Salih POLAT, Serkan YARIMOĞLU, Ibrahim Halil BOZKURT, Tarık YONGUÇ, Özgü AYDOĞDU, Tansu DEĞİRMENCİ

PERKÜTAN NEFROLİTOTOMİ TEDAVİ BAŞARISINI VE KOMPLİKASYONLARINI ÖNGÖRMEK İÇİN KULLANILAN S.T.O.N.E. TAŞ SKORLAMA SİSTEMİNİN VALİDASYONU

Giriş: Çalışmamızda böbrek taşı nedeniyle perkütan nefrolitotomi(PNL) uygulanan hastalarda tedavi başarısı ve komplikasyonları öngörmek için kullanılan S.T.O.N.E. taş skorlama sisteminin validasyonunun yapılması amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Ocak 2012 ile Ağustos 2015 tarihleri arasında İzmir Bozyaka Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesinde PNL uygulanan 568 hasta retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Hastalar postoperatif 1. aydaki kontrollerinde direkt üriner sistem grafisi (DÜSG) ile değerlendirildi. Semptomatik hastalar, non-opak taşı olan ve/veya DÜSG’de şüpheli opasite saptanan hastalar kontrastsız BT ile değerlendirildi. Semptomları olmayan ve

EXTERNAL VALIDATION OF S.T.O.N.E. STONE SCORE SYSTEM TO PREDICT TREATMENT SUCCESS AND COMPLICATIONS OF PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY

Introduction: In our study, we aimed to validate S.T.O.N.E. score systems for predictions treatment success and complication of patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) for kidney stones. Material and Method: We retrospectively analysed 568 patients who underwent PNL from January 2012 to August 2015 at Izmir Bozyaka Research and Training Hospital for kidney stones. Stone-free status(SFS) was assessed on 1-month postoperative visit using kidney ureter bladder (KUB) radiograph. CT is reserved for only symptomatic patients, radiolucent stones, and/or suspicion of residual fragments seen on KUB radiography. Residual stone size of

PDF

___

1. Rupel E BR. Nephroscopy with removal of Stone following nephrostomy for obstructive calculus anuria. J Urol 1941; 46(2): 177.
2. Fernström I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol Urology 1976; 10(3): 257-9.
3. Michel MS, Trojan L RJ. Complications in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2007; 51(4): 899-906.
4. Opondo D, Gravas S, Joyce A, Pearle M, Matsuda T, Sun YH, et al. Standardization of patient outcomes reporting in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2014; 28(7): 767–74.
5. Okhunov Z, Friedlander JI, George AK, Duty BD, Moreira DM, Srinivasan AK, et al. S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry: novel surgical classification system for kidney calculi. Urology 2013; 81(6): 1154.
6. Turna B, Umul M, Demiryoguran S, Altay B, Nazli O. How do increasing stone surface area and stone configuration affect overall outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? J Endourol 2007; 21(1): 34–43.
7. Zhu Z, Wang S, Xi Q, Bai J, Yu X, Liu J. Logistic regression model for predicting stone-free rate after minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 2011; 78(1): 32–6.
8. Shahrour K, Tomaszewski J, Ortiz T, Scott E, Sternberg KM, Jackman SV, et al. Predictors of immediate postoperative outcome of single-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 2012; 80(1): 19–25.
9. Smith A, Averch TD, Shahrour K, Opondo D, Daels FP, Labate Get al. CROES PCNL Study Group. A nephrolithometric nomogram to predict treatment success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 2013; 190(1): 149-56.
10. Thomas K, Smith NC, Hegarty N, Glass JM. The Guy’s stone scoreegrading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures. Urology 2011; 78(2): 277-81
11. Muslumanoglu AY, Tefekli A, Karadag MA, Tok A, Sari E, Berberoglu Y. Impact of percutaenous access point number and location on complication and success rates in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. UrolInt 2006; 77(4): 340-6.
12. Antonelli JA, Pearle MS. Advances in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Clin North Am. 2013; 40(1): 99-113.
13. de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, Gutierrez J, Lingeman J, Scarpa R. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, andoutcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol 2011; 25(1): 11-7.
14. Oner S, Okumus MM, Demirbas M, Onen E, Aydos MM, Ustun MH et al. Factors influencing complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single-center study. Urol J 2015; 12(5): 2317-23.
15. Nakamon T, Kitirattrakarn P, Lojanapiwat B. Outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of elderly and younger patients. Int Braz J Urol 2013; 39(5): 692-700.
16. Gokce MI, Ozden E, Suer E, Gulpinar B, Gulpınar O, Tangal S. Comparison of imaging modalities for detection of residual fragments and prediction of Stone related events following percutaneous nephrolitotomy. Int Braz J Urol 2015; 41(1): 86-90.
17. Okhunov Z, Moreira D, George A, Friedlander JI, Duty BD, Moreira DM, et al. PD32-09 Multicenter validation of S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry. J Urol 2014; 191: e839.
18. Labadie K, Okhunov Z, Akhavein A, Moreira DM, Moreno-Palacios J, Del Junco M, et al. Evaluation and comparison of urolithiasis scoring systems used in percutaneous kidney stone surgery. J Urol 2015; 193(1): 154-9.
19. Noureldin YA, Elkoushy MA, Andonian S. Which is better? Guy’s versus S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring systems in predicting stone-free status post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 2015; 33(11): 1821-5.
20. Noureldin YA, Elkoushy MA, Andonian S. External validation of the S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring system. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015; 9(5-6): 190-5.
21. Farhan M, Nazim SM, Salam B, Ather MH. Prospective evaluation of outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the 'STONE' nephrolithometry score: A single-centre experience. Arab J Urol. 2015; 13(4): 264-9.
22. Akhavein A, Henriksen C, Syed J, Bird VG. Prediction of single procedure success rate using S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry surgical classification system with strict criteria for surgical outcome. Urology. 2015;85(1):69-73.
23. Kumsar Ş, Aydemir H, Halis F, Köse O, Gökçe A, Adsan O. Value of preoperative Stone scoring systems in predicting the results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Cent European J Urol. 2015; 68(3): 353-7.