MALİ SAYDAMLIK AÇISINDAN TÜRKİYE VE ŞANGAY İŞBİRLİĞİ ÖRGÜTÜ ÜLKELERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Mali saydamlık, mali yönetimin ve hesap verebilirliğin temel unsurlarından biridir. Mali saydamlığın derecesi, ülkenin mali kredibilitesi ve performansının önemli bir göstergesidir. Ayrıca, mali saydamlık; kamunun mali durumuna ilişkin potansiyel risklerin, politika değişikliklerinin fayda ve maliyetlerinin ve mevcut mali pozisyonunun doğru değerlendirilerek ekonomik kararlar alınmasını sağlar. Bu nedenle, gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülkelerde mali saydamlığa bir yönelim vardır. Diğer taraftan IMF'de, üyelerini iyi yönetişim ve mali saydamlığı sağlama noktasında teşvik etmektedir. Şangay ülkeleri de mali saydamlığa ilgi duymaktadırlar. Fakat, onlar yeterince uluslararası kriterlere uyum sağlamamışlardır. Bu makale, Türkiye ve Şangay ülkelerinde mali saydamlığı değerlendirmektedir

AN EVALUATION OF FISCAL TRANSPARENCY PRACTICES BETWEEN TURKEY AND THE MEMBER STATE OF SHANGHAI COOPERATION ORGANIZATION

Fiscal transparency is a critical element of fiscal management and accountability. The degree of fiscal transparency has been shown to be an important predictor of a country’s fiscal credibility and performance. Furthermore, fiscal transparency helps ensure that governments’ economic decisions are informed by a shared and accurate assessment of the current fiscal position, the costs and benefits of policy changes, and the potential risks to the fiscal outlook. For this reason, there is a global movement towards more fiscal transparency, in both developed and developing countries. On the other hand, the IMF encourages its members to promote good governance and to enhance fiscal transparency. This demand for fiscal transparency has also caught up with Shangai Countries. However, they are not adapt to the international criteria. This paper evaluates fiscal transparency in Turkey and Shanghai Countries

___

  • ANDREULA, N., CHONG, A., & GUİLLÉN, J. (2009), “Institutional Quality and Fiscal Transparency”, IDB Working Paper Series, 125, 1-33.
  • ALT, J. E., VE LASSEN, D. D. (2006), “Fiscal Transparency, Political Parties, and Debt in OECD Countries”, European Economic Review, 50(6), 1403-1439.
  • ALT, J. E., LASSEN, D. D., VE ROSE, S. (2006), “The Causes of Fiscal Transparency: Evidence from the US States”, IMF Staff Papers, 30-57.
  • BAKKAL, HAKAN VE KASIMOĞLU, ALPER (t.y.), Bütçe Sürecinde Mali Saydamlık Ve Hesap Verebilirliğin Önemi, http://www.yalova.edu.tr/Files/UserFiles/60/Butce_ Surecinde_Mali_Saydamlk_Ve_Hesap_Verebilirliin_Onemi.pdf (18.07.2014).
  • BTAP (2014), News from Around the World on Budget Transparency, Accountability and Participation, http://makebudgetspublic.org/pdf/BTAP%20PR%20june%2021.pdf (19.11.2014).
  • DENG, S., PENG, J., VE WANG, C. (2013), “Fiscal Transparency at the Chinese Provincial Level”, Public Administration, 91(4), 947-963.
  • DPT (2000), Kamu Mali Yönetiminin Yeniden Yapılandırılması ve Mali Saydamlık, Sekizinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu, Ankara http://www.vavek.org.tr/docs/belgeler-2.pdf (18.07.2014).
  • EMİL, FERHAT VE YILMAZ, H. H. (2009), Mali Saydamlık İzleme Raporu VII, Tepav Yayınları, http://www.tepav.org.tr/upload/files/1271243419r6297.Mali_Saydamlik_Izle me_Raporu_VII.pdf (19.07.2014).
  • IBP (2006), Open Budget Initiative 2006, http://internationalbudget.org/wp-content/uploads/ 2011/06/SummaryReportenglish.pdf (21.07.2014).
  • IBP (2008), Open Budget Survey 2008, http://internationalbudget.org/wp-content/uploads/ 2011/06/2008FinalFullReportEnglish1.pdf (21.07.2014).
  • IBP (2010), Open Budget Survey 2010, http://internationalbudget.org/wp-content/uploads/ 2011/06/2010_Full_Report-English.pdf (21.07.2014).
  • IBP (2012), Open Budget Survey 2012, http://internationalbudget.org/wpcontent/uploads/ OBI2012-Report-English.pdf (21.07.2014).
  • IMF (1999), Experimental Imf Report on Observance of Standards and Codes: People's Republic of China-Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, http://www.imf.org/ external/np/rosc/hkg/#ııı (25.07.2014).
  • IMF (2003), Republic of Kazakhstan: Report on Observance of Standards and CodesFiscal Transparency Module, Washington D.C., www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/ 2008/cr 0856.pdf (21.07.2014).
  • IMF (2004), Russia Federation: Report on The Observance of Standards and Codes-Fiscal Transparency Module, IMF Country Report No. 04/288, Washington D.C. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2004/cr04288.pdf (24.07.2014).
  • IMF (2006), Turkey: Report on The Observance of Standards and Codes-Fiscal Transparency Module, Washington D.C. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr /2006/cr06126.pdf (21.07.2014).
  • IMF (2007a), Manual On Fiscal Transparency, Fiscal Affairs Department, Washington D.C. www.imf.org/external/np/pp/2007/eng/101907m.pdf (23.07.2014).
  • IMF (2007b), Republic of Tajikistan: Report on Observance of Standards and CodesFiscal Transparency Module, Washington D.C. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs /ft/scr/2007/ cr0756.pdf (21.07.2014).
  • IMF (2008), Kyrgyz Republic: Report on Observance of Standards and Codes-Fiscal Transparency Module, Washington D.C. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/ 2008/ cr08151.pdf (25.07.2014)
  • IMF (2010), Turkey-2010 Article IV Consultation and Post-Program Monitoring: Preliminary Conclusions, http://www.imf.org/external/np/ms/2010/052610.htm (28.12.2014)
  • IMF (2011), Russian Federation: Report on Observance of Standards and Codes-Data Module, IMF Country Report No. 11/56, Washington D.C. www.imf.org /external/pubs/ft /scr/2011/cr1156.pdf (21.07.2014).
  • IMF (2012), Fiscal Transparency, Accountability, and Risk, Prepared by the Fiscal Affairs Department in collaboration with the Statistics Department, Washington D.C. http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2012/080712.pdf (24.07.2014).
  • IMF (2013), Republic of Kazakhstan-2013 Article IV Consultation Concluding Statement of the IMF Mission, https://www.imf.org/external/np/ms/2013/ 060413c.htm (18.11.2013).
  • IMF (2014a), Russian Federation Fiscal Transparency Evaluation, IMF Country Report No. 14/134, Washington, D.C. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2014/cr14134.pdf (12.08.2014).
  • IMF (2014b), How Does the IMF Encourage Greater Fiscal Transparency?, Factsheet, https://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/fiscal.htm (14.10.2014).
  • IMF (2014c), Republic of Kazakhstan-2014 Article IV Consultation Concluding Statement of the IMF Mission, https://www.imf.org/external/np/ms/2014/ 050114.htm (18.11.2014).
  • IMF (2014d), IMF Staff Concludes 2014 Article IV Mission to Tajikistan, https://www.imf.org/ external/np/sec/pr/2014/pr14527.htm (22.10.2014).
  • JARMUZEK, M. (2006), Does Fiscal Transparency Matter? The Evidence from Transition Economies, Warsaw, Poland: Center for Social and Economic Research. Available at: http://www. cerge-ei. cz/pdf/gdn/RRCV_77_paper_03.pdf (16.11.2014).
  • KARAARSLAN, ERKAN (2006), Kamu Mali Yönetimi ve Mali Raporlama, www.kamumuhasebesi.org/bolum/kitap/dosya/41.pdf (23.07.2014).
  • KOPİTS, G., VE CRAİG, J. D. (1998), “Transparency in Government Operations”, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 158. TI (2012), Transparency International Annual Report 2012, http://www.transparency.org/ annualreport/2012, (23.07.2014)
  • Toker, Murat (2002), Mali Saydamlık ve Türkiye, T.C. Sayıştay Başkanlığı Bilgi Notu, Ankara. www.sayistay.gov.tr/yayin/elek/ekutupana3.asp?id=35, (15.07.2014).
  • URL 1, Republic of Uzbekistan Ministry of Finance Information, Public Financial Management Reform Strategy 2007–2018. http://www.publicfinance.uz/upload /iblock/440/440b138a66f06f1f6d2a35a665fa5dad.pdf (18.11.2014).
  • URL 2, Transparency Corruption Index, http://www.transparency.org/cpi2014/results/ (30.12.2014).
  • URL 3, Transparency Corruption Index, http://archive.transparency.org/policy_research/ urveys_indices/cpi/2002 (24.07.2014).
  • URL 4, U.S. Department of State 2012 Fiscal Transparency Report, Federal Register, http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-03-04/pdf/2013-04914.pdf, (18.11.2014).
  • WB (2005), Republic of Uzbekistan Public Expenditure Review, Report No. 31014-UZ, https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/8528/310140UZ.pdf?seq uence=1. (19.11.2014).
  • WB (2011), Republic of Uzbekistan Country Integrated Fiduciary Assessment, Report No. 60713-UZ, http://wwwwds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/ IB/2012/05/23/000425962_20120523172801/Rendered/PDF/607130ESW0P1200ry0As sessment0Final.pdf. (19.11.2014).
  • YILMAZ, H. HAKAN VE TOSUN, SELMA (2010), “5018 Sayılı Kanun Çerçevesinde Mali Saydamlık ve Parlamentonun Bütçe Sürecinde Etkinliği”, Yasama Dergisi, 14, 5-23. http://www.yasader.org/web/yasama_dergisi/2010/sayi14/5-23.pdf (17.07.2014).
  • ZHANG, Q., VE CHAN, J. L. (2013), “New Development: Fiscal Transparency in ChinaGovernment Policy and the Role of Social Media”, Public Money & Management, 33(1), 71-75.