MA’RIB BÖLGESİ’NDE (ARABİSTAN YARIMADASI GB’SI) İLK KEŞFEDİLEN MANYEZİTDOLOMİT KUŞAĞININ KÖKENİ, SEDİMANTOLOJİSİ VE MİNERALOJİSİ

Bu makalede, KB Yemen’de, Rub’Al-Khali sektörünün Al-Thanyiah bölgesinde yer alan metamorfik kıvrım kuşağında ilk kez keşfedilen ve tanımlanan yüksek saflık derecesindeki manyezit mineralizasyonu ele alınmıştır. Prekambriyen-Neoproterozoyik (?) yaşlı manyezitli metamorfik kuşağı, genel olarak K-G uzanımlı bir bindirme kuşağı halindedir.Manyezit mineralizasyonu, onlarca km boyunca uzanan (yaklaşık 31 km) karbonat-metamorfik kuşağı içinde keşfedilmiş olup sekiz ayrı stratigrafik seviye ile ilişkilidir. Saf manyezit içeren seviyelerin net kalınlıkları 20 ila 60 metre arasında olup büyük ultrabazik sokulumlar ile kesilen koyu yeşil klorit-şist düzeyleri ile ilişkilidir. Jeokimyasal, mineralojikve petrografik analizler, söz konusu stratigrafik düzeylerdeki manyezit zenginleşmesinin % 78 ile % 99.6 arasında, MgOoranının ise % 35 ile % 48.9 arasında değiştiğini, az miktarda da dolomit ve kalsit bulunduğunu göstermiştir. Bunlarınyanı sıra, eser miktarda talk ve brusit mineralleri de saptanmıştır. Bunlardan, MgCO3 içerikleri %95’in üzerinde olan vekalınlıkları 40 ve 60 metre olan iki adet manyezit yatağının, ekonomik olduğu anlaşılmıştır. Manyezitin kaynağı olarak,ultramafik sokulumlar ile ilişkili amfibolit ve harzburjit gibi kayaçların bölgesel metamorfizma sırasında sokulumuntermal etkisiyle Mg2+ açısından zenginleşen diyajenetik çözeltiler gösterilebilir. Dolomitin manyezite alterasyonu, kalsitya da dolomitin çok fazlı olarak manyezite dönüşümü şeklinde gelişmiştir.

SEDIMENTOLOGY, MINERALOGY AND ORIGIN OF THE FIRST DISCOVER MAGNESITEDOLOMITE BELT IN MA’RIB DISTRICT, SW ARABIAN PENINSULA

Magnesite mineralization of high purity was discovered and described herein for the first time from metamorphosed folded belt from Al-Thanyiah locality in Rub’Al-Khali sector, 360 km east of Sana’a City, northwest Yemen. The magnesite-metamorphic belt, belonging to the Precambrian/Neoproterozoic age? comprises thrust belt, which trends generally N-S direction. Magnesite mineralization was identified in an extended carbonate-metamorphic belt for several tens of kilometers cf. 31 km and occurred in association with 8 stratigraphic units. The thicknesses of pure magnesite bearing units are variable and ranges from 20 to 60 m, associated with dark green chlorite-schist with intersecting huge ultrabasic intrusions. Geochemical, mineralogical and petrographic analyses show that the magnesite concentrations in the stratigraphic units are ranging from 78% up to high purity of 99.6% cf. 35 to 48.9% MgO, with minor dolomite and calcite respectively. Little to rare content of talc and brucite were also recognized. Two thick, productive and high purity magnesite beds, the first is of 40 m thick and the second is 60 m in thickness, which reveals more than 95% MgCO3 and considered to be economic. The suggested origin of the magnesite mineralization is coming from high stress of regional metamorphism associated with ultramafic intrusions cf. amphibolite and harzburgite associated with diagenetic solutions rich in Mg2+, associated with the heat of magma. The alteration of dolomite to magnesite was formed by multiple phases to transform calcite and/or dolomite to magnesite.

___

  • Allan, J.R., Wiggins, W.D.1993. Dolomite reservoirs; geochemical techniques for evaluating origin and distribution: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Continuing Education Course Note Series, 36, 129s.
  • Al-Mashaikie, S. Z. 2006. Preliminary Report; Petrography and geochemistry of Al-Thanyiah magnesitecarbonate belt in Ma’rib District, NW Yemen. Geological Survey and Mineral Resource Board, Ministry of Oil, Sana’a, Yemen, 34s.
  • Al-Mashaikie, S. Z. 2007. Petrography, geochemistry and technical report of the Carbonate - Magnesite rocks belt in Al-Thanyiah region NE YEMEN, Unpublished Geological Research. Geological Survey and Mineral Resource Board, Ministry of Oil, Sana’a, Yemen, 82s.
  • Al-Mashaikie, S. Z. 2008. Geochemistry, mineralogy and industrial evaluation of the first discover of Magnesite – Carbonate belt rocks, in Yemen. 8th conference of Mineral resources in the Arabian Countries, Amman, Jordan, 32s.
  • Beydoun, Z.R., As-Sururi, M., El-Nakhal, H., Al-Ganad, I., Baraba, R., Nani, A., Al-Awah, M. 1998. International Lexicon of stratigraphy, vol., Asia, Fascicule 3(10b2), Republic of Yemen. IUGS publication No. 34, 245p. Sedimentary cover. Z.geol. Wiss., 26(5/6) 517-529 Berlin.
  • Brasier, D. Martin, Allen, A Phillip, Leather, J. 2011. Chapter 20, The Abu Mahara Group (Ghubrah and Fiq formations), Jabal Akhdar, Oman. Geological Society, London, Memoirs 36, 251-262.
  • Bucher, M., Frey, M. 1994. Petrogenesis of Metamorphic Rocks. Springer-Verlag, 318s.
  • Davies, G.R. 2004. Hydrothermal (thermobaric) dolomitization: rock fabric and organic petrology support for emplacement under conditions of thermal transients, shear stress, high pore fluid pressure with abrupt pressure transients, hydrofracturing, episodic rapid fluid flow, and instantaneous cementation by saddle dolomite. In: Davies, G.R., Packard, J., McAuley, R. (Eds.), Dolomite Seminar and Core Conference. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, Calgary, 20s.
  • Dragastan, O.N., Richter, D.K. 2011. Stromatolite and calcareous algae of Munder Formation (Tithonian- -Berriasian) From NW Germany. Acta Palaeontologica Romanıae 7, 139-168.
  • Dulski, P., Morteany, G. 1989. Magnesite formation by CO2 metasomatism during regional metamorphism of the ultrabasic rocks of the Ochsner serpentinite (Zillertaler Alpen, Tyrol, Austria). Monograph Series on Mineral deposits, 28. Borntraeger, BerlinStuttgart, 95–104.
  • Fabricius, I.L. 2000. Interpretation of burial history and rebound from loading experiments and occurrence of microstylolites in mixed sediments of Caribbean sites 999 and 1001. In: Leckie, R.M., Sigurdsson, H., Acton, G.D., Draper, G. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, scientific results 165: College Station, Texas, Ocean Drilling Program, 177–190.
  • Franz, G. 1989. Stability of magnesite in carbonate–silicate assemblages; a review. Monograph Series on Mineral deposits, 28. Borntraeger, Berlin-Stuttgart, 259–268.
  • Geomine Company. 1984-1985. Preliminary Report; Industrail rocks and minerals in Ma’rib District. Unpublished report, Geological Survey and Mineral Resources Board, Romaine 210s.
  • Herrero, M.J. Martín-Pérez, A. Ana M. Alonso-Zarza, GilPeña, I. Meléndez, A. Martín-García, R. 2011. Petrography and geochemistry of the magnesites and dolostones of the Ediacaran Ibor Group (635 to 542 Ma), Western Spain: Evidences of their hydrothermal origin. Sedimentary Geology 240, 71-84.
  • IUGS, 2009. International Stratigraphic Chart. International Commision on Stratigraphy. http://www. stratigraphy.org/2009.
  • Johannes, W. 1970. Zur entstehung von magnesitvorkommen. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie Abhandlungen 113, 274–325.
  • Kralik, M., Aharon, P., Schroll, E., Zachmann, D. 1989. Carbon and oxygen isotope systematics of magnesites: a review. In: Moller, P. (Ed.), Magnesite, Monograph Series on Mineral deposits, 28. Berlin-Stuttgart, Borntraeger, 197–224.
  • Kilias, S.P., Pozo, M., Bustillo, M., Stamatakis, M.G., Calvo, J.P. 2006. Origin of the Rubian carbonatehosted magnesite deposit, Galicia, NW Spain: mineralogical, REE, fluid inclusion and isotope evidence. Mineralium Deposita 41, 713–733.
  • Lugli, S., Torres–Ruiz, J., Garuti, G., Olmedo, F. 2000. Petrography and geochemistry of the Eugui magnesite deposit (Western Pyrenees, Spain): evidence for the development of a peculiar zebra banding by dolomite replacement. Economic Geology 95, 1775–1791.
  • Lugli, S., Morteani, G., Blamart, D. 2002. Petrographic, REE, fluid inclusion and stable isotope study of magnesite from the Upper Triassic Burano Evaporites (Secchia Valley, northern Apennines): contributions from sedimentary, hydrothermal and metasomatic sources. Mineral Deposits 37, 480– 494.
  • Machel, H.G., Lonnee, J. 2002. Hydrothermal dolomite; a product of poor definition and imagination. Sedimentary Geology 152, 163–171.
  • Melezhik, V.A., Fallick, A.E., Medvedev, P.V., Makarikhin, V.V. 2001. Palaeoproterozoic magnesite: lithological and isotopic evidence for playa/sabkha environments. Sedimentology 48, 379–397.
  • Melezhik, V.A., Fallick, A.E. 2003. δ13C and δ18O variations in primary and secondary carbonate phases: several contrasting examples from Palaeoproterozoic 13C–rich dolostones. Chemical Geology 201, 213–228.
  • Meister, P., Judith A. Mckenzie, J., Bernascon, S. M., Brack, P. 2013 Dolomite formation in the shallow seas of the Alpine Triassic. Sedimentology 60, 270–291.
  • Möller, P. 1989. Minor and trace elements in magnesite. In: Moller, P. (Ed.), Magnesite, Monograph Series on Mineral deposits, 28. Berlin–Stuttgart, Borntraeger, 173–196.
  • Morse, J.V., Mackenzie, F.T. 1990. Geochemistry of sedimentary carbonates. Developments in Sedimentology, 48. Elsevier Scientific Publication Co, New York, 696s.
  • Moore, C.H. 2001. Carbonate reservoirs: porosity evolution and diagenesis in a sequence stratigraphic framework. Developments in Sedimentology 55, 444.
  • Morad, S. 1998. Carbonate cementation in sandstones: distribution patterns and geochemical evolution. In: Morad, S. (Ed.), Carbonate Cementation in Sandstones: Distribution Patterns and Geochemical Evolution: International Association of Sedimentologists Special Publication 26, 1–26.
  • Morteani, G., Möller, P., Schley, F. 1982. The rare earth element contents and the origin of the sparry magnesite mineralizations of Tux-Lanersbach, Entachen Alm, Spiessnägel, and Hochfilzen, Austria, and the lacustrine magnesite deposits of Aiani-Kozani, Greece, and Bela Stena, Yugoslavia. Economic Geology 77, 617–631.
  • Müller, G., Irion, G., Förstner, U. 1972. Formation and diagenesis of inorganic Ca–Mg carbonates in the lacustrine environment. Naturwissenschaften 59, 158–164.
  • Nash, M. C., Troitzsch, U., Opdyke, B. N., Trafford, J. M., Russell, B. D., Kline, D. I. 2011. First discovery of dolomite and magnesite in living coralline algae and its geobiological implications. Biogeosciences 8, 3331–3340.
  • Perri, E. Manzo, E. Maurice E. Tucker, M.E. 2012. Multi-scale study of the role of the biofilm in the formation of minerals and fabrics in calcareous tufa. Sedimentary Geology 263-264, 16–29.
  • Pierson, J. 1981. The control of cathodoluminescence in dolomite by iron and manganese. Sedimentology 28, 601–610.
  • Pohl, W. 1989. Comparative geology of magnesite deposits and occurrences. In: Moller, P. (Ed.), Magnesite, Monograph Series on Mineral deposits, 28. BerlinStuttgart, Borntraeger, 1–14.
  • Pohl, W. 1990. Genesis of magnesite deposits models and trends. Geologische Rundchau 79, 291–299.
  • Prasannakumar, V. Vikas, C. Kumar, S.N. 2002. Constraints on the origin of south indian magnesite deposits. Boletim Paranaense de Geociências 50, 15-20.
  • Pueyo, J.J., Inglés, M. 1987. Magnesite formation in recent playa lakes, Los Monegros,Spain. In: Marshall, J.D. (Ed.), Diagenesis of Sedimentary Sequences. Geological Society Special Publication, 119–122.
  • Quemeneur, J.M. 1974. Les gisement de magnesite du Pays Basque: Cadre geoligique et sedimentologique; genese de la magnesite en milieu sédimentaire. Diss. Univ. Paris VI, Unpublished, 210s.
  • Schroll, E. 2002. Genesis of magnesite deposits in the view of isotope geochemistry. Boletim Paranaense de Geociências, UFPR 50, 59–68.
  • Sibley, D.F., Gregg, J.M. 1987. Classification of dolomite rock textures. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 57, 967–975.
  • Siegl,W. 1984. Reflections on the origin of sparrymagnesite deposits. In:Wauschkuhn, A., Kluth, C., Zimmermann, R.A. (Eds.), Syngenesis and Epigenesis in the Formation of Mineral Deposits. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 177–182.
  • Smith, L.B., Davies, G.R. 2006. Structurally controlled hydrothermal alteration of carbonate reservoirs: introduction. American Associaiton of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 90, 1635–1640.
  • Souza, R.S., De Ros, L.F., Morad, S. 1995. Dolomite diagenesis and porosity preservation in lithic reservoirs, Carmópolis Member, Sergipe–Alagoas Basin, Northeastern Brazil. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 79, 725–748.
  • Spadafora, A. Perri, E. Judith, A. Mckenzie, J.A., Vasconcelos, C. G. 2010. Microbial biomineralization processes forming modern Ca:Mg carbonate stromatolites. Sedimentology 57, 27–40.
  • Teedumäe, A., Shogenova, A., Kallaste, T. 2006. Dolomitization and sedimentary cyclicity of the Ordovician, Silurian, and Devonian rocks in South Estonia. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences, Geology 55(1), 67-87
  • Tucker, M.E. 1982. Precambrian dolomites: petrography and isotopic evidence that they differ from Phanerozoic dolomites. Geology 10, 7–12.
  • Tucker, M.E. 1988. Technique in Sedimentology. – Blackwell scientific publication: 394s.
  • Tucker, M.E., Wright, P. 1990. Carbonate Sedimentology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, 482s.
  • Veizer, J. 1989. Strontium isotopes in seawater through time. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science 17, 141–167.
  • Wacey, D., Wright, D.T., Boyce, A.J. 2007. A stable isotope study of microbial dolomite formation in the Coorong Region, South Australia. Chemical Geology 244, 155–174.
  • Winkler, H.G.F. 1988. Petrogenesis of Metamorphic Rocks. Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, 348s.
  • Zachmann, D.W. 1989. Mg-carbonate deposits in freshwater environment. In: Moller, P. (Ed.), Magnesite, Monograph Series on Mineral Deposits, 28. BerlinStuttgart, Borntraeger, 61–94.
  • Zachmann, D.W., Johannes, W. 1989. Cryptocrystalline magnesite. In: Moller, P. (Ed.), Magnesite, Monograph Series on Mineral Deposits, 28. BerlinStuttgart, Borntraeger, 15–28.
Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 0026-4563
  • Yayın Aralığı: 3
  • Başlangıç: 1950
  • Yayıncı: Cahit DÖNMEZ
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

KARABAĞLAR POLYESİNDE YERALTI SUYU METAL-METALOİT İÇERİĞİNİN JEOİSTATİSTİKSEL YÖNTEMLERLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ (MUĞLA, TÜRKİYE)

Özgür AVŞAR, Bedri KURTULUŞ, Çağdaş SAĞIR

TERSİYER (ÜST MİYOSEN-PLİYOSEN) KATRANDEDETEPE FORMASYONUNDA SODYUM SÜLFAT (GLOBERİT-BLÖDİT) – HALİT BİRLİKTELİĞİ, EREĞLİ-BOR HAVZASI, TÜRKİYE

Abdurrahman MURAT, Mustafa KARAKAŞ, Gökhan KADINKIZ, Memet PEKGÖZ

DATÇA VE HİSARÖNÜ KÖRFEZLERİNİN GÜNCEL SEDİMANLARINDA TANE BOYU, TOPLAM AĞIR MİNERAL VE ELEMENT DAĞILIMLARI İLE BUNLARI KONTROL EDEN FAKTÖRLER

Mustafa ERGİN, Barbaros ŞİMŞEK, Hakan PEHLİVAN, Murat EVREN, Füsun ÖCAL, Özgür TÜRKMEN, Serkan PALAS, Bahri Serkan AYDEMİR

GRAVİTE VERİLERİNİN FİZİKSEL DÖNÜŞÜM REAKSİYONU VE DOĞRUSALLIK İKİLEMİ

Ertan TOKER

ZEMİNLERİN EMNİYETLİ TAŞIMA KAPASİTESİNİN BELİRLENMESİNDE OTURMA MİKTARININ ÖNEMİ

Selçuk ALEMDAĞ, Aslıhan CİNOĞLU, Elif GACENER

KB İÇ ANADOLU’DAKİ ANA NEOTEKTONİK YAPILARDAN BİRİ: BEYPAZARI KÖR BİNDİRME ZONU VE İLİŞKİLİ FAY-İLERLEME KIVRIMLARI

KORHAN ESAT, Gürol SEYİTOĞLU, BÜLENT KAYPAK

AKVEREN FORMASYONUNUN MAASTRİHTİYENDEN SELANDİYENE PLANKTONİK FORAMİNİFER BİYOSTRATİGRAFİSİ VE PALEOEKOLOJİK ÖZELLİKLERİ, BATI KARADENİZ, TÜRKİYE

Caner Kaya ÖZER

ANTALYA DOĞUSU SAHİLLERİNDE KIYI KENAR ÇİZGİSİ PROBLEMLERİNE BİR YAKLAŞIM

Levent BAŞAYİĞİT, Muhittin GÖRMÜŞ, Ahmet UYSAL

ÇAMARDI (NİĞDE) YÖRESİNDE NİĞDE MASİFİNİN YAPISAL ÖZELLİKLERİ

Yaşar EREN, Ramazan DEMİRCİOĞLU

GÜLLÜK (MUĞLA) SULAK ALANININ DURAYLI İZOTOPLARLA (δ18O, δD) İNCELENMESİ

Melis A. SOMAY