Okul Yılları ve Okul Dışındaki Sosyal İlişkilerin Kadın Liderlerin Liderlik Gelişimindeki Rolü

Okul yılları, insanların bütün eğitim hayatları süresince eğitim kurumlarında geçirdikleri dönem, sosyal ilişkiler ise birbirinden haberdar olan en az iki insan arasında belirli bir süre devam eden, anlamlı ve belirli amaçlar etrafında kurulan sosyal bir bağdır. Bu süreçlerin insan kişiliği ve liderlik gelişiminde erken yaşlardan itibaren önemli bir yer tutması nedeniyle mevcut çalışmanın temel amacı, bu örneklem grubunda yer alan kadın liderlerin okul yılları ve okul dışındaki sosyal ilişkilerinin (âile, çevre vb.) onların liderlik gelişimleri üzerindeki rolünü ortaya çıkarmaktır. Nitel olarak yürütülen bu çalışmada İstanbul ilinde bulunan bazı devlet üniversiteleri ve Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı'na bağlı devlet okullarında hâlen yönetim görevi yapan ve yürüttükleri görevlerde kurumlarının akademik olarak gelişiminde önemli katkılar sağlamış olan seçilmiş 20 kadın liderle yüz yüze görüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veriler tümevarımcı analiz yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmada elde edilen sonuçlar, kadın liderlerin okul yılları ve sosyal ilişkilerinin onların liderlik gelişimlerinde önemli bir role sâhip olduğunu göstermektedir

The Role of School Years and Social Relations Outside the School on Woman Leaders' Leadership Development

School years is the period when people spend their times throughout their educational lives in their institutions and social relations are the social ties set and continue for some time between at least two people consciously and meaningfully for a certain purpose. As these processes are important in people's life and their leadership development since very early ages, the main concern of this study is to discover the role of school years and their social relations outside the school (family, social environment) on woman leaders' leadership development. In this qualitative study, interviews were conducted with 20 selected women who are currently working as administrators at some public universities and some public schools of Ministry of National Education (MoNE) in Istanbul province and have obtained great successes academically at their institutions. The data were analyzed with inductive method. Results indicate that school years and social relations have an important role in woman leaders' leadership development process

PDF

___

Alvesson, M. ve Billing, Y. D. (1997). Understanding gender and organizations. London: Sage.
Antonio, A. L. (2001). The role of interracial interaction in the deve- lopment of leadership skills and cultural knowledge and unders- tanding. Research in Higher Education, 42(5), 593-617.
Arıkan, G. ve Yıldırım, Ş. (1993). Amerikan toplumunda kadınların yönetim kadrolarında yer alma koşulları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(2), 45-53.
Aydın, İ. (2009). Türk eğitim yönetiminde öncü kadınlar-1. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Bailey, K. D. (1994). Methods of social research (4. baskı). New York: The Free Press.
Barker, R. (1999). Social work dictionary. Washington, DC: NASW.
Başaran, İ. E. (1992). Yönetimde insan ilişkileri. Ankara: Kadıoğlu Matbaası.
Berscheid, E. (2006). A human being's greatest strength: other people. L. G. Aspinwall ve U. M. Staudinger, (Eds.), A psychology of human strengths içinde (47-56). Helsinki: Edita.
Bogdan, R. C. ve Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for edu- cation: an introduction to theories and methods (4. baskı). New York: Pearson Education.
Bosak, J. ve Sczesny, S. (2011). Exploring the dynamics of ıncongruent beliefs about women and leaders. British Journal of Manage- ment, 22(2), 254-269.
Boydak, M. ve Akpınar, B. (2002). Okul yönetiminde kadın yönetici- lerin başarısı. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(2),
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2008).Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pe- gem A Yayıncılık.
Cavanagh, F. R. ve Romanoski, J. T. (2006). Development of a model of school principal behaviours: Rasch model and structural equ- ation model analyses of teacher observations. (Rapor No.2145), Australian Research Council.
Charbonneau, D. ve Nicol, A. A. M. (2002). Emotional intelligence and leadership in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differen- ces, 33(7), 1101-1113.
Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and, qualitative research. Upper Saddle Creek, NJ: Pearson Education.
Çelikten, M. (2004).Okul müdürü koltuğundaki kadınlar: Kayseri ili örneği. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(2), 91-118.
Çiçek Sağlam, A. ve Bostancı, A. B. (2012). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı merkez ve taşra örgütleri yönetim pozisyonlarinda kadinlarin temsil edilme düzeyine yönelik yönetici görüşleri. Uşak Üniver- sitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 140-155.
Dasgupta, N. ve Asgari, S. (2004). Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleabi- lity of automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(5), 642-658.
Davidson, M. J. ve Burke, R. J. (2004). Women in management worldwide: Facts, figures and analysis-An overview. R. J. Burke ve M. J. Davidson, (Eds.), Women in management worldwide: Facts, figures and analysis içinde (1-15). Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
Day, D. (2000). Leadership development: A review in context. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 581-613. doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00061-8.
Day, D. (2011). Integrative perspectives on longitudinal investigations of leader development: From childhood through adulthood. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(3), 561-571. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.04.012.
Denzin, N. K. ve Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The sage handbook of quali- tative research (3. baskı). Sage, Thousand Oak.
Dhuey, E. ve Lipscomb, S. (2008). What makes a leader? Relative age and high school leadership. Economics of Education Review, 27(2), 173-183.
Dominici, F., Fried, L. P. ve Zeger, S. L. (2009). So few women leaders ıt's no longer a pipeline problem, so what are the root causes? Academe Online. http://csuw3.csuohio.edu/engineering/IDEAL/New%20Folder/S o_few_women_leaders.pdf.
Eagly, A. H. ve Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233-256.
Ekonen, M. (2007). Manifold careers: Narrative research on female leaders' career development. Lic. thesis, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Ergin, A. ve Çınkır, Ş. (2005). Eğitim yönetiminde kadınlar. Eğitim araştırmaları. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. Anı Yayıncılık, 18, 84-96.
Fine, M. (2010). Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. New York and London: Routhlegde, Taylor & Francis Group.
Gidengil, E. ve Everitt, J. (2003). Talking though: Gender and reported speech in campaign news coverage. Political Communication, 20, 209-232. doi:10.1080/10584600390218869.
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the metho- dology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, Ca: Sociology Press.
Gümüşeli, A. İ. (1996). İlköğretim okulu müdürlerinin öğretim liderliği davranışlarına ilişkin araştırma (İstanbul ili örneği). Yayım- lanmamış doktora tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi.
Graen, G. B. ve Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level mul- ti-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
Gündüz, H. B. ve Doğan, A. (2009, Mayıs). Okul yöneticilerinin li- derlik stilleri ve yaraticilik düzeyleri. 1. Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Kongresi, Çanakkale.
Hacıfazlıoğlu, Ö. (2010). Yükseköğretimde lider olarak göreve uyum sağlama süreci: Türkiye ve Amerika'dan kadın liderlerin dene- yimleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 10(4), 2221-2273.
Hoobler, J. M., Wayne, S. J. ve Lemmon, G. (2009). Bosses' percep- tions of family-work conflict and women's promotability: Glass ceiling effects. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 939-957.
Hoppe, B. ve Reinelt, C. (2010). Social network analysis and the eva- luation of leadership networks. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(4), 600-619.
Huy, Q. N. (2001). In praise of middle managers. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 72-79.
Hyvärinen, S. ve Uusiautti, S. (2014). Safe and encouraging home providing the countdown to leadership? Finnish female leaders' childhood memories. Early Child Development and Care. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2013.876626.
Juuti, P. (2010). Special features of Finnish leadership. P. Juuti, (Ed.), Leadership as resource: From change to success içinde (13-28). Helsinki: JTO.
Kerkhof, van de M. (2006). The repertory grid technique, (RGT), in- tegrated assessment. http://www.ivm.vu.nl/en/Images/PT4_tcm53-161509.pdf.
Kim, Y. ve Baylor, L. A. (2006). A social-cognitive framework for pedagogical agents as learning companions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(6), 569-596.
Kuusela, S. (2010). Power and interaction in leadership. Yayımlan- mamış doktora tezi, University of Tampere.
Lindberg, M. (2009). Study times and transition to worklife: perspec- tive to policy discourse and research offered by comparative re- search. Tiedepolitiikka, 34, 27-33.
Lombardo, M. M. ve McCall, M. W. Jr. (1978). Leadership. M. W. McCall Jr. ve M. M. Lombardo, (Eds.), Leadership: where else can we go? içinde (1-12). Durham, NC: Duke University.
Lord, R. G. ve Hall, R. J. (2005). Identity, deep structure and the de- velopment of leadership skill. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(4),
Marlene, G. F. (2009). Women Leaders' Discursive Constructions of Leadership. Women's Studies in Communication, 32(2), 180-202. doi: 10.1080/07491409.2009.10162386.
Marshall, C. ve Rosman, B. G. (2006). Designing qualitative research (4. baskı). Thousand Oak: Sage.
Martelius-Louniala, T. (2003). Emotions and female leaders. A.-M. Lämsä, (Ed.), Perspectives on female leadership içinde (47-71). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
Matthews, M. S. (2004). Leadership education for gifted and talented youth: A review of the literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 77-113. doi: 10.1177/016235320402800105.
Mayhew, M. J., Wolniak, G. C. ve Pascarella, E. T. (2008). How edu- cational practices affect the development of life-long learning orientations in traditionally-aged undergraduate students. Rese- arch in Higher Education, 49(4), 337-356.
Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), 1-10. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1 089/2385.
McCall, M. W. Jr., Lombardo, M. M. ve Morrison, A. M. (1988). The lessons of experience: how successful executives develop on the job. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
MEB. (2015). Millî Eğitim İstatistikleri Örgün Eğitim 2015-2016. http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/www/icerik_goruntule.php?KNO=232.
Miles, M. B. ve Huberman, M. A. (1994). An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis. London: Sage.
Mitra, D. (2006). Increasing student voice and moving toward youth leadership. The Prevention Researcher, 13, 7-10.
Mozhgan, A., Parivash, J., Nadergholi, G. ve Jowkar, B. (2011). Stu- dent leadership competencies development. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1616-1620. Doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.340.
Murphy, S. E. ve Johnson, S. K. (2011). The benefits of a long-lens approach to leader development: Understanding the seeds of le- adership, The Leadership Quarterly, 22(3), 459-470. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.04.004.
Myers, M. M., Slavin, M. C. ve Southern, W. T. (1990). Emergence and maintenance of leadership among gifted students in group prob- lem solving. Roeper Review, 12(4), 256-261. doi:10.1080/02783199009553287.
Nidiffer, J. (2001). Crumbs from the boy's table. The first century of coeducation. J. Nidiffer ve C. T. Bashaw, (Eds.), Women admi- nistrators in higher education içinde (13-34). New York: State University of New York Press.
Northouse, P. G. (2013). Leadership: Theory and practice (6. baskı). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Onay, M. (2014). Kadın ve erkek yöneticilerin liderlik davranışları arasındaki farklılıklar. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Der- gisi, 6(2), 73-85.
Özdemir, S. (21 Haziran 2013). Lider öğretmenleri nasıl yetiştirmeli- yiz? Kamudan Haber. http://www.kamudanhaber.com/lider-ogretmenleri-nasil-yetistir meliyiz-makale,1938.html adresinden edinilmiştir.
Peele, G. (2005). Leadership and politics: A case for a closer relati- onship? Leadership, 1(2), 187-204. doi: 10.1177/1742715005051858.
Porat, K. L. (1991). Women in administration: The difference is posi- tive. Clearing House, 64(6), 412-415.
Quinn, R. E. (1988). Beyond rational management: mastering para- doxes and competing demands of high effectiveness. San Fran- cisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ropers-Huilman, B., Carwile, L. ve Barnett, K. (2005). Student acti- vists' characterizations of administrators in higher education: Perceptions of power in the system. The Review of Higher Edu- cation, 28(3), 295-312.
Ross, S. (2015). The road to self-leadership development: Busting out of your comfort zone. USA: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Rouleau, L. ve Balogun, J. (2011). Middle managers, strategic sense- making, and discursive competence. Journal of Management Studies, 48(5), 953-983.
Saloniemi, A., Salonen, J., Lipiäinen, L., Nummi, T. ve Virtanen, P. (2014). Haning many irons in the fire: Finnish female leaders' school memories. Journal of Education and Learning, 3(2), 1-13.
Schneider, B., Paul, M. C., White, S. S. ve Holcombe, K. M. (1999). Understanding high school student leaders, I: Predicting teacher ratings of leader behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(4), 609-636.
Snyder, C. R. ve Lopez, S. J. (2002). The future of positive psychology. A declaration of independence. C. R. Snyder ve S. J. Lopez, (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology içinde (751-767). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Solheim, B. O. (2000). On top of the world: women's political lea- dership in Scandinavia and beyond. Westport, CN: Greenwood.
Syväjärvi, A. ve Vakkala, H. (2012). Psychological leadership orien- tation-the meaning of positivity in people management. J. Pert- tula ve A. Syväjärvi, (Eds.), Psychology of leadership-People management in changing working life içinde (195-226). Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Tan, M. (2002). Eğitim yönetiminde kadınlara yer var mı? C. Elma ve Ş. Çınkır (Eds.), 21. Yüzyıl Eğitim Yöneticilerinin Yetiştirilmesi Sempozyumu içinde (37-49). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi.
Thompson, A. (2003). Special series on girls and women in education caring in context: four feminist theories on gender and education. Curriculum Inquiry, 33(1), 9-65.
Turan, S. ve Ebiçlioğlu, N. (2002). A study of gender differences and leadership characteristic of elementary school principals. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 31, 444-445.
Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quar- terly, 17(6), 654-676.
Usluer, L. (2000). Kadın öğretmenlerin yönetici konumlara yükseltil- meme nedenleri konusundaki öğretmen ve yönetici görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Ankara Üni- versitesi.
Uusiautti, S. ve Määttä, K. (2013a). How to promote the healthy de- velopment of human resources in children and youngsters? Eu- ropean Journal of Academic Research, 1(5), 212-221.
Uusiautti, S. ve Määttä, K. (2013b). Significant trends in the deve- lopment of Finnish teacher training education programs (1860-2010). Education Policy Analysis Archives, 21(59), 1-22.
Uusiautti, S., Syväjärvi, A., Stenvall, J., Perttula, J. ve Määttä, K. (2012). It's more like a growth process than a bunch of answers, University leaders describe themselves as leaders, Proce- dia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 828-837. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.005.
Vanhala, S. (2007). Women as leaders in Finland, Women and lead- ership. http://www.jyu.fi/economics/naisjohtajuus/Naiset%20ja%20joht ajuus% 20oppimateriaali.pdf adresinden edinilmiştir.
Vanhala, S. (2011). Career orientations of women middle managers. L. Husu, F. Hearn, A.-M. Lämsä ve S. Vanhala, (Eds.), Women, management and leadership-Naiset ja johtajuus içinde (30-37). Helsinki: Edita.
Vinnicombe, S. (2000). The position of women in management in Europe. J. B. Ronald ve M. J. Davidson, (Eds.), Women in ma- nagement. Current research issues içinde (9-25). London: Sage.
Wilson, B. (1995). Metaphors for instruction: Why we talk about lear- ning environments. Educational Technology, 35(5), 25-30.
Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2003). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Zacharatos, A., Barling, J. ve Kelloway, E. K. (2000). Development and effects of transformational leadership in adolescents. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(2), 221-226.
Zeldin, S. ve Petrokubi, J. (2006). Understanding innovation: Yo- uth-adult partnerships in decision making. The Prevention Re- searcher, 13(1), 11-14.