The Effectiveness of eBook versus Printed Books in the Rural Schools in Indonesia at the Modern Learning Era

This article is an advanced research from previous research, which aimed to test the use of eBooks and printed books in the schools outside urban areas. This study employed a quantitative approach, using the General Linear Model (GML) through Univariate analysis technique. The data-collection Instruments were the students' learning outcomes' documents. The data obtained were processed using IBM SPSS Statistic 21. The results showed the value of Sig (0.000) < α (0.05) so that H0 is rejected. Hence, there is an influence of teaching materials on the students' learning outcomes. Covariant analysis results in column B by 5.573 points showed that the learning outcomes of the students who used eBooks were higher by 5.573 points than those using printed books. This study employs that rural schools also experience the impact of digitalization era in the modern learning era, as evidenced by the effectiveness of using eBooks which is higher than that of using printed books. Limited facilities are not the main thing in improving the quality of learning.

___

  • Bradshaw. (2005). Multimedia textbooks and student learning. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 1 (2), 1-9. Bronshteyn, K. (2007). Using NetLibrary eBooks at the reference desk. Reference Services Review, 35 (4), 560-570. Brown, S. A. (2014). Conceptualizing digital literacies and digital ethics for sustainability education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 15 (3), 280-290. Chen, H. Y. (2013). Exploring the reasons for using electric books and technologic pedagogical and content knowledge of taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers. Journal TOJET: Educational Technology, 12 (2), 131-141. Christoph, S., Enrico, C., & Alison, G. (2013). Internet going mobile: internet access and use in 11 African countries. Info, 15 (5), 34-51. Darmawan, D. (2012). Inovasi Pendidikan: Pendekatan Praktik Teknologi Multimedia dan Pembelajaran Online. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarja. Darsono, Winarno, & Slamet, S. T. Y. (2018). The need textbook writing of children’s story based on character education. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3 (2), 1-8. deNoyelles, A., & Seilhamer, R. (2013). E-textbook access, usage, and beliefs: Implications for adoption in higher education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 5 (2), 189-201. Duman, T. & Karagöz, S. (2016). An evaluation of turkish teacher education system compared to other models in different countries. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 1 (1), 1-13. Epps, A. S. V. (2005). The evolution of electronic reference sources. Library Hi Tech, 23 (2), 287-298. Fauzie, Y. Y. (2018). https://www.cnnindonesia.com/gaya-hidup/20180607113429-284-304214/bank-dunia-kualitas-pendidikan-indonesia-masih-rendah, accessed on August 1, 2018 Goodwin, C. (2014). The e-Duke scholarly collection: E-book v. print use. Collection Building, 33 (4), 101-105. Hidayati, A. & Ismail (2018). Strategies to improve student learning habits for middle school student in Sukoharjo, Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3 (3), 74-79. Jana, M. (2014). Comparing electronic short books from the USA and the UK to South Africa: Can they be successful in the South African trade book sector?. The Electronic Library, 32 (4) 4, 508-521. Jeong, H. (2012). A comparison of the influence of electronic books and paper books on reading comprehension, eye fatigue, and perception. The Electronic Library, 30 (3), 390-408. Katsarska, M. (2005). Reading text books interculturally, helpdesk for intercultural evaluation of learning materials. Managerial Law, 47 (3/4), 159-168. Koh, H. S. & Herring, S. C. (2016). Historical insights for ebook design. Library Hi Tech, 34 (4),764-786. Kouis, D. & Konstantinou, N. (2014). Electronic textbooks advantages and challenges for the Hellenic higher education and publishing community. Library Review, 63 (6/7), 531-543. Kumbhar, R. (2012). E‐books: Review of research and writing during 2010. The Electronic Library, 30 (6), 777-795. Lai, C. (2016). Integrating E-Books into science teaching by preservice elementary school teachers. Journal of Education in Science: Environment and Health (JESEH). 2 (1), 57-66. Letchumanan, M., & Muniandy, B. (2016). How mathematics postgraduate students use mobile e-book? Library Hi Tech News, 33 (7), 6-7. Lewellen, R., Bischof, S., & Plum, T. (2016). EBL ebook use compared to the use of equivalent print books and other eresources: A University of Massachusetts Amherst – MINES for Libraries® case study. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 17 (2), 150-164. Liaw & Huang (2014). Investigating learner attitudes toward e-books as learning tools: Based on the activity theory approach. Journal Interactive Learning Environments. 1 (1), 1–15. Massis, B. E. (2010). E‐book readers and college students. New Library World, 111 (7/8), 347-350. Medeiros, N. (2010). Every (e)book its (e)reader: book collections at a crossroads.OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives, 26 (4), 229-231. Nwagwu, W. E. & Okafor, J. L. (2014). Diffusion of ebooks among postgraduate students of the University of Ibadan, Nigeria. Library Review, 63 (1/2), 86-109. Parkes, D. (2007). E‐books from ebrary at Staffordshire University: A case study. Program, 41 (3), 253-261. Rojeski, M. (2012). User perceptions of ebooks versus print books for class reserves in an academic library.Reference Services Review, 40 (2), 228-241. Sehn, T. C. M. & Fragoso, S. (2015). The synergy between eBooks and printed books in Brazil. Online Information Review, 39 (3), 401-415. Sehn, T. C. M., & Fragoso, S. (2015). The synergy between eBooks and printedbooks in Brazil. Online Information Review, 39 (3), 401-415. Tucker, J. C. (2012). Ebook collection analysis: subject and publisher trends. Collection Building, 31 (2), 40-47. Vserv, https://www.vserv.com/vserv-unveils-first-smartphone-userpersona-report-supr-Indonesia/, diakses tanggal 1 agustus 2018 Woo, T. K. (2011). Developing quality learning materials for effective teaching and learning in an ODL environment: Making the jump from print modules to online modules. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 6 (1), 51-58. Yachina, N. P., Valeeva, L. A., & Sirazeeva, A. F. (2016). E-teaching materials as the means to improve humanities teaching proficiency in the context of education informatization. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11 (4), 433-442.