Anıl EKER, Tansu DEGİRMENCİ, Bulent GUNLUSOY, Ertugrul SEFİK, Serdar CELİK, Ismail BASMACI, Ibrahim Halil BOZKURT

PCNL OPERASYONU SONRASI REZİDÜEL FRAGMANLARIN TESPİTİNDE PEROPERATİF FLOROSKOPİ GÖRÜNTÜSÜNÜN ETKİNLİĞİ

Giriş: Perkütan nefrolitotomi (PCNL) ameliyatı sonrası rezidüel fragmanların tespitinde peroperatif floroskopi görüntüsü ile ilk hafta ultrasonografi kombinasyonunu non kontrast bilgisayarlı tomografi (NKBT) ile karşılaştırmak.Gereç ve Yöntem: Kliniğimizde Ocak 2018 - Ocak 2019 tarihleri arasında radyopak böbrek taşı nedeniyle PCNL yapılan toplam 208 hasta çalışmaya alındı. Rezidüel fragmanların (RF) tespitinde kullanılan teknikler (floroskopi, direk üriner sistem grafisi (DÜSG)), ultrasonografi (US), NKBT ve US + floroskopi kombinasyonu) duyarlılık, özgüllük, pozitif ve negatif prediktif değerler açısından karşılaştırıldı.Bulgular: RF tespitinde peroperatif floroskopi görüntüsü ile ilk hafta ultrasonografi kombinasyonunun duyarlılık ve özgüllük oranları % 91.3 ve % 98.8 (PPV:% 95.5 ve NPV:% 97.6), klinik önemli rezidüel fragman tespitinde (>4mm) ise 91.7 ve% 96.5 (PPV:% 84.6 ve NPV:% 98.2) olarak bulunmuştur.Sonuç: Bu çalışmada, floroskopi ve US kombinasyonunun DÜSG ve NKBT gibi x-ray maruziyeti olmadan RF tespiti için yüksek hassasiyet ve özgüllük değerlerine sahip olduğunu gösterdik

EFFICACY OF PEROPERATIVE FLUOROSCOPY IMAGE IN DETECTION OF RESIDUAL FRAGMENTS AFTER PCNL OPERATION

Introduction: To compare the combination of peroperative fluoroscopy image and the first week ultrasonography with the firsth month Non-contrast computarised tomography (NCCT) for The Detection Of Residual Fragments after Percutaneousnephrolithotomy (PCNL) operation.Material and Method: A total of 208 Patients who underwent PCNL due to a radioopaque renal stone in between January 2018 to January 2019 in our clinic were included in this study. Techniques for the detection of residual fragments (RF) (fluoroscopy, plain radiography of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder (KUB), ultrasonography (US), NCCT and combination of US + fluoroscopy) were compared according to sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive valueResults: Sensitivity and specifisity rates of the prediction of postoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative 1st week US combination were 91.3% and 98.8% (PPV: 95.5% and NPV: 97.6%) for RF status; and 91.7% and 96.5% (PPV: 84.6% and NPV: 98.2%) for CSRF (>4mm) status, respectively.Conclusion: In this study, we showed that the combination of fluoroscopy and US has high sensitivity and specificity values for RF detection without x-ray exposure such as KUB and NCCT.

PDF

___

1. Argyropoulos AN, Tolley DA. Evaluation of outcome following lithotripsy. Curr Opin Urol 2010; 20(2): 154-8.
2. Srisubat A, Potisat S, Lojanapiwat B, Setthawong V, Laopaiboon M. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 24(11): CD007044.
3. Sahinkanat T, Ekerbicer H, Onal B, Tansu N, Resim S, Citgez S, Oner A.Evaluation of the effects of relationships between main spatial lower pole calyceal anatomic factors on the success of shock-wave lithotripsy in patients with lower pole kidney stones. Urology 2008; 71(5): 801-5.
4. Danuser H, Müller R, Descoeudres B, Dobry E, Studer UE. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower calyx calculi: how much is treatment outcome influenced by the anatomy of the collecting system? Eur Urol 2007; 52(2): 539-46.
5. 5.Segura JW, Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Dretler SP, Kahn RI, Lingeman JE, et al: Nephrolithiasis Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of staghorn calculi. The American Urological Association Nephrolithiasis Clinical Guidelines Panel. J Urol 1994; 151(6); 1648-51.
6. Degirmenci T, Bozkurt IH, Celik S, Yarimoglu S, Basmaci I, Sefik E. Does leaving residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with positive stone culture and/or renal pelvic urine culture increase the risk of infectious complications? Urolithiasis 2019; 47(4): 371-5.
7. de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, Gutierrez J, Lingeman Jet al. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol. 2011; 25(1): 11-7.
8. Omar M, Chaparala H, Monga M, Sivalingam S. Contemporary Imaging Practice Patterns Following Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease. J Endourol 2015; 29(10): 1122-5.
9. Rippel CA, Nikkel L, Lin YK, Danawala Z, Olorunnisomo V, Youssef RF, et al. Residual fragments following ureteroscopic lithotripsy: incidence and predictors on postoperative computerized tomography. J Urol 2012 ; 188(6): 2246-51.
10. Park J, Hong B, Park T, Park HK. Effectiveness of noncontrast computed tomography in evaluation of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2007; 21(7): 684–7.
11. Delvecchio FC, Preminger GM. Management of residual stones. Urol Clin North Am 2000; 27(2): 347-354.
12. Kaufmann OG, Sountoulides P, Kaplan A, Louie M, McDougall E, Clayman R. Skin treatment and tract closure for tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: University of California, Irvine, technique. J Endourol 2009; 23(10): 1739–41.
13. Portis AJ, Laliberte MA, Holtz C, Ma W, Rosenberg MS, Bretzke CA. Confident intraoperative decision making during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: does this patient need a second look? Urology 2008; 71(2); 218–22.
14. Osman Y, El-Tabey N, Refai H, Elnahas A, Shoma A, Eraky I, et al. Detection of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: role of nonenhanced spiral computerized tomography. J Urol 2008; 179(1): 198–200.
15. Pearle MS, Watamull LM, Mullican MA. Sensitivity of noncontrast helical computerized tomography and plain film radiography compared to flexible nephroscopy for detecting residual fragments after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 1999; 162(1): 23–6.
16. Khaitan A, Gupta NP, Hemal AK, Dogra PN, Seth A, Aron M. Post-ESWL, clinically insignificant residual stones: reality or myth? Urology 2002; 59(1): 20–4.
17. Skolarikos A, Papatsoris AG. Diagnosis and management of postpercutaneous nephrolithotomy residual stone fragments. J Endourol 2009; 23(10): 1751–5.
18. Portis AJ, Laliberte MA, Holtz C, Ma W, Rosenberg MS, Bretzke CA. Confident intraoperative decision making during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: does this patient need a second look? Urology. 2008; 71(2) :218-22.
19. Batagello CA, Vicentini FC, Marchini GS, Torricelli FCM, Srougi M, Nahas WC, Mazzucchi E. Current trends of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a developing country Int Braz J Urol 2018; 44(2): 304-13.