FEN EĞİTİMİNDE PROBLEME DAYALI ÖĞRENME YAKLAŞIMININ PROBLEM ÇÖZME VE ÖZ-YETERLİK İNANÇ DÜZEYLERİNİN GELİŞİMİNE ETKİSİ

___

  • Açıkgöz. K. Ü. (2004). Aktif Öğrenme (6. Baskı). lzmir: Eğitim Dünyası Yayınları.
  • Bandura. A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Barrows, H. (2002). Is it truly possible to have such a thing as dPBL? Distance Education, 23(1). 119-122.
  • Bentley. J.. Lowry. G. & Sandy, G. (1999. December). Initiatives in information systems matching learning to professional practice. In Eds.. J. Marsh. Implementing problem based learning: I'" Asia pacific conference on problem based learning (p. l 11-117). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University.
  • Cerezo. N. (2004). Problem-based learning in the middle school: A research case study of the perceptions of at-risk females. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 27(1), 20—42.
  • Chin, C. & Chia, L. (2004). Problem-based learning: Using students’ questions to drive knowledge construction. Science Education. 88(5), 707-727.
  • Cohen. L.. Manion. L. & Morrison. K. (2000). Research methods in education (5m Edition). London: Routledge/Falmer. Taylor&Francis Group.
  • Dahlgren. M. A. & Öberg. G. (2001). Questioning to learn and learning to question: Structure and function of problem-based learning scenarios in environmental science education. Higher Education. 41 . 263—282.
  • Hmelo-Silver. GB. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn'l. Educational Psychology Review, l6(3). 235-266.
  • Iglesias. J. L. (2001 ). Problem—based learning. in initial teacher education. Prospects. 32(3). 319-332.
  • Kaptan. F. & Korkmaz, H. (2001). İşbirliğine dayalı fen öğretiminin öğretmen adaylarının öz-yeterlik düzeylerine etkisi. IV. Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Kongresi 2000. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.
  • Karaşar, N. (1999). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (9.Basım). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Korkmaz, H. & Kaptan. F. (2001). Fen eğitiminde probleme dayalı öğrenme yaklaşımı. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20, 185-192.
  • Linn. R. L. & Gronlund. N. E. (2000). Measurement and assessment in teaching (8'h Edition). New Jersey. USA: Prentice Hall.
  • McDonald. J. T. (2002. January). Using problem based learning a in science methods course. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting ofthe Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Charlotte, USA.
  • McMillan. J. H. (2000). Educational research fundamentals for the consumer. USA: Longman
  • Mierson. S. & Parikh. A. A. (2000). Stories from the field. Change, 32(1). 20—27.
  • Miller. C. M. (2000). Student—researched problem—solving strategies. Mathematics Teacher, 93(2). 136-138.
  • Murray—Harvey, R.. Curtis, D. D.. Cattley. G. & Slee, P. T. (2005). Enhancing teacher education students’ generic skills through problem—based learning. Teaching Education. 16(3), 257-273.
  • Schmidt. H. G. (1983). Problem based learning: Rationale and description. Medical Education, 17(1 ), 11-16.
  • Süleyman YAMAN, Necati YALÇIN / H. Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal ofEducatian), 29(2005), 229-236
  • Schriver, M. & Czemiak, CM. (1999). A comparison of middle and junior high science teachers' levels of efŞcacy and knowledge of developmentally appropriate curriculum and instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(1), 21 - 42.
  • Siegel, M. A. (2002, April). Models of teaching learning: A study of a case analyses by pre-service teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, USA.
  • Siege], M. A. & Lee, J. A. C. (2001, March). But electricity isn't static: Science discussion, identiŞcation of learning issues, and use of resources in a problem-based learning education course. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO. USA.
  • Sonmez, D. & Lee. H. (2003). Problem-based learning in science. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED482724).
  • Thomas, J. A., Pedersen, J. E. & Finson, K. (2001). Validating the draw-a-science-teacher—test checklist exploring mental models and teacher beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(3), 295-310.
  • Yaman, S. (2003). Fen bilgisi eğitiminde probleme dayalı öğrenmenin öğrenme ürünlerine etkisi. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara. yayınlanmamış doktora tezi.
  • Yaman, S. & Yalçın, N. (2005). Fen bilgisi öğretiminde probleme dayalı öğrenme yaklaşınunın yaratıcı düşünme becerisine etkisi [Elektronik versiyonu]. Ilköğretim Online Dergisi, 4(1 ), 42-52.
  • Yiğit. N., Akdeniz. A. R. & Kurt, Ş. (2001, Eylül). Fizik eğitiminde çalışma yapraklarının geliştirilmesi... Makale, Yeni Bin Yılın Başında Türkiye’de Fen Bilimleri Sempozyumu’nda bildiri olarak sunulmuştur, Maltepe Universitesi Eğitim Fakültesi.
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • Başlangıç: 1986
  • Yayıncı: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dekanlığı