QUENTIN SKINNER'İN BAĞLAMCI TARİH ANLAYIŞI

Quentin Skinner, 1969 yılında yazdığı "Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas" başlıklı bir makale ile daha sonra 1980lerde geniş bir literatür oluşturacak bir tartışma başlatmıştır. İddiaları gerektirdiği sonuca taşınırsa, tarih ile felsefenin içiçe geçmesini ve bir yerde tarihsel bir felsefi metnin incelemesinin tarihsel metoda mahkum olmasını kaçınılmaz kılan bu düşüncenin, analitik felsefenin araştırma biçimi yanında yorum teorileri ve felsefe tarihi yazımlarını da eleştiren boyutu da ne kadar geniş bir kapsamı olduğunu göstermektedir. Skinner'in metodunun önemi bununla da sınırlı değildir. Bir taraftan felsefenin metodunu tarihselleştiren Skinner'in metodu ise özünde felsefidir ve Searle-Wittgenstein etkisinde söz-eylemi kavramına dayanmaktadır. Bu makale, kapsamlı düşüncesi ile Skinner'in metoduna kuş bakışı bakmayı ve felsefe çalışmaları açısından bu metodu benimsemenin ne kadar verimli olacağı sorusunu sormayı hedeflemektedir.

QUENTIN SKINNER'S CONTEXTUALIST UNDERSTANDING OF HISTORY

Quentin Skinner's 1969 article "Meaning and Understanding in History ofIdeas" triggered a number of methodological discussions that already took shapeof a large literature by 1980's. In this contextualist manifesto, philosophical textappear to melt in historical methodology and if the claims are taken on to theirultimate implications, then a philosophical text in history is to be interpreted butwith a historical method. His texts engage with analytical way of philosophizingas well as the continental hermeneutical methods and theories on historiographies of philosophy. This proves the comprehensive nature of his method. Incontrast with his historicizing the philosophy, his method is philosophical innature: his main claim is built on the notion of speech-act developed by theSearle-Wittgenstein line. This research aims to discuss Skinner's method in itscomprehensive nature with a bird-eye view and to question the efficiency of thismethod if ever applied on the studies of philosophy.

___

  • Skinner, Quentin; Visions of Politics, c. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2002, 2010).
  • ---; "Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas", History and Theory, v. 8, no.1, s. 3-53
  • Taylor, Charles; "Philosophy and its history", Philosophy in History: Essays on the History
  • of Philosophy, (ed.) R. Rorty, J. B. Schneewind, and Q. Skinner, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1984, s. 17-30.
  • Elffers-van Ketel, Els; The Historiography of Grammatical Concepts: 19th and 20th- Century Changes in the Subject-predicate Conception and the Problem of Their Historical Reconstruction,1991, Amsterdam, Atlanta: Rodopi.
  • McIntyre, Alasdair; "The Relationship Philosophy to its Past", Philosophy in History: Essays on the History of Philosophy, (ed.) R. Rorty, J. B. Schneewind, and Q. Skinner, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1984, s. 31-48.
  • Rorty, R.; "Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres", Philosophy in History: Essays on the History of Philosophy, (ed.) R. Rorty, J. B. Schneewind, and Q. Skinner, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1984, s. 49-77.
  • Little, Daniel; "Philosophy of History", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), forthcoming URL = _____https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/history/>Kaya, Cüneyt; "İslam Felsefesinin mahiyeti üzerine", İslam Felsefesi Tarih ve Problemler, ed. C. Kaya içinde, ss. 15-36
  • Alper, Ö. M.; "İslam Felsefesinin mahiyeti ve İslam Felsefesi tabirinin kullanımı", İslam felsefesi Tarihi ed. B.A. Çetinkaya içinde, ss. 13-54
  • Mccormick; John P. Machiavelli against Republicanism: On the Cambridge School's "Guicciardian Moments", Political Theory, C. 31, S. 5, Ekim 2003.
  • Lamb, Robert; 2009, 'Quentin Skinner's Revised Historical Contextualism: A Critique' History of Human Sciences 22, 3, s.51-73.
  • Taylor, Charles; Sources of the Self: the making of Modern Identity, Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1989.
  • Davidson, Donald; "Actions, Reasons and Causes," in his Essays On Actions and Events, Oxford, Oxford University Press,1980; ---; "Knowing One's Own Mind," Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association, 61, 1987, 441-458.
  • Jesper, Kallestrup; Semantic Externalism, NY: Routledge, 2012.
  • Rowland, Mark; Externalism: Putting Mind and World Back Together Again, Chesham: Acumen, 2003.
  • McCulloch, Gregor; The Life of the Mind, London: Routledge, 2003.
  • Strauss, Leo; Persecution and the Art of Writing, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988
  • Lovejoy, Arthur O.; Varlık Zinciri, İstanbul:İnsan Yayınları
  • Koselleck, Reinhart; Begriffsgeschichten, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag Collingwood, R.G.; The Idea of Nature, Oxford: Oxford Paperbacks
  • Peter, Hylton; "Willard van Orman Quine", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = _____https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/ win2016/entries/quine/>.
  • Hyrkkanen, Markku; "The Point of Intellectual History" (review), 2003, Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought 7, 163-180
  • Schochet, Gordon J.; "Quentin Skinner's Method", Political Theory, 2 (3), s. 261-276
  • Müller, Jan-Werner; "On Conceptual History" in Rethinking Modern European Intellectual History, Edited by Darrin M. McMahon and Samuel Moyn, USA: Oxford University Press, s.74-94.