Avrupa’da Geri Kabul Anlaşmaları ve Avrupa Birliği-Türkiye Geri Kabul Anlaşması: Geçmişten Günümüze

Avrupa Birliği (AB), düzensiz göçün önüne geçmek için 50 yılı aşkın bir süredir geri kabul anlaşmaları imzalamaktadır. Son zamanlarda AB’nin bu alandaki çabaları yoğunlaşmış ve daha stratejik hale gelmiştir. Bu çıkarımla yola çıkan çalışmada ilk olarak geri kabul kavramı incelenmiş ve AB geri kabul anlaşmaları, tarihi süreç itibariyle özellikleri bakımından üç döneme ayrılmıştır. Sonrasında, AB’nin geri kabul anlaşmalarına yönelik tutumu ve bu anlaşmaların AB hukukundaki yapısı ortaya konmuştur. Son olarak, çalışmanın odak noktası olan ve konuya ilişkin AB geri kabul sisteminde en çok öne çıkan anlaşmalardan biri olan AB-Türkiye Geri Kabul Anlaşması ile bu Anlaşma’nın yükümlülükleri ayrıntılı olarak değerlendirilmiş ve ABTürkiye Mutabakatı gibi iyileştirme adımlarına değinilmiştir

READMISSION AGREEMENTS IN EUROPE AND THE EUROPEAN UNION-TURKEY READMISSION AGREEMENT: FROM PAST TO PRESENT

Readmission agreements have been an implementation of the European Union (EU) over than 50 years due to irregular immigration. Recently, the EU’s efforts in this area have intensified and become more strategic. Hereunder in this study, firstly, the concept of readmission has been examined and, readmission agreements of the EU have been divided into three periods in terms of their characteristics in the historical process. Secondly, the EU’s attitude towards readmission agreements and the structure of them in EU law have been analysed. Finally, the focus of the study, the EU-Turkey Readmission Agreement which is one of the most strategic agreements in EU system and the obligations of the Agreement have been evaluated in detail and, improvement steps like the EU-Turkey Statement have been discussed.

___

  • Batır K, ‘Avrupa Birliği’nin Geri Kabul Anlaşmaları: Türkiye İle AB Arasında İmzalanan Geri Kabul Anlaşması Çerçevesinde Hukuki Bir Değerlendirme’, Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 15/30: 585-604, 2017.
  • Bayraklı E and Keskin K, Türkiye, Almanya ve AB Üçgeninde Mülteci Krizi (Turkuvaz 2015), accessed 10 April 2021.
  • Bilgin A and Pierluigi S, ‘One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Legal Arguments on the Visa–Free Travel of Turkish Citizens to the EU’ (2019) 16(61) Uluslararası İlişkiler 75-95.
  • Billet C, ‘EC Readmission Agreements: A Prime Instrument of the External Dimension of the EU’s Fight against Irregular Immigration. An Assessment after Ten Years of Practice’, (2010) 12 European Journal of Migration and Law 45-79.
  • Bouteillet-Paquet D, ‘Passing the Buck: A Critical Analysis of the Readmission Policy Implemented by the European Union and Its Member States’ (2003) 5 European Journal of Migration and Law 359-377.
  • Coleman N, ‘European Readmission Policy, Third Country Interests and Refugee Rights’ in Elspeth Guild and Jan Niessen (eds.), Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy in Europe Vol. 16 (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2009). Demir O.Ö and Soyupek Y, ‘Mülteci Krizi Denkleminde AB ve Türkiye: İlkeler, Çıkarlar ve Kaygılar’ (2015) Global Politika ve Strateji.
  • Ekinci M.U, Türkiye - AB Geri Kabul Anlaşması ve Vize Diyaloğu, (SETA 2016) 21, accessed 12 February 2021.
  • Ekşi N, Türkiye Avrupa Birliği Geri Kabul Antlaşması (Beta 2016).
  • Ekşi N, ‘18 Mart 2016 Tarihli AB-Türkiye Zirvesi Bildirisinin Hukuki Niteliği’, (2017) 1(1) İktisat ve Sosyal Bilimlerde Güncel Araştırmalar 47-85.
  • Giuffre M, ‘Readmission Agreements and Refugee Rights: From a Critique to a Proposa’ (2013) 32(3) Refugee Survey Quarterly 79-111.
  • Göçmen İ, ‘EU-Turkey Readmission Agreement in the Wake of the Migrant Crisis: What might go wrong with it?’ (UACES 46th Annual Conference, London, September 2016), accessed 10 April 2021.
  • Hailbronner K, , ‘Readmission Agreements and the Obligation on States under Public International Law to Readmit their Own and Foreign Nationals’ (1997) 57(1) Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 1-49.
  • İçduygu A, ‘The Irregular Migration Corridor Between the EU and Turkey: Is It Possible to Block It With a Readmission Agreement?’ (2011) 10 Robert Schuman Center for Advanced Studies of the European University Institute, accessed 12 February 2021. Küçük E, ‘Türkiye’nin Taraf Olduğu Geri Kabul Antlaşmaları’ (2008) 7(2) İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 99-121.
  • Odman, M.T, Mülteci Hukuku (AÜ. SBF. İnsan Hakları Merkezi 1995). Ölmez Kıyıcı G and Kaygısız U, ‘Avrupa Bi̇rli̇ği̇’nin Geri̇ Kabul Anlaşmalarının Avrupa Birliği̇ Göç Politikaları ve İnsan Hakları Çerçevesi̇nde Değerlendi̇ri̇lmesi̇’ (2018) 10(25) Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 467-484.
  • Panizzon M, ‘Readmission Agreements of EU Member States: A Case for EU Subsidiarity or Dualism?’, (2012) 31(4) Refugee Survey Quarterly 101, -133. Roig A and Huddleston T, ‘EC Readmission Agreements: A Re-evaluation of the Political Impasse’ (2007) 9 European Journal of Migration and Law 363- 387. Schieffer M, ‘Community Readmission Agreements with Third Countries - Objectives, Substance and Current State of Negotiations’, (2003) 5 European Journal of Migration and Law 343-357.
  • Strik T, ‘Readmission Agreements: A Mechanism for Returning Irregular Migrants’ (2010) Report of Committee on Migration, Refugees and Population Doc. 12168, accessed 29 March 2021.
  • Trauner F and Kruse I, ‘EC Visa Facilitation and Readmission Agreements: Implementing a New EU Security Approach in the Neighbourhood’ (2008) 290 Case Network Studies&Analyses, 21.
  • Wolff S, ‘The Politics of Negotiating EU Readmission Agreements Insights from Morocco and Turkey’ (2014) 16 European Journal of Migration and Law 69-95.
  • Legislations
  • Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Turkey on the Readmission of Persons Residing without Authorisation. OJ L 134, Vol. 57, 07 May 2014 accessed 18 April 2021.
  • Commission, ‘Return and Readmission’ (2020), accessed 08 April 2021.
  • Commission, ‘The EU Facility for Refugees in Turkey: €6 billion to support refugees and local communities in need fully mobilised (2019), accessed 21 April 2021.
  • Commission, The EU-Turkey Statement Four Years On March 2020 accessed 21 April 2021.
  • Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, General Assembly Resolution 429 (V), 14 December 1951. < https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ ProfessionalInterest/refugees.pdf> accessed 29 November 2021.
  • Council, Presidency Conclusions, Summit in Seville, 24 June 2002 accessed 03 April 2021.
  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights [1966] United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2200A (XXI), accessed 29 November 2021. Official Gazette of the Republic of Turkey, No: 7217, Date: 27 May 1947 accessed 29 November 2021.
  • Official Gazette of the Republic of Turkey, No: 29076, Date: 2 August 2014. accessed 29 November 2021.
  • Official Gazette of the Republic of Turkey, No: 26250, Date: 5 August 2006. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2006/08/20060805-1.htm, accessed 29 November 2021.
  • Official Gazette of the Republic of Turkey, No: 10898, Date: 5 September 1961, https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/arsiv/7217.pdf> accessed 29 November 2021.
  • The European Union-Turkey Statement, 18 March 2016, https://www.consilium. europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2016/03/18/eu-turkey-statement/> accessed 20 April 2021.
  • Treaty of Amsterdam amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related acts [1997] OJ C 340/40, accessed 03 December 2021.
  • Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community [2007] OJ C 306/50, accessed 03 December 2021.
  • Universal Declaration of Human Rights [1948] United Nations General Assembly Resolution 217A, accessed 29 November 2021.
  • Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties [1969] United Nations Treaty Series/1155, accessed 29 November 2021.