Savaş-Arabaları’nın İç Asya – Çin Cephesi (M.Ö. XII. – M.Ö. VIII. Yy.)

Savaşlar tarihine baktığımızda bilhassa Bronz ve Erken Demir Çağları’nın en ün yapmış silahının savaş-arabaları olduğu görülür. Başlangıçta bir prestij, seromoni ve avcılık aracı olarak kullanılmaya başlayan “savaş-arabaları”, iki tekerli ispitli hafif ve kompozit yapılı formu ile İlk Çağ’ın en büyük askeri icatlarından birine dönüşmüştür. Savaş-arabalarının, kuvvetle muhtemel atın da evcilleştirildiği kuzey-batı Bozkır kuşağında başlayan serüveni birkaç yüzyıl içinde bilhassa Andronovo kültürünün de etkisiyle neredeyse Eski Kıta’nın tamamına yayıldı. Yapılan arkeolojik ve kimyasal çalışmalar ile artık erken metal teknolojisi gibi savaş-arabası teknolojisinin de Merkezi Ovalar’a (Çin), Bozkır Kuşağı üzerinden Kuzey ve/veya Kuzey-batı yönünden girdiği açık bir şekilde ortaya konmuştur. Çin’in gerekli dinamiklere sahip olması sayesinde daha ileri seviyelere taşınmıştır. Böylece bu araçların “üreticileri” oldukları düşünülen “Bozkırlılara” karşı üstün gelmeyi başarmışlardır. Biz bu makalede savaş-arabalarının, Çin ile İç Asya’nın Bozkır kuşağı kavimleri arasında vuku bulan muharebelerdeki yerine kısaca değinmeye çalışacağız.

The Inner Asia – China Aspect of War-Chariots (c. XII. – VIII. BCE)

A close look at history of wars reveals that the “war-chariots” were probably the mostprominent weapon of Bronze and Early Iron Ages. Firstly used as a prestige, ceremonial andhunting vehicle, the chariots especially their light-composite with spoked two-wheeled form,became the greatest military invention of the Antiquity. The beginning of its adventure inthe North-western Steppe Zone, as the same region where the horse was also most probablydomesticated, they spreaded all over the Old Continent particularly by the help of theAndronovo Culture which had relied heavily upon and far-famed for their war-chariots. Withthe archaelogical and chemical studies, it is now obviously clear that the Bronze Age war chariot technology had entered to the Central Plains (China) from the North and/or NorthWestern Steppe Zone as like as the early metallurgy technologies. China had taken thesetechnologies to higher levels because of possessing the required dynamics. Thus, theysucceeded to prevail against the “Steppe peoples” who were thought to be the “producers” of these vehicles. In this article, we will try to briefly mention the place of the war-chariotsin the battles between the steppe peoples of Inner Asia and China.

___

  • ANTONY, David W., The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World, Princeton University Press, 2007.
  • BARBIERI-LOW, Anthony J., “Wheeled Vehicles in the Chinese Bronze Age (2000-741 B.C.)”, Sino-Platonic Papers, ed. Victor H. Mair, no. 99, 2000.
  • BURKE, A. – CINQ-MARS, J., “Paleoethnological Reconstruction and Taphonomy from the BluefishCaves, Yukon Territory, Canada”, Arctic, vol 51 no.2, 1998, s. 105-115.
  • CHERNYKH, E. N., Ancient Metallurgy in the USSR, Cambridge Universty Press, 1992.
  • CHONDROS, T. G., MILIDONIS, Kypros F., ROSSI, Cesare, ZRNIC, Nenad, “The evolution of the double-horse chariots from the bronze age to the Hellenistic times”, FME Transactions, vol. 44, no.2, 2016, s. 229-236.
  • DI COSMO, N., Ancient China and It’s Enemies, Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  • DREWS, Robert, The Coming of the Greeks: Indo-European Conquests in the Agean and the Near-East, Princeton University Press, Princeton-New Jersey, 1988.
  • EBERHARD, W., Çin Tarihi, Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları, 1947.
  • FRACHETTI, Michael D., “Multiregional Emergence of Mobile Pasotalism and Nonuniform Institutional Complexity across Eurasia”, © The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, 2012, s. 2-38.
  • GAUNITZ, C. et al., “Ancient genomes revisit the ancestry of domestic and Przewalski’s horses”, Science, 10.1126/science.aao3297 (2018). https://science.sciencemag.org/content/360/6384/111.full (Erişim tar. 30/08/2020).
  • JACOBSON-TEPFER, Esther, “The Image of the Wheeled Vehicle in the Mongolian Altai: Instability and Ambiguity”, The Silk Road, 10 (2012), s. 1-28.
  • KIRKPATRICK, Jay F.–FAZIO, Patricia M., “The Surprising History of America’s Wild Horses”, 2008: https://www.livescience.com/9589-surprising-history-america-wildhorses.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Li vesciencecom+%28LiveScience.com+Science+Headline+Feed%29. Erişim tar.: 31/08/2020.
  • MEI, Jianjun, “Qijia and Seima-Turbino: The question of early contacts between Northwest China and the Eurasian steppe”, Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities, 75, 2003.
  • MEI, Jianjun, “Cultural Interaction between China and Central Asia during the Bronze Age”, Proceedings of the British Academy, 121, © The British Academy 2003.
  • MEI, Jianjun, YU, Yongbin, CHEN, Kunlong, WANG, Lu, “The Appropriation of Early Bronze Technology in China”, Appropriating Innovations (Entangled Knowledge in Eurasia, 5000-1500 BCE.), ed. Philipp. W. Stockhammer-Joseph Maran, Oxbow, Oxford&Philadelphia, 2017, s. 231-240.
  • MIZRAK, Egemen Çağrı, “Türklerin Ataları”, Bozkırdan Batıya Hüseyin Salman’a Armağan, Epsilon Yayınevi, 2017, s. 39-61.
  • MOOREY, P. R. S., “The emergence of the light, horse-drawn chariot in the Near East c. 2000- 1500 B.C.”, World Archaeology, vol. 18 (no. 2), Weaponry and warfare, 1986, s. 196-215.
  • OLSEN, Stanley J., “The Horse in Ancient China and Its Cultural Influence in Some Other Areas”, Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, vol. 140, No. 2, 1988, s. 151-189.
  • ONAT, Ayşe, ORSOY, Sema, ERCİLASUN, Konuralp, Han Hanedanlığı Tarihi Bölüm 94 A/B (Hsiung-nu Monografisi), TTK Basımevi, Ankara, 2004.
  • OTKAN, Pulat, Tarihçinin Kayıtları’na (Shi Ji) göre Hunlar, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul, 2018.
  • POLOSMAK, N. V., “Traces of Chinese Chariot”, Science First Hand (SCFH), N1 (34), 2013, s. 18-29.
  • PUETT, Michael, “China in Early Eurasian History: A Brief Review of Recent Scholarship on the Issue”, The Bronze Age and Early Iron Age Peoples of Eastern Central Asia, ed. Victor H. Mair, vol. 2, 1998, s. 699-715.
  • ROMGARD, Jan, “Ancient Human Settlements in Xinjiang and the Early Silk Road Trade”, Sino-Platonic Papers, 185, 2008, 1-123.
  • SHAUGHNESSY, Edward L., “Historical Perspectives on the Introduction of the Chariot into China”, Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, v. 48 (1), 1988,189-237.
  • SUN, Boyang – DENG, Tao, “The Equus Datum and the Early Radiation of Equus in China”, Front. Ecol. Evol., 7: 429. Doi: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00429. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2019.00429/full). Erişim tarihi: 01/09/2020.
  • TAISHAN, Yu, “A Hypothesis about the Source of the Sai Tribes”, Sino-Platonic Papers, no. 106, ed. V. H. Mair, 2000.
  • WAN, Xiang, The Horse in Pre-Imperial China, Phd. Thesis in Eastern Asian Languages and Civilizations, University of Pennsylvania, Danışman: Victor H. Mair, 2013.
  • WU, Shu-hui, “The Great Migration: Inception of the Zhou Identity”, Studia Orientalia, vol. 111, 2011, s. 407-445.
  • YÜ, Ying-Shi, “The Hsiung-nu”, s. 119, The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia, vol. I, ed. Denis Sinor, reprinted: Athenæum Press Ltd., Great Britain, 1994.