An Investigation of the Differences in the Dark Triad and the Big Five Personality Traits Across Majors

The Dark Triad (DT) personality traits include interrelated personality constructs which are Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy, and research has shown that individuals who are high on the DT personality traits tend to choose occupations that provide outcomes compatible with these traits. Supporting this reasoning, the DT is suggested to have impacts on major choices of university students. Previous research has also shown that the Big Five (BF) personality traits influenced educational choices. The main aim of the current study was to examine whether or not self-selection based on these personality characteristics predicted career choices. Data was collected from 659 (359 female) newly enrolled students in seven academic majors (i.e., psychology, law, economics/business, engineering, political science, medicine, and education) in Turkey. Mean scores of the groups were compared using two (gender) by seven (major) analysis of variance with the DT and BF personality traits as the dependent variables. The results revealed that Machiavellianism scores of economics/business and engineering students were significantly higher than those of psychology students. In addition, psychopathy scores of engineering, economics/business, and political science students were higher than those of psychology students. Neuroticism scores of students from psychology departments were higher than those of engineering, economics/business, and political science students. Law and education students’ neuroticism scores were also higher than those of students from engineering and economics/business departments. Finally, interaction effects of major and gender were significant for openness to experience and conscientiousness. The findings are discussed regarding theoretical and practical implications along with suggestions for future research.

Bölüm Seçimine Göre Karanlık Üçlü ve Büyük Beşli Kişilik Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi

Karanlık Üçlü (KÜ) kişilik özellikleri, birbirleriyle ilişkili kişilik özelliklerinden Makyavelizm, narsisizm ve psikopatiyi kapsamaktadır ve araştırmalar KÜ kişilik özelliklerinde yüksek skor alan bireylerin bu kişilik özelliklerine uygun olan ödüllere/çıktılara ulaşmalarını sağlayacak meslekler seçme eğiliminde olduklarını göstermektedir. Bu bulgular ve önermeyle uyumlu olarak, KÜ kişilik özelliklerinin üniversite öğrencilerinin bölüm tercihlerini etkileyeceği önerilmektedir. Önceki araştırmalar Büyük Beşli (BB) kişilik özelliklerinin de eğitim tercihlerini etkilediğini göstermektedir. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, kariyer seçimlerinde bu kişilik özelliklerine bağlı olarak yapılan öz-seçimlerin etkili olup olmadığını araştırmaktır. Veri, Türkiye’de yedi farklı alanda (psikoloji, hukuk, iktisat/işletme, mühendislik, siyaset bilimi, tıp ve eğitim bilimleri) henüz eğitime başlamış 659 (359 kadın) üniversite öğrencisinden toplanmıştır. Grupların değişkenlerdeki ortalamaları KÜ ve BB kişilik özelliklerinin bağımlı değişken olduğu 2 (cinsiyet)×7 (bölüm) varyans analizi yöntemiyle karşılaştırılmıştır. Sonuçlar, iktisat/işletme ve mühendislik öğrencilerinin Makyavelizm skorlarının psikoloji öğrencilerinin skorlarından daha yüksek olduğunu; ayrıca, mühendislik, iktisat/işletme ve siyaset bilimi öğrencilerinin psikopati skorlarının psikoloji öğrencilerinin skorlarından yüksek olduğunu göstermiştir. Psikoloji öğrencilerinin nevrotizm skorlarının, mühendislik, iktisat/işletme ve siyaset bilimi öğrencilerinin skorlarından daha yüksek olduğu bulunmuştur. Hukuk ve eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin nevrotiklik skorları da mühendislik ve iktisat/işletme öğrencilerinin skorlarından daha yüksektir. Son olarak, sonuçlar deneyime açıklık ve dürüstlük kişilik özellikleri için bölüm ve cinsiyetin etkileşim etkisinin olduğunu göstermiştir. Bulgular, kuramsal ve uygulamaya yönelik çıkarımlar ile gelecekteki araştırmalar için öneriler bağlamında tartışılmıştır.

PDF

___

Barrick, M. R. and Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26. Doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x

Cleckley, H. M. (1964). The mask of sanity (4th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

Costa, P. T. J., McCrae, R. R. and Holland, J. L. (1984). Personality and vocational interests in an adult sample. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 390-400. Doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.69.3.390

Costa, P. T. J. and McCrae, R. R. (1992). The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Costa, P. T. J. and McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64(1), 21-50. Doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6401_2

De Fruyt, F. (1996). Personality and vocational interests: relationship between the Five-Factor model of personality and Holland’s RIASEC typology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Ghent.

De Fruyt, F. and Mervielde, I. (1996). Personality and interests as predictors of educational streaming and achievement. European Journal of Personality, 10(5), 405-425. Doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199612)10:5<405::AID-PER255>3.0.CO;2-M

Furnham, A., Hyde, G. and Trickey, G. (2014). The dark side of career preference: dark side traits, motives and values. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(2), 106-114. Doi:10.1111/jasp.12205

Gottfredson, G. D., Jones, E. M. and Holland, J. L. (1993). Personality and vocational interests: the relation of Holland’s six interest dimensions to five robust dimensions of personality. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40(4), 518-524. Doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.40.4.518

Gunnthorsdottir, A., McCabe, K. and Smith, V. (2002). Using the Machiavellianism instrument to predict trustworthiness in a bargaining game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(1), 49-66. Doi: 10.1016/S0167-4870(01)00067-8

Hare, R. D. (1993). Without conscience: The disturbing world of the psychopaths among us. New York: Pocket Books.

Holland, J. (1973). Making vocational choices: A theory of careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Humburg, M. (2012). The effect of the Big Five personality traits on college major choice: Evidence from a Dutch longitudinal youth cohort study. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Effect-of-the-Big-Five-Personality-Traits-on-C Humburg/01b9250d3e7a11c05def28cd6a63ad7d2cde0e99

İdikut-Özpençe, A. (2017). Economic stability and growth: The case of Turkey. Research in Applied Economics, 9(3), 41-63.

John, O. P., Donahue, E. M. and Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory-Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.

Jonason, P. K., Wee, S., Li, N. P. and Jackson, C. (2014). Occupational niches and the dark triad traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 119-123. Doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.05.024

Jones, D. N. and Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28-41. Doi: 10.1177/1073191113514105

Kowalski, C. M., Vernon, P. A. and Schermer, J. A. (2017). Vocational interests and dark personality: Are there dark career choices? Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 43-47. Doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.029

Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R. and Stewart, G. L. (1998). Five-factor model of personality and performance in jobs involving interpersonal interactions. Human Performance, 11(2/3), 145-165. Doi: 10.1080/08959285.1998.9668029

Özsoy, E., Rauthmann, J. F., Jonason, P. K. and Ardıç, K. (2017). Reliability and validity of the Turkish versions of Dark Triad Dirty Dozen (DTDD-T), Short Dark Triad (SD3- T), and Single Item Narcissism Scale (SINS-T). Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 11-14. Doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.019

Paulhus, D. L. (2001). Normal narcissism: two minimalist accounts. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4), 228-230.

Paulhus, D. L. and Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556-563. Doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6

Southard, A. C. and Zeigler-Hill, V. (2016). The dark triad traits and fame interest: Do dark personalities desire stardom? Current Psychology, 35(2), 255-267. Doi: 10.1007/s12144-016-9416-4

Sümer, N., Lajunen, T. and Özkan, T. (2005). Big five personality traits as the distal predictors of road accident involvement. In G. Underwood, (Ed.), Traffic and transport psychology (pp. 215-227). USA: Elsevier Ltd.

Turkish Statistics Association. (2018). Labor force statistics, October 2017. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?hbid=16

Turkish Statistics Association. (2019). Labor force statistics. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/UstMenu.do?metod=temelist

Vedel, A. (2016). Big five personality group differences across academic majors: A systematic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 92, 1-10. Doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.011

Vedel, A. and Thomsen, D. K. (2017). The dark triad across academic majors. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 86-91. Doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.030

Vize, C. E., Lynam, D. R., Collison, K. L. and Miller, J. D. (2018). Differences among dark triad components: A meta-analytic investigation. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9(2), 101-111.

Wankowski, J. A. (1969, December). Some aspects of success and failure at university. Paper presented at the 4th Annual Conference of the Society for Research into Higher Education, London, UK.