Romatoid artrit ve Ankilozan Spondilit Tedavisinde Biyolojik Ajanların Değişimlerinin Analizi

GİRİŞ ve AMAÇ: Hastalığı modifiye edici biyolojikantiromatizmal ilaçlar (bDMARDs), romatoid artrit (RA) veankilozan spondilit (AS) tedavisinde kullanılmaktadırlar. Buçalışmada, bDMARDs değişim paternlerinin, ilaç tedavisindekalım sürelerinin ve RA ile AS hastalarında ilaç değişimnedenlerinin gerçek dünya verileri ışığında araştırılmasıamaçlandı. YÖNTEM ve GEREÇLER: Çalışma, retrospektif, tekmerkezli, gözlemsel bir çalışma olarak dizayn edildi.Çalışmaya, en az 1 kez bDMARDs değişimi yapmış 102 hasta(55 RA ve 47 AS) dahil edildi. İlaç tedavisinde kalım sürelerive bDMARDs değişim nedenleri kaydedildi. Her biyolojik ajaniçin ilaç devamlılık sürelerini analiz etmek ve gruplar arasıkarşılaştırma yapmak için Kaplan-Meier analizi ve Log-Ranktesti kullanıldı. BULGULAR: Ellibeş (%53.9) hasta RA iken, 47 (%46.1) hastaAS idi. İlk değişim oranı RA hastalarında %23.7 iken, bu oranAS hastalarında %21.5 idi. İkinci ilaç değişim oranları RAhastalarında %5.5 ve AS hastalarında %4.3 bulundu. En sıkgörülen üç ilaç değişim nedeni sırası ile; ilaç etkinliğininkaybı, yeni gelişen klinik durumlar ve yan etkilerdi. Kaplan Meier analizie göre, ilk biyolojik ilaç tedavisinde kalım süresi,AS’de RA’ya göre daha yüksekti (p=0.039, Log-Rank test). İlkseçilen bDMARD’lar arasında, Etanercept ile ilaç tedavisindekalım süresi AS’de RA hastalarından daha uzundu (p=0.036,Log-Rank test). TARTIŞMA ve SONUÇ: bDMARDs’ların ilk ve ikinci ilaçdeğişim oranları ve değişim nedenleri gruplar arasındabenzerdi. İlk bDMARD tedavisinde kalım süresi, AShastalarında RA hastalarından daha uzundu.

Analysis of Switching Biological Agents in Treatment ofRheumatoid Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis

INTRODUCTION: Biological disease-modifying anti rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) have been used in the treatmentof rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS).The aim of the study was to investigate the switching patternsof bDMARDs, the drug survival rates and the reasons forswitching in patients with RA and AS by means of Real-Worlddata. METHODS: The study was designed as retrospective, single center, and observational. One hundred and two patients (55RA, 47 AS) who switched at least one biologic agent wereincluded in the study. The drug survival time and causes ofswitching bDMARDs were recorded. The Kaplan-Meieranalysis and Log-Rank tests were performed to analyze thesurvival curves of each biological agent and compare theresults between groups. RESULTS: Of 102, 55 patients (53.9%) were RA, 47 patients(46.1%) were AS. First switching ratio of RA was 23.7% whilstit was 21.5% in AS. Second switching rates were 5.5% and4.3% in RA and AS patients, respectively. The most threecauses of switching were loss of efficacy, the occurrence ofnew clinical conditions, and adverse events. In the Kaplan Meier analysis, the higher continuance of using the firstbDMARD was observed in AS than in RA (p=0.039, Log-Ranktest). Among the first bDMARDs, the drug survival rate ofEtanercept was higher in AS patients than in RA. (p=0.036,Log-Rank test). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The first and secondswitching ratios of bDMARDs, and switching causes weresimilar between groups. The drug survival rate was longer inAS than in RA.

___

  • 1. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Barton A, Burmester GR, Emery P, Firestein GS, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:18001.
  • 2.Sieper J, Poddubnyy D. Axial spondyloarthritis. Lancet. 2017;390(10089):73-84.
  • 3.Firestein GS, McInnes IB. Immunopathogenesis of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Immunity. 2017;46(2):183-96.
  • 4.Watad A, Bridgewood C, Russell T, Marzo-Ortega H, Cuthbert R, McGonagle D. The Early Phases of Ankylosing Spondylitis: Emerging Insights From Clinical and Basic Science. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2668.
  • 5.Smolen JS, Landewé R, Bijlsma J, Burmester G, Chatzidionysiou K, Dougados M, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(6):960-77.
  • 6.van der Heijde D, Ramiro S, Landewé R, Baraliakos X, Van den Bosch F, Sepriano A, et al. 2016 update of the ASAS-EULAR management recommendations for axial spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(6):978-91.
  • 7.Buer JK. A history of the term "DMARD". Inflammopharmacology. 2015;23(4):163-71.
  • 8.Burmester GR, Bijlsma JWJ, Cutolo M, McInnes IB. Managing rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases - past, present and future. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017;13(7):443-448.
  • 9.T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı, Türkiye ilaç ve Tıbbi ilaç kurumu, Küb/Kt listesi: Available From: https://www.titck.gov.tr/kubkt.
  • 10.Lee MY, Shin JY, Park SY, Kim D, Cha HS, Lee EK. Persistence of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: An analysis of the South Korean National Health Insurance Database. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018;47(4):485-91.
  • 11.Favalli EG, Raimondo MG, Becciolini A, Crotti C, Biggioggero M, Caporali R. The management of firstline biologic therapy failures in rheumatoid arthritis: Current practice and future perspectives. Autoimmun Rev. 2017;16(12):1185-95.
  • 12.Wilke T, Mueller S, Lee SC, Majer I, Heisen M. Drug survival of second biological DMARD therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective noninterventional cohort analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):332.
  • 13.Carmona L, Gómez-Reino JJ; BIOBADASER Group. Survival of TNF antagonists in spondylarthritis is better than in rheumatoid arthritis. Data from the Spanish registry BIOBADASER. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8(3):R72.
  • 14.Meissner B, Trivedi D, You M, Rosenblatt L. Switching of biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a real world setting. J Med Econ. 2014;17(4):259-65.
  • 15.Chastek B, Chen CI, Proudfoot C, Shinde S, Kuznik A, Wei W. Treatment Persistence and Healthcare Costs Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Changing Biologics in the USA. Adv Ther. 2017;34(11):2422-35.
  • 16.Monti S, Klersy C, Gorla R, Sarzi-Puttini P, Atzeni F, Pellerito R, et al. Factors influencing the choice of first- and second-line biologic therapy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: real-life data from the Italian LORHEN Registry. Clin Rheumatol. 2017;36(4):753-61.
  • 17.Fleischmann R, van Adelsberg J, Lin Y, CastelarPinheiro GD, Brzezicki J, Hrycaj P, et al. Sarilumab and Nonbiologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(2):277- 90.
  • 18.Deodhar A, Yu D. Switching tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017;47(3):343-50.
  • 19.Strand V, Miller P, Williams SA, Saunders K, Grant S, Kremer J. Discontinuation of Biologic Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Analysis from the Corrona RA Registry. Rheumatol Ther. 2017;4(2):489-502.
  • 20.Jarow JP, LaVange L, Woodcock J. Multidimensional Evidence Generation and FDA Regulatory Decision Making: Defining and Using "RealWorld" Data. JAMA. 2017;318(8):703-704.
  • 21.van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 1984;27(4):361-8.
  • 22.Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988;31(3):315-24.
  • 23.Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO 3rd, et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010; 69(9): 1580-8.
  • 24.Navarro-Compán V, Plasencia-Rodríguez C, de Miguel E, Diaz Del Campo P, Balsa A, Gratacós J. Switching biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from a systematic literature review. RMD Open. 2017;3(2):e000524.
  • 25.Rashid N, Lin AT, Aranda G Jr, Lin KJ, Guerrero VN, Nadkarni A, Patel C. Rates, factors, reasons, and economic impact associated with switching in rheumatoid arthritis patients newly initiated on biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in an integrated healthcare system. J Med Econ. 2016 Jun;19(6):568-75. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2016.1142448. Epub 2016 Feb 8. PubMed PMID: 26766553.
  • 26.Glintborg B, Østergaard M, Krogh NS, Tarp U, Manilo N, Loft AG, et al. Clinical response, drug survival and predictors there of in 432 ankylosing spondylitis patients after switching tumour necrosis factor α inhibitor therapy: results from the Danish nationwide DANBIO registry. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013; 72(7):1149-55.
  • 27.Cantini F, Niccoli L, Nannini C, Cassarà E, Kaloudi O, Giulio Favalli E, et al. Second-line biologic therapy optimization in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017;47(2):183-92.
  • 28.Park DJ, Choi SJ, Shin K, Kim HA, Park YB, Kang SW, et al. Switching profiles in a population-based cohort of rheumatoid arthritis receiving biologic therapy: results from the KOBIO registry. Clin Rheumatol. 2017;36(5):1013-22.
  • 29.Gulyas K, Bodnar N, Nagy Z, Szamosi S, Horvath A, Vancsa A, et al. Real-life experience with switching TNF-α inhibitors in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur J Health Econ. 2014;15:93-100.
  • 30.Lie E, van der Heijde D, Uhlig T, Mikkelsen K, Rødevand E, Koldingsnes W, et al. Effectiveness of switching between TNF inhibitors in ankylosing spondylitis: data from the NOR-DMARD register. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(1):157-63.
  • 31.Smolen JS, Burmester GR, Combe B, Curtis JR, Hall S, Haraoui B, et al. Head-to-head comparison of certolizumab pegol versus adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis: 2-year efficacy and safety results from the randomised EXXELERATE study. Lancet. 2016; 388(10061):2763-74.
  • 32.Codullo V, Iannone F, Sinigaglia L, Favalli EG, Sarzi-Puttini P, Atzeni F, et al. Comparison of efficacy of first- versus second-line adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: experience of the Italian biologics registries. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017;35(4):660-5.
  • 33.Gottenberg JE, Brocq O, Perdriger A, Lassoued S, Berthelot JM, Wendling D, et al. Non-TNF-Targeted Biologic vs a Second Anti-TNF Drug to Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients With Insufficient Response to a First Anti-TNF Drug: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016;316(11):1172-80.
  • 34.Heinonen AV, Aaltonen KJ, Joensuu JT, Lähteenmäki JP, Pertovaara MI, Romu MK, et al. Effectiveness and Drug Survival of TNF Inhibitors in the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Rheumatol. 2015;42(12):2339-46.
  • 35. Cantini F, Niccoli L, Nannini C, Cassarà E, Kaloudi O, Giulio Favalli E, et al. Tailored first-line biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, and psoriatic arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016;45(5):519-32.
  • 36.Rudwaleit M, Van den Bosch F, Kron M, Kary S, Kupper H. Effectiveness and safety of adalimumab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis or psoriatic arthritis and history of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(3):R117.
Kocaeli Tıp Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-0758
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: -