SAHRA SAYĞAN TUNÇAY, OLCA SÜRGEVİL DALKILIÇ

Yönetim ve Organizasyon Bilim Alanında Ortak Yazarlılık

Bu çalışmanın amacı yönetim ve organizasyon bilim alanında ortak yazarlılık olgusunun nasıl bir çerçeve çizdiğini ortaya çıkarmak ve detaylı yazın taramasıyla elde edilen bulgulardan saptamalara ulaşmaktır. Bu amaçla, yazındaki çalışmalardan yola çıkarak ilk önce ortak yazarlılık konusunda, kavramsal bir yapı oluşturulmuş, ortak yazarlılığın "nedenleri", "sonuçları", ortak yazarlılıkta "üretkenlik" ve "yöntem" hakkında bilgi verilmiştir. Ardından yönetim ve organizasyon alanında ortak yazarlılık konusunda ulaşılabilen tüm çalışmalar irdelenmiş ve ortak bulgulardan belirgin tespitler elde edilmiştir. Yönetim ve organizasyon alanında "iki yazarlı ortak yazarlılığın baskın olduğu ve bu çalışmaların daha fazla atıf aldıkları", "bireylerin daha çok benzer özelliklere sahip oldukları bireylerle ortak yayın yaptıkları fakat farklı özellikteki bireylerle yapılan ortak yazarlı yayınların oranında artış olduğu", "ulaşılan ortak yazarlılık ağlarının yoğunluklarının düşük olduğu", "ağ içindeki izole grupların yıllar içerisinde azaldığı", "en başarılı araştırmacıların birbirleriyle bağlantı içinde oldukları ve bazen ortak yazarlılık ağı içerisinde aracılık rolü üstlendikleri" bulgularına ulaşılmıştır

Co-Authorship in Management and Organization Science

The aim of this research is to reveal out a framework about how co-authorship constitutes in management and organization science and to reach detections via a detailed literature review. By this way, firstly a conceptual structure is formed based on the studies in the literature. “Reasons” and “results” of co-authorship and “production” and “method” in co-authorship studies are examined. Afterward, all studies reached about co-authorship in management and organization science are investigated and significant determinations are discovered. The detections (common findings) of all these researches can be classified as, “co-authorship studies which are written by two authors are dominated and cited more in the literature in comparison by the other co-authorship studies which are written by different amount of authors”, “authors collaborate with the ones having same features but also there is an increase in the number of authors whom collaborates with different kind of people”, “densities of co-authorship networks of reached studies are low”, there is a decrease in the ratio of isolated groups in co-authorship networks”, “the most successful researchers in the specified discipline are connected to each other and sometimes they become brokers in these co-authorship networks”

PDF

___

Abbasi, A., Altmann, J. ve Hossain, L., (2011). “Identifying the Effects of CoAuthorship Networks on the Performance of Scholars: A Correlation and Regression Analysis of Performance Measures and Social Network Analysis Measures”, Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 5, No. 4, 594-607.
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A. ve Costa, F. D., (2009). “Research Collaboration and Productivity: Is There Correlation?”, Higher Education, Vol. 57, No. 2, 155-171.
Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C. ve Galan, J. L., (2006). “Co-authorship in Management and Organizational Studies: An Empirical and Network Analysis”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 43, No. 5, 957-983.
Amabile, T. M., Patterson, C., Mueller, J., Wojcik, T., Odomirok, P. W., Marsh, M. ve Kramer, S. J., (2001). “Academic-Practitioner Collaboration in Management Research: A Case of Cross-Profession Collaboration”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, No. 2, 418-431.
Ang, S. H., (1997). “Fourteen Years of Research in the Asia Pacific Journal of Management”, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 14, No. 1, 89-97.
Arnaboldi, V., Dunbar, R. I. M., Passarella, A. ve Conti, M., (2016). “Analysis of CoAuthorship Ego Networks”, İçinde International Conference and School on Network Science (s. 82-96), Springer, Cham.
Beaver, D. ve Rosen, R., (1979). “Studies in Scientific Collaboration: Part I. The Professional Origins of Scientific Co-Authorship”, Scientometrics, Vol. 1, No. 1, 65-84.
Bordons, M., Aparicio, J., González-Albo, B. ve Díaz-Faes, A. A., (2015). “The Relationship Between the Research Performance of Scientists and Their Position in Co-Authorship Networks in Three Fields”, Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 9, No. 1, 135-144.
Bozeman, B. ve Boardman, C., (2014). Research Collaboration and Team Science: A State of the Art Review and Agenda, Springer, London.
Bukvova, H., (2010). “Studying Research Collaboration: A Literature Review”, Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1-18.
Debicki, B. J., Matherne III, C. F., Kellermanns, F. W. ve Chrisman, J. J., (2009). “Family Business Research in the New Millennium: An Overview of the Who, the Where, the What and the Why”, Family Business Review, Vol. 22, No. 2, 151- 166.
Ding, Y., (2011). “Scientific Collaboration and Endorsement: Network Analysis of Coauthorship and Citation Networks”, Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 5, No. 1, 187- 203.
Ductor, L., (2015). “Does Co-authorship Lead to Higher Academic Productivity?”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 77, No. 3, 385- 407.
Durden, G. C. ve Perri, T. J., (1995). “Coauthorship and Publication Efficiency”, Atlantic Economic Journal, Vol. 23, No. 1, 69-76.
Dyer W. G. ve Sanchez, M., (1998). “Current State of Family Business Theory and Practice as Reflected in Family Business Review 1988-1997”, Family Business Review, Vol. 11, No. 4, 287-295.
Floyd, S. W., Schroeder, D. M. ve Finn, D. M., (1994). “Only If I'm First Author: Conflict over Credit in Management Scholarship”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37, No. 3, 734-747.
Frame, J. D. ve Carpenter, M. P., (1979). “International Research Collaboration”, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 9, No. 4, 481-497.
Frenken, K., Hoekman, J., Kok, S., Ponds, R., Oort, F. V. ve Vliet, J. V., (2009). “Death of Distance in Science? A Gravity Approach to Research Collaboration”, İçinde Innovation Networks: New Approaches in Modelling and Analyzing (43-58), Edt: Andreas Pyka, Andra Scharnhorst. Springer, Berlin.
Gazni, A. ve Didegah, F., (2011). “Investigating Different Types of Research Collaboration and Citation Impact: A Case Study of Harvard University’s Publications”, Scientometrics, Vol. 87, No. 2, 251-265.
Glanzel, W., (2002). “Coauthorship Patterns and Trends in the Sciences (1980-1998): A Bibliometric Study with Implications for Database Indexing and Search Strategies”. Library Trends, Vol. 50, No. 3, 461-473.
Glanzel, W. ve Schubert, A., (2005). “Analysing Scientific Networks Through CoAuthorship”, İçinde Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems (s. 257- 279), Edt: Henk F. Moed, Wolfgang Glanzel ve Ulrich Schmoch, Kluwer Academic Publishers, America.
Glanzel, W., Schubert, A., ve Braun, T., (2002). “A Relational Charting Approach to the World of Basic Research in Twelve Science Fields at the End of The Second Millennium”, Scientometrics, Vol. 55, No. 3, 335-348.
Hagstrom, W.O., (1965). The Scientific Community, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.
He, Z. L., Geng, X. S. ve Campbell-Hunt, C., (2009). “Research Collaboration and Research Output: A Longitudinal Study of 65 Biomedical Scientists in A New Zealand University”, Research Policy, Vol. 38, No. 2, 306-317.
Hoekman, J., Frenken, K. ve Tijssen, R. J. W., (2010). “Research Collaboration at a Distance: Changing Spatial Patterns of Scientific Collaboration within Europe”, Research Policy, Vol. 39, No. 5, 662-673.
Inkpen, A. C. ve Beamish, P. W., (1994). “An Analysis of Twenty-Five Years of Research in the Journal of International Business Studies”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 25, No. 4, 703-713.
Jassawalla, A. R. ve Sashittal, H. C., (1998). “An Examination of Collaboration in High-Technology New Product Development Processes”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 15, No. 3, 237-254.
Jeong, S., Choi, J. Y. ve Kim, J., (2011). “The Determinants of Research Collaboration Modes: Exploring the Effects of Research and Researcher Characteristics on CoAuthorship”, Scientometrics, Vol. 89, No. 3, 967-983.
Katz, J. S., (1994). “Geographical Proximity and Scientific Collaboration”, Scientometrics, Vol. 31, No. 1, 31-43.
Katz, J. S. ve Martin, B. R., (1997). “What is Research Collaboration?”, Research Policy, Vol. 26., No. 1, 1-18.
Kim, J. ve Perez, C., (2015). “Co-Authorship Network Analysis in Industrial Ecology Research Community”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 19, No. 2, 222-235.
Köseoğlu, M. A., (2016). “Growth and Structure of Authorship and Co-Authorship Network in the Strategic Management Realm: Evidence from the Strategic Management Journal”, Business Research Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 3, 153-170.
Köseoğlu, M. A., (2016). “Mapping the Institutional Collaboration Network of Strategic Management Research: 1980–2014”, Scientometrics, Vol. 109, No. 1, 203-226.
Kraut, R. E., Galegher, J. ve Egido, C., (1988a). “Relationships and Tasks in Scientific Collaboration”. Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, 31-58.
Kraut, R., Egido, C. ve Galegher, J., (1988b). “Patterns of Contact and Communication in Scientific Research Collaboration”. İçinde Proceedings of the 1988 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (s. 1-12).
Kretschmer, H., (1994). “Coauthorship Networks of Invisible Colleges and Institutionalized Communities”, Scientometrics, Vol. 30, No. 1, 363-369.
Kumar, S., (2015). “Co-authorship Networks: a Review of the Literature”, Aslib Journal of Information Management, Vol. 67, No. 1, 55-73.
Lee, S. ve Bozeman, B., (2005). “The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity”, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 35, No. 5, 673-702.
Lee, Y. S., (2000). “The Sustainability of University-Industry Research Collaboration: An Empirical Assessment”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 25, No. 2, 111-133.
Li, E. Y., Liao, C. H. ve Yen, H. R., (2013). “Co-authorship Networks and Research Impact: A Social Capital Perspective”, Research Policy, Vol. 42, No. 9, 1515- 1530.
Liao, C. H., (2011). “How to Improve Research Quality? Examining the Impacts of Collaboration Intensity and Member Diversity in Collaboration Networks”, Scientometrics, Vol. 86, No. 3, 747-761.
Manton, E. J. ve English, D. E., (2006). “Reasons for Co-authorship in Business Journals and the Extent of Guest or Gift Authorships”, Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, Vol. 48, No. 2, 86-95.
Manton, E. J. ve English, D. E., (2007). “The Trend Toward Multiple Authorship in Business Journals”, Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 82, No. 3, 164-168.
Manton, E. J. ve English, D. E., (2008). “An Empirical Study of Gift Authorships in Business Journals”, Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 83, No. 5, 283-287.
Matherne III, C. E., Debicki, B. J., Kellermanns, F. W. ve Chrisman, J. J., (2013). “Family Business Research in the New Millennium: An Assessment of Individual and Institutional”, Handbook of Research on Family Business (s. 17- 40), Edt: K. X. Symirnous, P. Z. Poutziouris ve S. Goel.
Melin, G., (2000). “Pragmatism and Self-Organization: Research Collaboration on the Individual level”, Research Policy, Vol. 29, No. 1, 31-40.
Melin, G., ve Persson, O., (1996). “Studying Research Collaboration Using CoAuthorships”, Scientometrics, Vol. 36, No. 3, 363-377.
Moody, J., (2004). “The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 69, No. 2, 213-238.
Newman, M. E., (2004). “Coauthorship Networks and Patterns of Scientific Collaboration”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 101, No. 1, 5200-5205.
Newman, M. E., (2001). “The Structure of Scientific Collaboration Networks”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 98, No. 2, 404-409.
Otte, E. ve Rousseau, R., (2002). “Social Network Analysis: A Powerful Strategy, also for the Information Sciences”, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 28, No. 6, 441-453.
Pekdemir, I. M., Sözüer, A., Yaşlıoğlu, D. T. ve Ceran, E. B., (2016). “Yönetim ve Organizasyon Yazını Üzerine İnceleme: Bir Anabilim Dalı Akademisyenlerinin 2005-2014 Yılları Arasındaki Yayınları”, Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business, Vol. 45, 81-93.
Ponds, R., Oort, F. V. ve Frenken, K., (2007). “The Geographical and Institutional Proximity of Research Collaboration”, Papers in Regional Science, Vol. 86, No. 3, 423-443.
Ronda-Pupo, G. A. ve Guerras-Martín, L. A., (2010). “Dynamics of The Scientific Community Network within the Strategic Management Field through the Strategic Management Journal 1980–2009: the Role of Cooperation”, Scientometrics, Vol. 85, No. 3, 821-848.
Siva, N., Hermanson, D. R. ve Hermanson, R. H., (1998). “Co-Authoring in Refereed Journals: Views of Accounting Faculty and Department Chairs”, Issues in Accounting Education, Vol. 13, No. 1.
Stokes, T. D. ve Hartley, J. A., (1989). “Coauthorship, Social Structure and Influence within Specialties”, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 19, No.1, 101-125.
Subramanyam, K., (1983). “Bibliometric Studies of Research Collaboration: A Review”, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 6, No. 1, 33-38.
Tahai, A. ve Meyer, M. J., (1999). “A Revealed Preference Study of Management Journals' Direct Influences”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, No. 3, 279- 296.
Xu, S., Yalcinkaya, G. ve Seggie, S. H., (2008). “Prolific Authors and Institutions in Leading International Business Journals”, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 25, No. 2, 189-207.
Ye, Q., Li, T. ve Law, R., (2013). “A Coauthorship Network Analysis of Tourism and Hospitality Research Collaboration”, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, Vol. 37, No. 1, 51-76.
Zupic, I. ve Cater, T., (2015). “Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization”, Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 18, No. 3, 429-472.