GÜVENİN VERGİ AHLAKI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: ÜLKELER ARASI BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Kamu mali yönetimi alanındaki tartışmalarda, vergi yükümlülüklerinin yerine getirilmesinde en az cezalar ve yasal yaptırımlar kadar mükelleflerin vergi ahlakının da etkili olduğu öne sürülmektedir. Özellikle, denetim ve cezaların nispeten düşük olduğu ülkelerde bireylerin vergi kaçırma eğilimlerinin yüksek olmaması, bu bireylerin içinde yaşadıkları toplumda olumlu bir sosyal sermaye etkisinin olduğunu düşündürmektedir. Bir toplumun geçmişten geleceğe taşıdığı değer yargıları ile şekillenen vergi ahlakı ve ortaya çıkardığı vergi uyumu, o toplumun sosyal sermaye stokunun niteliği ile yakın ilişkilidir. Bu çerçevede, bu çalışma, sosyal sermayenin önemli bir bileşeni olan ‘güven’ duygusunun, vergi ahlakını nasıl etkilediğini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada bu amaca yönelik olarak, 60 ülkede binlerce kişiye uygulanan Dünya Değerler Anketi verilerinin kullanılması suretiyle ülkeler arası yatay-kesit regresyon tahminleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu regresyon tahminlerinde, her bir ülke için bireylerin ortalama güven düzeyini ölçen farklı kapsama sahip nicel göstergeler kullanılmıştır. Bu tahminler sonucunda, bireylerin devlet sistemine ve birbirlerine duydukları güvenin yüksek olduğu ülkelerde vergi ahlakının da yüksek olduğu bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Hükümetlerin vergi uyumunu arttırmak üzere aldığı zorlayıcı önlemlerin yanında, bir toplum içinde kurumsal anlamda geçmişten bugüne aktarılan bir sosyal sermaye türü olan güvenin gönüllü vergi uyumunu teşvik eden bir unsur olduğu anlaşılmıştır.

THE EFFECT OF TRUST ON TAX MORALE: A CROSS-COUNTRY RESEARCH

Debates in the field of public fiscal-management assert that tax morale is at least as essential as punishments and enforcements for fulfilling the tax obligations. Especially, the absence of individuals with high tendency for evading taxes in countries where tax audits and punishments are relatively low, implies the presence of a positive social-capital effect on individuals in the society they live. The tax morale and its tax compliance outcome, which are shaped by value judgements that are transferred from the past to future in a society, are closely related with the quality of the social capital stock of that society. Within this framework, this study aims at exploring how trust, an essential ingredient of social capital, affects the tax morale. In the study, with respect to this objective, cross-section regression estimations are carried out across countries by using the data from the World Values Survey, which is conducted to thousands of people in 60 countries. In these regression estimations, various quantitative indicators with different contents are used for measuring the level of trust in each of the countries. As a result of these estimations, tax morale is found to be high in countries where individuals’ trust to the governmental system and to each other are high. This implies that trust, which is a type of social capital transferred institutionally in a society from the past to the present, is a factor that encourages the voluntary tax compliance beside the coercive precautions taken by governments to increase the tax compliance.

___

  • Allingham, M. and Sandmo, A. (1972). Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3-4), 323-338.
  • Alm, J., Kirchler E. ve Muehlbacher, S. (2012). Combining Psychology and Economics in the Analysis of Compliance: From Enforcement to Cooperation. Economic Analysis and Policy, 42(2), 133-151.
  • Alm, J., McClelland, G. H. and Schulze, W. D. (1992). Whay Do People Pay Taxes?. Journal of Public Economics, 48(1), 21-38.
  • Alm, J. and Torgler, B. (2006). Culture Differences and Tax Morale in the United States and in Europe. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(2), 224-246.
  • Andreoni, J., Erard, B. and Feinstein, J. (1998). Tax Compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(2), 818-860.
  • Andriani, L. (2016). Tax Morale and Prosocial Behaviour: Evidence from a Palestinian Survey. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40(3), 821-841.
  • Baldry, J. C. (1987). Income Tax Evasion and the Tax Schedule: Some Experimental Results. Public Finance=Finances Publiques, 42(3), 357-383.
  • Becker, G. (1968). Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169-217.
  • Chan, H.F., Supriyadi, M.W. and Torgler, B. (2018). Trust and Tax Morale. Uslaner (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust, (s. 1-71), New York : Oxford University Press
  • Clotfelter, C. T. (1983). Tax Evasion and Tax Rates: An Analysis of Individual Returns. Review of Economics and Statistics, 65(3), 363-373.
  • Ehrlich, I. (1972). The Deterrent Effect of Criminal Law Enforcement. Journal of Legal Studies, 1(2), 259-276.
  • Elster, J. (1989). Emotions and Economic Theory. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 47-74.
  • Feld, L. P. and Frey, B. S. (2002). Trust Breeds Trust: How Taxpayers Are Treated. Economics of Governance, 3(2), 87-99.
  • Frey, B. S. and Torgler, B. (2006). Tax Morale and Conditional Cooperation. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(1), 136–159.
  • Friedland, N., Maital, S. and Rutenberg, A. (1978). A Simulation Study of Income Tax Evasion. Journal of Public Economics, 10(1), 107-116.
  • Hammar, H., Jagers, S. C. and Nordblom, K. (2009). Perceived Tax Evasion and the Importance of Trust. Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(2), 238-245.
  • Hofmann, E., Gangl, K., Kirchler, E. and Stark, J. (2014). Enhancing Tax Compliance through Coercive and Legitimate Power of Tax Authorities by Concurrently Diminishing or Facilitating Trust in Tax Authorities. Law and Policy, 36(3), 290-313.
  • Horodnic, I. A. (2018). Tax Morale and Institutional Theory: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 38(9/10), 868- 886.
  • Hug, S. ve Spörri, F. (2011). Referendums, Trust, and Tax Evasion. European Journal of Political Economy, 27(1), 120-31.
  • Inglehart, R., Haerpfer, C., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., DiezMedrano, J., Lagos, M., Norris, P., Ponarin E. ve Puranen, B. (Ed.). (2014).
  • World Values Survey: Round Six - Country-Pooled Datafile, JD Systems Institute: Madrid.
  • Kastlunger, B., Lozza, E., Kirchler E. ve Schabmann, A. (2013). Powerful Authorities and Trusting Citizens: The Slippery Slope Framework and Tax Compliance in Italy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34, 36–45.
  • Keefer, P. ve Knack, S. (2008). Social Capital, Social Norms and the New Institutional Economics. Ménard ve Shirley (Ed.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, (s. 701-725), Berlin.: Springer-Verlag
  • Keeley, B. (2007). Human Capital: How What You Know Shapes Your Life. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E. ve Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus Voluntary Tax Compliance: The “Slippery Slope” Framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 210-225.
  • Kogler, C., Batrancea, L., Nichita, A., Pantya, J., Belianin, A. and Kirchler, E. (2013). Trust and Power as Determinants of Tax Compliance: Testing the Assumptions of the Slippery Slope Framework in Austria, Hungary, Romania and Russia. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34, 169–180.
  • Lee, D. (2013). How Does Social Capital Reduce the Size of the Shadow Economy?. Global Economic Review, 42(3), 251-268.
  • Li, S.X. (2010). Social Identities, Ethnic Diversity, and Tax Morale. Public Finance Review, 38(2), 146-177.
  • Lisi, G. (2012). Unemployment, Tax Evasion and the Slippery Slope Framework. International Review of Economics, 59(3), 297-302.
  • Lisi, G. (2014). The Interaction between Trust and Power: Effects on Tax Compliance and Macroeconomic Implications. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 53, 24-33.
  • Martinez-Vazquez, J. ve Torgler, B. (2009). The Evolution of Tax Morale in Modern Spain. Journal of Economic 43(1), 1-28.
  • Muehlbacher, S. and Kirchler, E. (2010). Tax Compliance by Trust and Power of Authorities. International Economic Journal, 24(4), 607-610.
  • Putnam, R. (1997). Democracy in America at Century’s End. Hadenius (Ed.), Democracy’s Victory and Crisis, (s. 27-70), Cambridge : Cambridge University Press
  • Roth, F. (2009). Does Too Much Trust Hamper Economic Growth?. Kyklos, 62(1), 103-128.
  • Rothstein, B. (2000). Trust, Social Dilemmas and Collective Memories. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 12(4), 477-501.
  • Scholz, J. (1998). Trust, Taxes, and Compliance. Braithwaite ve Levi (Eds.), Trust and Governance, (s. 135-166), New York : Russel Sage Foundation.
  • Scholz, J. T. and Lubell, M. (1998). Trust and Taxpaying: Testing the Heuristic Approach to Collective Action. American Journal of Political Science, 42(2), 398-417.
  • Slemrod, J. (1998). On Voluntary Compliance, Voluntary Taxes, and Social Capital. National Tax Journal, 51(3), 485-491.
  • Slemrod, J. (2007). Cheating Ourselves: The Economics of Tax Evasion. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1(1), 25-48.
  • Srinivasan, T. N. (1973). Tax evasion: A model. Journal of Public Economics, 2(4), 339-346.
  • Torgler, B. (2003). Tax Morale in Transition Countries. Post-Communist Economies, 15(3), 357-381.
  • Torgler, B. (2005). Tax Morale and Direct Democracy. European Journal of Political Economy, 21(2), 525–531.
  • Torgler, B., Demir, I. C., Macintyre, A. ve Schaffner, M. (2008). Causes and Consequences of Tax Morale: An Empirical Investigation. Economic Analysis and Policy, 38(2), 313-339.
  • Torgler, B. and Murphy, K. (2004). Tax Morale in Australia: What Shapes It and Has It Changed Over Time?. Journal of Australian Taxation, 7(2), 298-335.
  • Trüdinger, E.-M. ve Hildebrandt, A. (2013). Causes and Contexts of Tax Morale: Rational Considerations, Community Orientations, and Communist Rule. International Political Science Review, 34(2), 191-209.
  • Witte A. D. ve Diane, F. (1985). The Effect of Tax Laws and Tax Administration on Tax Compliance: The Case of the U.S. Individual Income Tax. National Tax Journal, 38(1), 1-13.
  • Yitzhaki, S. (1974). Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 3(2), 201-202.