Clinical effectiveness of ivermectin on bovine dermatophytosis

Bu çalışma, dermatofitozisli sığırlarda ivermektinin klinik etkinliğini araştırma amacıyla yapıldı. Çalışmanın materyalini, klinik ve mikrobiyolojik olarak dermatofitozis tanısı konulan, 3-14 aylık, 20 deneme (Grup I), 10 kontrol (Grup II) olmak üzere toplam 30 genç sığır oluşturdu. Hayvanların klinik durumları; lezyonların lokalizasyonu, büyüklüğü, sayıları ve kondisyonlarına göre, hafif (+), orta (++) ve şiddetli (+++) olarak skorlandırıldı. Çalışma süresince deneme ve kontrol grubundaki hayvanların bakım, besleme ve barınak koşullarında herhangi bir değişiklik yapılmadı. Grup I’deki hayvanlara 0.2 mg/kg dozunda deri altı yolla bir kez uzun etkili ivermektin uygulandı. Grup II’deki hayvanlara ise herhangi bir tedavi uygulanmayarak kontrol olarak tutuldu. Tedaviyi takiben hayvanlar 45 gün gözlemlendi. Grup II’deki hayvanlarda herhangi bir iyileşme görülmezken, grup I’deki 18 hayvanın (%90) iyileştiği gözlemlendi. Bu çalışma ile yaygın olarak antiparaziter amaçla kullanılan ve aynı zamanda immun sistemi aktive ettiği bilinen ivermektin ilk kez ruminantlarda dermatofitozisin tedavisinde kullanılmış ve tedavide %90 oranında başarı elde edilmiştir. Bu sonuçlarla ivermektinin sığır dermatofitozisinin tedavisinde klinik olarak oldukça etkili olduğu kanısına varıldı.

Dermatofitozisli sığırlarda ivermektinin klinik etkinliği

In the present study, clinical effectiveness of ivermectin on bovine dermatophytosis was evaluated. The material of the study consisted of 30 cattle, 20 experimental (Group I) and 10 control (Group II) animals aged between 3-14 months, diagnosed as dermatophytosis following clinical examination and microbiology. Clinical status of cases were scored on localization, size and number of lesions and condition of the cases were as follows mild (+), moderate (++) and severe (+++). During the study period, farm management practices of the animals were not changed. A single long acting injection of ivermectin at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg was subcutaneously administered to the animals in Group I. Animals in Group II served as a control and received no treatment. Following medical treatment and 45 days of observation period, recovery was recorded 18 animals from Group I (90%). No recovery was observed in the Group II. This study indicated that, ivermectin which is widely used as antiparasiter medicine, activate the immune system. For this reason, in the present study, first time, ivermectin was used in the treatment of dermatophytosis in ruminants with a 90% of recovery rate. These findings show that ivermectin can be used succesfully in the treatment of dermatophytosis infection in cattle.

___

  • 1. Weber A: Mycozoonoses with special regard to ringworm of cattle. Mycoses, 43, 20-22, 2000.
  • 2. Gudding R, Lund A: Immunoprophylaxis of bovine dermatophytosis. Can Vet J, 36, 302-306, 1995.
  • 3. Randentz WH: Fungal skin infections associated with animal contact. Am Fam Physician, 43, 1253-1256, 1991.
  • 4. Quinn PJ, Carter ME, Markey B, Carter GR: Clinical Veterinary Microbiology, 1st ed., pp. 1164-1167, Wolfe Publishing, London, 1994.
  • 5. Connole MD: Review of animal mycoses in Australia. Mycopathologia, 111, 133-164, 1990.
  • 6. Kırmızıgül AH, Gökçe E, Özyıldız Z, Büyük F, Şahin M: Sığırlarda dermatofitozis tedavisinde enilconazole’ün (%10) topikal kullanımı: Klinik, mikolojik ve histopatolojik bulgular. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 15 (2): 273-277, 2009.
  • 7. Kırmızıgül AH, Gökçe E, Mitat Ş, Büyük F, Irmak K: Dermatofitozisli sığırlarda enilconazole’ün (%10’luk Pour-On) etkinliği. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 14 (2): 141-144, 2008.
  • 8. Stenwig H: Isolation of dermatophytes from domestic animals in Norway. Nord Vet Med, 37, 161-169, 1985.
  • 9. Nooruddin M, Singh B: Dermatophytosis in buffaloes, cattle and their attendants. Mykosen, 30, 594-600, 1987.
  • 10. Cam Y, Gumussoy KS, Kibar M, Apaydin N, Atalay O: Efficacy of ethylenediamine dihydriodide for the treatment of ringworm in young cattle. Vet Rec, 24, 408-410, 2007.
  • 11. Gökçe G, Şahin M, Irmak K, Otlu S, Aydın F, Genç O: Sığır trichophytosis’inde profilaktik ve terapotik amaçla aşı kullanımı. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 5 (1): 81-86, 1999.
  • 12. Rybnikár A, Chumela J, Vrzal V, Krupka V: Immunity in cattle vaccinated against ringworm. Mycoses, 34, 433-436, 1991.
  • 13. Rybnikár A, Vrzal V, Chumela J: Protective efficacy of vaccines against bovine dermatophytosis after double and single vaccination. Mycoses, 41, 83-86, 1998.
  • 14. Wawrzkiewicz K, Wawrzkiewicz J: An inactivated vaccine against ringworm. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis, 15, 31-40, 1992.
  • 15. Courtney CH, Roberson EL: Avermectin. In, Adams HR (Ed): Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. p. 920, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, 1995.
  • 16. Uhlir J: Effect of ivermectin on the development of serum antibody activity in rabbits infested with Psoroptes cuniculi (Acari: Psoroptidae). Folia Parasitol (Praha), 38, 79-82, 1991.
  • 17. Rao UR, Chandrashekar R, Subrahmanyam D: Effect of ivermectin on serum dependent cellular interactions to Dipetalonema viteae microfilariae. Trop Med Parasitol, 38, 123-127, 1987.
  • 18. Dennis VA, Klei TR, Miller MA, Chapman MR, McClure JR: Immune responses of pony foals during repeated infections of Strongylus vulgaris and regular ivermectin treatments. Vet Parasitol, 42, 83-99, 1992.
  • 19. Knab J, Darge K, Buttner DW: Immunohistological studies on macrophages in lymph nodes of onchocerciasis patients after treatment with ivermectin. Trop Med Int Health, 2, 1156-1169, 1997.
  • 20. Blakley BR, Rousseaux CG: Effect of ivermectin on the immune response in mice. Am J Vet Res, 52, 593-595, 1991.
  • 21. Aslan Ö, Oruç E: Is it possible to treat equine papillomatosis with ivermectin given orally? Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 16 (6): 1065- 1068, 2010.
  • 22. Borku MK, Atalay O, Kibar M, Cam Y, Atasever A: Ivermectin is an effective treatment for bovine cutaneous papillomatosis. Res Vet Sci, 83, 360-363, 2007.
  • 23. Kırmızıgül AH, Gökçe E, Sözmen M, Yıldırım Y, Beytut E: İvermektin’in sığır deri papillomatozisinde tedavi etkinliği. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 16 (4): 627-631, 2010.
  • 24. Cheesbrough M: Medical Laboratory Manual for Tropical Countries. Vol. 2, pp. 371-385, Tropical Health Technology, Butterworth-Heinemann, Great Britain, 1992.
  • 25. Halley LD, Standard PG: Laboratory Methods in Medical Mycology. 3rd ed., pp, 41-57, US Departmentof Health, Education and Welfare, Center of Disease Control, Atalanta, 1973.
  • 26. Quinn PJ, Carter ME, Markey B, Carter GR: The dermatophytes. In, Clinical Veterinary Microbiology. 5th ed., pp. 381-390, London, New York, Philadelphia, Sydney, Toronto, Mosby, 2002.
  • 27. Pascoe RR: The epidemiology of ringworm in racehorses caused by Trichophyton equinum var autotrophicum. Aust Vet J, 55, 403-407, 1979.
  • 28. Al-Ani FK, Younes FA, Al-Rawashdeh OF: Ringworm infection in cattle and horses in Jordan. Acta Vet Brno, 71, 55-60, 2002.
  • 29. Imren HY, Sahal M: Trikofiti. In, Alacam E, Sahal M (Eds): Sığır Hastalıkları. Birinci Baskı. s. 201-202, Medisan, Ankara, 1997.
  • 30. Stannard AA: Dermatophytosis. In, Smith BP (Ed): Large Animal Internal Medicine, 2nd ed., pp. 1419-1421, Philadelphia, London, Tokyo, Mosby, 1996.
  • 31. Kaaman T: Dermatophyte antigens and cell-mediated immunity in dermatophytosis. In, McGinnis MR (Ed): Current Topics in Medical Mycology. Vol. 1, pp. 117-134, New York, Springer-Verlag, 1985.
  • 32. Sohnle PG: Dermatophytosis. In, Murphy JW, Friedman H, Bendinello M (Eds): Fungal Infections and Immune Response. pp. 27-47, New York, Plenum, 1993.
  • 33. Weigl E: Immunology in dermatophytoses. Cesk Epidemiol Mikrobiol Immunol, 36, 308-319, 1987.
  • 34. Pier AC, Ellis JA, Mills KW: Development of immune response to experimental bovine Trichophyton verrucosum infection. Vet Dermatol, 3, 131-138, 1993.
Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-6045
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1995
  • Yayıncı: Kafkas Üniv. Veteriner Fak.
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Etlik piliçlerde kısıtlı yemlemenin performans özelliklerine etkisi

A.Ahad TELLİ SHADDEL, Naser SİS MAHERİ, Ömer Faruk ALARSLAN, Keyvan NAZHAD HATEFİ, Çiğdem ALTINSAAT, Alireza AHMADZADEH

Antimicrobial susceptibility, presence of resistance genes and biofilm formation in coagulase negative staphlococci ısolated from subclinical sheep mastitis

Yaşar ERGÜN, FATMA ÖZTÜRK KÜP, Özkan ASLANTAŞ, AHMET CEYLAN, EKREM KİREÇCİ, Yılmaz BOYAR

Identification of β-lactoglobulin gene Sacıı polymorphism in Honamli, hair and Saanen goat breeds reared in Burdur vicinity

ÖZGECAN KORKMAZ AĞAOĞLU, ÖZKAN ELMAZ, BENGİ ÇINAR KUL, MAHİYE ÖZÇELİK METİN, MUSTAFA SAATCI, Bilal AKTÜZ, Okan ERTUĞRUL

Growth performance and body composition in mirror carp (cyprinus carpio) fed culban seed (vicia peregrina) with different heat treatments

HAKAN MURAT BÜYÜKÇAPAR

Effects of antioxidants resveratrol, catechin and lipoic acid and carcinogen kbro3 on lipophylic vitamins and cholesterol in lung, liver and kidney of wistar rats

SERHAT KESER, ORHAN ERMAN, ÖKKEŞ YILMAZ, SEVGİ İRTEGÜN KANDEMİR, Mehmet TUZCU

Ham petrolün Poecilia sphenops (Valenciennes, 1846) (Cyprinidae, Teleostei) deri histolojisi üzerine etkileri

ÖZLEM ÖNEN ÇELEBİ, Burak GÖKÇE, Gürsel ERGEN, Sema ÜÇÜNCÜ İŞİSAĞ

Determination of potential nutritive value of exotic tree leaves in Turkey

ÖNDER CANBOLAT

The determination of some morphological characteristics of Honamlı goat and kids, defined as a new ındigenius goat breed of turkey

Özkan ELMAZ, Birol DAĞ, Mustafa SAATCI, Hamdi Ahmet AKTAŞ, Nuri MAMAK, Bekir GÖK

Changes in hematological and biochemical parameters of european chub (Squalius cephalus L.) in unpolluted reservoir and polluted creek

Ekrem Şanver ÇELİK, Hasan KAYA, SEVDAN YILMAZ

Expression of epidermal growth factor (EGF) and heparin-binding EGF (HB-EGF) mrna in mare endometrium

Mehmet Osman ATLI, SEYİT ALİ KAYIŞ, Aydın GÜZELOĞLU, Selim ASLAN, Ahmet SEMACAN, Ercan KURAR, SEFA ÇELİK