Direnen fotoğraflar: Türkiye de toplumsal belleğin ikonlaşmış imgeleri

This study moves from the idea that the images do not get the academic respectthey deserve in a world surrounded by a myriad of images. Unfortunately, in thehegemonic logocentric meaning context, the images are mostly seen as objects ofanalysis or posited in the text as supporting and decorating data; and they arehardly given any academic credit beyond that. This study, focusing on somepeculiar photographic images in order to trace the struggle between discourseand reality in these images, is theoretically planned as an attempt to think aboutand through the images. In this way, it is regarded that the photographs haveiconic power. This study attributes to the image a specific power and mobilizingcapacity within the struggle of social memory.In the study, both some historical images of the patriarchal nation-statedesigned to aid the national collective and some actual news images which resistthe nation-state images are exemplified. The image regime of the patriarchalnation-state, which is based on the ideological strategy of covering by showing ,is challenged by photographic images that are resisting with the strategy ofshowing by covering . Through these example of images, the strategies ofcovering and/or revealing the reality are put into consideration. This article,describing the war of discourses among the relevant photographic images, takesside by those images, which resist against the hegemonic discourse of thepatriarchal nation-state, for constructing the collective memory of the oppressedin an activist way.

Resisting images: Iconic images of collective memory in Turkish context

PDF

___

Akşam Gazetesi (23.02.2013). http://www.aksam.com.tr/magazin/akilli-kadin dayak-yemez/haber-171784. Erişim tarihi: 20.05.2014.
Azoulay, Ariella (2008). The Civil Contract of Photography. New York: Zone Books.
Baker, Ulus (2010). Kanaatlerden şmajlara: Duygular Sosyolojisine Doğru. İstanbul: Birikim.
Barthes, Roland (1996). Camera Lucida: Fotoğraf Üzerine Düşünceler, Çev., Reha Akçakaya. İstanbul: Altıkırkbeş.
Bayrak, Emek (2012). Kadının iddetten Korunması için Eril Devlet Dönüşmeli. http://www.bianet.org/bianet/diger/127481-kadinin-siddetten korunmasi-icin-eril-devlet-donusmeli. Erişim tarihi: 17.12.2012.
Belge, Burçin (2012). A.P.nin Katili Yalnızca Kocası mı? http://www.bianet.org/bianet/kadin/126797-a-p-nin-katili-yalnizca-kocasi mi. Erişim tarihi: 17.12.2012.
Benjamin, Walter (2002). Fotoğrafın Kısa Tarihçesi. Çev., Ali Cengizkan. İstanbul: YGS Yayınları.
Benjamin, Walter (2008). Tekniğin Olanaklarıyla Yeniden Üretilebildiği Çağda Sanat Yapıtı. Pasajlar. Çev., Ahmet Cemal. şstanbul: YKY.
Berger, John (1995). Görme Biçimleri. İstanbul: Metis.
Bianet (2014). Adalet BakanlıŞında Erkek iddeti Verileri Yokmuş. http://www.bianet.org/bianet/kadin/155220-adalet-bakanligi-nda-erkek siddeti-verileri-yokmus. Erişim tarihi: 31.05.2014.
Burnett, Ron (2007). İmgeler Nasıl Düşünür? şstanbul: Metis.
Canetti, Elias (1998). Kitle ve iktidar. İstanbul: Ayrıntı.
Crawford, Peter Ian ve David Turton (1992). Film as Ethnography. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Rasha, El-Ibiary (2010). Affective Imagery and Collective Memory: Discursive Analysis of Iconic Images of Pain. Global Media Journal, Arabian Edition 1 (2): 49-66.
Ergüven, Mehmet (2007). Görmece. İstanbul: Metis.
Harriman, Robert ve John Louis Lucaites (2003). Public Identity and Collective Memory in U.S. Iconic Photography: The Image of Accidental Napalm. Critical Studies in Media Communication 20 (1): 35-66.
Harriman, Robert ve John Louis Lucaites (2007). No Caption Needed: Iconic Photographps, Public Culture, and Liberal Democracy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Linfield, Susie (2013). Acımasız Aydınlık: Fotoğraf ve Politik iddet. İstanbul: Espas.
Mitchell, J.W.T (1996). What do Pictures Really Want? October (77): 71-82. Örer, Ayça (2006). Medya Operasyona Ortak Oldu. http://eski.bianet.org/2006/12/18/89146.htm. Erişim tarihi: 31.05.2014.
Robins, Kevin (1999). şmaj. Görmenin Kültür ve Politikası. şstanbul: Ayrıntı. Sancar, Serpil (2012). Türk Modernleşmesinin Cinsiyeti: Erkekler Devlet, Kadınlar Aile Kurar. İstanbul: İletişim.
Sayın, Zeynep (2003). şmgenin Pornografisi. şstanbul: Metis.
Sontag, Susan (2008). Fotoğraf Üzerine, Çev., Osman Akınhay. İstanbul: Agora.
Sontag, Susan (2005). Başkalarının Acısına Bakmak. Çev., Osman Akınhay. şstanbul: Agora.
Taussig, Michel (1997). Mimesis und Alteritaet: Eine eigenwillige Geschichte der Sinne. Çev., Regina Mundel ve Christoph Shirmer. Hamburg: Europaeische Verlaganstalt.
Tekin, Oya (2013). O Ben Olabilirim Ama Hülya Avşar Ben DeŞil. http://blog.milliyet.com.tr/o-ben-olabilirdim-ama-hulya-avsar-ben-degil-- ayse-pasali-hic-degil/Blog/?BlogNo=405488. Erişim tarihi: 20.05.2014.
Yuval-Davis, Nira (2010). Cinsiyet ve Millet. İstanbul: İletişim.
Yücel, Halime (2013). İmgeden Yoruma. İstanbul: Ayrıntı