LIMITING/DISSOLVING POLITICAL PARTIES DUE TO TERRORISM: NATIONAL RESPONSES OF THE UK, SPAIN, AND TURKEY UNDER THE REVIEW OF THE ECtHR

LIMITING/DISSOLVING POLITICAL PARTIES DUE TO TERRORISM: NATIONAL RESPONSES OF THE UK, SPAIN, AND TURKEY UNDER THE REVIEW OF THE ECtHR

Political parties are the main players in a democratic system with a multi-party system. The fundamental principles of democracy consist of free election, the right of criticism, and the right to organise political opposition. However, democracy provides available ground for party politics to abuse or misuse democratic institutions and procedures to harm or overturn democracy. In some cases, political parties aim to replace a democratic regime with their non-democratic ideology. For instance, a political party advocates violence or aims to overthrow the existing constitutional order through armed struggle, terrorism, or subversive activity. So, political parties might also play a role in causes of terrorism. From past to present, many examples can be founded that political parties have involved in or created terrorist organisations, based on different types of relationships. National authorities have adopted measures against such relationships through restricting or dissolving political parties. The United Kingdom, Spain and Turkey are some of these countries that have developed different approaches to interfere with the linkage between political parties and terrorist organisations (the Irish Republican Army (IRA), Basque Homeland and Freedom (ETA) and Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK)), within the democratic system. This study analyses the legal framework established by these countries and the European Court of Human Rights against such linkages.

___

  • Akbulut Olgun, `The State of Political Participation on Minorities in Turkey – an Analysis under the ECHR and the ICCPR` (2005) 12 The International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 375-395.
  • Akgun Birol and Hakyemez Yusuf Sevki, `Limitations on the Freedom of Political Parties in Turkey and the Jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights` (2002) 7 Mediterranean Politics 54–78.
  • Algan Bülent, ‘Dissolution of Political Parties by the Constitutional Court in Turkey: An Everlasting Conflict Between the Court and The Parliament?’ (2011) 60 (4) AUHFD 809-836.
  • Bennett Geoffrey, ‘The Northern Ireland Broadcasting Ban: Some Reflections on Judicial Review’ (1989) 22 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1119- 1160.
  • Bew, John, Martyn Frampton and Inigo Gurruchaga, Talking to Terrorists (New York: Columbia University Press 2009)
  • Bibi van Ginkel, Incitement to Terrorism: A Matter of Prevention or Repression? (ICCT Research Paper, August 2011)
  • Bourne Angela K. “Political Parties and Terrorism: Why ban Batasuna?” Paper presented at Elections, Public Opinion and Parties Annual Conference University of Exeter, 9-11 September 2010
  • Bourne, A. Security or Tolerance? The proscription of political parties in democratic states. Paper Presented at European Consortium of Political Research, Salamanca, Spain (2014)
  • Council of Europe, Parliamentary Assembly Resolution 1344 (2003) 1 Threat Posed to Democracy by Extremist Parties and Movements in Europe
  • Cunningham, Michael, British Government Policy in Northern Ireland 1969- 2000 (Manchester UP 1991)
  • Dağ Rahman, ‘The Spillover Effect of the Syrian Crisis on the Peace Process in Turkey’ (2018) 53 (8) Journal of Asian and African Studies 1251-1270.
  • Dağ Rahman, Ideological Roots of The Perception Between Pro-Kurdish and Pro-Islamic Political Streams in Turkey (Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2017)
  • Dahl Robert A., The American Oppositions: Affirmation and Denial, in Political Opposition in Western Democracies (Yale Univ. Press, 1968) Donohue, Laura K. ‘Regulating Northern Ireland: The Special Powers Act 1922-1972’ (1998) 41 (4) The Historical Journal 1089-1120.
  • English Richard, Armed Struggle, The History of the IRA (OUP 2003)
  • Explanatory Report on Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism, 16 May 2005
  • Feeney, B. Sinn Fein: A Hundred Turbulent Years (Dublin: O’Brien. 2002)
  • Flauss Jean-Francois, `The European Court of Human Rights and the Freedom of Expression` (2009) 84 Indian Law Journal 809-849.
  • Gomien Donna, `Short Guide to the European Convention on Human Rights` (3th Ed, Council of Europe Publishing 2005)
  • Greer Steven, `Exceptions to Articles 8-11 of the European Convention on Human Rights` (Council of Europe 1997)
  • Greg McLaughlin and Stephen Baker, The Propaganda of Peace: The Role of Media and Culture in The Northern Ireland Peace Process (Intellect 2010)
  • Hanley, Brian, The IRA 1926-1936 (Four Courts Press, Dublin 2002)
  • Interior Ministry, ‘Belediyelerdeki Kayyum Sistemi Ve Mevcut Durum Raporu’ accessed 08.09.2021 Jan Mansvelt-Beck, Territory and Terror: Conflicting Nationalisms in the Basque Country (Routledge, 2005)
  • Joseph La Palombara and Myron Weiner, ‘The Origins and Development of Political Parties’ in La Palombara and Weiner (eds), Political Parties and Political Development, Princeton (NJ: Princeton University Press 1966)
  • Katz Richard S.,‘Democracy, and the Legal Regulation of Political Parties’, in Ingrid van Biezen & Hans-Martien ten Napel (eds.), Regulating Political Parties European Democracies in Comparative Perspective (Leiden University Press, 2014)
  • Kay Lawson, Political Parties and Linkage (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1980)
  • Kose Talha, PKK’s dirty gamble with Kurdish Youth, 7 September 2019
  • Laqueur Walter, A History of Terrorism (Third Ed. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co 2002)
  • Laqueur Walter, Guerrilla Warfare: A Historical and Critical Study (Boston, MA: Little, Brown 1976)
  • Martin Scheinin, ‘Limits to Freedom of Expression: Lessons from Counter- Terrorism’ in Tarlach McGonagle and Yvonne Donders (Ed.), The UN and Freedom of Expression (CUP: 2015)
  • McAllister, Ian and Nelson, Sarah, ’Modern Developments in the Northern Ireland Party System’ (1979) Parliamentary Affairs, 279-316.
  • Mersel Yigal, `The dissolution of political parties: The problem of internal democracy` (2006) 4 International Journal of Constitutional Law 84-113.
  • Miller Martin, ‘The Intellectual Origins of Modern Terrorism in Europe’ in Martha Crenshaw (ed.), Terrorism in Context (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania University Press, 1995)
  • Munci Kapani, Kamu Hurriyetleri, (Ankara Universitesi Hukuk Fakultesi Yayini 1981)
  • Muro, Diego ‘Nationalism and nostalgia: the case of radical Basque nationalism’ (2005) 11 Nations and Nationalism 571–89.
  • Muro, Diego, Ethnicity and Violence (London: Routledge 2008)
  • O’Brien Brandan, A Short Story of the IRA: From 1916 Onwards (The O’Brien Press Dublin, 2019)
  • Özcan Nihat Ali, PKK: Tarihi, İdeolojisi ve Yönetimi (ASAM Yayınları 1999) Paul Harvey, ‘Militant democracy and the European Convention on Human Rights` (2004) 29 European Law Review 407-420.
  • Pettigerew Max, The Oxygen of Publicity and the Suffocation of Censorship: British Newspaper Representations of The Broadcasting Ban (1988- 1994) (UMI Dissertation Publishing 2011)
  • Rolston, Bill. ‘Resistance and Terror: Lessons from Ireland’, in Phil. Scraton (ed.) Beyond September 11: an Anthology of Dissent (London: Pluto Press 2002)
  • Şen Halil, PKK: Terör ve İdeoloji (Yeditepe Akademi, 2021)
  • Teziç Erdogan, `100 Soruda Siyasi Partiler` (Gercek Yayinevi, Istanbul 1976)
  • Teziç Erdogan, Anayasa Hukuku (20. Baskı, Beta 2016)
  • Thomas Ayres, `Batasuna Banned: The Dissolution of Political Parties Under the European Convention of Human Rights` (2004) 27 Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 99-113.
  • TRTWorld, A Timeline of the PKK's War on Turkey: 1974-2019, 16 OCT 2019 accessed 08.08.2021
  • Turano Leslie, `Spain: Banning Political Parties as a response to Basque Terrorism` (2003) 1 INT’L J.CONST. L. 730-740.
  • Venice Commission Guidelines on Prohibition and Dissolution of Political Parties and Analogous Measures Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 41st plenary session (Venice, 10 – 11 December 1999)
  • Venice Commission, `European Commission for Democracy through Law Guidelines on Prohibition and Dissolution of Political Parties and Analogous Measures` (Strasbourg, 10 January 2000)
  • Venice Commission, Guidelines on Political Party Regulation by Osce/Odihr and Venice Commission Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 84th Plenary Session, (Venice, 15-16 October 2010)
  • Vidmar Jure, `Multiparty Democracy: International and European Human Rights Law Perspective` (2010) 23 Leiden Journal of International Law 209- 240.
  • Ware Alan, Political Parties and Party Systems (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996)
  • Watts, N. F. ‘Activists in Office: Pro-Kurdish Contentious Politics in Turkey’ (2006) 5(2) Ethnopolitics 125-144.
  • Weinberg Leonard, Pedahzur Ami and Perliger Arie, Political Parties and Terrorist Groups, (Routledge, 2008)
  • White, Jacobs and Ovey, The European Convention on Human Rights (Fifth ed., OUP 2010)
  • Whiting Matthew, Sinn Féin and the IRA: From Revolution to Moderation (Edinburgh University Press 2018)
  • Yargıtay Cumhuriyet Başsavcılığı, İddianame, Konu: Halkların Demokratik Partisi (HDP) Sayı: 6321649/2021/1, 17.03.2021.
  • Yılmaz Ensar, `Sociology of Political Parties’ Closure Regime` (2009) 3 African Journal of Business Management 831-835. The cases of the ECtHR
  • Adams and Benn v. UK, Application no. 28979/95 and 30343/96 (ECtHR 13 January 1997)
  • Brind and Others v. UK No. 18714/91 (ECtHR 12 July 1993)
  • Castells v. Spain, Application no. 11798/85 (ECtHR 23/04/1992)
  • Dicle for DEP v. Turkey, Application No: 25141/94 (Turkish Translation) (10 December 2002)
  • DTP and Others v. Turkey, Application no. 3840/10, 3870/10, 3878/10, 15616/10, 21919/10, 39118/10 and 37272/10 (12 January 2016)
  • Freedom and Democracy Party (ÖZDEP) v. Turkey, Application No. 23885/94 (ECtHR 8 December 1999)
  • HADEP And Demir V. Turkey, Application No. 28003/03 (14/03/2011) Handyside v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 5493/72 (ECtHR, 7 December 1976)
  • Herri Batasuna and Batasuna v. Spain, Applications nos. 25803/04 and 25817/04 (ECtHR 30 June 2009)
  • Ireland v. the United Kingdom, App no. 5310/71 (ECtHR, 18 January 1978) Leroy c. France App no 36109/03 (ECtHR, 2 October 2008) (Turkish Translation)
  • Mclaughlin v. UK Application No. 18759/91 (ECtHR 9 May 1994)
  • Purcell and Others v. Ireland Application no 15404/89 (ECtHR 16/04/1991)
  • Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and others v. Turkey, Application no: 41340/98, 41342/98, 41343/98 (ECtHR 13.2.2003)
  • Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom Application no. 5947/72; 6205/73; 7052/75; 7061/75; 7107/75; 7113/75; 7136/75 (ECtHR 24 October 1983)
  • Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria, Applications nos. 29221/95 and 29225/95 (ECtHR 02/01/2002)
  • Sürek v. Turkey (no. 3) App no 24735/94 (ECtHR, 8 July 1999)
  • United Communist Party of Turkey, (App no: 133/ 1996/ 752/ 951 (ECtHR 30 January 1998)
  • Yazar and Others v. Turkey, Applications Nos. 22723/93, 22724/93 And 22725/93 (ECtHR 9 April 2002)
  • Zana v. Turkey, Application no 69/1996/688/880 (25 November 1997)