Corporate Social Responsibilities (CSR) and Empirical Insight into CSR Practises of Companies Listed on the BIST 100

Corporate Social Responsibilities (CSR) and Empirical Insight into CSR Practises of Companies Listed on the BIST 100

Purpose – The main aim of this study is to evaluate the role, importance, advantages and disadvantages of CSR and to understand to what extent the theory of CSR has been converted into the practice in companies listed on the BIST 100. Design/methodology/approach – This study is based on combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches. Fundamentally, it can be divided into two parts. The first part provides a theoretical framework for the main issues of CSR. In this respect, the first part of the study uses library-based information, such as books, articles and web-sources. The second part analyses the practicability of these theories by making an empirical research about CSR practises of companies listed on the BIST 100. The sample size of this study consists of randomly selected 30 companies that are carried out their commercial activities within the different sectors. All information used throughout this study is primary and indicates the 2020/2021 data of these companies on their annual reports or webpages. The BIST 100 is accepted as the main indicator used to measure the market and volume performance of the top 100 shares traded in the BIST. It is an index that is carefully examined by all major investors. The fluctuation expectations of the stock market are made by taking into account the BIST 100 Index. Briefly, the shares of these 100 corporations reflect the overall performance of the BIST. Hence, in order to get more realistic results about the success of corporations on disclosing level of CSR, the BIST 100 Index has been applied in this research. Findings – The finding of this study showed that the CSR helps to increase the number of long-term investors in financial markets, to improve the quality of products and services in corporations, and to reduce social, environmental, ethical problems in society. Due to these advantages of the CSR, the empirical research also proved that the application process of the CSR projects seems to reach a satisfactory level for listed companies on the BIST 100 on a voluntary basis. However, the points to take into consideration are the availability of human rights and anti-corruption issues because this type of the CSR projects seems to be problematic for the selected corporations. Additionally, it can be useful to create a competent authority, which will be responsible for monitoring and supervising all the CSR projects. Discussion – When CSR is examined in the first place; it can be seen as a new burden that increases the costs for corporations. Additionally, defenders of the traditional economics theory accept CSR as violating obligation to shareholders and covering the wrongdoings of corporations. Yet, it also provides many advantages in terms of companies, financial markets and societies. The most important benefits of CSR can be listed as follows; it may increase the number of both national and international investors; thus, it makes positive contributions to the long-term profitability of a company; it may improve the quality of products, the brand value and competitive power of corporations by having a positive impact on the performance of employees; it also helps to protect environment, to care human-rights issues and to establish good relations with non-governmental organizations.

___

  • Akmeşe, H. (2017). Muhasebede Sosyal Yaklaşımlar, Konya: Eğitim Yayınevi,
  • Aktan, C. C. (2011). Toplam ahlak felsefesi ve toplam ahlak yönetimi, Hukuk ve İktisat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3 (2), 65-82,
  • Aktan, C. C. ve Börü, D. (2007). Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk; (Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk: İşletmeler ve Sosyal Sorumluluk, Editör: Coşkun Can Aktan). İstanbul: İGİAD Yayınları, 6-24,
  • Aydınalp, G. I. (2013). Halkla İlişkiler Ekseninde Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk, İstanbul: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık,
  • Boeger, N., Murray, R., and Villiers, C. (2008). Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility, UK-Northampton USA: Edward Elgar Cheltenham,
  • Bonsu, S. (2019). Corporate social responsibility: Assessing the alignment of theory and practice utilizing case studies, Journal of Marketing and Management, 10 (1), 1-18,
  • Campbell J. L. (2007). Why Would Corporations Behave In Socially Responsible Ways? An Institutional Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility, Academy of Management Review, Vol.32 No: 3, 946-967,
  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance, Academy of Management Review, 4 (4), 497-505,
  • Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders, Business Horizons, 34 (4), 39-48,
  • Carroll, Archie B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: The centerpiece of competing and complementary frameworks, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 44, 87-96, 

  • Carroll, Archie B. (2016). Carroll’s pyramis of CSR: Taking another look, International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Vol.1, 1-8,
  • Dalyan, F. ve Gökbel, S. A. (2005). İşletmelerde sosyal sorumluluk: İMKB’de işlem gören bankaların sosyal sorumluluk faaliyetleri ile kârlılıkları arasındaki ilişki, Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları,
  • Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities, California Management Review, 2, 70-76,
  • Demirtaş, M. (2015). Türkiye'de yapılan kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk faaliyetlerinin uluslararası gelişmeler bağlamında değerlendirilmesi, Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk ve Kurumsal İtibar (Editör: Mine Demirtaş̧). İstanbul: Derin Yayınları, 1-54,
  • Ersöz, H. Y. (2009). Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk, İşletmelerde İşEtiği (Editörler: Sabri Orman ve Zeki Parlak), İstanbul: İstanbul Ticaret Odası, Yayın No: 2009-23, 131-170,
  • European Commission (2001). Green Paper-Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility, Commission of the European Communities, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/committees/deve/20020122/com(2001)366_en.pdf, accessed at 17.11.2021,
  • Fisk, P. (2010). Sürdürülebilir Büyüme: İnsanlar, Gezegen ve Kâr (Çeviren: Eren Yıldırım). İstanbul: MediaCat Yayınları,
  • Fombrun, C. J., Van Riel, C. B.M. (2003). Fame and Fortune: How Successful Companies Build Winning Reputation, New York: Financial Times Prentice Hall Books,
  • Freeman E.R., Dmytriyev, S. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Theory: Learning From Each Other, Emerging Issues in Management, Vol.1, 7-15,
  • Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits, The New York Times Magazine, September 13,
  • Friedman, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits, Corporate Ethics & Corporate Governance (By Zimmerli, Walther Ch). Holzinger, M., Richter, K., Berlin, H.: SpringerVerlag, 173-178,
  • Gardner M., Lienin S. (2015). Impact of the EU Directive on Non-Financial Reporting, Environmental Leader, https://www.environmentalleader.com/2015/08/impact-of-the-eu-directive-on-non-financial-reporting/, accessed at 15.11.2021,
  • Harris, Jared D., R. Edward Freeman. (2008). The impossibility of the separation thesis: A response to Joakim Sandberg, Business Ethics Quarterly, 18 (4), 541-548,
  • Hetherington J.A.C. (1973). Corporate Social Responsibility Audit: A Management Tool for Survival; London; The Foundation for Business Responsibilities cited in Crowther D., Aras G. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility, Ventus Publishing ApS, https://my.uopeople.edu/pluginfile.php/57436/mod_book/chapter/121631/BUS5116.Crowther.Aras.CS R.pdf, accessed at 11.11.2021,
  • Hohnen, P. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility: An Implementation Guide For Business (Editor: Jason Potts). Manitoba Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2007/csr_guide.pdf, accessed at 15.11.2021,
  • Hoştut, S., Deren van het Hof, S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility practices of transnational corporations: Examples from Turkey and Italy, European Journal of Research on Education, 2(2), 202-213, https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200818437,
  • Jarolimek, S. (2016). Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk iletişiminde ölçme sorunları, (Çeviren: Seçil Deren Van Het Hof), Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumlulukta Güncel Yönelim ve Yaklaşımlar (Editörler: Sibel Hoştut ve Seçil Deren Van Het Hof). Ankara: Nobel, 117-136,
  • Jhawar N., Gupta S. (2017). Understanding CSR- Its History and the Recent Developments, IOSR Journal of Business and Management, Vol.19 No: 5, 105-109,
  • Kağnıcıoğlu, D. (2007). Endüstri İlişkileri Boyutuyla Sosyal Sorumluluk, Eskişehir, Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınevi,

  • Kitzmueller, M., Shimshack, J. (2012). Economic Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.50/1, 51-84,
  • Koroğlu, Ç., ve Ersoz, H. O. (2015). Muhasebe Meslek Mensuplarının Bakış Açılarından Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Muhasebe İlişkisi, Journal Of Accounting, Finance And Auditing Studies, Volume: 1, Issue: 3, 123-153,
  • Kotler P., Lee, N. (2017). Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk (Çeviren: Sibel Kaçamak), İstanbul: MediaCat Yayınları,
  • Ormiston, M.E., Wong E.M. (2013). License to ill: The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility and CEO Moral Identity on Corporate Social Irresponsibility, Personal Psychology, 66(4), 861-893, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/peps.12029,
  • Özgener, Ş. (2000). Ahlâk ve Sosyal Sorumluluk: İmalat Sanayinde Bir Uygulama, Doktora Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya,
  • Öztürk, Ö. N. (2009). Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluğun Gelişimi ve Türkiye’de Uygulanması, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul,
  • Peltekoğlu, F. B. (2014). Halkla İlişkiler Nedir?, 8.Baskı, İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım,
  • Roberts, P. W., Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance, Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1077-1093,
  • Saxton, M. K. (1998). Where do reputation come from?, Corporate Reputation Review, 1 (4), 393-399,
  • Tak, B. (2009). İşletmelerin Sosyal Sorumlulukları ve Paydaş̧Grupları ile İlişkilerinin Yönetimi, İstanbul: Beta,
  • Taşlıyan, M. (2012). Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk: Modern işdünyasının vicdani gereği, Ankara Sanayi Odası Yayın Organı, Mayıs-Haziran, 22-42,
  • Transparency International (2020). Corruption Perceptions Index 2020, https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2020/index/nzl, accessed at 20.11.2021,
  • Vural, A. B., Coşkun, G. (2011). Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk ve Etik, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi (e-gifder), S.1, 61-87,
  • World Business Council for Sustainable Development (1999). CSR definition, http://www.wbcsd.org/workprogram/business-role/previous-work/corporate-social-responsibility.aspx, accessed at 17.11.2021.
İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1309-0712
  • Yayın Aralığı: 4
  • Başlangıç: 2009
  • Yayıncı: Melih Topaloğlu
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Açgözlülük, Materyalizm ve Tüketici Kibrinin Tüketicilerin Yaşam Tatmini Üzerindeki Etkisinin İncelenmesi

Betül BALIKÇIOĞLU, Müzeyyen GELİBOLU

Tepe Yöneticilerin Kişisel Güç Kaynakları ve Kullandıkları Sert Etkileme Taktiklerinin Algılanan Örgütsel Politika Üzerine Etkisi

Şeyda Nur SEÇKİN, Mehmet TİKİCİ

Yiyecek İçecek İşletmelerinde Nomofobinin İşgören Verimliliğine Etkisi

Özel KILIÇ, Yunus ÖZHASAR, Barış DEMİRCİ

Diyarbakır İli İmalat Sanayinin Mevcut Durum Analizi

Mustafa BULUT, Hasan BAYINDIR, Abdulkadir SAKA, Aziz Mahmut YÜCELEN

Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleriyle Otogar Lokasyon Seçimi: İstanbul İli Örneği

Uğur Orhan KARAKÖPRÜ, Hazar DÖRDÜNCÜ, Barış Erkan YAZICI

Muhasebe Meslek Mensuplarının Adli Muhasebeciliğe İlişkin Farkındalık ve Algı Düzeyleri Farklılıkları

Azize ESMERAY, Ceyhan ÖZER

Psikolojik Güçlendirmenin Yenilikçi İş Davranışı Üzerindeki Etkisinde İşle Bütünleşmenin Aracı Etkisi: Öğretmenler Üzerinde Ampirik Bir Araştırma

Mustafa CANBEK, Mehmet Ali İPEK

Covid-19 Pandemisinin BIST Sektör Endeksleri İle İlişkisi: Bayer – Hanck (2013) Eşbütünleşme Analizi

Ayşegül ERTUĞRUL AYRANCI, Gizem ARI

Çalışan Sesi ile İşveren Markası İlişkisi: Karmaşık Devamlılık ve Farklılık Algısının Ardışık Aracılık Etkileri

Alptekin SÖKMEN, Osman BENK

İşletmelerde COSO İç Kontrol Modeli ve Muhasebe Bilgi Sistemine Yönelik Uygulamaların Değerlendirilmesi Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Mehmet DEMİR, Hatice ÇİÇEKAY