Küresel Dönüşümde Sosyal Politikanın Etkinliği: Dört Perspektiften Değerlendirme

Küreselleşme politik, akademik ve pratik alanda tüm dünyada popüler bir konudur. Bu konuyu tam olarak anlayabilmek, birbiri ile ilişkili birçok sürecin dikkate alınmasını gerektirmektedir. Küreselleşme üzerinde fikir beyan eden birçok yazar, politikacı ya da siyasi eylemci, küreselleşmenin daha çok olumsuz etkilerine vurgu yapmaktadır. Fakat bu makalede küreselleşme, farklı görüşleri ifade eden dört temel bakış açısı çerçevesinden incelenmiştir. Ardından, küreselleşme ve sosyal politika ilişkisi bu dört bakış açısı ışığında kurulmuştur. Çalışmada temel olarak, küreselleşme ve sosyal politika arasında iki yönlü ve dinamik ilişkinin varlığı tespit edilmiştir. Bu makale dört bölüm üzerine yapılandırılmıştır. İlk bölüm, küreselleşme kavramı ile ilgilidir. İkinci bölüm küreselleşme ve sosyal politika ilişkisini, üçüncü bölüm bu ilişkiyi dinamik sürecin bir parçası olarak incelemektedir. Son bölüm ise değerlendirme ve sonucu içermektedir.

Efficiency of Social Policy in the Global Transformation: Evaluation from Four Perspectives

Globalization is one of the most popular issues in political, academic and practical areas in the world. It is highly contested concept best understood as several of interlinked processes. Most of the writers, politicians and political activists who talk about globalization, express the concern about its negative effects. But in this article globalization has examined from the four main perspectives. These perspectives include all side of views. After, globalization and social policy relationship has been set up in the light of these main perspectives. It has been seen that there was dynamic, two-way relationships between globalization processes and the national and worldwide social policies. This article has been formed upon four sections. The first section is related to globalization notion. The second one includes globalization and social policy relationships. The third section examines the globalization and social policy relationships as a part of a dynamic process. And the last section includes evaluation and conclusions.

PDF

___

Aisbett, E. (2007), “Why are the Critics so Convinced that Globalization is Bad for the Poor”, Globalization and Poverty, ed. Harrison, A., The University of Chicago Press, USA.
Annetts, J. Alex, L, McNeish W and Mooney G. (2009), Understanding Social Welfare Movements, Social Policy Association, UK.
Appadurai, A. (2001), Globalization, Duke University Press, UK.
Bellamy, A.J (2005), International Society and its Critics, Oxford University Press, UK.
Cooper, F., Hocking B, Maley, W. (2008), Global Governance and Diplomacy World Apart?, Macmillan St Martin‟s Press, USA.
Dasgupta, S., Kiely, R. (2006), Globalization and After, Sage Publications, New Delhi.
Deacon, B., Hulse M., Stubbs P. (1997), Global Social Policy-International Organizations and the Future of Welfare, SAGE Pub. London.
Deacon, B. (2007), Global Social Policy & Governance, SAGE Pub. London.
Esping-Anderson G. (1996), Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies, Sage Publications, UK.
Fukuyama, F. (2004), State Building: Governance and World Order in the Twenty-first Century, London: Profile Books.
Gautney, H. (2010), Protest and Organization in the Alternative Globalization Era, Palgrave MacMillan.
Gould A. (1993), Capitalist Welfare Systems-A Comparison of Japan, Britain&Sweden, Longman, NewYork.
Huntington, S.P. (1996), The Clash of Civilizations: The Debate, Foreign Affairs, New York- London.
Jordan, B. (1996), A Theory of Poverty and Social Exclusion, Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, UK.
Kanbur, R. (2008), “Economic Policy, Distribution and Poverty: The Nature of Disagreements”, Globalization and Poverty, ed. Collier, P., Gunning, J.M., Edward Elgar Publishing, Vol.1, USA.
Lomborg, B., Global, C. (2004), Global Solutions, Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, UK.
Mesa-Lago, C. (2005), “Models of Development, Social Policy and Reform in Latin America”, Social Policy in a Development Contex, Ed. Mkandawire, T. UNRISD, Palgrave McMillan.
Mishra, R., (1999), Globalization and the Welfare State, Edward Elgar Publishing, UK.
Nester, W. R. (2010), “Globalization, Wealth, and Power in the Twenty,-first Century”, Palgrave Macmillan St Martin‟s Press, USA, 2010.
Nye, J. S., Donahue J. D. (2000), Governance in a Globalizing World, Brookings Institution Pres, USA.
Pierson, P. (2001), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford University Press, UK.
Pitzer, G., Atalay, Z. (2010), Reading in Globalization Key Concepts and Major Debates, Blackwell Publishing, UK.
Reiger, E, Leibfred S. (2003), Limits to Globalization: Welfare States and the World Economy, Blackwell, UK.
Saurin, J. (2000), “Globalization, Poverty and the Promises of Modernity”, Poverty in World Politics, ed. Vandersluis S. and Yeros P., Millennium: Journal of International Studies, UK.
Schaeffer, R.K. (2005), Understanding Globalization, Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, USA, 2005.
Scholte, J.A. (2005), Globalization a Critical Introduction, Palgrave Macmillan St Martin‟s Press, USA, 2005.
Shaw, M. (2000), Theory of the Global State, Cambridge Studies in International Relations: 73, Cambridge University Press, UK.
Sykes, R. (1998), “The Future of Social Policy in Europe?”, Developments in European Social Policy- Governance and Diversity ed. Sykes R. and Alcock P., The Policy Press, UK.
Sykes, R. (2008), “Globalization and Social Policy”, The Student’s Companion to Social Policy, ed. Alcock P, Margeret M., and Rowlingson K., Blackwell Publishing, UK.(430- 437).