An Investigation on the Elementary Teachers' Knowledge About Air Pollution Issues

Bu çalışmanın amacı ilköğretim öğretmenlerinin hava kirliliği, ozon tabakasının incelmesi, asit yağmurları ve temiz enerji kaynakları hakkında sahip oldukları bilgilerin belirlenmesidir. Hava kirliliği bahsedilen kavramlarla birlikte incelenerek konu hakkında genel bir durum ortaya çıkarılmak istenmiştir. Çalışmaya Ankara’da 91 okulda çalışan 183 öğretmen katılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler nicel istatistik teknikleri ve doküman analizi tekniği ile analiz edilmiştir. Sonuçlara göre öğretmenlerin %50 sinin kava kirliliğinin sebepleri hakkında yeterli bilgileri olmadığı ortaya çıkmıştır. Öğretmenlerin temel hava kirleticileri, CO2, CH4, SO2 ve NOX, hakkında bilgileri olmakla beraber bunların hava kirliliğine nasıl neden olduklarını bilmemektedirler. Temiz enerji kaynakları hakkındaki bilgileri ise oldukça yeterli bulunmuştur, bunun nedeni olarak Türkiye’nin sahip olduğu coğrafik özellikleri (güneşli mevsimlerin olması, yarım ada olması, yeraltı sularının olması) düşünülmüştür.

İlköğretim Öğretmenlerinin HAva Kirliliği Konusundaki Bilgileri ile İlgili Bir Araştırma

The aim of this study was to determine the elementary teachers’ knowledge about air pollution. Ozone depletion, global warming, acid rain, and renewable energy were also addressed in this study to get holistic picture about air pollution. A total of 183 teachers from the 91 schools in Ankara participated to the study. The data obtained were analyzed by means of both quantitative statistical and document analyses techniques. Results revealed that majority of the teachers have an idea about the basic air pollutants and the air pollution problem it causes, like CO2, CH4, SO2 and NOX, they do not seem as having an in depth knowledge about the air pollutants and corresponding air pollution problems. Teachers’ knowledge about renewable energy was quite satisfactory. It was argued that geographical nature of Turkey (having sunny seasons, being a peninsula, and having spring waters) improved teachers’ knowledge about renewable energy sources.

___

  • Aydemir M. (2007). The investigation of teachers with respect to knowledge level on environmental concepts. Unpublished Ms.Thesis. Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  • Chawla, L. (1998). Significant life experiences revisited: A review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29(3), 11-21.
  • Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs D. J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P. J., Dai, X., et. all. (2001). The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I in the Third Assessment Report of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press.
  • Cutter, A. (2002). The value of teachers’ knowledge: Environmental education as a key study. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 466456).
  • Demiröven, P. Ö. (1999). Türkiye’de çevre eğitiminin durumu. Unpublished Ms. Thesis. Akdeniz Universitesi, Antalya.
  • Dove, J. (1996). Student teacher understanding of the greenhouse effect, ozone layer depletion and acid rain. Environmental Education Research, 2(1), 89-100.
  • Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education. (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill, Inc.
  • Gayford, C. G. (2000). Biodiversity education: A teacher’s perspective. Environmental Education Research, 6(4), 348–361.
  • Hart, P. (2003). Teachers thinking in environmental education: Consciousness and responsibility New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Hungerford, H. R. & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8-21.
  • Ko. C. A. & Lee J. C. (2003). Teachers' perceptions of teaching environmental issues within the science curriculum: A Hong Kong perspective. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 12(3), 187-204.
  • Lane, J., Wilke, R., Champeau, R. & Sivek, D. (1995). Strengths and weaknesses of teacher environmental education preparation in Wisconsin. Journal of Environmental Education, 27(1), 36-45.
  • Mansaray, A., Ajiboye, J. O. & Audu, U. F. (1998). Environmental knowledge and attitudes of some Nigerian secondary school teachers. Environmental Education Research, 4(3), 329-339.
  • Marco, P. (1997). Barriers to EE: Perceptions of high school teachers in Orange Co., CA. Master's Thesis, California State University.
  • Michail, S., Stamou, A. G. & Stamou, G. P. (2007). Greek primary school teachers' understanding of current environmental issues: An exploration of their environmental knowledge and images of nature. Science Education, 91(2), 244-259.
  • Özdemir, N. ve Çobanoğlu, E. O. (2008). Türkiye’de nükleer santrallerin kurulması ve nükleer enerji Kullanımı konusundaki öğretmen adaylarının tutumları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34, 218-232.
  • Palmer, A. J. (1998). Environmental education in the 21st century: Theory, practice progress and promise. History and development of environmental education. New York: Routledge
  • Sail, A. B. C. (1999). The status of environmental education in elementary and middle public schools of East Tennessee: A teacher perspective. Dissertation abstract. (UMI No. 9962303)
  • Summers, M., Kruger, C., Childs, A. & Mant, J. (2000). Primary school teachers’ understanding of environmental issues: An interview study. Environmental Education Research, 6(4), 293 – 312.
  • Tanner, T. (1990). Significant life experiences: a new research area in environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 11(4), 20-24.
  • UNEP. (1992). World Atlas of Desertification. London: Edward Arnold.
  • UNESCO (1977). First Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education, Final Report, Tbilisi, USSR, Paris: UNESCO.
  • WCED (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Wilke, R. (1985). Mandating preservice environmental education teacher training: the Wisconsin experience. Journal of Environmental Education, 17(1), 1-18.