Enzootik Sığır Lökozunun Rutin Teşhisi İçin Kullanılan Dört Laboratuvar Testinin Karşılaştırılması

Bu çalışmanın amacı, agar jel immünodifüzyon testi (AGID) ve iki tip PCR’nin, nested PCR (kandan nükleik asit ekstraksiyonu ile birlikte) ve kanda direkt nested PCR (db nested PCR) - ekstraksiyon olmaksızın, tanısal yeteneklerinin bu hastalığın rutin teşhisinde altın standart olarak kullanılan Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) ile karşılaştırılmasıydı. Çalışmada, 18 ay ile 5 yaş arası sığırlardan toplam 409 kan örneği toplandı ve tüm örnekler bu dört yöntem ile analiz edildi. İlk analizleri takiben, örnekler -20°C’de saklandı ve sonuçların tekrarlanabilirliği açısından bir aylık dondurularak depolamanın ardından dört yöntem ile yeniden analiz edildi. ELISA ile 57 (%13.9) hayvan pozitif saptanırken, AGID ile 33 ve her iki tip nested PCR ile 56 hayvan pozitif saptandı. ELISA’ya kıyasla AGID, %57.9’luk düşük sensitivite ve orta düzeyde uyum gösterdi. Ayrıca AGID, iki bağımsız ölçümden elde edilen sonuçlarla da tutarlılık göstermedi. İki tip nested PCR yöntemi de 0.99 kappa değeriyle ELISA ile neredeyse tam uyum gösterdi. Bu çalışmada kullanılan diğer tekniklere kıyasla AGID, 22 örnekte daha düşük sensitivite gösterdiği için ve tekrarlanabilirliği olmadığı için kan örneklerinde Enzootik sığır lökozunun teşhisinde bu testin gelecekte uygulanmasının yeniden düşünülmesi gerektiğini öneriyoruz. Diğer taraftan, db nested PCR çok iyi bir sensitivite ve tekrarlanabilirlik gösterdi, ayrıca daha az örnek işlenmesine ihtiyaç duydu. Bütün bunlar, db nested PCR’yi rutin teşhis için potansiyel olarak uygun hale getirmektedir

Comparison Between Four Laboratory Tests for Routine Diagnosis of Enzootic Bovine Leukosis

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic capabilities of the agar gel immunodiff usion test (AGID) and two types of PCR, nested PCR (with nucleic acid extraction from blood) and direct blood nested PCR (db nested PCR) - without extraction, vs. enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as the gold standard in the routine diagnostics of this disease. A total of 409 blood samples were obtained from cattle 18 mo. to 5 yrs. of age, and all the samples were analyzed using the four assays. Following the initial testing, the samples were stored at -20°С and re-tested using all the four techniques after a month of freeze storage to determine the reproducibility of the results. ELISA detected 57 animals as positive (13.9%) versus 33 ones using AGID and 56 using the two types of nested PCR. AGID showed low sensitivity of 57.9% and moderate agreement compared to ELISA. In addition, AGID did not show consistency in the results from the two independent measurements. The two types of nested PCR showed nearly full agreement with ELISA with a kappa value of 0.99. Since AGID showed lower sensitivity and lack of reproducibility in the results for 22 samples as compared to the other techniques used in this study, we suggest that the future application of this test for the diagnosis of Enzootic bovine leucosis in blood samples should be reconsidered. On the other hand, db nested PCR demonstrated very good sensitivity and reproducibility of results, it also requires less sample processing. All this makes it potentially suitable for routine diagnostics.

___

  • 1. Juliarena MA, Barrios CN, Lützelschwab CM, Esteban EN, Gutiérrez SE: Bovine leukemia virus: Current perspectives. Virus Adapt Treat, 9, 13- 26, 2017. DOI: 10.2147/VAAT.S113947
  • 2. Esmailnejad A, Najafi H, Torfi Y: Molecular and serological evaluation of bovine leukemia virus in water buffaloes of southern Iran. Iran J Vet Med, 14 (1): 37-44, 2020. DOI: 10.22059/ijvm.2019.283696.1004998
  • 3. Zyrianova IM, Kovalchuk SN: Bovine leukemia virus tax gene/Tax protein polymorphism and its relation to Enzootic Bovine Leukosis. Virulence, 11 (1): 80-87, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/21505594.2019.1708051
  • 4. Markiewicz L, Rulka J, Kamiński S: Detection of BLV provirus in different cells by nested-PCR. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy, 47, 325-331, 2003.
  • 5. Gillet N, Florins A, Boxus M, Burteau C, Nigro A, Vandermeers F, Balon H, Bouzar AB, Defoiche J, Burny A, Reichert M, Kettmann R, Willems L: Mechanisms of leukemogenesis induced by bovine leukemia virus: Prospects for novel anti-retroviral therapies in human. Retrovirology, 4:18, 2007. DOI: 10.1186/1742-4690-4-18
  • 6. Mekata H, Sekiguchi S, Konnai S, Kirino Y, Horii Y, Norimine J: Horizontal transmission and phylogenetic analysis of bovine leukemia virus in two districts of Miyazaki, Japan. J Vet Med Sci, 77 (9): 1115-1120, 2015. DOI: 10.1292/jvms.14-0624
  • 7. Ruggiero VJ, Norby B, Benitez OJ, Hutchinson H, Sporer KRB, Droscha C, Swenson CL, Bartlett PC: Controlling bovine leukemia virus in dairy herds by identifying and removing cows with the highest proviral load and lymphocyte counts. J Dairy Sci, 102 (10): 9165-9175, 2019. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2018-16186
  • 8. Porta N G, Alvarez I, Suarez Archilla G, Ruiz V, Abdala A, Trono K: Experimental infection of sheep with Bovine leukemia virus (BLV): Minimum dose of BLV-FLK cells and cell-free BLV and neutralization activity of natural antibodies. Rev Argent Microbiol, 51 (4): 316-323, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ram.2019.01.004
  • 9. Giovanna M, Ulloa JC, Uribe AM, Gutierrez MF: Bovine leukemia virus gene segment detected in human breast tissue. Open J Med Microbiol, 3, 84-90, 2013. DOI: 10.4236/ojmm.2013.31013
  • 10. Buehring GC, Shen HM, Jensen HM, Jin DL, Hudes M, Block G: Exposure to bovine leukemia virus is associated with breast cancer: A case-control study. PLoS One, 10 (9): e0134304, 2015. DOI: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0134304
  • 11. Zhang R, Jiang J, Sun W, Zhang J, Huang K, Gu X, Yang Y, Xu X, Shi Y, Wang C: Lack of association between bovine leukemia virus and breast cancer in Chinese patients. Breast Cancer Res, 18 (1): 101, 2016. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-016-0763-8
  • 12. Taghadosi C, Kojouri G, Ahadi A, Hashemi Bahremani M, Kojouri A: Bovine leukaemia virus Tax antigen identification in human lymphoma tissue: possibility of onco-protein gene transmission. Res Mol Med, 7 (2): 25-32, 2019. DOI: 10.32598/rmm.7.2.75
  • 13. Kazemimanesh M, Madadgar O, Mahzoonieeh MR, Zahraei-Salehi T, Steinbach F: A serological study on bovine leukemia virus infection in ten provinces of Iran between 2010 and 2012. Iran J Virol, 6 (3): 1-7, 2012. DOI: 10.21859/isv.6.3.1
  • 14. Kuczewski A, Hogeveen H, Orsel K, Wolf R, Thompson J, Spackman E, van der Meer F: Economic evaluation of 4 bovine leukemia virus control strategies for Alberta dairy farms. J Dairy Sci, 102 (3): 2578-2592, 2019. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2018-15341
  • 15. OIE Terrestrial Mannual: Enzootic bovine leucosis. 1113-1124, 2018. https://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahm/ 3.04.09_EBL.pdf Accessed: 14.04.21.
  • 16. Camargos MF, Pereda A, Stancek D, Rocha MA, dos Reis JKP, Greiser-Wilke I, Leite RC: Molecular characterization of the env gene from Brazilian field isolates of Bovine leukaemia virus. Virus Genes, 34, 343-350, 2007. DOI: 10.1007/s11262-006-0011-x
  • 17. Jimba M, Takeshima SN, Murakami H, Kohara J, Kobayashi N, Matsuhashi T, Ohmori T, Nunoya T, Aida Y: BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR: A useful tool for evaluating bovine leukemia virus infection status. BMC Vet Res, 8, 167, 2012. DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-167
  • 18. Jaworski JP, Pluta A, Rola-Łuszczak M, McGowan SL, Finnegan C, Heenemann K, Carignano HA, Alvarez I, Murakami K, Willems L, Vahlenkamp TW, Trono KG, Choudhury B, Kuźmak J: Interlaboratory comparison of six real-time PCR assays for detection of bovine leukemia virus proviral DNA. J Clin Microbiol, 56 (7): e00304-18, 2018. DOI: 10.1128/ JCM.00304-18
  • 19. El Daous H, Mitoma S, Elhanafy E, Thi Nguyen H, Thi Mai N, Hara A, Duangtathip K, Takezaki Y, Kaneko C, Norimine J, Sekiguchi S: Establishment of a novel diagnostic test for bovine leukaemia virus infection using direct filter PCR. Transbound Emerg Dis, 67 (4): 1671-1676, 2020. DOI: 10.1111/tbed.13506
  • 20. Nishimori A, Konnai S, Ikebuchi R, Okagawa T, Nakahara A, Murata S, Ohashi K: Direct polymerase chain reaction from blood and tissue samples for rapid diagnosis of bovine leukemia virus infection. J Vet Med Sci, 78 (5): 791-796, 2016. DOI: 10.1292/jvms.15-0577
  • 21. Maresca C, Costarelli S, Dettori A, Felici A, Iscaro C, Feliziani F: Enzootic bovine leukosis: Report of eradication and surveillance measures in Italy over an 8-year period (2005-2012). Prev Vet Med, 119 (3- 4): 222-226, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.02.024
  • 22. Bartlett PC, Ruggiero VJ, Hutchinson HC, Droscha CJ, Norby B, Sporer KRB, Taxis TM: Current developments in the epidemiology and control of enzootic bovine leukosis as caused by bovine leukemia virus. Pathogens, 9 (12): 1058, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens9121058
  • 23. Sandev N, Ilieva D, Rusenova N, Marasheva V: Prevalence of enzootic bovine leucosis in Bulgaria. Bull Univ Agric Sci Vet Med, 72 (1): 43- 46, 2015. DOI: 10.15835/buasvmcn-vm:10521
  • 24. McHugh ML: Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochem Med, 22 (3): 276-82, 2012. DOI: 10.11613/BM.2012.031
  • 25. Fenner’s Veterinary Virology: Interpretation of serologic laboratory findings. In, MacLachlan NJ, Dubovi EJ (Eds): Laboratory Diagnosis of Viral Infections. 4th ed., 122-123, Academic Press, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/ B978-0-12-800946-8.00005-2
  • 26. Walsh RB, Kelton DF, Hietala SK, Duffield TF: Evaluation of enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays performed on milk and serum samples for detection of neosporosis and leukosis in lactating dairy cows. Can Vet J, 54 (4): 347-52, 2013.
  • 27. Polat M, Takeshima SN, Aida Y: Epidemiology and genetic diversity of bovine leukemia virus. Virol J, 14 (1): 209, 2017. DOI: 10.1186/s12985- 017-0876-4
  • 28. Tîrziu E, Cumpănășoiu C, Nichita I, Reman GR, Sonea C, Șereș M: Performance assessment of three tests applied in enzootic bovine leukosis diagnosis. Rom Biotechnol Lett, 19 (5): 9666-9677, 2014.
  • 29. Roberts DH, Lucas MH, Wibberley G, Westcott D: Response of cattle persistently infected with bovine virus diarrhoea virus to bovine leukosis virus. Vet Rec, 122 (13): 293-296, 1988. DOI: 10.1136/vr.122.13.293
  • 30. Monti GE, Frankena K, Engel B, Buist W, Tarabla HD, de Jong MCM: Evaluation of a new antibody-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of bovine leukemia virus infection in dairy cattle. J Vet Diagn Invest, 17 (5): 451-457, 2005. DOI: 10.1177/104063870501700507
  • 31. Michaut L, Laurent N, Kentsch K, Spindeldreher S, Deckert-Salva F: Stability of anti-immunotherapeutic antibodies in frozen human serum samples. Bioanalysis, 6 (10): 1395-1407, 2014. DOI: 10.4155/bio.14.97
  • 32. Alhabbab RY: Precipitation and Agglutination Reactions. In, Basic Serological Testing. Techniques in Life Science and Biomedicine for the Non-Expert. Cham, Springer, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-77694-1_3
  • 33. Rivers JL, Jones J: Antibody titer variance due to freezing of patient specimens. TXSTUR, 1 (2): 6-14, 2013.
  • 34. Maruyama K, Fukushima T, Mochizuki S: Cross-reactive antibodies to BLV and HTLV in bovine and human hosts with retrovirus infection. Vet Immunol Immunopathol, 22 (3): 265-273, 1989. DOI: 10.1016/0165- 2427(89)90013-5
  • 35. Lojkić I, Balić D, Rudan N, Kovačić M, Čač Ž, Periškić M, Bedeković T, Roić B, Ciglar Grozdanić I: Eradication of bovine leukosis virus on a dairy farm through improved virus detection. Vet Arhiv, 83 (6): 581-591, 2013.
  • 36. González ET, Bonzo EB, Echeverría MG, Licursi M, Etcheverrigaray ME: Enzootic bovine leukosis: Development of an indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (I-ELISA) in seroepidemiological studies. Rev Microbiol, 30: 37-42, 1999. DOI: 10.1590/S0001-37141999000100007
  • 37. Trono KG, Pérez-Filgueira DM, Duffy S, Borca MV, Carrillo C: Seroprevalence of bovine leukemia virus in dairy cattle in Argentina: Comparison of sensitivity and specificity of different detection methods. Vet Microbiol, 83, 235-248, 2001. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(01)00420-5 38. Konishi M, Kobayashi S, Tokunaga T, Chiba Y, Tsutsui T, A
  • Kameyama KI, Yamamoto T: Simultaneous evaluation of diagnostic marker utility for enzootic bovine leucosis. BMC Vet Res, 15 (1): 406, 2019. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-019-2158-4
  • 39. Nuotio L, Rusanen H, Sihvonen L, Neuvonen E: Eradication of enzootic bovine leukosis from Finland. Prev Vet Med, 59 (1-2): 43-49, 2003. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-5877(03)00057-6
  • 40.Haghparast A, Tabatabaiezadeh E, Mohammadi G, Kord N: Prevalence of bovine leukemia virus (BLV) antibodies in bulk tank milk of dairy cattle herds of Mashhad area, North-East of Iran. J Anim Vet Adv, 11 (2): 276-280, 2012. DOI: 10.3923/javaa.2012.276.280
  • 41. Kuczewski A, Orsel K, Barkema HW, Kelton DF, Hutchins WA, van der Meer FJUM: Short communication: Evaluation of 5 different ELISA for the detection of bovine leukemia virus antibodies. J Dairy Sci, 101 (3): 2433-2437, 2018. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13626
  • 42. Sirakov IN: Nucleic acid isolation and downstream applications. Nucleic Acids-from Basic Aspects to Laboratory Tools. Larramendy ML, Soloneski s (Eds.), IntechOpen, 2016. DOI: 10.5772/61833
  • 43. Gregory L, Carneiro PS, Birgel Junior EH, Beier D, Akamatsu MA, Harakava R, Lara MCCSH, Pituco EM, Oliveira JCF, Ferreira VCA, Ikuno AA: Nested polymerase chain reaction validated for sensitive detection of bovine leukemia virus in blood samples from Brazilian cattle herds: Comparison with conventional ELISA and agar gel immunodiffusion methods. Arq Inst Biol, 71 (3): 303-308, 2004.
  • 44. Villalobos-Cortés A, Franco S, Gonzalez R, Jaén M: Nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR) based diagnosis of bovine leukemia virus in Panama. Afr J Biotechnol, 16 (11): 528-535, 2017. DOI: 10.5897/ AJB2016.15849
  • 45. Florins AF, Gillet N, Asquith B, Boxus M, Burteaux C, Twizere JC, Urbain P, Vandermeers F, Debacq C, Sanchez-Alcaraz MT, Schwartz- Cornil I, Kerkhofs P, Jean G, Thewis A, Hay J, Mortreux F, Wattel E, Reichert M, Burny A, Kettmann R, Bangham C, Willems L: Cell dynamics and immune response to BLV infection: A unifying model. Front Biosci, 12, 1520-1531, 2007. DOI: 10.2741/2165
  • 46. Biedermann K, Dandachi N, Trattner M, Vogl G, Doppelmayr H, Moré E, Staudach A, Dietza O, Hauser-Kronberger C: Comparison of real-time PCR signal-amplified in situ hybridization and conventional PCR for detection and quantification of human papillomavirus in archival cervical cancer tissue. J Clin Microbiol, 42 (8): 3758-3765, 2004. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3758-3765.2004
  • 47. Gaynor EM, Mirsky ML, Lewin HA: Use of flow cytometry and RT- PCR for detecting gene expression by single cells. Biotechniques, 21, 286- 291, 1996. DOI: 10.2144/96212rr02
  • 48. Petropavlovskiy M, Vereschyak N, Bezborodova N, Oparina O: Immuno-biological evaluation of individual genetic variants of bovine leukemia virus in the conditions of the Ural region. Adv Intell Syst, 167, 372-377, 2019. DOI: 10.2991/ispc-19.2019.84
  • 49. Moe KK, Polat M, Borjigin L, Matsuura R, Hein ST, Moe HH, Aida Y: New evidence of bovine leukemia virus circulating in Myanmar cattle through epidemiological and molecular characterization. PLoS One, 15 (2): e0229126, 2020. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229126
Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-6045
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1995
  • Yayıncı: Kafkas Üniv. Veteriner Fak.
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Evaluation of Acute Phase Response in Blood and Milk Samples of Healthy Holstein Cattle in the Postpartum Period

Oğuz MERHAN, Kadir BOZUKLUHAN, Kemal VAROL, Hale ERGİN EĞRİTAĞ

Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Haemophilus parasuis ve Pasteurella multocida’nın Saptanmasında SYBR Green I Multiple Gerçek Zamanlı Floresan PCR Yönteminin Geliştirilmesi

Yanhua XU, Zhichen WANG, Yongjun DONG, Lirong WANG, Yu ZHANG, Nan YU, Hailin LIU

Kanin Parvoviral Enterit’in Klinik Şiddeti ve Prognozunu Değerlendirmede Serum İntestinal Yağ Asidi Bağlayıcı Protein ve Kalprotektin Konsantrasyonlar

Gulten Emek TUNA, Ceren DINLER AY, Bulent ULUTAS, Gamze Sevri EKREN ASICI, Huseyin VOYVODA

Comparison of the Efficacy of the Nictitating Membrane Flap, Conjunctival Pedicle Flap, and Platelet-Rich Fibrin Membrane Graft Techniques in the Surgical Management of Corneal Necrosis in Cats: A Retrospective Study (2016-2020)

Aynur DEMİR, Yusuf ALTUNDAĞ

Melatonin ve Mikofenolat Mofetilin Wistar Sıçanlarında Takrolimus Tarafından İndüklenen Nefrotoksisiteye Karşı Koruyucu Etkisi

Ahmet AKTAS, Suleyman KOC, Mustafa OZKARACA, Bilal SAHIN

Köpeklerde Yüksek ve Düşük Serum Kreatinin Düzeyleri İle Irk, Yaş ve Cinsiyet Arasında Bir İlişki Var mı? - Elektronik Tıbbi Kayıt Veri Analizi

Ryou TANAKA, Akiko UEMURA, Lina HAMABE, Noriko TANAKA, Tsuyoshi TAKIZAWA, Toshiro IWASAKI

Enzootik Sığır Lökozunun Rutin Teşhisi İçin Kullanılan Dört Laboratuvar Testinin Karşılaştırılması

Nikolina RUSENOVA, Mihail CHERVENKOV, Ivo SIRAKOV

Progesteron-Benzeri Bileşiklerin %10 Lipozom İçerisinde Kapsüllenmesi ve Bu Bileşiklerin Enjektabl Dozaj Formunun Uygulandığı Sıçanlardaki Konsantrasyonlarını ArtırıR

Mochamad LAZUARDI, Suharjono SUHARJOMO, Chi-Hsien CHIEN, Jie-Long HE, Chia-Kang PENG, Chi-Wen LEE, Bambang HERMANTO, Mohammad SUKMANADI, Rahmi SUGIHARTUTI, Lilik MASLACHAH

Wohlfahrtia magnifica’nın Kışlama Davranışı ve Soğuk Stresiyle İlgili Unigenleri Üzerine Çalışmalar

Haobo LI, Jiaqi XUE, Baoxiang HAN, Demtu ER

Yerli Türk Kazlarında İçme Suyuna Probiyotik Karışımı İlavesinin Büyüme Performansı, Karkas Parametreleri ve Serum Biyokimyasal Parametreleri Üzerine Etkisi

Tarkan ŞAHİN, Mükremin ÖLMEZ, Özlem KARADAĞOĞLU, Sakine DALĞA, Metin ÖĞÜN