___

• Aritonang, K. T. (2008). Minat dan motivasi dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal pendidikan penabur, 7(10), 11-21.
• As’ari, A.R., Kurniati, D., Abdullah, A.H., Muksar, M., & Sudirman, S. (2019). Impact of Infusing Truth Seeking and Open-Minded Behaviors on Mathematical Problem-Solving. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 1019-1036. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.606031
• Ball, D.L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 90(4), 449-466.
• Ball, D.L., & Bass, H. (2003). Toward a practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. In B. Davis & E. Simmt (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group, (3-14). Edmonton, AB: CMESG/GCEDM.
• Ball, D. L. & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511
• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?, Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
• Berger, M. (2013). Examining mathematical discourse to understand in-service teachers’ mathematical activities. Pythagoras. 34 (1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v34i1.197
• Briand-Newman, H., Wong, M. & Evans, D. (2012). Teacher subject matter knowledge of number sense. J Dindyal, L P Cheng, S F Ng. 130-137. Australia: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
• Ding, L., He, J., & Leung, F. K. S. (2014). Relations between subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: A study of Chinese pre-service teachers on the topic of three-term ratio. The Mathematics Educator, 15(2), 50-76.
• Even, R. (1993). Subject-matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: Prospective secondary teachers and the function concept. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(2), 94-116. DOI: 10.2307/749215.
• Fauzi, T.C. Nusantara,T., Hidayanto, E., (2019). Kesulitan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Materi Teorema Pythagoras: Perspektif Commognition. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan. 4(12).
• Hamalik, O. (2009). Teknologi dalam Pendidikan. Bandung: Yayasan Partisipasi Pembangunan Indonesia.
• Hannula, J. (2017). Subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in the learning diaries of prospective mathematics teachers. In T. Dooley, & G. Gueudet (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, 3312-3319.
• Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., Tabach, M. & Nachlieli, T. (2016). Opportunities for learning given to prospective mathematics teachers: Between ritual and explorative instruction. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(6), 547–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9311-1
• Inah, E. N. (2015). Peran komunikasi dalam interaksi guru dan siswa. Al-Ta'dib, 8(2), 150-167
• Khan, A., Khan, S., Zia-ul-islam, S., & Khan, M. (2017). Communication Skills of a Teacher and Its Role in the Development of the Students. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(1), 18–21.
• Lee, Y., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2018). Mathematics Teachers' Subject Matter Knowledge and Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Problem Posing. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(2), 75--90. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/2698.
• Martino, A. M., & Maher, C. A. (1999). Teacher Questioning to Promote Justification and Generalization in Mathematics : What Research Practice Has Taught Us. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(99)00017-6
• Metzuyanim, E. H., & Tabach, M. (2017). The Commognitive Theory Framework: From Theory to Implementation. In K-12 Mathematics Education in Israel, Issues and Innovations. 343–350.
• Mulyasa. (2008). Menjadi Guru Profesional. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda Karya.
• Nardi, E., Ryve, A., Stadler, E., & Viirman, O. (2014). Commognitive analyses of the learning and teaching of mathematics at university level: The case of discursive shifts in the study of Calculus. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(2). 182-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2014.918338
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2007) Mathematics Teaching Today: Improving Practice, Improving Student Learning. Reston, VA: NCTM.
• Nurfuadi. (2012). Profesionalisme Guru. Porwokerto: Penerbit STAIN Press.
• Park, J. (2013). Is the derivative a function? If so, how do students talk about it? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(5), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.795248
• Sagala, S. (2009). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: CV. ALFABETA.
• Sahabuddin, C. (2016). Hubungan Komunikasi Belajar Mengajar terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Negeri I Kabupaten Majene. Pepatudzu: Media Pendidikan dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 10(1), 17-30.
• Setyaningrum, D. (2009). Pengaruh Kemampuan Guru dalam Berkomunikasi dan Pengelolaan Kelas Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Akuntansi Siswa Kelas XI IPS di SMA Negeri 8 Semarang Tahun Ajaran 2008/2009. (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Negeri Semarang)
• Sfard. A. (2001). There is more to discourse than meets the ears: Looking at thinking as communicating to learn more about mathematical learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 46(1-3). 13-57. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014097416157
• Sfard, A. (2007). When the Rules of Discourse Change, but Nobody Tells You: Making Sense of Mathematics Learning From a Commognitive Standpoint. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 16(4). 565-613. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701525253
• Sfard, A. (2008). Learning in doing: social, cognitive, and computational perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
• Sfard, A. (2012). Introduction: Developing mathematical discourse-Some insights from communicational research. International Journal of Educational Research,51-52 (3). 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.12.013
• Sfard, A., & Kieran, C. (2001). Cognition as communication: Rethinking learning-by-talking through multi-faceted analysis of students’ mathematical interactions. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 8(1). 42–76. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0801_04
• Shabtay, G., & Heyd-metzuyanim, E. (2017). Teachers’ Discourse On Students' Conceptual Understanding And Struggle. The 41th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Vol 4. 177-184. Singapore: PME.
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 3–36). New York, NY: Macmillan.
• Subanji, S. (2015) Peningkatan Pedagogical Content Knowledge Guru Matematika Dan Praktiknya Dalam Pembelajaran Melalui Model Pelatihan Teqip. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Malang, 21(1),71-79
• Tabach, M., & Nachlieli, T. (2016). Communicational perspectives on learning and teaching mathematics: prologue. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 91(3). 299-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9638-7
• Tasara, I (2018) Commognitive analysis of a teacher’s mathematical discourse on the derivative. In: Curtis, F, (ed.) BSRLM Proceedings. BSRLM 2017: British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics Conference, 11 Nov 2017, Liverpool, UK. BSRLM.
• Turnuklu, E.B., & Yesildere, S. (2007). The pedagogical content knowledge in mathematics: Pre-service primary mathematics teachers' perspectives in Turkey. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, The Journal, 1(1), 1-13.
• Tuset, G. A. (2018). A commognitive lens to study pre-service teachers’ teaching in the context of achieving a goal of ambitious mathematics teaching. In Proceeding, Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education.
• Viseu, F., & Oliveira, I. B. (2012). Open-ended tasks in the promotion of classroom communication in Mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(2), 287-300.
• Voss, T., Kunter, M,. & Baumert, J., (2011). Assessing Teacher Candidates’ General Pedagogical/Psychological Knowledge: Test Construction and Validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3). 952–969. DOI: 10.1037/a0025125.
• Viirman, O. (2015). Explanation, motivation and question posing routines in university mathematics teachers’ pedagogical discourse: a commognitive analysis. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 46(8). 1165-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1034206
• Weingarden, M., Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. & Nachlieli, T. (2017). The realization tree assessment tool: Assessing the exposure to mathematical objects during a lesson, in The Tenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME )10, Dublin, Ireland.
• Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L. S. & Richert, A. E. (1987). 150 Different Ways of Knowing: Representations of Knowledge in Teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring Teachers' Thinking. London: Cassess.
• Zayyadi, M., Nusantara, T., Hidayanto, E., Sulandra, I. M., & As’ari, A.R. (2019). Exploring prospective student teacher’s question on mathematics teaching practice. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(2), 228-237. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.46
• Zayyadi, M., Nusantara, T., Subanji., Hidayanto, E., & Sulandra, I. M. (2019). A Commognitive Framework: The Process of Solving Mathematical Problems of Middle School Students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. 18(2), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.2.7