Ticari bilimlerde matematik öğretiminde karşılaşılan sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri

Ticari Bilimlerde öğrenciler Ekonomi ve Finans başta olmak üzere ana dal müfredatlarında mevcut olan dersleri daha iyi anlayabilmek, mezun olduklarında, ekonomik analiz yapıp, matematik model kurabilmek için iyi derecede matematik bilmek zorundadırlar. Oysa liseden gelen, Ticari Bilimler öğrencilerinin çoğunluğu, başlangıçta matematiğe çok fazla ilgi duymamaktadır. Bu öğrenciler arasında, matematikten başarılı olamadıkları ya da sevmedikleri için sosyal bilimleri seçtiklerini söyleyenlerin azımsanamayacak sayıda olması, matematik öğretimine özel bir yaklaşımın gerekliliğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Ticari Bilimler Fakültesinde 8 yıl boyunca uygulanan basit ama etkili yöntem anlatılmıştır. Burada uygulanan matematik dersinin içeriğinin, yanı sıra bu içeriğin anlatım sırası ve metodu hepsi bir bütün olarak önem kazanmaktadır.

The problem faced in mathematics teaching in commercial science and proposal for solutions

In order to better understand their majors’ curriculum, and to do economic analysis and create mathematical models when they graduate, students studying Commercial Science have to know mathematics very well. However, high school graduates who decide to study Commercial Science are not very interested mathematics. There is a nontrivial number of students among these graduates who choose social sciences because they are not sucsessful in or dislike mathematics. Thus, a new approach to teaching mathematics is essential. In this study, the simple but effective methods used in Commercial Science Faculty for the last 8 years are explained. The contents of the mathematics courses and the way the contents are taught are of utmost importance.

___

  • Barker, W. and S. L. Ganter, Fundamental Mathematics: Voices of the Partner Disciplines, In S. Gordon and J. Narayan (Eds.), Rethinking Precalculus, MAA Reports, Mathematical Association of America,2004
  • Becker, J-P. & Shimada S. (1997). The Open-Ended Approach: A New Proposal for Teaching Mathematics. Reston, Virginia: NCTM.
  • Cai, J. (2003). What research tells us about teaching mathematics through problem solving. In F. K. Lester, Jr. (Ed.), Research and issues in teaching mathematics through problem solving (pp. 241-254). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Cai, J., & Nie, B. (2007). Problem solving in Chinese mathematics education: Research and practice. ZDM, 39, 459–473.
  • Chiang, A. C., Fundamental Methods of Mathematical Economics 3rd ed., N.Y, McGraw Hill Co, (1984), PP. 3-4.
  • CUPM (The Committee on the Undergraduate Program in Mathematics ) Discussion Papers about Mathematics and the Mathematical Sciences in (2010):What Should Students Know Published and Distributed by The Mathematical Association of America
  • Dossey,J., Halvorsen, K., McCrone, S., (2008), Mathematics Education in the United StatesA Capsule Summary Fact Book written forThe Eleventh International Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME- 11) Monterrey, Mexico, July 2008,under the auspices of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and the United States.
  • Dossey, J. A.,(1998) ed., Confronting the Core Curriculum: Considering Change in the Undergraduate Mathematics Major, MAA Notes 45, MAA, Washington, DC.
  • Gold, Bonnie, Sandra Keith, and William Marion, eds., Assessment Practices in Undergraduate Mathematics,,MAA Notes 49, MAA, Washington, DC, 1999.
  • Henningsen, M. A., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and students’ cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 524-549.
  • Judson T.W. , (1999) Japan: A Different Model of Mathematics Education Contemporary Issues in Mathematics Education MSRI Publications Volume 36, , 75-80.
  • Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 29-63.
  • Lappan, G., & Phillips, E. (1998). Teaching and learning in the Connected Mathematics Project. In L.
  • Leutzinger (Ed.), Mathematics in the middle (pp. 83-92). Reston, Va.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Lesh, R., & Zawojewski, J. S. (2007). Problem solving and modeling. In F. K. Lester, Jr., (Ed.), The handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 2nd ed. (pp. 763-804). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, and Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
  • Marcus, R., & Fey, J. T. (2003). Selecting quality tasks for problem-based teaching. In H. L. Schoen & R. I. Charles (Eds.), Teaching mathematics through problem solving, (pp. 55-67). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • the METAL Project Consortium Mathematics for Economics: enhancing Teaching and Learning, (2007) http://www.metalproject.co.uk/METAL/Resources/Question_bank/Economics%20applications/index.html Miyakawa T. (2006). A study of “good” mathematics teaching in Japan. In Proceedings of the APEC International Symposium on Innovation and Good Practice for Teaching and Learning Mathematics through Lesson Study (pp. 119-132), 14-17 June, Khon Kaen, Thailand. (http://home.kku.ac.th/crme/apec.htm). McCloskey,D., The Trouble with Mathematics and Statistics in Economics. History of Economic Ideas XIII (3,2005): 85-102
  • Kahramaner,Y. Kahramaner, R.(2002) Üniversite Eğitiminde Matematik Düşüncenin Önemi, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Dergisi,(15-22)
  • Springer, L.Stanne, M.E.and Donovan, S.(1998) Effects of cooperative learning on undergraduate in science, mathematics, engineering and technology: A meta –analysis.(Research Monograph No. 11) Madison: University of Wiskonsin-Madison, NAtional Institute for Science Educational Research.
  • Steen, L. A. ed., (1989) Reshaping College Mathematics, MAA Notes 13, MAA, Washington, DC,.
  • Stinson, J.E. and Milter, R.G. (1996) Problem-Based Learning in Business Education: Curriculum Design and Implementation Issues New Directions in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Jossey-Bass.
  • Stuparu, D., Daniasa,C.I.,(2009) Significance of Mathematics for Economics, http://fse.tibiscus.ro/anale/Lucrari2009/064.%20Stuparu,%20Danaiasa.pdf Tall,D.,(1991) Advanced Mathematical Thinking,Boston, London, Kluwer Academic Publishers
  • Willoughby, S. S. (1990). Mathematics education for a changing world. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Yıldırım, C., (1999) Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme, ÖSYM Yayınları, Ankara