Çoklu zeka kuramına dayalı öğretim tasarımı modellerinin analizi

Çoklu Zeka Kuramı (ÇZK), son yıllarda ülkemizde dahil olmak üzere dünyanın bir çok yerindeki eğitim bilimci, öğretmen ve okul yöneticisi arasında popüler bir terim haline gelmiştir. Kuramla ilgili sayısız kitap, makale ve internet sayfasına, ve bu kaynaklardan çoklu zeka öğretim aktivitelerine ulaşmak mümkündür. Buna karşın, ÇZK tabanlı bir öğretimin sistematik olarak nasıl geliştirileceği hakkında bir çok öğretmen ve öğretmen adayı yeterli bir bilgiye ve deneyime sahip değildir. Bu çalışmada, öğretmen ve öğretmen adaylarına yardımcı olmak amacıyla literatürde bulunan üç farklı ÇZK tabanlı öğretim tasarımı modeli analiz edilip, bu modeller arasındaki farklılıklar ortaya konmuştur.

Analysis of models of teaching design based on multiple intelligences theory

Multiple intelligences (MI) theory has become a popular term among educational researchers, teachers and school administrators around the world, including our country. A number of books, articles and Internet pages related to the theory, and MI teaching activities from those sources can be easily obtained. However, many teachers do not have enough knowledge and experience about how the MI teaching sequence can be developed. In this study, three models of teaching design based on the MI theory in the literature are analyzed, and differences among these models are presented in order to help in-service and pre-service teachers.

PDF

___

1. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
2. Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
3. Ebenezer, J. V., and Haggerty, M. S. (1999). Becoming a secondary school science teacher. Merill Press, New Jersey.
4. Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
5. Silver, H., Strong, R. and Perini, M. (1997). Integrating learning styles and multiple intelligences. Educational Leadership, 55(1), 22-27.
6. Eisner, E. W. (2004). Multiple Intelligences: Its Tensions and Possibilities. Teachers College Record, 106 (1), 31-39.
7. Flick, L. and Lederman, N. (2003). Editorial: Popular Theories - Unpopular Research. School Science and Mathematics, 103(3), 117-120.
8. Armstrong, T. (1994). Multiple intelligences in the classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Alexandria, Virginia USA.
9. Armstrong, T. (2000). Multiple intelligences in the classroom. (2nd edition) Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Alexandria, Virginia USA.
10. Campbell, L., Campbell, B. and Dickinson, D. (1996). Teaching and learning through multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
11. Lazear, D. (1992). Teaching for Multiple Intelligences. Fastback 342 Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappan Educational Foundation. (ED 356 227).
12. Kaya, O. N. and Ebenezer, J. (2006, April). Invisible Obstacles on the Implementation of Multiple Intelligences Theory in K-8 Classrooms in Turkey. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
13. Kaya, O. N. and Ebenezer, J. (2003, April). The effects of implementation of the multiple intelligences theory on grade-7 students’ attitudes and perceptions toward science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
14. Kaya, O. N., Dogan, A., Gökçek, N. et al. (2007, April) Comparing Multiple Intelligences Approach With Traditional Teaching on Eight Grade Students’ Achievement in and Attitudes toward Science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
15. Gardner, H. (1995). Reflections on multiple intelligences. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 200- 208.
16. Haley, M. H. (2004). Learner-Centered Instruction and the Theory of Multiple Intelligences With Second Language Learners. Teachers College Record, 106 (1), 163-180.
17. Shearer, C. B. (2006, April). Triarchic Theory and Multiple Intelligences Integrated: A Theoretical, Practical, and Empirical Investigation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
18. Shearer, C. B. (2007, April). Investigating the Relationships Among the Multiple Intelligences and Reading and Math Test Scores. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
19. Shearer, C. B. (1994a). Çoklu Zeka Değerlendirme Anketi (Öğrenci Formu). (Çev: O. N. Kaya). Ankara: Gazi Eğitim Kültür Vakfı Özel İlköğretim Okulu Yayınları.
20. Shearer, C. B. (1994b). Çoklu Zeka Değerlendirme Anketi (Öğretmen ve Veli Formu). (Çev: O. N. Kaya). Ankara: Gazi Eğitim Kültür Vakfı Özel İlköğretim Okulu Yayınları.
21. Ausubel, D.P. (1968). Educational Psychology. A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
22. Driver, R., Guesne, E., and Tiberghien, A. (Eds.) (1985). Children’s ideas in science. London, UK: Open University Press.
23. Driver, R. (1989). Students’ conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5) 481-490.
24. Novak, J. D. and Gowin, D.B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge University Press, New York.
25. Osborne, R. J. and Wittrock, M. C. (1983). Learning science: A generative process. Science Education, 67(4), 489-508.
26. Yager, R. E. (1991). The constructivist learning model. The Science Teacher, 58 (6), 52-57.
27. Gardner, H. (2006, April). The Theory of Multiple Intelligences in Turkish Educational System. Multiple Intelligences in Global Perspectives: Howard Gardner (Harvard University) and Panel. SIG Multiple Intelligences: Theory and Practice. Panelist at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
28. Klein, P. D. (1997). Multiplying the problems of intelligence by eight: A critique of Gardner’s theory. Canadian Journal of Education, 22(4), 377-394.
29. Kaya, O. N. (2006, April). The Theory of Multiple Intelligences in Turkish Educational System. Multiple Intelligences in Global Perspectives: Howard Gardner (Harvard University) and Panel. SIG Multiple Intelligences: Theory and Practice. Invited panelist from Turkey at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
30. Gardner, H. (1997). Multiple intelligences as a partner in school improvement. Educational Leadership, 55, 20-21.
31. Emig, V. B. (1997). A Multiple Intelligences Inventory. Educational Leadership, 55(1), 47-50.