Enhancing critical thinking and English-speaking skills of gifted students through philosophy for children approach

This study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of "Philosophy for Children (P4C)" approach on the critical thinking and English-speaking skills of twenty-three 7th grade gifted students learning English as a foreign language at a Science and Art Center (SAC) in the city of Denizli, Türkiye. In the study a mixed methods research design was adopted with the participation of randomly assigned experimental and control groups. While quantitative data were collected through the Cornell Critical Thinking Test (CCTT) X level and the Cambridge English Speaking Test (A2 level for Schools), qualitative data were collected through reflective diaries written by the experimental group participants and evaluation forms. While the control group followed the usual SAC English speaking lessons, English speaking lessons for the experimental group were based on the P4C approach. According to the quantitative data findings, there was an increase in the scores of both groups in terms of speaking skills in English, however this difference was not statistically significant. In terms of critical-thinking skills, there was a slight decrease between the pre-test and post-test scores of the control group and an increase in the scores of the experimental group and this difference was statistically significant. In addition, the qualitative data revealed that the experimental group participants generally provided positive feedback on P4C practices and speaking lessons based on the P4C approach created positive effects on their critical thinking and speaking skills in English, while such an application did not create a significant effect on their speaking skills in English.

Enhancing critical thinking and English-speaking skills of gifted students through philosophy for children approach

This study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of "Philosophy for Children (P4C)" approach on the critical thinking and English-speaking skills of twenty-three 7th grade gifted students learning English as a foreign language at a Science and Art Center (SAC) in the city of Denizli, Türkiye. In the study a mixed methods research design was adopted with the participation of randomly assigned experimental and control groups. While quantitative data were collected through the Cornell Critical Thinking Test (CCTT) X level and the Cambridge English Speaking Test (A2 level for Schools), qualitative data were collected through reflective diaries written by the experimental group participants and evaluation forms. While the control group followed the usual SAC English speaking lessons, English speaking lessons for the experimental group were based on the P4C approach. According to the quantitative data findings, there was an increase in the scores of both groups in terms of speaking skills in English, however this difference was not statistically significant. In terms of critical-thinking skills, there was a slight decrease between the pre-test and post-test scores of the control group and an increase in the scores of the experimental group and this difference was statistically significant. In addition, the qualitative data revealed that the experimental group participants generally provided positive feedback on P4C practices and speaking lessons based on the P4C approach created positive effects on their critical thinking and speaking skills in English, while such an application did not create a significant effect on their speaking skills in English.

___

  • Afrizal, M. (2015). Improving English speaking ability through classroom discussion. Lentera, 15(14), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.33603/rill.v2i3.2127
  • Akar, Ü. (2007). Öğretmen adaylarının bilimsel süreç becerileri ve eleştirel düşünme beceri düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki [The relationship between student teachers’ scientific proces skills and critical thinking skills] [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Kocatepe University.
  • Anwar, F.Z. (2015). Enhancing students’ speaking skill through Gallery Walk technique. Register Journal, 5(1), 253-568. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v8i2.384
  • Arslan, R.Ş., & Yıldız, N. (2012). Enhancing critical thinking at the tertiary level through a literature based critical thinking program. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21(2), 19-36. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/cusosbil/issue/4390/60352
  • Arter, J.A., & Salmon, J.R. (1987). Assessing higher order thinking skills. A consumer's guide. Oregon: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory Test Center.
  • Báez, C.P. (2009). Critical thinking in the EFL classroom: The search for a pedagogical alternative to improve English learning. Íkala Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 9(15), 45-80. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277834572
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çokluk, Ö., & Köklü, N. (2014). Sosyal bilimler için istatistik [Statistics for the social sciences] (15th ed.). Pegem Akademik.
  • Chamberlain, M.A. (1993). Philosophy for children program and the development of critical thinking of gifted elementary students [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Kentucky.
  • Chan, D.W. (2015). Education for the gifted and talented. International Encyclopaedia of the Social & Behavioural Sciences, 2nd edition, 7, 158-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.92137-8
  • Cinquino, D. (1981). An evaluation of a philosophy program with 5th and 6th grades academically talented students. Thinking the Journal of Philosophy for Children, 2(3 & 4), 79-83. https://doi.org/10.5840/thinking19812324
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge.
  • Colom, R., Moriyón, F.G., Magro, C., & Morilla, E. (2018). The long-term impact of Philosophy for Children: A Longitudinal Study (Preliminary Results). Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis, 35(1), 50 56. https://journal.viterbo.edu/index.php/atpp/article/view/112
  • Dabbagh, A., & Noshadi, M. (2016). Philosophy-based language teaching approach on the horizon: A revolutionary pathway to put Applied ELT into practice. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(5), 1022-1028. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0705.25
  • Davidson, B.W., & Dunham, R.A. (1997). Assessing EFL student progress in critical thinking with the Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test! Jalt Journal, 19(1), 43-57. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED403302.pdf
  • Demir, E., Saatcioğlu, Ö., & İmrol, F. (2016). Examination of educational researches published in international journals in terms of normality assumptions. Current Research in Education, 2(3), 130 148. https://atif.sobiad.com/index.jsp?modul=makale goruntule&id=AWY_Ip3eHDbCZb_mQzvn
  • Ennis, R.H., & Millman, J. (1985). Cornell critical thinking test, level X (3rd ed.). The US: Midwest Publications.
  • Ennis, R.H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities in J.B. Baron and R.J. Sternberg (Eds.). Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice. W.H. Freeman.
  • Ennis, R.H., & Millman, J., & Tomko, T.N. (2005). Cornell critical thinking test, level X (5th ed.). Seaside, CA: The Critical Thinking Company.
  • Facione, P. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment, 1, 1–30. https://www.student.uwa.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/1922502/Critical Thinking-What-it-is-and-why-it-counts.pdf
  • Gülveren, H. (2007). Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin eleştirel düşünme becerileri ve bu becerileri etkileyen eleştirel düşünme faktörleri [Critical thinking skills of education faculty students and factors influencing critical thinking skills] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Dokuz Eylül University.
  • Gürkaynak, İ, Üstel, F., & Gülgöz, S. (2008). Eleştirel düşünme: Erg raporları [Critical thinking: Erg reports]. Sabancı Üniversitesi İstanbul Politikalar Merkezi, İstanbul. https://www.egitimreformugirisimi.org/wp content/uploads/2017/03/Elestireldusunme_0.pdf
  • Haryanti, D.U., Indah, R.N., & Wahyuni, S. (2021). Enhancing oral proficiency using Three Steps Interview technique for eleventh graders. JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 9(1), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v%vi%i.3271
  • Holsti, O.R. (1968). Content analysis. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed.), 596-692. Amerind Publishing Co.
  • Hughes, J. (2014). Critical thinking in the language classroom. Italy: Eli Publishing.
  • Kökdemir, D. (2003). Belirsizlik durumlarında karar verme ve problem çözme [Decision making and problem solving in situations of uncertainty] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Ankara University.
  • Kuhn, D. (2015). Thinking together and alone. Educational Researcher. 44(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x15569530
  • Kürüm, D. (2002). Öğretmen adaylarının eleştirel düşünme gücü [Critical thinking abilities of teacher trainers] [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Anadolu University.
  • Lam, M. (2013). An empirical study of the effectiveness of Lipman’s Philosophy for Children Programme on promoting children’s critical thinking in Hong Kong, China. Childhood, Philosophy and Open Society, 67-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-06-2_4
  • Lam, C. (2020). Integrating philosophy into English curriculum: The development of thinking and language competence. The Journal of Educational Research, 112(6), 700-709. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2019.1696273
  • Lim, T.K. (2006). Gifted students in a community of inquiry. Journal of Educational Policy, 3(2), 67 80. https://www.proquest.com/openview/4442a444684609172622831f371e50d2/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=946348
  • Lipman, M. (1982). Harry Stottlemeier’s discovery. United States of America: Institute for the Advancement of Philosophy for Children, University Press of America Inc.
  • Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education. Cambridge University Press.
  • Marland, S. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented. Report to the Congress of the United States by the Commissioner of Education. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 72 502. https://www.valdosta.edu/colleges/education/humanservices/document%20/marland-report.pdf
  • McGregor, D. (2007). Developing thinking; developing learning. England: Open University Press.
  • MoNE, (2009). İlköğretim Türkçe dersi öğretim programı ve kılavuzu. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, Ankara. Retrieved from http://web.deu.edu.tr/ilyas/ftp/turkce2009.pdf on 20.01.2021
  • MoNE, (2021). Resource Rooms Directive. http://meb.gov.tr
  • Niklasson, J., Ohlsson, R., & Ringborg, M. (1996). Evaluating Philosophy for Children. Thinking, 12(4), 17-23.
  • Oradee, T. (2012). Developing speaking skills using three communicative activities (Discussion, problem-solving, and role playing). International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2(6), 533-535. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJSSH.2012.V2.164
  • Pala, F. (2022). The effect of Philosophy Education for Children (P4C) on students’ conceptual achievement and critical thinking skills: A mixed method research. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(3), 27-41. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.05.03.522
  • Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Philosophy 592 (Pre-College Philosophy) Class Members (2013). Philosophy for children: Lesson plans. Michael Davidson (Ed), (1-74). The USA: The University of North Carolina. https://philosophy.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/122/2013/10/Philosophy-for-Children-Lesson-Plans.pdf
  • Rashtchi, M., & Khoshnevisan, B. (2020). Lessons from critical thinking: How to promote thinking skills in EFL writing classes. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5(1), 34-47. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v5i1.3153
  • Rustam, U., Anwar, A., & Amzah, A. (2018). Implementing Philosophy-based language teaching approach to improve students’ speaking skill. Eternal, 4(1), 127-145. https://doi.org/10.24252/Eternal.V41.2018.A10
  • Sapere P4C. (2023, May 12). P4C and the curriculum. https://www.sapere.org.uk/why-sapere-p4c/p4c-and-the-curriculum/
  • Shahini, G.H., & Riazi, A.M. (2011). A PBLT approach to teaching ESL speaking, writing, and thinking skills. ELT Journal, 65(2), 170- 179. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq045
  • Sutcliffe, R. (2004). Philosophy for children – a gift from the gods? Gifted Education International, 19, 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142940401900103
  • Tosuncuoğlu, I. (2018). Place of critical thinking in EFL. International Journal of Higher Education, 7(4), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v7n4p26
  • Türksoy, N. (2020). Çocuklar için felsefe (P4C) eğitiminin Ortaokul öğrencilerinin bilimsel sorgulamaya yönelik görüşlerine ve eleştirel düşünme becerilerinin gelişimine katkısı: Bir karma yöntem araştırması [The contribution of philosophy (P4C) education for secndary school students to scientific inquiry views and development of critical thinking skills: A mixed method research] [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Alanya Alaattin Keykubat University.
  • Wartenberg, T.E. (2009). Big ideas for little kids: Teaching philosophy through children`s literature. Lanham: The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group.
  • Yang, Y., Newby, T.J., & Bill, R.L. (2005). Using Socratic questioning to promote critical thinking skills through asynchronous discussion forums in distance learning environments. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 163-181. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_4
  • Yang, Y.C., & Gamble, J. (2013). Effective and practical critical thinking-enhanced EFL instruction. ELT Journal, 67(4), 398-412. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct038
  • Zahrani, B.S., & Elyas, T. (2017). The implementation of critical thinking in a Saudi EFL context: Challenges and opportunities. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 133-142. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v1i2.21
  • Zulkifli, H., & Hashim, R. (2020). Philosophy for Children (P4C) in improving critical thinking in a secondary moral education class. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(2), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.2.3