BEYİN LEZYONLARINDA NÖRONAVİGASYON CİHAZI OLARAK İNTRAOPERATİF ULTRASON KULLANIMI
Giriş: Beyin anomalileri, abseler, intrakranial kitlelerin cerrahisinde intraoperatif ultrasonografi (USG) ile oldukça iyi sonuçlar alınabilmektedir. Bu çalışmada amaç, intraoperatif USG yardımı ile cerrahisi yapılan kranial lezyonlarda rezeksiyon başarısını değerlendirmek ve intraoperatif ultrasonun cerrahide etkinliğini araştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: 2012-2018 yılları arasında İzmir Bozyaka Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Beyin ve Sinir Cerrahisi Kliniği’ nde intrakranial kitle tanıları olan 16 hastaya intraoperatif ultrason yardımı ile cerrahi uygulandı. Rezeksiyon miktarının ve rezidünün değerlendirilmesi için hastaların hepsi postoperatif manyetik rezonans görüntüleme (MRG) ile kontrol edildi. Bulgular: İntraoperatif ultrason yardımı ile kranial cerrahi yapılan hastalardan 9’ u erkek 7’ si bayandı. Hastaların ortalama yaşı 58’ idi. Histopatolojik tanıları 8 hastada gliom, 3 hastada metastaz, 2 hastada menenjiom, 2 hastada abse, 1 hastada kavernom olarak geldi. Hastaların tümünde lezyonun sınırları ve rezeksiyon sınırları ultrason yardımı ile güvenilir biçimde ortaya konuldu. Cerrahi sonrası olguların tümünde gross total rezeksiyon sağlandı ve hiçbir hastada ek nörolojik kayıp gözlenmedi. İntraoperatif ultrason kullanımına bağlı herhangi bir komplikasyon ya da enfeksiyon görülmemiştir.
INTRAOPERATIVE ULTRASOUND USE AS A NEURONAVIGATION TOLL IN BRAIN LESIONS
Introduction: Good results can be obtained with the help of intraoperative ultrasound (USG) in the surgery of the brain anomalies, abscesses, intra cranial masses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the success of resection in cranial lesions with intraoperative USG and to investigate the effectiveness of intraoperative ultrasound in surgery. Material and method: Between 2012 and 2018, 16 patients with intracranial masses underwent surgery with the help of intraoperative ultrasound in the neurosurgery clinic of Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital. All patients were checked with postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate the amount of resection and the residue. Results: Of thepatients who underwent cranial surgery with the help of intraoperative ultrasound, 9 were male and 7 were female. The mean age of the patients was 58 years. Histopathological diagnoses were glioma in 8 patients, metastasis in 3 patients, meningioma in 2 patients, abscess in 2 patients and cavernoma in 1 patient. In all patients, the limits of the lesion and resection limits were reliably demonstrated with the help of ultrasound. Gross total resection was achieved in all cases after surgery and no additional neurological loss was observed in any patient. There was no complication or infection related to intraoperative ultrasound use. Conclusion: Intraoperative ultrasound is a convenient intraoperative guiding tool in the localization of brain lesions and the reliability of the amount of resection.
___
- 1. Hammoud MA, Ligon BL, elSouki R, Shi WM, Schomer DF, Sawaya R. Use of intra operative ultra sound forlocalizingtumorsand determining theex tent of resection: a comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 1996; 84(5):737–41.
- 2. Kumar P, Sukthankar R, Damany BJ, Mishraa J, Jha AN. Evaluation of intraoperative ultrasound in neurosurgery. Ann Acad Med Singap 1993;22(supp3):422–7.
- 3. Moiyadi AV. Objective assessment of intraoperative ultrasound in brain tumors. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014; 156(4):703–4.
- 4. Engelhardt M, Hansen C, Eyding J, Wilkening W, Brenke C, Krogias C, et al. Feasibility of contrast-enhanced sonography during resection of cerebral tumours: initial results of a prospective study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007; 33(4):571–5.
- 5. Selbekk T, Jakola AS, Solheim O, Johansen TF, Lindseth F, Reinertsen I, et al. Ultrasound imaging in neurosurgery: approach esto minimize surgically induced image artefacts for improved resection control. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2013; 155(6):973–80.
- 6. He W, Jiang XQ, Wang S, Zhang MZ, Zhao JZ, Liu HZ, et al. Intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound for brain tumors. Clin Imaging 2008; 32(6):419–24.
- 7. Gerganov VM, Samii A, Akbarian A, Stieglitz L, Samii M, Fahlbusch R. Reliability of intraoperative high-resolution 2D ultrasound as an alternative to high-field strength MR imaging for tumor resection control: a prospective comparative study. J Neurosurg 2009; 111(3):512–9.
- 8. Nikas DC, Hartov A, Lunn K, Rick K, Paulsen K, Roberts DW. Coregistered intraoperative ultrasonography in resection of malignant glioma. Neurosurg Focus 2003; 14(2):E6.
- 9. Unsgard G, Solheim O, Lindseth F, Selbekk T. Intra-operative imaging with 3D ultrasound in neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2011; 109:181–6.
- 10. Lindner D, Trantakis C, Renner C, Arnold S, Schmitgen A, Schneider J, et al. Application of intraoperative 3D ultrasound during navigated tumor resection. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2006; 49(4):197–202.
- 11. Bal J, Camp SJ, Nandi D. The use of ultrasound in intracranial tumor surgery. Acta Neurochir 2016; 158(6):1179-85.
- 12. Mair R, Heald J, Poeata I, Ivanov M. A practical grading system of ultrasonographic visibility for intracerebral lesions. Acta Neurochir 2013; 155(12): 2293-8.