Nostalgia without the referent: The photographic image now

Bu çalışma, fotoŞrafın doŞası gereŞi bir nostalji nosyonuyla işlediği ve bunosyonun Roland Barthesın göndergenin ayrılmazlığı (bağlılığı) olarakadlandırdığı şeye dayandığı varsayımına dayanmaktadır. Yazar dijital imgeleringönderge ile ilişkisi baŞlamında ontolojisine odaklanarak bir zamanlar fotoğrafaiçkin olan nostalji nosyonunun fotoğrafta dijital dönüşüm denilen olgu ilebirlikte kökten bir biçimde dönüştüŞünü iddia etmektedir. Dijital imgelerinestetiŞi de bu yeni nostalji kipini teyit etmektedir: Dijital imgeler bir yandanmükemmelik ve pürüzsüzlüğü görülebilecek herşeyi görme arzusu ilebirleştirirken, aynı zamanda, paradoksal bir biçimde, analog benzeri imgelerüretmek için doku ve kusur nosyonlarıyla işlemektedirler. Bu makalede buiki farklı ancak birbirleriyle ilişkili temsil formunun, kendi nesnesini bilinçliolarak yok eden bir postmodern (ironik) nostalji ve Lev Manovichten (2006)esinlenerek fotografik olanın pekiştirilmesi ve yüceltilmesi ile işleyen iki farklı alana tekabül ettiŞini iddia edeceğim.

Göndergesiz nostalji: Günümüzde fotoğrafik İmge

This article rests on the assumption that photography operates inherentlythrough a notion of nostalgia, which in turn depends on what Roland Barthescalls the adherence of the referent. The author focuses on the ontology ofdigital images with respect to their relation to the referent and claims that thenostalgia once immanent to the photograph has been fundamentally changed bythe so-called digital turn in photography. The aesthetics of digital images confirmthe existence of this new mode of nostalgia: while the digital images marryperfection and tactlessness with a desire to behold everything possible, they also,somewhat paradoxically, operate through texture and defect to generateanalog-like images. I will argue that these two different but interrelated forms ofrepresentation correspond to two distinct realms: a postmodern (ironic) nostalgiathat consciously withers its object and, via inspiration from Lev Manovich(2006), solidification and glorification of the photographic.

___

  • Barthes, Roland (1981). Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. Çev., Richard Howard. New York: Hill and Wang.
  • Barthes, Roland (1977). Image, Music, Text, Çev., Stephen Heath. London: Fontana Press.
  • Benjamin, Walter (2007). Illuminations. Çev., Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken Books.
  • Boym, Svetlena (2001). The Future of Nostalgia. New York: Basic Books.
  • Bull, Stephen (2009). Photography. New York: Routledge.
  • Crary, Jonathan (1992). Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Değirmenci, Koray (2010). “Photographic Images in the Digital Age: Does Photography Still Exist?” In The Aesthetic Dimension Of Visual Culture.
  • Ondrej Dadejik ve Jakub Stejskal (der.) içinde. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 146-154.
  • Edwards, Elizabeth ve Janice Hart (2004). Photographs Objects Histories: On the Materiality of Images. New York: Routledge.
  • Gooskens, Geert (2011). “The Digital Challenge: Photographic Realism Revisited.” Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics (3): 115-125.
  • Graf, Alexander (2002).The Cinema of Wim Wenders. London: Wallflower Press.
  • Jäger, Gottfried (2003). “Abstract Photography.” In Rethinking Photography I+II: Narration and New Reduction in Photography, Ruth Horak (der.) içinde. Salzburg: Fotohof Edition. 162-195.
  • Jameson, Fredric (1985). “Postmodernism and Consumer Society.” In Postmodern Culture. Hal Foster (der.) içinde. London: Pluto Press. 111-125.
  • Jameson, Fredric (1984). “Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism.” New Left Review (146) : 59-92.
  • Lowenthal, David (2003). The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • MacCabe, Colin (1997). “Barthes and Bazin: The Ontology of the Image.” In Writing the Image After Roland Barthes. Jean-Michel Rabaté (der.) içinde. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 71-76.
  • Manovich, Lev (2006). “The Paradoxes of Digital Photography.” In The Photography Reader. Liz Wells (der.) içinde London: Routledge. 240-249.
  • Mitchell, William J (1992). The Reconfigured Eye: Visual Truth in the Post Photographic Era. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Nöth, Winfried (2007). “The Death of Photography in Self-Reference.” In Sel Reference in the Media. Winfried Nöth ve Nina Bishara (der.) içinde. New York ve Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 95-106.
  • Nöth, Winfried (2003). “Photography between Reference and Self-reference.” In Rethinking Photography I+II: Narration and New Reduction in Photography. Ruth Horak (der.) içinde. Salzburg: Fotohof Edition. 22-39.
  • Peirce, Charles Sanders (1955). Philosophical Writings of Peirce. Justus Buchler (der.). Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
  • Proust, Marcel (1998). Swann’s Way: In Search of Lost Time. Çev., Dennis Joseph Enright. New York: Modern Library.
  • Robins, Kevin (1995). “Will Image Move us Still?” In The Photographic Image in Digital Cuture. Martin Lister (der.) içinde. New York, NY: Routledge. 29-50.
  • Rosen, George (1975). “Nostalgia: A ‘Forgotten’ Psychological Disorder.” Clio Medica 10(1): 29-51.
  • Sontag, Susan (1977). On Photography. New York: Penguin.
  • Starobinski, Jean (1966). “The Idea of Nostalgia.” Çev., William S. Kemp. Diogenes (54): 81-103.
  • Tagg, John (1988). The Burden of Representation: Essays on Photographies and Histories. London: Macmillan.
  • Wawrzycka, Jolanta (1997). “Photographeme: Mythologizing in Camera Lucida.” In Writing the Image After Roland Barthes. Jean-Michel Rabate (der.) içinde. Philadelpia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 90-98.