Özgüç GÜVEN

ANALİTİK FELSEFENİN TANIMLAYICI ÖZELLİKLERİ ÜSTÜNE

Analitik felsefe 19. yüzyılın sonlarına doğru ortaya çıkan, felsefi sorunlara geleneksel felsefenin dışında yeni yaklaşımlar öneren, kavramsal açıklık, mantık ve gidimli düşünceyi öne çıkaran bir tutum olarak bilinmektedir. Son derece etkili ve yaygın olmasına karşın, kökenleri ve tanımlayıcı özellikleri hakkında tartışmalar süregelmektedir. Bu makalede analitik felsefenin tek bir özellik üzerinden tanımlanamayacağı, tersine bir dizi özelliklerin toplamı olarak belirdiği ve bu özelliklerin tümünün analitik felsefede anılan her filozofta bulunmadığı ileri sürülmektedir

ON CHARACTERISTICS OF ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY

Analytic philosophy has been an efficient way of philosophy going back to late nineteenth century that proposes a new approach to philosophical problems based on clarity, argumentation, and exactness. Although it is very renowned and wide-spread, there has been a debate concerning the origins and the characteristics of analytic philosophy. In this paper it is argued that, it is not possible to define analytic philosophy depending only one feature, i.e., there is not any unique feature of analytic philosophy but it is a sum of features. It is also claimed that philosophers who considered to be in analytic tradition don’t include all but some of these features in their philosophies

___

Baker, G., Hacker, P. M. S.; Frege: Logical Excavations, Oxford University Press New York, 1984.

Beaney, Michael; “The Analytic Turn in Early Twentieth-century Philosophy”, The Analytic Turn Analysis in Early Analytic Philosophy, ed. Michael Beaney, New York&London, Routledge, 2007, s. 1-30.

Blattner, William; Some Thoughts About “Continental” and “Analytic” Philosophy, http:// www9.georgetown.edu/faculty/blattnew/contanalytic.html, çevrimiçi (01.09.2015).

Dummett, Michael; “Can Analytic Philosophy be Systematic, and Ought it to Be?”, Truth and Other Enigmas, Duckworth, London, 1978, s. 437-458.

––––; Origins of Analytical Philosophy, London, Duckworth, 1993.

Gary Hatfield; “Perception and Sense-data”, The Oxford Handbook of The History of Analytic Philosophy ed., Michael Beaney, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013, s. 948-975.

Griffin Nicholas; “Russell and Moore’s Revolt Against British Idealism”, The Oxford Handbook of The History of Analytic Philosophy ed., Michael Beaney, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013, s. 383-407.

Frege, Gottlob; Aritmetiğin Temelleri, çev. Bülent Gözkân, İstanbul, YKY, 2007.

Hacker, Peter M. S.; “Analytic Philosophy: What, Whence, and Whither?”, The Story of Analytic Philosophy: Plot and Heroes, London, New York, Routledge, 2002, s. 3-36.

––––; “Beyond the Linguistic Turn and Back Again”, The Analytic Turn Analysis in Early Analytic Philosophy, ed. Michael Beaney, New York&London, Routledge, 2007, s. 125- 141.

Hann, Robert; “Kant, Wittgenstein and the Fate of Analysis”, The Analytic Turn Analysis in Early Analytic Philosophy, ed. Michael Beaney, New York&London, Routledge, 2007, s. 142-163.

Hatfield, Gary; “Perception and Sense-data”, The Oxford Handbook of The History of Analytic Philosophy ed., Michael Beaney, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013, s. 948-975.

Kenny, Anthony; Frege, London, Penguin, 1995.

Monk, Ray; “Was Russell an Analytical Philosopher?”, The Rise of Analytic Philosophy, ed. Hans-Johann Glock, Oxford, Blackwell, 1997, s. 35-50.

––––; “What Is Analytical Philosophy?”, Bertrand Russell and the Origins of Analytical Philosophy, ed. Ray Monk, Anthony Palmer, Bristol, Thoemmes Press, 1996, s. 1-22.

Nagel, Ernest; “Impressions and Appraisals of Analytic Philosophy in Europe”, Journal of Philosophy, 33, 1936, s. 5-24.

Griffin, Nicholas; “Russell and Moore’s Revolt Against British Idealism”, The Oxford Handbook of The History of Analytic Philosophy ed., Michael Beaney, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013, s. 383-407.

Price, Henry; “Clarity is Not Enough”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 19, 1945, 1-31.

Russell, Bertrand; Bertrand Russell Speaks His Mind, ed. Woodrow Wyatt, The World Publishing Company, Clevelend, 1960.

––––; Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, London, George Allen&Unwin, 1919.

––––; My Philosophical Development, London, George Allen&Unwin Ltd. 1959.

––––; On Denoting, Mind. Sayı 56, 1905, s. 470-493.

––––; The Philosophy of Logical Atomism, Routledge, London, 2009.

Ryle, Gilbert; The Concept of Mind, Hutchinson’s University Library, London, New York, 1949.

Sluga, Hans; Gottlob Frege, Routledge, New York, 1980.

––––; “What Has History to Do with Me?: Wittgenstein and Analytic Philosophy”, Inquiry, s. 41, 99-121.

Wittgenstein; Nachlass, MS, 120, Vol. XIV, 12.