Selim YAZICI

1810

TOWARDS CORPORATE SUSTA I NABIL I TY: THE L INK BETWEEN BUSINESS ETH ICS, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBIL I TY

Is ahlaki, günümüzde isletmeler ve toplum arasindaki iliskiler arttikça ve genellikle toplum açisindan problem yaratan uygulamalar görülmeye basladikça daha siklikla gündeme gelmeye baslamistir. Bu çalismanin temeli, isletmeler ve toplum arasinda uzun süredir devam eden bu ikileme dayanmaktadir. Bu sorunun çözümünde, yönetic ilerin bu ikilemi yaratan is ahlaki, kurumsal yönetim ve kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk gib i faktörleri anlamalari ve buna uygun davranislar sergilemeleri kritik öneme sahip olmaktadir. Bu kapsamda çalismada, is letme ve toplum arasinda süregiden bu sorunlarin çözümünde yöneticilerin tutumlarini yönlend iren is ahlaki kavrami, kurumsal yönetim ve kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk kavramlari ile ilis kilendirilerek, is letmenin uzun vadede sürdürüleb ilirligini saglama perspektifi ile degerlendirilecektir

Sorumluluk Iliskisi K ur umsal Sür dür ülebili r lige Dogr u: I s Ahlak i, K ur umsal Yönetim ve K ur umsal Sosyal

The root of this study is mostly grounded to an old dilemma between the corporations and the society. The important issue is that, solving this problem requires that, managers should understand the critical factors such as business ethics, corporate governance, and corporate social responsibility and createssolutions by using the outcomes. The aim of this paper is to reframe the discussion and find a link between business ethics, corporate governance and corporate social responsibility for a sustainable business
PDF

___

  • BUCHHOLZ, Rogene A., “Corporate Responsibility and The Good Society: From Economics to Ecology”, Business Horizons, (July-August 1991), pp. 19-
  • CARROLL, Archie B., “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders”, Business Horizons, Vol. 34, No. 4, (July-August 1991), pp. 39-48.
  • CARROLL, Archie B., BUCHHOLTZ, Ann K., Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management, 4th. Ed., Cincinnati: South-Western Publications, 2000.
  • COLLINS, Denis, Essentials of Business Ethics: Creating an Organization of High Integrity and Superior Performance, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, 2009.
  • CRANE, Andrew, MATTEN, Dirk, Business Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
  • CRANE, Andrew, MATTEN, Dirk, MOON, Jeremy, Corporations and Citizenship, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
  • DAVIS, Keith, “The Case for and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 16, No. 2, (June 1973), pp. 312-322.
  • De GEORGE, Richard T., Business Ethics, 6th. Ed., New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2006.
  • De GEUS, Arie, The Living Company: Habits for Survival in Turbulent Business Environment, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2002.
  • DRUCKER, Peter F., ‘The New Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility’, California Management Review, Vol.26, No.2, (Winter 1984), pp. 53-63.
  • ELKINGTON, John, Cannibals With Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, Oxford: Capstone Publishing, 1997.
  • ETHEREDGE, John M., “The Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility: An Alternative Scale Structure”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 18, 1999. pp. 51-64.
  • EWIN, RE, “The Moral Status of the Corporation”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 10, 1991, pp. 749-756.
  • FREEMAN, R. Edward, Strategic Management: Stakeholder Approach, Boston: Pitman, 1984.
  • FRENCH, Peter A., “The Corporation as Moral Person”, American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 3, (July 1979), pp. 207-215.
  • FRIEDMAN, Milton, “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits”, New York Times, (September 13, 1970) in: Walther Ch.
  • ZIMMERLI, Klaus RICHTIGER, Markus HOLZINGER (Eds.), Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2007, pp. 173- 178.
  • GILL, Amiram, “Corporate Governance as Social Responsibility: Research Agenda”, Berkeley Journal of International Law, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2008, pp. 452-478.
  • HAWKINS, David E., Corporate Social Responsibility: Balancing Tomorrow’s Sustainability with Today’s Profitability, New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2006.
  • JAMALI, Dima, SAFIEDDINE, Asem M., RABBATH, Myriam, “Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Synergies and Interrelationships”, Corporate Governance, Vol. 16, No. 5, (September 2008), pp. 443-459.
  • KOLK, Ans, PINKSE, Jonatan, “The Integration of Corporate Governance in Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management Journal, Vol. 17, 2010, pp. 15-26.
  • MALLIN, Christine A., Corporate Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
  • MELLAHI, Kamel, WOOD, Geoffrey, The Ethical Business: Challenges and Controversies, N.Y.: Palgrave MacMillan, 2003.
  • MOORE, Geoff, “Corporate Moral Agency: Review and Implications”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.21, No.4, 1999, pp. 329-343.
  • PREMEAUX, Shane, “The Link Between Management Behavior and Ethical Philosophy in the Wake of the Enron Convictions”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 85, 2009, pp. 13—25.
  • RICKETTS, Martin, The Economics of Business Enterprise, Third Ed., Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2002.
  • ROSSOUW, G. J., “Business Ethics and Corporate Governance: Global Survey”, Business Society, Vol.44, No. 1, (March 2005), pp. 32-39.
  • SAHLIN-ANDERSON, Kerstin, “Corporate Social Responsibility: Trend and Movement, but of What and for What?”, Corporate Governance, Vol. 6, No.5, 2006, pp. 595-608.
  • SHANKMAN, Neil A., “Reframing the Debate Between Agency and Stakeholder Theories of the Firm”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 19, No. 4,1999, pp. 319—334.
  • SHLEIFER, Andrei, VISHNY, Robert W., “A Survey of Corporate Governance”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, No. 2, (June 1997), pp. 737- 783.
  • SINCLAIR, Amanda, “Approaches to Organisational Culture and Ethics”, Journal of Business Ethics, No. 12, 1993, pp. 63-73.
  • SINGHAPAKDI, Anusorn, et. al., “The Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility: Scale Development”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 15, No. 11, 1996, pp. 1131-1140.
  • STANWICK, Peter A., STANWICK, Sarah D., Understanding Business Ethics, New Jersey: Pearson Education, 2009.
  • TREVINO, Linda K., NELSON, Katherine A., Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk about How to Do It Right, rd. Ed., New Jersey: John Wiley Sons, 2004.
  • VELASQUEZ, Manuel, “Why Ethics Matters: Defense of Ethics in Business Organizations”, Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1996, pp. 201-222.
  • VELASQUEZ, Manuel G., Business Ethics, 6h. Ed., New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2006.
  • WICKS, Andrew C., FREEMAN, R. Edward, WERHANE, Patricia H., MARTIN, Kristen E., Business Ethics: Managerial Approach, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2010.
  • http://www.ftse.com/Indices/FTSE4Good Index Series/index.isp
  • http://www.ise.org/Indexes/StockIndexesHome/CorporateGovernanceIndeX.as px?sfopl=true
  • http://Wwwsustainability-index.com/
İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1303-1260
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: İstanbul Üniversitesi
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

TÜKETICI AÇISINDAN IS AHLAK INA BIR BAK IS VE PERAK ENDE SEK TÖRÜNDE AMPIRIK BIR ARASTIRMA

Ahmet SEK ERK AYA, Emrah CENGI Z

CAM TAVAN SORUNUNUN TESPITINDE NITEL UNSURLARIN ÖNEMi: IMK B100 ENDEKSI SIRKETLERI ÜZERINE BIR ÇALIşMA

Ahmet M ENTES

BUSINESS ETHICS, CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND MULTINATIONAL COMPANIES

Esra Nemli ÇALISKAN

TOWARDS CORPORATE SUSTA I NABIL I TY: THE L INK BETWEEN BUSINESS ETH ICS, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBIL I TY

Selim YAZICI

YÜKÜMLÜLÜK DOLARIZASYONU VE BILANÇO ETKISI: TÜRKIYE ÜZERINE BIR ANALIZ“

Nejla ADANUR AKLAN

IS AHL AK I PERSPEK TIFINDE YA TIRI M CI IÇIN K URUMSAL YÖNETISI M IN SEFFAFL IKIL K ESININ ÖNEM I

Gökçe AKDEMIR ÖMÜR