2011-2013 Anayasa Yapım Süreci ve Türkiye’de Medya Alanı

Bu makalede 2011-2013 yılları arasında yaşanan ve hem ülke hem de uluslararası kamuoyunda yüksek beklentiler doğuran ve “Anayasa Yapım Süreci” olarak adlandırılan dönem, medya ve iletişim açısından ele alınmıştır. Türkiye’deki anaakım medyanın başta Anayasa Uzlaşma Komisyonu olmak üzere anayasa yapım sürecinin başat aktörleri üzerindeki etkisi, medya içeriği ya da performansı ile söz konusu dönem Türkiye medyasının ekonomi politiği üzerinden tartışılmıştır. Gazete, televizyon kanalları gibi geleneksel medya kuruluşları ve büyük ölçüde dijital platformlar, günümüzde siyasi gündemin belirlendiği ve tartışıldığı bir arena işlevine sahiptir. Medya ve iletişim çalışmaları alanında yapılan araştırmalar, bu çevrimiçi ve çevrimdışı kanalların siyasi elitlerin kararları üzerinde farklı düzeylerde etki gücüne sahip olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Küresel medyayla birlikte, ulusal medya sistemleri, kendi elitlerinin ortaya çıkmasını teşvik ederken, üst düzey siyasi karar alma süreçleriyle mevcut çok katmanlı ilişkilerini sürdürmeye devam ederler. Bu nedenle, medya kanalları, gündem belirleme ve çerçeveleme gibi araçlar kullanarak politika oluşturma sürecini etkileyebilecek sembolik güçlere sahiptir. Buradan hareketle, bu makale Türkiye medyasını bir alan olarak ele alıp, söz konusu dönemde ortaya çıkan ana akım medya içeriğini ve ana akım medyanın ekonomi politiğini, 2013 sonlarında başarısızlıkla sonuçlanan Anayasa Yapım süreciyle ilişkilendirerek tartışmaktadır. Makalenin amacı bir yandan Anayasa Yapım süreçleri gibi üst düzey politize dönemlerde medyanın oynadığı role dair mevcut bilgi birikimine katkıda bulunmak bir yandan da söz konusu medya performansını doğuran faktörleri tartışmaktır.

2011-2013 Constitution-making Process and Media Field in Turkey

This paper examines so-called “Constitutional Process” which took place between 2011 and 2013 in Turkey to eventually fail after more than two years of intense work and rise of expectations both in Turkish society and international community from the perspective of media and communications. How Turkish media influenced the constitution making process including workings of Constitutional Conciliation Commission is discussed, surveying relevant media content or performance with a particular focus on the political economy of Turkish media during that period. Traditional media outlets such as newspapers and television channels, and nowadays largely digital platforms, function as present-day agoras where political agenda is determined and contested. These online and offline channels have different levels of influence on discussions of the political elite, as presented extensively in media and communication studies. Together with the global media environment, national media foster the emergence of its own elites, while maintaining multi-layered relationships with high-level political decision-making processes. Media channels therefore bear symbolic powers that impact political policymaking by employing methods such as agenda setting and framing. In this line of thought, this article approaches Turkish media space as a specific field while its content and its political economy are examined in relation with the constitution making process to reveal the role played by media during highly politicized processes, such as constitution making, as well as eliciting the dynamics that herald such media performance.

___

  • Adaklı, Gülseren (2006). Türkiye’de Medya Endüstrisi: Neoliberalizm Çaında Mülkiyet ve Kontrol lişkileri. Ankara: Ütopya Yayınları.
  • Bennett, Tony (1982). “Media, ‘Reality’, Signification.” In Culture, Society and the Media. Gurevitch, M., Bennett, T., Curran, J., & Woollacott, J. (eds.). London: Methuen. 287308.
  • Benson, Rodney (1999). “Field Theory in Comparative Context: A New Paradigm for Media Studies.” Theory and Society 28(3): 463498.
  • Benson, Rodney (2006). “News Media as a “Journalistic field”: What Bourdieu Adds to New Institutionalism, and Vice versa.” Political Communication 23(2): 187202.
  • Benson, Rodney and Erik Neveu (2005). Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press. Bourdieu, Pierre (2005). ”The Political Field, the Social Science Field, and the Journalistic Field.” In Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field. Benson, R, Neveu, E (eds). Cambridge: Polity Press. 2947.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1998). On Television. Trans. New York: New Press. Bourdieu, Pierre and Loïc J. D. Wacquant (1992). An invitation ot reflexiv sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Çarkolu, Ali, et al. (2014). “Pressparty Parallel ism and Polarization of News Media During an Election Campaign: The Case of the 2011 Turkish Elections.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 19(3): 295317.
  • Champagne, Patrick (2005). “The ‘double dependency’: The Journalistic Field Between Politics and Markets.” In Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field. Benson, R, Neveu, E (eds). Cambridge: Polity Press. 4863.
  • Christians, Clifford G., et al. (2009). Normative Theories of the Media: Journalism in Democratic Societies. University of Illinois Press.
  • Couldry, Nick (2003). “Media Metacapital: Extendin g the Range of Bourdieu’s Field Theory.” Theory and Society 32(56): 653677.
  • Curran, James (2002). Media and Power. Psychology Press.
  • Depeli, Gülsüm. (2013). “Anayasa Yazım Sürecine LGBT Müdahilliinin Merkez Medyadaki Görünümü.” İLETİŞİM, 18(18): 3760.
  • Finkel, Andrews (2015). Captured News Media: The Case of Turkey. The Center for International Media Assistance Report.
  • Geertz, Clifford (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
  • Gunther, Richard and Anthony Mughan (2000). Democracy and the Media: A Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
  • Hackett, Robert. A. (2006). “Is Peace Kournalism Possible? Three Frameworks for Assessing Structure and Agency in News Media.” Conflict and Communication Online 5(2): 113.
  • Hackett, Robert and William Carroll (2006). Remaking Media: The struggle to Public Communication. Routledge.
  • Haynes, Jeffrey (2009). “The AKP Government in Turkey: Politics, Democracy and the Media.” In Media, Religion and Conflict. L. Marsden, H. Savigny (eds.). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate. 95115.
  • Johnson, Randal (1993). “Editor’s Introduction: Pierre Bourdieu on Art, Literature and Culture.” In The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature Pierre Bourdieu (eds.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. 125.
  • Kaya, Raşit and Barış Çakmur (2010). “Politics and the Mass Media in Turkey.” Turkish Studies 11(4): 521537.
  • Keeble, Richard, et al. (2010). Peace Journalism, War and Conflict Resolution. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Keyman, E. Fuat (2010). “Turkey, Transformation and the Left Media.” Turkish Studies 11(4): 539553.
  • Garlicki, Lech and Zofia A. Garlicka (2010). “Constitution Making, Peace Building, and National Reconciliation: The Experience of Poland.” In Framing the State in Times of Transition: Case Studies in Constitution Making Laura
  • Miller (eds.). Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace. 391416. McNair, Brain (2009). “Journalism and Democracy.” In The Handbook of Journalism Studies. WahlJorgensen, Karin & Hanitzsch, Thomas (Eds.). London: Routledge. 237249.
  • Rhoufari, Mathieu M. (2000). “Talking About the Tabloids: Journalists’ Views.” In Tabloid Tales C. Sparks and J. Tulloch (eds.). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. 163–176.
  • Schudson, Michael (1989). “The Sociology of News Production.” Media, Culture and Society 11(3): 263282.
  • Smith, Edwin (2003). “Ethos, Habitus and Situation for Learning: An Ecology.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 24(4): 463470.
  • Sözeri, Ceren (2013a). Yeni Anayasa Sürecini zleme Raporu Haziran 2012– O cak 2013. Yeni Anayasa Yapım Sürecinde Basın. (Making of a New Constitution in Turkey Monitoring Report June 2012January 2013. Me dia in New Constitution Making Process). TESEV http://tesev.org.tr/wpcontent/uploads/2015/11/Yeni_Anayasa_Yapim_Surecind e_Basin.pdf. Retrieved on: 19.01.2019.
  • Sözeri, Ceren (2013b). Yeni Anayasa Yapım Sürecinde Basın: OcakTemmuz 2013 (Media in New Constitution Making Process: January July 2013). TESEV http://tesev.org.tr/wpcontent/uploads/2015/11/Yeni_Anayasa_Yapim_Surecinde_Basin_Ocak_Tem muz_2013.pdf. Retrieved on: 19.01.2019.
  • Tansel Ilic, Deniz (2015). “Pierre Bourdieu ve Televizyon Alanı.” Selçuk Üniversitesi letişim Fakültesi Akademik Dergisi 8(4): 321340.
  • Ünlüönen, Sezen (2014). Yeni Anayasa Yapım Sürecinde Basın: Austos 2013 Şubat 2014 (Media in New Constitution Making Proces s: August 2013 February 2014). TESEV http://tesev.org.tr/wp content/uploads/2015/11/Yeni_Anayasa_Yapim_Surecinde_ Basin_Agustos_2013 _Subat_2014.pdf. Retrieved on: 19.01.2019.
  • Wacquant, Loïc J. D. (1992). “Toward a Social Praxeology: The Structure and Logic of Bourdieu’s Sociology.” In An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Pierre Bourdieu and Loïc J. D. Wacquant, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1–60.
  • Yavçan, Basak and Hakan Övünç Ongur (2016). “Determinants of Media Criticism in a Democracy in Transition: Applying Field Theory to Turkey.” International Journal of Communication 10: 2422–2441.
  • Yeşil, Bilge (2016). Media in New Turkey: The Origins of an Authoritarian Neoliberal State. University of Illinois Press.
  • Yüce, Erman (2007). Simgesel Seçkinler ve Habitus: Hürriyet Gazetesi’nde Köşe Yazarlığı . Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.