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkileri. Uludağ Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(1), 75-93.
  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.