Ulusaşırı şslam ve Milliyetçilik: Bir Sosyal-CoŞrafi Tahayyül Olarak Köln Merkez Camii

Küreselleşme ulusal sınırların ötesinde, geniş sermaye, ürünler, insanlar ve enformasyon akışında kendini gösteren eşi görülmemiş derecede karşılıklı baŞa yol açan bir süreçtir. Küreselleşmenin bir görüngüsü göçmenlerin ve göçmen topluluklarının ulusaşırılaşmasıdır. Göçmenler yalnızca ev sahibi ülke ile deŞil, göçmen-veren topluluklarla da kültürel, sosyal, ekonomik baŞlarını devam ettirerek yeni sosyal uzamlar ve yeni kimlikler oluşturarak ulus devletleri aşmaktadırlar. Bu makale sınır ötesi karşılıklı etkileşimlerin, ilişkilerin ve ulusaşırı dinselliŞin kurumsal niteliklerinin yeni biçimlerini ortaya çıkarmayı hedeflemiştir. Araştırmanın odak noktası Almanya'da ulusaşırı şslami kurumların en büyüklerinden biri olan Diyanet şşleri Türk-şslam BirliŞi (DşTşB)'dir. Bu makalede benimsenen yaklaşım küreselleşme ile baŞlantılı olan ulusaşırı sosyal uzamların ve kimlik politikalarının yanı sıra toplumsal tahayyülleri içermiştir. Çalışma, şslam'ın ulusaşırı bir güç olarak ortaya çıkmasının, devletler ve topluluklar arasında geleneksel coŞrafi ve soysal uzam kavramının ötesinde bir rekabete sebep olduŞunu ve "ulusaşırı milliyetçiliŞin" doŞuşuna yol açtıŞını ortaya koymaktadır

Transnational Islam and Nationalism: Cologne Mosque a5 Social-Geographical Imagination

Globalization is process which entails unprecedented growth in interconnectedness of the world, reflected in the expanded flows of capital, goods, people, and information across national borders. One phenomenon of globalisation is the transnationalisation of migrants and migrant communities. Migrants transcend the nation—states by manifesting and creating social fields and new identities incorporating cultural, social, economic ties not only with the host societies, but also with the migrant—sending communities. Migrants are not bounded by specific cultural and social genres that are constrained by space and locality. This paper intends to explore new forms of cross—border interactions, relations and institutional characteristics of transnational religiosity. The focus of this research is one of the largest transnational Islamic organizations in Germany, The Turkish—Islamic Union for Religious Affairs (DITIB). The research approach adopted in this article includes transnational social spaces related to the processes of globalization and the politics of identity as well as social imagination. The study shows that emergence of Islam as transnational force brings forth competition between states and communities beyond the traditional notion of the geographic and the social space and it leads to the emergence of “transnational nationalism”

PDF

___

Allievi, Stefano ve Jorgen Nielsen, (2003). Muslim Networks and Transnational Communities in and Across Europe. Leiden: Brill.
Anderson, Benedict (1983), Imagined Communities: Reflections on tlIe Origins and Spread ofNationalism, London: Verso.
Anthias, Floya (1998). “Evaluating ‘Diaspora’: Beyond Ethnicity?” Sociology, 32(3): 557—580.
Appadurai, Arjun (1996). ModernityAt Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Atay, Tayfun (1996). Bat] ’da Bir Nakşi Cemaati İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
Aydın, Suavi (2001). “Cumhuriyet’in İdeolojik Şekillenmesinde Antropolojinin Rolü: Irkçı Paradigmanin Yükselişi ve Düşüşü”, Modern Türkiye 'de Siyasi Düşünce Kemalizm. Tanıl Bora, Murat Gültegingil Ahmet İnsel (der.) içinde. lstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. 344—369
Bauman, Zygmunt (1998). Globalization: l1e Human Consequences. New York: Columbia University Press.
Beck, Ulrich (2006a). “The Cosmopolitan State: Redefining Power in the Global Age.” Internationaljournal ofPolitics, Culture, and Society, 18(3—4): 143— 159.
Beck, Ulrich (2006b). The Cosmopolitan Vision. Cambridge: Polity.
Bowen, John R. (2004). “Beyond Migration: Islam as Transnational Public Space.” journal ofEtlmic and Migration Studies, 30(5): 879—894.
Bowen, John R. (2010). Can Islam Be French.): Pluralism and Pragmatism in Secularist State. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Bramadat, Paul ve Koenig Matthias (der.) (2009). International Migration and tlie Governance ofReligious Diversity. Montreal: School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University Press.
Braziel, Jana Evans ve Anita Mannur (2003). l1e0riZing Diaspora.'A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell Pub. Breuilly, John (1993). “The Sources of Nationalist Ideology”, Nationalism. John Hutchinson ve Anthony Smith (der.) içinde. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 103—113
Bruneau, Michel (2010). “Diasporas, Transnational Spaces and Communities.” Diaspora and ransnationalism: Concepts, Theories and Methods. T. Faist ve B. Rainer (der.) içinde. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 35—50
Casanova, Jose (1994). Public Religions in tlie Modern World Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cesari, Jocelyne (2005). “Mosque Conflicts in European Cities: Introduction.” journal ofEtlmic and Migration Studies, 31(6): 1015—1024.
Clayer, Nathalie ve Eric Germain (2008). Islam in lnter- War Europe. New York: Columbia University Press.
Clifford, James ve George E. Marcus (1986). Writing Culture: l1e Poetics and Politics ofEtlmograpliy. California: University of California Press.
Featherstone, Mike (der.) (1990). Global Culture: Nationalism, Globalization, and Modernity: Theory, Culture &Society Special Issue. Londra: Sage.
Fetzer, S. Joel ve J. Christopher Soper (2005). Muslims and the State in Britain, France, and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Geertz, Clifford (1985). Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology (3. ed.). USA: Basic Books.
Gellner, Ernest (1983) Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell. Gupta, Akhil ve James Ferguson (1997). Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of Field Science. California: University of California Press.
Hafez, Kai (20 10). Radicalism and Political Reform in the Islamic and Western Worlds. Cambridge University Press.
Hannerz, Ulf (1996). Transnational Connections: Culture, People, Places. New York: Routledge.
Harvey, D. (2006). “The Sociological and Geographical Imaginations.” Internationaljournal ofPolitics, Culture, and Society, 18(3—4), 21 1—255.
Hear, Nicholas Van (1998). NeW Diasporas.‘ The Mass EXodus, Dispersal And Regrouping OfMigrant Communities. Londra: Taylor Francis.
Held, David (2010). Cosmopolitanism: Ideals and Realities. Cambridge: Polity.
Hobsbawm, Eric (1990). Nations and Nationalism since 780. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hunter, Shireen (2002). Islam, Europe’s Second Religion: The NeW Social, Cultural, and Political Landscape. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Kastoryano, Riva (2007). “Transnational Nationalism: Redefining Nation and Territory.” Identities, Affiliations, and Allegiances. S. Benhabib, I. Shapiro ve D. Petranovi (der.) içinde. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 159—180.
Kaya, Ayhan (2000). “Sicher in Kreuzberg” Berlindeki Küçük Istanbul. İstanbul: Büke Yayıncılık.
Kaya, Ayhan (1998). “Multicultural Clientelism and Alevi Resurgence in the Turkish Diaspora: Berlin Alevis” NeW Perspective on Turkey. 18:23—46.
Kedorie, Elie (1993) Nationalism. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Kepel, Gilles ve Susan Milner (1997). Allah in the West: Islamic Movements in America and Europe. Standford: Stanford University Press.
Landau, Jacop M. (2010). “Diaspora Nationalism: The Turkish Case.” The Call of the Homeland: Diaspora Nationalisms, Past and Present. A. Gal, A. S. Leoussi ve A. D. Smith (der.) içinde. Leiden: Brill. 219-240
Malik,]amal ve John R. Hinnells (2006). Sufism in The West. New York: Routledge.
Marcus, George E. ve Michael Fischer (1999). AnthropologyAs Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mills, Wright (1959). The Sociological Imaginations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Özbudun, Sibel (2002). Kültür Halleri: Gecmiste, Otelerde, Günümüzde. Ankara: Ütopya Yayınevi
Rabinow, Paul (1977). Reflections on Fieldwork in Morocco. California: University of California Press.
Robertson, Roland (1992). Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. London: Sage.
Rosaldo, Renato (1993). Culture ruth: The Remaking ofSocial Analysis. New York: Routledge.
Roy, Oliver (2004). Globalised Islam: The Search for New Ummah. Londra: C. Hurst Co. Publishers.
Safran, William (1991). “Diasporas in Modern Societies: Myths of Homeland and Return.” Diaspora, 1(1): 83—99.
Schiller, Nina Gilick (2010). “A Global Perspective on Transnational Migration: Theorising Migration without Methodological Nationalism.” Diaspora and ransnationalism: Concepts, Theories and Methods R. Bauböck ve T. Faist (der.) içinde. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 109—13.
Schiller, Nina Glick vd. (1992). Towards Transnational Perspective on Migration: Race, Class, Ethnicity, and Nationalism Reconsiderecl. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Şenay, Banu (2013). Beyond urkey’s Borders: Long-distance Kemalistn, 5tate politics and the Turkish Diaspora. London ve New York: LB. Tauris.
Smith, Michael P. ve Luis Guarnizo (1998). ransnationalism From Below. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Soysal, Yasemin (1994). Limits ofCitizenslnp: Migrantsand Postnational Membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Statham, Paul vd. (2005). “Resilient or Adaptable Islam? Multiculturalism, Religion and Migrants’ Claims—Making for Group Demands in Britain, the Netherlands and France.” Ethnicities, 5(4): 427—459.
Sen, Faruk (2007). Euro- ürkler: Sayilar, İstemler, Analizler ve Yorumlar. İstanbul: Günizi Yayıncılık
Tibi, Bassam (2001). Islam Between Culture and Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tibi, Bassam (2009). Islam ’s Predicament With Modernity: Religious Reform and Cultural Change. Taylor Francis.
Tomlinson,]ohn (1999). Globalization and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.