Developing a Scale for Self-Regulated L2 Learning Strategy Use

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Oxford (2011) tarafından geliştirilen Stratejik Öz-Düzenleme Modeli'ne dayanarak özdüzenlemeli yabancı dil öğrenme stratejisi kullanımına ilişkin bir ölçek geliştirmektir. Araştırma, 305 (232 kız, 73 erkek) öğrencinin katılımıyla gerçekleşmiştir. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliliğini belirlemek için açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri uygulanmıştır. Açımlayıcı faktör analizi sonuçlarına göre ölçek altı alt boyuttan ve dörtlü Likert tipi 35 maddeden oluşmuştur (Ölçeğin açıkladığı toplam varyans miktarı 41.625%, maddelerin faktör yük değerleri .80 ile .35 arasında değişmektedir). Doğrulayıcı faktör analiz sonuçları, ölçeğin açımlayıcı faktör analiz sonuçlarını doğrulamıştır ve bulgular modelin uygun olduğunu göstermiştir (?2/df=1298.61/545). Ölçeğin düzeltilmiş madde toplam korelasyonları .44 ve .76 arasında değişmektedir. Üst %27 ve alt %27 grupları ile yapılan t-test sonuçları, farkların tüm madde ve faktörler için anlamlı olduğunu ortaya koymuştur (p

Öz-Düzenlemeli Yabancı Dil Öğrenme Strateji Kullanımı Ölçeği'nin Geliştirilmesi

This study aims to develop a scale on the use of self-regulated L2 learning strategies based on Oxford's (2011) Strategic Self-Regulation (S2R) Model. The study was conducted with 305 (232 female, 73 male) participants. In order to determine construct validity, EFA and CFA were applied. Depending on the results of EFA, the scale is composed of 35 items on a 4 point Likert type embedded in 6 dimensions (the total variance explained is 41.625%, factor loadings of 35 items vary from .80 to .35.). CFA confirmed the results of EFA, and the findings showed that the model had acceptable fit (χ2/df=1298.61/545). The corrected item total correlation values of items in the scale range from .44 to .76. The results of t-test with top 27% and bottom 27% groups revealed that the differences are significant (p

___

  • Akbulut, Y. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS uygulamaları. İstanbul: İdeal Kültür Yayıncılık.
  • Anderson, J. C, & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychametrika, 49, 155-173.
  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, First Edition. NY: Guilford Publications, Inc.
  • Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Churchill, G. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (February), 64-73.
  • Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309-319.
  • Cohen, A. D. & Chi, J. C. (2002). Language Strategy Use Inventory and Index. In R. M. Paige, A. D. Cohen, B., Kappler, J. C., Chi & J. P., Lassegard (Eds). Maximizing study abroad, 16-28. Minneapolis, Center for Advanced Research for Language Acquisition, University of Minnesota.
  • Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Çelik, N. (2012). Investigation of Self-regulation Skills and Self-efficacy Perceptions of Prospective Mathematics Teachers and Teachers. Unpublished Master Thesis, Erzurum: University of Atatürk.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal Bilimler için Çok Değişkenli İstatistik: SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • DeCoster, J. (1998). Overview of Factor Analysis. [Available online at http://www.stat-help.com/notes.html], Retrieved on November, 2, 2015.
  • DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Thousand Oaks,California: Sage Publications.
  • Diamantopoulos, A. & Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Introducing LISREL: A Guide for the Uninitiated. London: Sage Publications.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Griffiths, C. (2013). The strategy factor in successful language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Herhausen, D. (2011). Understanding Proactive Customer Orientation: Construct Development and Managerial Implications. Published PhD Thesis. Universty of St. Gallen. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.
  • Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1: 104-121.
  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods. Volume 6 Issue 1 2008, pp. 53 - 60. [Available at www.ejbrm.com], Retrieved on December, 1, 2015.
  • Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications, R. H. Hoyle (editor). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., pp. 1-15.
  • Hu, L.T. & Bentler, P.M. (1999), Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling, 6 (1), 1-55.
  • Jöreskog, K. & Sörbom, D. (1993), LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International Inc.
  • Kadıoğlu, C. , Uzuntiryaki, E., & Aydın, Ç. Y. (2011). Development of Self-Regulatory Strategies Scale (SRSS): Özdüzenleyici Öğrenme Stratejileri Ölçeğinin (ÖÖSÖ) Geliştirilmesi, Eğitim ve Bilim 2011, Cilt 36, Sayı 160.
  • Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling: A Researcher's Guide. London: Sage.
  • Kocaman, O. & Cumaoğlu, K. G. (2014). Developing a Scale for Vocabulary Learning Strategies in Foreign Languages. Education & Science / Egitim ve Bilim . 2014, Vol. 39 Issue 176, p293-303. 11p.
  • MacCallum R. C., Browne M.W., & Sugawara H. M. (1996). Power Analysis and Determination of Sample Size for Covariance Structure Modeling. Psychological Methods. 1:130–49.
  • Mueller, R. O. (1996). Basic Principles of Structural Equation Modeling: An Introduction to LISREL and EQS. New York: Springer.
  • Nambiar, R. (2008). Towards A Descript.ve Language Learning Strategy Inventory, The DELLSI. The Buckingham Journal of Language and Llinguistics, Vol. 1.
  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994) Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
  • O'Neil Jr, H. F. & Herl, H. E. (1998). Reliability and validity of a trait measure of self-regulation. Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Diego, CA.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1989). Use of language learning strategies: A synthesis of studies with implication for strategy training. System, 17, 235-247.
  • Oxford, R. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. NY: Newbury House Publisher.
  • Oxford, R. (2011). Teaching and Researching Language Learning Strategies. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited. Özdamar, K. (1999). Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi. Eskişehir: Kaan Kitabevi.
  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith D., Garcia T., & McKeachie W. J. (1991) . A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich, USA.
  • Ryu, E. (2008). Evaluation of Model Fit in Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling: Level-Specific Model Fit Evaluation and The Robustness to Non-normality. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Tucson. Arizona: Arizona University.
  • Schunk, D. H. & Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  • Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 25, 173-180.
  • Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal Eşitlik Modelleri. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları., 3 (6), 49-74.
  • Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Tavşancıl, E. (2005). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
  • Turan, S. (2009). Probleme dayali öğrenmeye iliskin tutumlar, ogrenme becerileri ve basari arasindaki ilişkiler (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Hacettepe Universitesi, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Tseng, W. T., Dörnyei, Z. & Schmidt, N. (2006). A New Approach to Assessing Strategic Learning: The Case of Self-Regulation in Vocabulary Acquisition. Applied Linguistics. March, 27 (1): 78-102.
  • Weinstein, C. E., & Palmer, D. (1990). LASSI-HS user's manual. Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing
  • Zimmerman, B. J. & Risemberg, R. (1997). Self-regulatory dimensions of academic learning and motivation. In G.D. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of academic learning (pp, 105-125). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of Self-regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview and Analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.) Self-regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives (pp, 1-35). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • Başlangıç: 1986
  • Yayıncı: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dekanlığı