İlköğretim Matematik Derslerinde Kubaşık Öğrenme Yönteminin Kullanılması

Bu çalışmada kubaşık öğrenme yönteminden ve bu yöntem içinde yer alan bazı yapılandırılmış ve yapılandırılmamış teknikler sunulmuştur. Bu teknikler esas alınarak İlköğretim matematik derslerinde kubaşık öğrenme yönteminin kullanımına ilişkin bazı etkinlik örnekleri ve örnek bir ders planı verilmiştir.

Using Cooperative Learning in Primary School Math Courses

In this study, cooperative learning and its some structured and unstructured techniques are described. Based on these techniques, some activities and a sample lesson plan concerning the use of cooperative learning in math courses are presented.

___

  • Andrini, B.(1998). Cooperative learning and mathematics, Sen Clemente: Kağan Cooperative Learning.
  • Artzt, A. F.; Newman C.M. (1990). How to use cooperative learning in the mathematics class. National Counsel of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Bryant, R. R. "Effects of team-assisted individualization on the attitudes and achievement of third, fourth and fifth grade students of mathematics". Dissertation Abstract International. 43(1), 70. (1981).
  • Gömleksiz, M.(1997). Kubaşık Öğrenme -Temel eğitim dördüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin matematik başarısı ve arkadaşlık ilişkileri üzerine deneysel bir çalışma. Baki Kitabevi, Adana.
  • Hertz, R., Lazarowitz; Milller, N. (1992). Interaction in cooperative groups. Cambridge University Press.
  • Johnson, D. W; Johnson R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition (Second edition) .Edina, Minnesota: Interaction Book Company.
  • Johnson, D. W; Johnson R.T.(1991j. Learning mathematics and cooperative learning lesson plans f or teachers. Edina, Minnesota: interaction Book Company.
  • Johnson, D. W; Johnson R. T.; Holubec, E. J. (1992). Advanced cooperative learning. Edina, Minnesota:İnteraction Book Company.
  • Kagan, S. (1992) Cooperative learning, Paseo Espada:Resources for Teachers, İne.
  • Karper, J., Melnick, S. A. (1993). The effectiveness of team accelerated intruction on high achievers in mathematics. Journal of Instructional Psychology 20(1), 49
  • Oishi, S. S. (1983). Effects of team-assisted individualization in mathematics on crossrace and cross-sex interaction of elementary school children. Dissertation Abstracts International 44(12), 3622.
  • Slavin, R. E. (1987) Cooperative learning and individualized instruction Arithmetic Teacher. 35(3). s:14-16.
  • Slavin, R.E. (1990). Comprehensive cooperative learning methods: Embedding cooperative learning in the cirrucullum and the school Cooperative Learning: Theory and Research. (Editör, S. Sharan.) New York: Preager, 261-271.
  • Slavin, R. E. ; Karweit, N. L. (1985). Effects of whole class, ability groupped and individualized instruction on mathematics achievement._American Educational Research Journal 22(3), 351-367.
  • Slavin,R. E.; Leavey, M. B.; Madden, N.A. (1984). Combining cooperative learning and individualized instruction: Effects on student mathemetics achievement, attitudes, and beheviors. The Elementary School Journal. 84(4), 409-422.
  • Slavin, R. E.; Madden, N. A.; Leavey, M. (1984). Effects of team-assisted individualization on the mathematics achievement of academically handicapped and nonhandicapped students. Journal of Educational Psychology. 76(5), 813-819.
  • Slavin, R. E.; Madden, N.A.; Leavey, M.( 1984).Effects of coopretive learning and individualized instruction on mainstreamed students. Exceptional Children. 50,434-443.
  • Xin, F.; and Others (1996) ."Computer-Assisted cooperative learning in an inclusive classroom. Annual International Convention of the Council for Exceptional Children (74th, Orlando, FL, April 1-5,1996).