Meslekler ve Profesyonellik

Bu çalışma, tanımları ve kullanımları problemli olmasına rağmen hem- şirelik için cazip kavramlar olagelmiş meslek ve profesyonellik kavramlarını incelemektedir. Burada ileri sürülen görüş belli bir uğraşla ilgili etkinliklerin eleştirel bir analizini yapmak için bu kavramların uğraş temelli çeşitli oluşumların çıkarları doğrultusunda nasıl kullanıldığının incelenmesinin daha yararlı olacağıdır. Meslek sahipleri arasındaki etkileşimleri, mesleklerle iktidar arasındaki ilişkileri ve örgütsel ve toplumsal bağlamlarda mesleki rollerin nasıl oluştuğunu ihmal eden analizler, eğer amaçları profesyonelleşme sürecini teşvik etmekse, bu amaçlarında başarılı olamayacaklardır.

Professions and Professionalism

This paper examines the continued appeal to nursing of the conceptsprofession and professionalism despite the fact that the definitions and use of both are problematic. It argues that for a critical analysis of occupational activities it is more useful to examine how these concepts are used in the service of occupational sectional interests. Analyses that ignore interactions between professionals, how professional roles are constructed within organizational and social contexts and the relationships between professions and power will fail if their intention is to promote the process of professionalization.

PDF

___

1. Scott R. Lords of the dance: professionals as institutional agents. Organization Studies 2008; 2(2):219-238.
2. Millerson G. The qualifying association. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1964.
3. Watson TJ. Professions and professionalism: should we jump off the bandwagon better to study where it is going? International Studies of Management and Organization 2002; 32(2):94-106.
4. Torstendahl R.The need for a definition of profession. Current Sociology 2005; 3: 947-951.
5. Sciulli D. Continental sociology of professions today: conceptual contributions. Current Sociology 2005; 53(6):915-942.
6. Macdonald K, Ritzer G. The sociology of the professions: dead or alive? Work and Occupations 1988; 15:251-272.
7. Lawrence TB. Corwin V. Being there: the acceptance and marginalization of part-time professional employees. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2003; 24(8):923-943.
8. Theobald H. Care for the elderly: welfare system, professionalization and the question of inequality. The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 2003; 23(4/5):159-185.
9. Allen C. Desperately seeking fusion: on joined-up thinking, holistic practice and the new economy of welfare professional power. British Journal of Sociology 2003; 54(2):287-306.
10. Greenwood R, Lachman R. Change as an underlying theme in professional service organizations: an introduction. Organization Studies 1996; 17(4):563-72.
11. Friedson E. Profession of medicine a study of the sociology of applied knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1988.
12. Harrison S, Ahmad WIU. Medical autonomy and the UK state 1975 to 2025. Sociology 2000; 34(1):129-46.
13. Macdonald KM. The sociology of the professions. London: Sage; 1995.
14. Freidson E. Professionalism reborn: theory, prophecy, and policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1994.
15. Schon DA. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith; 1983.
16. Etzioni A. The semi-professions and their organization: teachers, nurses, social workers. New York: Free Press; 1969.
17. Bourdieu P, Passeron JC. La reproduction. Eléments pour une théorie du système denseignement. Paris: Editions de Minuit; 1970. Çeviri: R Nice. Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage Publications; 1977.
18. Foucault M. Discipline and punishment. London: Tavistock; 1977.
19. Goode WJ. The theoretical limits of professionalization. In: A. Etzioni (ed). The semi-professions and their oganization. New York: Free Press; 1969.
20. Wilinskey HL. The professionalization of everyone. American Journal of Sociology 1964; 70:137-158.
21. Carr-Saunders AM, Wilson PA. The professions. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1933. (Reprinted by Frank Cass, London, 1964.)
22. Karadağ A, Hisar F, Elbaş NO. The level of professionalism among nurses in Turkey. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2007; 39:371-374.
23. Kearney-Nunnery R. Advancing your career: concepts of professional nursing. 3rd edition. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company; 2005.
24. Morrell K. Analysing professional work in the public sector: the case of NHS nurses. Leistershire, UK: Business School, Loughborough University; 2004.
25. Freidson E. Professional dominance. Chicago, IL: Atherton; 1970.
26. Johnson T. Professions and power. London: Macmillan; 1972.
27. Larson MS. The rise of professionalism: a sociological analysis. Berkeley and London: University of California Press; 1977.
28. Mintzberg H. The managers job: folklore and fact. Harvard Business Review1990; 68(2):163.
29. Illich I. Disabling professions. London: M. Boyars; 1977.
30. Hanlon G. Lawyers, the state and the market: professionalism revisited. Basingstoke: Macmillan Business; 1999.
31. Evetts J. The sociological analysis of professionalism: occupational change in the modern world. International Sociology 2003; 18(2);395-415.
32. Durkheim E. Professional ethics and civic morals. Translated by C Brookfield (with a new preface by Bryan S. Turner). London: Routledge; 1992.
33. Tawney RH. The Acquisitive Society. New York: Harcourt Brace; 1921.
34. Krause EA. Death of the guilds: professions, states and the advance of capitalism: 1930 to the present. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1996.
35. Brint S. In an age of experts: The changing role of professionals in politics and public life. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press; 1994.
36. Gray BH. The legislative battle over health services research. Health Affairs 1992; 11(4):38-66.
37. Leape LL.Error in medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association 1994; 272(23):1851-7.
38. Goldsmith J. Death of a paradigm: the challenge of competition. Health Affairs 1984; 3(3):5-19.
39. Wynia MK, Latham SR, Kao AC, Berg JW, Emanuel LL. Medical professionalism in society. New England Journal of Medicine 1999; 341(21):1612-1616.
40. Immerwahr J, Johnson J, Kernan-Schloss A. Faulty diagnosis: public misconceptions about health care reform. New York: Public Agenda Foundation; 1992.
41. Light DW. Countervailing powers: a framework for professions in transition. In: T Johnson, G Larkin, M Saks, eds. Health professions and the State in Europe. London: Routledge; 1995. pp.24-41.
42. Davies C. The sociology of the professions and the profession of gender. Sociology 1996; 30(4): 661-678.
43. Howe D. Knowledge, power and the shape of social work practice. In: M Davies, editor. The sociology of social work. London: Routledge; 1991.
44. Barber B. Control and responsibility in the powerful professions. Political Science Quarterly 1978; 93(4):599-615.
45. Sandel M. A new politics of the common good. The Reith Lectures. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00lb6bt [Erişim tarihi: Mayıs 2012].
46. Freidson, E. Professional powers: a study of the institutionalization of formal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1986.
47. Starr P. The social transformation of American Medicine. New York: Basic Books; 1984.
48. Sullivan W. Work and integrity: The crisis and promise of professionalism in America. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Calif: Jossey-Bass; 2005.
49. Benner P. Challenges to professionalism: work, American integrity and the call to renew and strengthen the social contract of the professions. Journal of Critical Care 2005; 14(1):78-84.