Zehra A GAZİ, Fahriye A AKSAL, Gökmen DAĞLI, Behçet ÖZNACAR

Öğretmen Adaylarının Yansıtıcı Ürün Dosyası Hazırlamada Öz Denetim ve Bilgi Yönetiminin Etkisi

Bu çalışmada eylem çalışmasına bağlı, bağlantı teorisinin öğretim sürecinde uygulanması ele alınmıştır. Araştırmaya 44 aday öğretmen katılmıştır. Çalışmada nitel araştırma çerçevesinde yarı yapılandırılmış mülakat ve yansıtıcı raporlar veri toplama süreci olarak kullanılmıştır. Araştırma bulguları, öğretmen adayının yansıtıcı ürün dosyası geliştirmesinde öz denetim ve bilgi yönetimi becerisine sahip olması gerektiğini ve yansıtıcı ürün dosyası kullanımının bu becerilere katkı sağladığını göstermektedir. Öğretmen adaylarının sahip olduğu öz denetim ve arkadaşları ile kurmuş olduğu diyalog, müzakere kullanarak bilgiyi yönetmede etkili olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Öz denetim ve öz disiplin ile öğretmen adaylarının arkadaşlarıyla ve öğretmen ile arasında kurduğu diyalog ve münazara aynı zamanda yansıtıcı ve esnek düşünme becerisine de katkı sağlamıştır. Buna ek olarak, araştırma bulguları bağlantı teorisinin yansıtıcı ürün dosyası kullanarak ders tasarımında uygulanabileceğini ve mesleki beceriye katkısı olacağını vurgulamıştır

Impact of Prospective Teachers’ Self Control and Knowledge Management in Compiling a Reflective Portfolio

Within the framework of action research, connectivity theory has been suggested as a means to encourage learners to manage the process during the teaching practicum. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of self-control and knowledge management abilities of prospective teachers in compiling a reflective portfolio in teaching practice as a part of a teaching practicum course. 44 prospective teachers participated in this study. In the study, qualitative research (i.e. semi structured interviews and reflective reports) was used. Research findings show that the prospective teachers require both self-control and the ability to manage knowledge in compiling a reflective portfolio. Self-control and self-learning through dialogue and negotiation with peers and course tutors enhance the prospective teachers’ reflection, ability in intellectual flexibility and skills in knowledge management. In addition to this, the research findings highlight how connectivity theory can be implemented in course instruction and enhance the professional experience through reflective portfolio

PDF

___

Altinay, L., & Paraskevas, A. (2008). Planning research in hospitality and tourism. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Beck, R. J., & Bear, S. L. (2009). Teachers’ self-assessment of reflection skills as an outcome of e-folios. In P. Adamy, & N. B. Milman, (Eds.), Evaluating electronic portfolios in teacher education (pp. 1–22). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university (2nd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education.
Bransford, J., Derry, S., Berliner, D., Hammerness, K., & Beckett, K. L. (2005). Theories of learning and their roles in teaching..In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 40–87). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. London, UK: Sage.
Davies, M. A., & Willis, E. (2001). Through the looking glass: Preservice professional portfolios. The Teacher Educator, 37, 27-36. http://doi.org/dnz59c Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2003). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. London, UK: Sage.
Dinham, S., & Scott, C. (2003). Benefits to teachers of the professional learning portfolio: A case study. Teacher Development: An International Journal of Teachers’ Professional Development, 7, 229-244. http://doi.org/d5g8zs
Edwards, S. (2007). From developmental-constructivism to socio-cultural theory and practice: An expansive analysis of teachers’ professional learning in early childhood education. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 5, 83-106. http://doi.org/cm5fbv Frick, L., Carl, A., & Beets, P. (2010). Reflection as learning about the self in context: Mentoring as catalyst for reflective development in pre-service teachers. South African Journal of Education, 30, 421-437.
Gazi A. Z., & Aksal, A. F. (2011). The film as visual aided learning tool in classroom management course. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 41, 170-179.
Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2002). Primal leadership: Realizing the power of emotional intelligence. Boston, MA: Harvard School Press.
Granberg, C. (2010). E-portfolios in teacher education 2002–2009: The social construction of discourse, design and dissemination. European Journal of Teacher Education, 33, 309-322. http://doi.org/bgzn2w Hamilton, S., & Kahn, S. (2009). Demonstrating intellectual growth and development: The IUPUI ePort. In D. R. Cambridge, B. L. Cambridge, & K. B. Yancey (Eds.), Electronic portfolios 2.0: Emergent research on implementation and impact (pp. 91-96). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Hauge, T. E. (2006). Portfolios and ICT as means of professional learning in teacher education. Studies in Educational Evaluation 32, 23–36.
Hautala, J. (2011). International academic knowledge creation and ba. A case study from Finland. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 9, 4–16.
Johnson, A. P. (2002). A short guide to action research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Jones, E. (2010). Personal theory and reflection in a professional practice portfolio. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 699-710. http://doi.org/cj8qnd Knottenbelt, M. (2002). Developing portfolios for learning and assessment: Processes and principles. International Journal for Academic Development, 7, 177-180. http://doi.org/dfjj9p
Loermans, J. (2002). Synergizing the learning organization and knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6, 285-294. http://doi.org/cs4m48
Mansvelder-Longayroux, D., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2007). The portfolio as a tool for stimulating reflection by student teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 47–62.
Mayisela T. (2013). The potential use of mobile technology: enhancing accessibility and communication in a blended learning course. South African Journal of Education, 33(1)
Merier C. (2007). Enhancing intellectual understanding using e-learning strategies. South African Journal of Education, 27, 655–671
Mestry, R., Hendricks, I., & Bisschoff, T. (2009). Perceptions of teachers on the benefits of teacher development programmes in one province of South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 29, 475-490.
Mills, G. E. (2003). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Montgomery, L. A. (2003). Digital portfolios in teacher education: Blending professional standards, assessment, technology, and reflective practice. Computers in the Schools, 20, 171-186.
http://doi.org/fm3n6x Schoeman, S., & Mabunda, P. L. (2012). Teaching practice and the personal and socio-professional development of prospective teachers. South African Journal of Education, 32, 240-254.
Seferoglu, S. S. (2007a). Professional teaching standards: The case of Turkish teacher candidates. World Applied Sciences Journal, 2(4), s. 412-419. [Available on at: http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~sadi/yayin/Seferoglu_WASJ-2007_Prof-Teaching-Standards.pdf], Retrieved on 13.08.2014.
Seferoglu, S. S. (2007b). Information technologies in teacher education: Teacher candidates’ perceived computer selfefficacy.
Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS International Conference on e-Activities, pp. 376-380. Puerto De La Cruz, Tenerife, Spain. [Available on at: http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~sadi/yayin/Seferoglu_e-Activities- 2007_IT-Comp-Self-Efficacy.pdf], Retrieved on 13.08.2014.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2, 3–10.
Smith, K., & Tillema, H. (2007). Use of criteria in assessing teaching portfolios: Judgemental practices in summative evaluation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51, 103-117. http://doi.org/b8v96j
Starkey, L. (2010). Teachers’ pedagogical reasoning and action in the digital age. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 16, 233-244. http://doi.org/b59hf9
Türel, V. (2013). The use of educational technology at tertiary level. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Hacettepe University Journal of Education], 28(2), 482-496. [Available on at: http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/201328-2VEHBİ%20TÜREL.pdf], Retrieved on 13.08.2014.
Van Der Westhuizen, G. J., & Smith, K. (2000). Teachers' portfolio reflections: A comparative analysis. Teacher Development: An International Journal of Teachers' Professional Development, 4, 339-352. http://doi.org/c3nr47
Verkler, K. W. (2000). Let's reflect: The professional portfolio as a prerequisite for internship. Action in Teacher Education, 22, 116-121. http://doi.org/fzddtr
Yenilmez, Y., & Seferoglu, S. S. (2013). An overview of teachers’ awareness on cyberbullying [in Turkish]. Eğitim ve Bilim [Education and Science], 38(169), 420-432. [Available online at: http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/2513/523], Retrieved on 13.08.2014.
Yıldız, H., Sarıtepeci , M., & Seferoglu, S. S. (2013). A study on the contributions of the in-service training activities within the scope of FATIH project to teachers’ professional growth in reference to ISTE teachers’ standards [in
Turkish]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Hacettepe University Journal of Education], Special Issue(1), 375-392. [Available online at: http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/2013OZELSAYIHATİCE%20YILDIZ.pdf], Retrieved on 13.08.2014.