Picnoleptic Horizons of the Knowledge Decade: Techno-Creative Communities in Turkey *

Paul Virilionun Kaybolmanın Estetiği başlıklı eserindeki ana kavramdır piknolepsi... Zamanda kısa/belirgin sekme, anlık bilinç kayıplarına, Virilionun deyimiyle, kaçırılan yaşamsal anlara neden olur. Piknolepsi, zamansızlık nedeniyle ortaya çıkan yaşantı hızına bağlı olarak deŞişen bir karakteristik özelliktir. Wood ve Landry tarafından yazılan Kültürellikler Arası Kentten (2008) esinlenilerek bu mekânsız zaman sekmeleri / hatta zamansız mekân sekmeleri kentin yaratıcı anlarına tanık olan alternatif kamusal mekânlara dönüşebilir. Bu yazı, kamusal meselelerin çağın hızına uyan çoklu medya çalışmalarıyla en iyi şekilde temsil edildiŞini tasavvur etmekte; bunu yaparken de kamuya mal edilmiş, web 2.0 paylaşım platformlarında sergilenen video ve fotoŞraf çalışmalarına odaklanmaktadır. Bunun yanında, tekno-yaratıcı web çaŞı olarak nitelendirilen web 3.0 kapsamında kuramsal seferini sürdürürken kent/li hakkını(Marcuse, 2009) yeni bir anlayışla sorgulamaktadır. Bu sorgulama, çalışmada ele alınan sanatsal işlerde, sürekli aracılıklar yoluyla başıboş dolaşan birey ve küresel zaman-mekân işgalcisi yurttaşların öyküsünü betimlemeye yönelmektedir. Burak Arıkanın Network Map of Artists and Political Inclinations, Ali Miharbinin Seance ve Meriç Akayın Pop up Park başlıklı çalışmaları siber-etnografik incelemeyle ele alınmaktadır. Siber-etnografik çalışmalar güncel ve görece yeni gelişen bir araştırma alanı olarak deŞerlendirilmelidir. Yazar, bu çalışmanın öncesinde sosyal meselelere odaklanan web platformlarında gölge hesap açarak pasif gözlemci konumunda içerik, görsel ve söylem analizi gibi anlatı ve paylaşım sürecine yönelik çözümlemeler yapmıştır. Bu çalışma kendisi için de yepyeni bir kapı aralamaktadır. Sözü geçen vakaları sergi alanında incelemenin yanında, web platformlarında yerleşim, ziyaretçi yorumları, sanatsal üretimleri farklı konumlandırma teknikleri ve katılımcı yaşam alanları gibi ayrıntıları da çalışmasına yansıtmaktadır.

Birikim Çağında Anlık Hızlandırılmış Ufuklar: Türkiye nin Yaratıcı Cemaatleri

The key concept introduced in The Aesthetics of Disappearance (2009) by Paul Virilio is picnolepsy - the condition of brief lapses in time, momentary absences of consciousness, in Virilio s words, fleeting instances of life escaping. Picnolepsy is produced by speed, and is a characteristic of the pace at which we live our lives. Once inspired by Wood and Landry s Intercultural City (2008), these spaceless timelags/timeless space lags may well be turned into creative instances/zones acting as alternative public spaces in the urban. The author, thus, imagines that communal issues are best translated into the virtual realm through picnoleptic art works of multimedia and attempts at analyzing web 2 creative sharing platforms focusing primarily on, but not limited to communal video and photography. She, further, renders a theoretical crusade of the transformation of the public sphere via emerging picnoleptic citizens of the technocreative web 3 era during which she questions the new understanding of the right to the city (Marcuse, 2009). During this theoretical crusade, she runs into artistic projects and interventions that question the impact of hyper-mediation on the individual city dweller and the citizen as the global occupier of time and space. Cyber-ethnographical research does not have a long history in the field of digital/visual communication studies. The author, in previous studies, signed up anonymous accountsin web platforms focusing on social issues as a passive observer and has reflected this experience by performing content, visual and at times discourse analysis. This sort of research attempt can be categorized under narrative readings and analysis upon networks of sharing. In this specific study, she reflects her active visits to the exhibition spaces, spectator comments as well as various positioning techniques for works of art and participatory ecologies.

___

  • Augé, Michel (2009). Non-places: An introduction to supermodernity. New York: Verso Books.
  • Appadurai, Arjun (1996). Modernity at Large: Globalization and Cultural Dimension. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Atkinson, Rowland (2006). Padding the bunker: strategies of middle class disaffiliation and colonisation in the city. Urban Studies, vol. 43. no. 4. 819- 832.
  • Ayiter, Elif & Germen, Murat. (2007). “Looking aside: collective constructs, autarchic assemblage”. MutaMorphosis: Challenging Arts and Sciences, Prague Municipal Library, Czech Republic. http://research.sabanciuniv.edu/9197/
  • Banham, Reyner. (1976). Megastructure: Urban futures of the recent past. London: Thames and Hudson.
  • Bazin, Andre (1967-71). What is cinema? in Gray, H. (trans., ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. Vol. 1 & 2.
  • Belfiore, Eleonora. (2004). “Auditing culture”. International Journal of Cultural Policy, vol. 10. no. 2, 183-202.
  • Berger, John (2003). Selected Essays. Dyer, G. (ed.) Vintage Press.
  • Bhabha, Homi K. (1994) The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
  • Bianchini, Francesco (2007).“A crisis in urban creativity and local distinctiveness? Reflections on some of the cultural consequences of globalisation for European cities, and on the potential of urban cultural policies”, The Nordic Journal of Cultural Policy, issue 2, 18-39.
  • Boskovic, Alexander (1997). “Virtual Places: Imagined Boundaries and Hyperreality in Southeastern Europe”, C-theory online. www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=97
  • Cohendet, Patrick and Simon Lewis (2006). “Knowledge intensive firms, communities and creative cities”, Draft paper for the DIME Conference on Communities of Practice, Durham. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265273445_Knowledge_intensive_fi rms_communities_and_creative_cities. 27.05.2015
  • Cooley, Heidi Ray (2004). “Identify”-ing a New Way of Seeing: Amateurs, Moblogs and Practices in Mobile Imaging”, Spectator 21(1), Spring, 65-79.
  • DeCauter, Lieven (2004). The Capsular Civilization : On the City in the Age of Fear (Reflect #3). Rotterdam, NL: NAi Uitgevers / Publishers Stichting.
  • DaEmpoli, Guiliano (2002). Overdose. La società dell’informazione eccessiva. Venice: Marsilio.
  • Debord, Guy (1995). The Society of the Spectacle. MIT Press: Zone Books.
  • Ellison, Roger and Burrows, Nick (2005). Neighborhoods on the Net: The Nature and Impact of Internet-based Neighborhood Information Systems. Australia: Policy Press.
  • Ellison, Roger. and Burrows, Nick (2007). “New spaces of disengagement? Social politics, urban technologies and the reasoning of the city”, Housing Studies, vol. 22. no. 4, 295-312.
  • Ewing, Reid et al. (2003) “Relationship between urban sprawl, physical activity, obesity and morbodity”. Am J Health Promotion. 18, 47-57.
  • Frenchman, Dennis. & Francisco Rojas (2006). Zaragoza’s Digital Mile: PlaceMaking in a New Public Realm [Media and the City], Places. 18(2), 16. Retrieved from: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/5dm2932p
  • Graham, Stephen and Marvin, Simon (2001). Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities, and the Urban Condition. New York: Routledge.
  • Harvey, David (2009). Social Justice and the City (Geographies of Justice and Social Transformation) Athens, GA: Georgia University Press.
  • Jansson, Andre and Lagerkvist, Amanda (2009). “The Future Gaze: City Panoramas as Politico-Emotive Geographies”. Journal of Visual Culture. vol. 8 no. 1, 25-53
  • Landry, Charles (2000). The Creative City. A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. London, Earthscan.
  • Landry, Charles and Bianchini, Franco (1995). The Creative City. London: Demos.
  • Lavazzi, Tom (2001). “The Global Subject in an electronic age: Re(X) Locating the Critical Self”, symploke, Vol. 9. no: 1 / 2, 83-101.
  • Lefebvre, Henri (1991). The production of space. Nicholson-Smith, D. (Trans.) Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Lefebvre, Henri (1996). Writings on Cities. Kofman, E & Lebas, E. (trans. & eds.) Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Mitchell, J. William (2005). Placing Words: Symbols, Space, and the City. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Murray, Susan (2008). “Digital Images, Photo-sharing and our shifting notions of everyday aesthetics”, Journal of Visual Culture, 7: 147. London: Sage Parikka, Jussi (2012). What is Media Archeology? Cambridge & Oxford: Polity Press.
  • Parker, Simon, Uprichard, Emma and Burrows, Roger (2007). “Class Places and Place Classes: Geodemographics and the spatialization of class”, Information, Communication and Society, vol. 10. No. 6, 902-921.
  • Power, Michael (1997). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Rosen, Philip (2001). Change Mummified: Cinema, Historicity, Theory. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Soja, Edward (1989). Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: Verso Press.
  • Sorkin, Michael (1992). “See you in Disneyland”. Design quarterly. n. 154, New York: MIT Press.
  • Tan, Pelin (2010).Conflict and Hospitality. In Dider Fiuza Faustino (ed.) Intime Collectif / Collective Intimacy(pp. 214-218) France: Monografik editions.
  • Thrift, Nigel (2004). “Intensities of Feeling: Towards a Spatial Politics of Affect”. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography. Volume 86, Issue 1, 57-78.
  • Thrift, Nigel (2006). “Re-inventing invention”, Economy & Society, vol. 35, no. 2, 279-300.
  • Virilio, Paul (2006). Art and Fear. London: Continuum
  • Virilio, Paul (2009). The Aesthetics of Disappearance. MIT Press, Cambridge: Semiotexte.
  • Wood, Phil and Landry, Charles (2008). The Intercultural City. London, Sterling, VA: Earthscan. http://domenicoquaranta.com/2010/02/arco-2010-expanding-the-field/#. Accessed 13 April 2014.
  • http://dugumkume.org/dk01. Accessed 13 April 2014.
  • http://www.acturban.org/biennial/doc_planners/boeri_europe.htm. Accessed 13 April 2014.
  • http://www.dijitalhikayeler.org/en/#/digital_stories_from_amargi_women/istanbul _february_2010/beach_____br>cadıbacı. Accessed 11 April 2014.