SİLAHLI ÇATIŞMA ESNASINDA KÜLTÜREL MALLARIN ULUSLARARASI TOPLUM YARARINA KORUNMASI

Kültürel malvarlığının korunması, sadece malvarlığının bulunduğu devleti değil, uluslararası toplumu da ilgilendirmektedir. Kültürel mirasa gelen her zarar, insanoğlunun ortak zararı ve kaybıdır. İşbu nedenle, kültürel malvarlığını korumak, uluslararası hukukun, özellikle insancıl hukukun konularından birini oluşturmuştur. Kültürel malvarlığını korumak için akdedilen antlaşmalar ve ek protokollerle, silahlı çatışmalarda çatışan taraflara, kural olarak, çatışma alanında yer alan kültürel malvarlığını tahrip etmeme ya da yok etmeme yükümlülüğü öngörülmüştür. İlgili yükümlülüğün ihlali, ciddi insancıl hukuk ihlaline verecek ve devletler kendi iç hukuk düzenlerinde, sorumluları yargılayabileceklerdir. Ayrıca Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi de savaş suçları kapsamında kültürel malvarlığını koruma yükümlüğünün ihlallerini yargılamakla yetkilendirilmiştir. Her ne kadar kültürel malvarlığı, uluslararası hukuk sisteminde, koruma altına alınsa ve yükümlülüğün ihlali için bireysel cezai sorumluluk öngörülse de kültürel malvarlığının tahribi ve yok olması geri dönülemez zararlara yol açmaktadır. İşbu nedenle, kültürel malvarlığının pasif koruması yanında, zarar görmeden ya da yok olmadan korunmasını temin altına alacak, aktif koruma araçlarının varlığı daha da önem arz etmektedir.

PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY FOR THE SAKE OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY DURING THE ARMED CONFLICT

The protection of cultural property concerns not only the state where it is situated but also the international community as a whole. Any harm to cultural heritage also represents a loss for human culture and international society. Therefore, the protection of cultural property has become a subject of international law and humanitarian law in particular. Treaties and additional protocols enacted for the protection of cultural heritage, in principle, provide an obligation to conflicting parties to not destroy or destruct cultural property in conflict zones. Any breach of this obligation constitutes a serious violation of humanitarian law, and it is the states who are competent to adjudicate on the responsible actor in their domestic legal systems. Further, the International Criminal Court is given jurisdiction over breaches of the obligation to protect cultural heritage within the context of war crimes. Although the international legal system provides protection for cultural property and individual criminal responsability in cases of the breach of this protection, the destruction of cultural property causes irreversible damages. For this reason, in addition to passive protection of cultural property, active protection tools have to be provided in order to protect cultural property before any damage or destruction occur.

___

  • AKSAR, Yusuf: Implementing International Humanitarian Law from the Ad Hoc Tribunals to a Permanent International Criminal Court Routhledge, London 2004.
  • BANTEKAS, Illias/NASH, Susan: International Criminal Court, Routhledge, UK 2007.
  • BAŞAK, Cengiz: Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi ve Uluslararası Suçlar (Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi), Turhan Kitabevi, Ankara 2003.
  • BATUR YAMANER, Melike/ÖKTEM, Emre, KURTDARCAN, Bleda R./UZUN, Mehmet C.: 12 Ağustos 1949 Tarihli Cenevre Sözleşmeleri ve Ek Protokolleri (Cenevre Sözleşmeleri), Galatasaray Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınları, No: 42, İstanbul.
  • BIANCHI, Andrea- NAQVI, Yasmin: International Humanitarian Law and Terrorism, Hart Publishing, USA 2011.
  • CASSESE, Antonio: International Criminal Law, Oxford University Press, UK 2003.
  • CRYER, Robert/ FRIMAN, Hakan/ROBINSON, Darry/WILMSHURST, Elizabeth: An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure (An Introduction), Cambridge University Press, UK 2014.
  • ÇINAR, Fatih: Uluslarara Ceza Mahkemelerinin Gelişimi Işığında Uluslararası Ceza Divanı, Kazancı, 2004.
  • DARCY, Shane: Judges, Law and War: The Judicial Development of International Humanitarian Law (Judges, Law and War), Cambridge University Press, UK 2014.
  • El ZEIDY, Mohamed M.: The Principle of Complementarity in International Criminal Law Origin, Development and Practice, Martinus Nijjhof Publishers, Leiden 2010.
  • HENCKAERTS, Jean-Marie: “New Rules for the Protection of Cultural Property in Armed Conflict: The Significance of the Second Protocol to the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict” in Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, International Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva 2002.
  • HLADIK, Jan: “The 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the event of Armed Conflict: Some Observations on the Implementation at the National Level” in Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, International Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva 2002.
  • O’KEEFE, Roger: The Protection of Cultural Property in Armed Conflict, Cambridge University Press, UK 2006.
  • ÖNOK, Murat: Tarihi Perspektifiyle Uluslararası Ceza Divanı, Turhan Kitabevi, Ankara 2003.
  • ÖZEL, Sibel: Uluslararası Alanda Kültürel Malvarlığının Korunması (Kültürel Malvarlığının Korunması), Alkım Yayınları, İstanbul 1998.
  • PARTSCH, Karl Josef: “Protection of Cultural Property”, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press, NewYork 2004.
  • RASTAN, Rod: “Jurisdiction”, in STAHN, Catsyen (ed.), The Law and Practice of the International Criminal Court, Oxford University Press, UK 2015.
  • ROWE, Peter: “War Crimes”, in McGOLDRICK, Dominic/ROWE, Peter/DONNELLY, Eric (ed.), The Permanent International Criminal Court: Legal and Policy Issues, Hart Publishing, USA 2004.
  • SCHABAS, William: An Introduction to the International Criminal Court, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, UK 2004.
  • SCHEFFER, David: “The International Criminal Court” in SCHABAS, William/BERNAZ, Nadia (ed.), Routhledge Handbook of International Criminal Law, Routhledge, London 2010.
  • SCOTT, James Brown (ed.): The Hague Convention and Declarations of 1899 and 1907, https://archive.org/stream/ hagueconventions00inteuoft#page/n5/mode/2up, (Erişim Tarihi: 10.12.2017), 1915.
  • SMEULERS, Alette/GRUNFELD, Fred: International Crimes and Other Gross Human Rights Violations a Multi and Interdisciplinary Textbook, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden 2011.
  • TEZCAN, Durmuş/ ERDEM, Mustafa Ruhan/ÖNOK, Rıfat Murat: Uluslararası Ceza Hukuku Seçkin Yayınları, Ankara 2014.
  • TOMAN, Jiri: The Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, UNESCO Publishing, Paris 1996.
  • TÜTÜNCÜ, Ayşenur: İnsancıl Hukuka Giriş, Beta Yayınları, İstanbul 2006.
  • AYDIN, Devrim: “Uluslararası Ceza Hukukunun Gelişimi”, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 52(4), 2002, 131 – 167.
  • BELLINGER, John B.: Make ISIS' Leaders Face Justice, https://www.nytimes.com/ 2015/04/03/opinion/make-isis-leaders-face-justice.html?_r=0 (Erişim Tarihi: 10.11.2017).
  • BHAT, P. Ishwara: “Protection of Cultural Property Under International Humanitarian Law: Some Emerging Trends”, ISIL Yearbook of International Humanitarian and Refugee Law, No: 4, 2001, 47 – 71.
  • GÜNEYSU, Gökhan: “Askeri Gereklilik İlkesi ve Uluslararası İnsancıl Hukuk”, Ankara Barosu Dergisi, 4, 2012, 91 – 108.
  • HALATÇI, Ülkü: “Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi’nin Yargı Yetkisini Kullanabilmesinin Önkoşulları”, Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, 2(3), 2005, 57 – 76.
  • HELLER, Kevin John: John Bellinger’s Op-Ed on ISIS and the ICC, http://opiniojuris.org/2015/04/02/john-bellingers-curious-op-ed-on-isis-and-the-icc/, (Erişim Tarihi: 10.11.2017)
  • NICHOLS, Michelle: France Presses at U.N. for Islamic State to Face World Court, http://m.thestar.com.my/story.aspx?hl=France+presses+at+UN+for+Islamic+State+to+face+world+court&sec=ews&id=%7B9B37534F-CA36-4759-BDBA-AADE5789CAFE%7D , (Erişim Tarihi: 10.11.2017).
  • POUST, Jordan: “Dr. Francis Lieber and Lieber Code”, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 95, 2001, 112 – 115.
  • TECHERA, Erika: “Protection of Cultural Heritage in Times of Armed Conflict: The International Legal Framework Revisited” (Protection of Cultural Heritage), Macquarie J. Int’l&Comp. Envtl.L, 4(1), 2007, 1 – 20.
  • Records of the General Conference, (1993), s. 40, http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0009/ 000956/095621E.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 10.11.2017)
  • Records of the general conference, 1991, s. 57, http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0009/ 000904/090448E.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 10.11.2017) Report of the office of the united nations high commissioner for human rights on the human rights situation in Iraq in the light of abuses committed by the so-called Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant and associated groups, (http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/RegularSessions/Session30/Documents/A_HRC_30_ 66_ENG.docx (Erişim Tarihi: 10.11.2017). S/RES/1593, 2005,
  • S/RES/1970, 2011,
  • Statement of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Fatou Bensouda, on the alleged crimes committed by ISIS (2015), https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item.aspx?name=otp-stat-08-04-2015-1 (Erişim Tarihi: 10.11.2017)
  • T.C. Resmi Gazete, 12145, 8 Kasım 1965.
  • “ISIS destroy Palmyra’s Roman amphitheatre after ‘beheading 4 and shooting 8 dead in ancient city’”, http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/isis-destroy-palmyras-roman-amphitheatre-9657148, (Erişim Tarihi: 20.12.2016)
  • “Referral of Syria to International Criminal Court Fails as Negative Votes Prevent Security Council from Adopting Draft Resolution”, 22 May 2014, http://www.un.org/press/en/2014/sc11407.doc.htm (Erişim Tarihi: 10.11.2017)
  • “Syria, Destruction of Cultural Heritage”, https://casebook.icrc.org/case-study/syria-destruction-cultural-heritage (Erişim Tarihi: 20.12.2017) Destruction of Cultural Heritage in the Middle East by ISIS, http://www.gecmun.com/uploads/2/3/7/0/237 02810/ gecmun_iii_unesco.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 20.12.2017)
  • https://www.haberler.com/isid-in-musul-muzesi-ne-saldirisi-7015091-haberi/ (Erişim Tarihi: 10.12.2017).
  • Practical Advice for Protection of Cultural Property by ICRC, 2002, https://www.icrc.org/en/document/ practical-advice-protection-cultural-property-event-armed-conflict-guidelines, (Erişim Tarihi: 15.12. 2017)
  • Prosecutor v Haradinaj, Dava No. IT-04-84-84-T, (Dava Dairesi), 3 Nisan 2008.
  • Procecutor v. Dario Kordic and Mario Cerkez Judgement, IT-95-14/2-T, 26 February 2001.
  • Prosecutor v. Boskoski, Dava No. IT-04-82, (Dava Dairesi), 10 Ağustos 2008.
  • Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic (a/k/a Dule), No IT-94-1-AR-72, 2 Ekim 19