Aliye OKGÜN ALCAN, Özlem SOYER, Meryem YAVUZ VAN GİERSBERGEN, Müjgan SOLAK, Hatice Eda YOLTAY

Hemşirelerin Robotik Cerrahi Konusundaki Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi

Amaç: Cerrahide robot kullanımı dünya genelinde giderek artmaktadır. Robotik cerrahinin avantajları, dezavantajları, klinik sonuçları ve ekonomik boyutu tartışma ve araştırma konusu olmaya devam etmektedir. Literatürde hemşirelerin robotik cerrahi hakkında görüşlerini inceleyen çalışmalara rastlanmamıştır. Bu nedenle bu çalışma, hemşirelerin robotik cerrahi konusundaki düşüncelerini belirlemek amacıyla yapıldı.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Robotik Cerrahi, Hemşirelik, Robotik Cerrahi Hemşireliği

Determination Of Nurses Aspects Regarding Robotic Surgery

Objective: The usage of robots in surgery is increasing worldwide. Advantages, disadvantages, clinical consequences and economic dimension of the robotic surgeon continue being contention and research subject. There were no studies that examined nurses' views on robotic surgery in the literature. For this reason, this study was performed to determine the nurses' aspects regarding robotic surgery.Methods: Data from this descriptive study were collected on the internet through data collection form created by researchers between September-November 2015. The research sample consisted of 286 nurses who voluntarily agreed to participate in the research and were actively using the internet. Mean, standard deviation, number and percentage were used in the analyzes of the data.Results: Of the nurses 92.7% included in the study are women and the average age is 34.6±8.1 years. 90.6% of the nurses stated that they had heard the term robotic surgery before and 34.6% of the nurses stated that they had enough knowledge about robotic surgery. 68.9% of the nurses stated that they could prefer robotic surgery if they needed surgery in the future. It was determined that 73.4% of the nurses were hesitant about how to feel themselves during robotic surgery and 57.7% of the nurses were uncertain about choosing robotic tele-surgery.Conclusion: Although most of the nurses have a high awareness of robotic surgery, they have limited knowledge and they would prefer this method in case of necessity for having robotic surgery. It is recommended to update the knowledge of nurses about robotic surgery, which is one of the incredible developments in health technology, and to carry out larger studies to determine the opinions of nurses in this subject.

Keywords:

Robotic surgery, nursing, robotic surgery nursing,

PDF

___

Avcı C, Avtan L, Özmen MM. Robotik Cerrahi, Cerrahide Robotlar, Tele-Robotik Cerrahi. Bilim ve Teknik Dergisi. Robotik Dergisi (ES). 2007; 12-14.
Karamanoğlu Y.A. Gök Özer F, Zencir G. Robotik Cerrahi. 6. Türk Cerrahi ve Ameliyathane Hemşireliği Kongresi Kongre Kitabı (1.baskı). 210-212, 2009.
Çelik S. Robot Yardımlı Laparoskopik Cerrahide Hemşirenin Rolü. Yeni Tıp Dergisi. 2011; 28(2): 83-86.
Çelik S. “Cerrahi Bakımda Bilgi Güncelleme”. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2011; 2(2): 61-65.
Hussain A, Malik A, Halim MU. and etc. The use of robotics in surgery: a review. Int J Clin Pract. 2014;68:1376-1382. Doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12492.
Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP and etc. Robotic Surgery a Current Perspective. Annals of Surgery. 2004; 239(1):14-21. Doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000103020.19595.7d.
Walters L, Eley S. Robotic Assisted Surgery And The Need For Standardized Pathway Sand Clinical Guidelines. AORN Journal. 2011;93(4):455-463. Doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2010.05.032.
Ucuzal M, Kanan N. Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy and Nursing Care. İ.Ü.F.N. Hemş. Dergisi. 2008;16(61): 57-64.
Yavuz Karamanoğlu A, Demir Korkmaz F. Robotik Kalp Cerrahisi Uygulamalarında Hemşirenin Sorumlulukları. Türkiye Klinikleri J. Nurs. Sci. 2013;5(2):105-114.
Francis P. New Technology and patient safety go hand in hand. OR Nurse 2008; 2(1):41-46.
Palep JH. Robotic Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery. Journal of Minimal Access Surgery. 2009; 5(1): 1-7. Doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.51313
Intuitive Surgical: Annual Report 2016. Sunnyvale, CA: Intuitive Surgical, Inc.; 10 Kasım 2017’de http://investor.intuitivesurgical.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=122359&p=irol-IRHome adresinden indirildi.
Jennifer M, Brusco BS. Trends in Robotic Surgery. AORN Connections. 2012; 95(4): C7- C9. Doi: 10.1016/S0001-2092(12)00253-0.
Kural KA, Atuğ F. “Ürolojide Robotik Cerrahi Uygulamaları”. Türk Üroloji Dergisi. 2010; 36(3): 248-257.
Abboudi H, Khan SM, Aboumarzouk O. and etc. “Current Status Of Validation For Robotic Surgery Simulators – A Systematic Review 2012. BJU International. 2012;111, 194–205. Doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11270.x.
Akgül A, Yıldız CE. Robotik Kalp Cerrahisinde Eğitim Prosedürü. Türkiye Klinikleri Cardiovasc. Surg. Special Topics. 2011;3(3):7-17.
BenMessaoud C, Kharrazi H, MacDorman KF. Facilitators and Barriers to Adopting Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Contextualizing the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. PLoS One. 2011; 6(1): e16395. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016395
Markar SR, Kolic I, Karthikesalingam AP. and etc. International Survey Study of Attitudes Towards Robotic Surgery. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 2012; 6(3): 231-235. Doi: 10.1007/s11701-011-0301-8.
Kang MJ, De Gagne JC, Kang HS. Perioperative nurses’work experience with robotic surgery a focus group study. Comput Inform Nurs. 2016;34(4):152-158. Doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000224.
Barbosa JABA, Barayan G, Gridley CM. and etc. Parent and patient perceptions of robotic vs open urological surgery scars in children. The Journal of Urology. 2013;190: 244-250. Doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.060.