___

• Ahi, B.; Cingi, M. A. & Kıldan, A. O. (2016). Examining 48-60 months old children’s perceptions about teacher concept by analyzing their drawings. Elementary Education Online, 15/1, 77-90.
• Aktas, B. C. (2010). Investigating primary school students’ perceptions regarding “teacher” through their drawings. International Journal of Learning, 17/8, 409-425.
• Amabile, T. M. (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48/2, 393-399.
• Aykaç, N. (2012). Perceptions of the teacher and teaching process in the drawings of elementary school students. Education and Science, 37 /164,298-315.
• Alvermann, D.E.; Moon, J.S. & Hagood, M.C. (1999). Popular culture in the classroom: Teaching and researching critical media literacy. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
• Anning, A. & Ring, K. (2004). Making sense of children’s drawings. New York: Open University.
• Aram, D. (2005). The continuity in children’s literacy achievements: A longitudinal perspective from kindergarten to second grade. First Language, 25/3, 259–289.
• Artut, K. (2002). Art education theories and methods. Ankara: Anı Publishing.
• Bağcı, H. (2007). A study on the attitudes of the Turkish teacher candidates towards the writing lessons and the writing skills. Unpublished doctorate dissertation. Gazi University, Institue of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
• Bayat, N. (2014). The effect of the process writing approach on writing success and anxiety. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14/3, 1133-1141.
• Beach, S. A. & Ward, A. (2013). Insights into engaged literacy learning: stories of literate identity. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 27/ 2, 239–255.
• Bindman, S. W.; Skibbe, L. E.; Hindman, A. H.; Aram, D. & Morrison, F. J. (2014). Parental writing support and preschoolers’ early literacy, language, and fine motor skills. Early childhood research quarterly, 29/4, 614-624.
• Blair, R. & Savage, R. (2006). Name writing but not environmentalprint recognition is related to letter-sound knowledge and phonological awareness in pre-readers. Reading and Writing, 19, 991–1016.
• Bloodgood, J. W. (1999). What’s in a name? Children’s name writing and literacy acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 342–367.
• Buldu, M. (2006). Young children’s perceptions of scientists: A preliminary study. Educational Research, 48/1, 121-132.
• Burnett, C. & Merchant, G. (2011). “Is there a space for critical literacy in the context of social media?”, English Teaching, 10/1, 41.
• Christensen, Larry B.; Johnson, R. Burke, & Turner, Lisa A. (2015). Research methods, design, and analysis. Boston: Pearson.
• Corkery, C. (2005). Literacy narratives and confidence building in the writing classroom. Journal of Basic Writing, 24/1, 48-67.
• Cox, M. V. (2013). Children's drawings of the human figure. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Cressy, D. (2006). Literacy and the social order: reading and writing in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Cambridge University Press.
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research. Boston: Pearson.
• Culham, R. (2010). Traits of writing: The complete guide for middle school. New York: Scholastic.
• Dağlıoğlu, E. (2011). A comparative study of teacher figures in 5 to 7 year old children’s drawings. Education and Science, 36/160, 144-157.
• Dyson, A. H. (2001). Where are the childhoods in childhood literacy? An axploration in outer (school) space. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 1, 9-39.
• Ehri, L. C., & Roberts, T. (2006). The roots of learning to read and write: Acquisition of letters and phonemic awareness. In D. K. Dickinson & S. B. Neuman (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2, pp. 113–131). New York: Guilford Press.
• Einarsdottir, J.; Dockett, S. & Perry, B. (2009). Making meaning: Children’s perspectives expressed through drawings. Early Child Development and Care, 179/2, 217-232.
• Ersoy, A. F. (2016). Phenomenology. In A. Saban ve A. Ersoy (Eds.), Qualitative research desing in educaitonal research, Ankara: Anı Publishing.
• Ersoy, A. & Türkkan, B. (2009). Perceptions about Internet in elementary school children’s drawings. Elementary Education Online, 8/1, 57-73.
• Fairbairn, S. B. & Fox, J. (2009). Inclusive achievement testing for linguistically and culturally diverse test takers: Essential considerations for test developers and decision makers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28/1, 10-24.
• Fargas-Malet, M.; McSherry, D.; Larkin, E. & Robinson, C. (2010). Research with children: methodological issues and innovative techniques. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 8/2, 175-192.
• Freeman, N. (1976). Chıldrens drawings–cogntive aspects. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17/4, 345-350.
• Gardner, H. (1980). Artful scribbles: The signifince of children’s drawings. New York: Basic Books.
• Gerde, H.K.; Bingham, G.R. & Wasik, B.A. (2012). Writing in childhood classrooms: Guidance for best practices. Early Chıldhood Educatıon Journal, 40/6, 351-359.
• Graves, D. H. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Exeter, NH: Heinemann.
• Hague, E. (2001). Nationalty and childrens’ drawings – pictures ‘about Scotland’ by primary school children in Edinburg, Scotland and Syracuse, New York State. The Scottish Geographical Magazine, 117 (2), 77-99.
• Halmatov, S. (2016). Child Picture Analysis and Psychological Tests. Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
• Harrison, L. J.; Clarke, L. & Ungerer, J. A. (2007). Children's drawings provide a new perspective on teacher– child relationship quality and school adjustment. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22/1, 55-71.
• Aydemir, Z.; Öztürk, E. & Horzum, M. B. (2013). The effect of reading from screen on the 5th grade elementary students’ level of reading comprehension on informative and narrative type of texts. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13/4, 2263-2276.
• Karadayıoğlu, M. & Karadağ, Ö. (2010). Examining the written expressions of prımary school graders as regard to their choıce of topics. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 7/13, 192-207.
• Karatay, H. (2011). Process based writing models: Planned writing and evaluation. Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
• Kearns, L. (2011). High-stakes standardized testing and marginalized youth: An examination of the impact on those who fail. Canadian Journal of Education, 34/2, 112-130.
• Kellogg, R.T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of writing research, 1 (1), 1-26.
• Kendrick, M. & McKay, R. (2002). Uncovering literacy narratives through children's drawings. Canadian Journal of Education, 27/1, 45-60. Kızıltepe, Z. (2015). Content analysis. In Fatma Nevra Seggie and Yasemin Bayyurt (Eds.), Qualitative research method, technique, analysis and approaches. Ankara: Anı Publishing.
• Lodge, C. (2007). Regarding learning: Children’s drawings of learning in the classroom. Learning Environments Research, 10, 145-156.
• Luke, C. (2000). New literacies in teacher education, Journal of adolescent & Adult literacy, 43/5, 424-435.
• Malchiodi, C. A. (1998). Understanding children's drawings. New York: Guilford Press.
• Margolis, H. & McCabe, P. P. (2006). Motivating struggling readers in an era of mandated instructional practices. Reading Psychology, 27/5, 435-455.
• McCarthey, S. J. (2001). Identity construction in elementary readers and writers. ReadingResearch Quarterly, 36/2, 122-151.
• McKay, R. & Kendrick, M.E. (2001). Children draw their images of reading and writing. Language Arts, 78/6, 529-533.
• Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
• Miles, M. & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage.
• Oğuz, A. (2007). Have you ever seen a scientist? Procedings of VI. National Symposium on Classroom Teacher Education. (pp.43-48). Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
• Özel, M. (2012). Children's images of scientists: Does grade level make a difference?. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12/4, 3187-3198.
• Özsoy, S. (2012). Investigating elementary school students’ perceptions about environment through their drawings. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12/2, 1117-1139.
• Özsoy, S. & Ahi, B. (2014). Elementary schools students’ perceptions of the future environment through artwork. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14/4, 1557-1582.
• Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading &Writing Quarterly, 19/2, 139-158.
• Punch, S. (2002). Research with children: The same or different from research with adults? Childhood, 9/3, 321-341.
• Reiners, G. M. (2012). Understanding the differences between Husserl’s (descriptive) and Heidegger’s (interpretive) phenomenological research. Journal of Nursing Care, 1 (5), 1-3.
• Rodari, P. (2007). Science and scientists in the drawings of European children. Journal of Science Communication, 6/3, 1-12.
• Saracho, O. N. (1997). Using the home environment to support emergent literacy. Early Child Development and Care, 127/1, 201-216.
• Shatil, E.; Share, D. L. & Levin, I. (2000). On the contribution of kindergarten spelling to grade 1 literacy: A longitudinal study in Hebrew. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 1–21.
• Smith, F. C. (2008). Literacy identity development. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 16/1, 47-51.
• Spandel, V. (2005). Creating writers: Through 6-trait writing assesment and instruction. Boston: Pearson.
• Thomas, G. V. & Silk, A. M. (1990). An introduction to the psychology of children's drawings. New York University Press.
• Tompkins, G. (2007). Literacy for the 21st century: Teaching reading and writing in prekindergarten through grade 4. New Jersey: Pearson Merrill Prentice.
• Tompkins, G. (2008). Teaching writing: Balancing process and product. New Jersey: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
• Türkcan, B. (2004). Assesment of preschool children drawings through the tips on the lives of family. Proceedings of I.International Congress on Preschool Education. (pp.79-97). İstanbul: YA-PA.
• Venger, A. (2007). Psychological picture tests: illustrated guide. Vlados Publishing.
• Yalçın, M. & Erginer, A. (2014). Primary school students’s drawings on the perceptions of school principal. Education and Science, 39/171, 270-285.
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2005). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
• Yılmaz, Z., Kubiatko, M., & Topal, H. (2012). Czech children's drawing of nature. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12/4, 3111-3119.