Joint Initiation and Joint Feedback: Connecting Collaboration with Pedagogy in Co-teaching

Joint Initiation and Joint Feedback: Connecting Collaboration with Pedagogy in Co-teaching

How teachers ask questions and give feedback to student responses is an age-old topic that pervades educational research, especially empirical work that examines classroom interaction. Focusing on the understudied context of co-teaching, and a virtually unexamined dynamic with two teachers with equal roles and skills sets, this study looks at how co-teachers can jointly accomplish the initiation and feedback work in IRF sequences. Two collaborative practices, joint initiation and joint feedback, are identified and described in context. The discovery of these practices reveals that co-teachers with equal roles can jointly occupy not only the same IRF sequence, but also the same component of the sequence. Beyond uncovering some interactional characteristics of this type of collaborative interaction, the findings of this study also carry important implications for pedagogy. First, the instances of joint initiation show how co-teacher collaboration can enhance the progressivity and the pedagogical effectiveness of question-answer exchange during instruction. Second, the practice of joint feedback reflects some of the distinct advantages of having two instructors in one classroom, which include making feedback more salient for learners, creating more opportunities for one-on-one teacher-student interaction, and increasing the likelihood of spotting and addressing problems in student understanding

___

  • Aline, D. & Hosada, Y. (2006). Team teaching participation patterns of homeroom teachers in English activities classes in Japanese public elementary schools. JALT Journal 28(1), 5-22.
  • Armstrong, D. (1977). Team teaching and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 65-86.
  • Bloome, D., Carter, S., Christian, B., Otto, S., & Shuart-Faris, N. (2005). Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microanalytic perspective. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Butterfield, J. L., & Bhatta, B. (2015). IRF sequences in team-teaching EFL classrooms. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(3), 176-185.
  • Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Edelsky, C. (1981). Who's got the floor? Language in Society, 10(3), 383-421.
  • Friend, M. (2008). Co-teaching: A simple solution that isn't simple after all. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 2(2), 9-19.
  • Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-23). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
  • Lee, J. (2016). Teacher entries into second turn positions: IRFs in collaborative teaching. Journal of Pragmatics, 95, 1-15.
  • Lee, J. (2017). Co-initiations in EFL collaborative teaching interaction. English Teaching, 72(3), 3-24.
  • Lee, Y. A. (2007). Third turn position in teacher talk: Contingency and the work of teaching. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(6), 1204-1230.
  • Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Nunan, D. (1992). Collaborative language learning and teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation aAnalysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sinclair, J. M, & Coulthard, R.M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Tannen, D. (2007). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published in 1989).
  • ten Have, P. (1999). Doing conversation analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (Eds.) (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Waring, H. Z. (2008). Using explicit positive assessment in the language classroom: IRF, feedback, and learning opportunities. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 577-594.
  • Waring, H. Z. (2009). Moving out of IRF (Initiation-Response-Feedback): A single case analysis. Language Learning, 59(4), 796-824.
  • Wells, G. (1993). Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistic & Education, 5(1), 1-37.