BİR TÜRKİYE KONTEKSTINDE SİYASAL PAZARLAMA: DEĞERLER ve PRATİKLER

Siyasal pazarlamanın, iş dünyasındaki pazarlama yöntemleriyle ortak birçok yanı vardır ve sosyoloji, politik psikoloji ve elbette bütün seviyelerinde iletişimden çokça faydalanır. En basit tanımlamasıyla, politikacılar siyasal pazarlama yoluyla, ticarette yapıldığı şekliyle, müşteriler için neleri olduğunu söyler; neden kendi ürünlerini seçmeleri gerektiğini ve gelecekte herhangi bir sorunla karşılaştıklarında ne türlü garantilere sahip olduklarını anlatırlar. Bu kampanya sürecinde, iletişim koordinatörleri, pazarlamayı adım adım yönetir ve politikacılara hangi mecraları ve iletişim yöntemlerini (reklam, sosyal medya aktiviteleri gibi) kullanmaları gerektiğini anlatırlar. Aynı zamanda, bu yöntemler karşılığında, her şey yolunda giderse, nasıl bir desteğe sahip olacaklarını ve ulaşacakları oy oranını öngörebildikleri stratejileri olur. Seçim kampanyası boyunca, rakipler, vaatlerini aktarır ve oy vermelerine ve katkılarına karşılık seçmenlere gelecekteki icraatlarını açıklarlar. Ne var ki, siyasal iletişim stratejileri farklı ülkelerde aynı özellikleri gösterse de yerel kültür, gelenekler ve değerler; siyasetçilerin, yerli halkın taleplerine özel, onların oylarını cezbeden ve politikacının onlardan biri olduğunu hissettiren, yeni seçim kampanyaları geliştirmelerini gerekli kılar. Bu nedenle, elinizdeki kavramsal makale; genel anlamda siyasal pazarlamayı daha çok teorik olarak ele alırken, diğer yandan politikacıların, iletişim kampanyalarında, kültürel gelenekler ve yerel motifleri kullanmalarıyla elde ettikleri avantajların nedenlerini keşfetmeyi amaçlar. Çalışmanın sonucu, Türkiye’deki siyasal iletişim kampanyalarının yerel öğeleri kullanmakla birlikte özellikle Amerika’da uygulanan stratejilerden etkilendiğini göstermektedir.

POLITICAL MARKETING in a TURKISH CONTEXT: VALUES and PRACTICES

Political marketing shares much in common with marketing in the business world and benefits from sociology, political phycology and of course mostly takes advantage of communication almost at its all levels. At its very simple description, politicians through political marketing just as done in the business marketing, tells what they have for people, why they should elect them as their representatives and explain them their future promises and guarantees if the follower faces any problem. The communication managers at this publicising process, direct the marketing steps, tell the politicians which services to use and what communication methods (e.g. advertising, social media activities) to practise. At the same time, they have a further strategy which depicts the support they might have in return and the voter loyalty they will receive if their strategy works. Throughout the election campaign, runners convey their promises and explain their future performances in exchange for the votes and supporters’ contributions. However, although political communication strategies look similar in different countries, the local culture, traditions and values force politicians to develop new ways of election campaigns special to that indigenous demands which will attract the voters and make them feel that the politician is one of them. Therefore, this conceptual paper while giving mostly a theoretical background for political marketing in general terms, it also tries to explore the relationship and benefits gained by practicing cultural traditions and the local outlines the politicians mostly apply in their communication campaigns. The outcomes of the study suggest that the political communication campaigns in Turkey have local patterns but also are particularly carrying the similar futures of American strategies.

___

  • Akay, A. (2012). Siyasal Iletisim Danismanligi (Political Communication Consultancy). Istanbul: Nobel.
  • Atal, N. and Gemici, H. (2004, January 02), “Tuyo Ozal’dan, Ozel TV Uzan’dan (Tip is from Ozal, Private TV is from Uzan)”. Sabah Daily, p. 1.
  • Bowler, S. and Farrell, D. (1992). Tthe Study of Election Campaigning, Electoral Strategies and Political Marketing. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Brants, K., & Voltmer, K. (2011). Political Communication in Postmodern Democracy: Challenging the Primacy of Politics. London: Palgrave.
  • Butler, P., & Collins, N. (1994). Political Marketing: Structure and Process. European Journal of Communication, 28(1), 19-34.
  • Çağlar, İ., & Özkır, Y. (2015). Türkiye’de Siyasal İletisim (Political Communication in Turkey). Ankara: SETA.
  • Cap, P., & Okulska, U. (2013). Analysing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins B. V.
  • Clarke, H., Sander, D., Stewart, M. and Whiteley, P. (2004). Political Choice in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dermody, J. and Hanmer-Lloyd, S. (2006). “A marketing analysis of the 2005 general election advertising campaign”, in Jackson, N. A., Scullion, R. and Lilleker, D. G. (eds), The Marketing of political parties, pp. 101-131. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Enli, G. S., & Moe, H. (2015). Social Media and Election Campaigns: Key Tendencies and Ways Forward. London: Routledge.
  • Farrel, D., Kolodny, R. and Medvic, S. (2007). “Parties and campaign professionals in a digital age”, in Negrine, R. and Stanyer, J. (eds), The Political Communication Reader, pp. 132-137. London: Routledge.
  • Frame, A., & Brachotte, G. (2015). Citizen Participation and Political Communication in a Digital Worl. London: Routledge.
  • Göksu, O., & Birol, C. (2017). ‘Storytelling’ in the Construction of Political Power: The Turkish Example of Generating a Political Image for Leaders. S. Mengü, P. Aslan, & D. Ünlü içinde, Storytelling in all Aspects (s. 77-93). Oxford: Peter Lang.
  • Hallin, D. C. and Mancini, P. (2004). “Americanization, Globalization and Secularization”, in Esser, F. and Pfetsch, B. (eds), Comparing Political Communication, pp. 25-44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hassanpour, A. (1998). “Satellite footprints as national borders: MED-TV and the extraterritoriality of state sovereignty”, Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 18.1: pp. 53 – 72.
  • Hellweg, S. A. (2004). “Campaigns and Candidate images in America”, in Hacker, K. L. (eds), Presidential Candidate Images, pp. 21-47. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Hızal, A. B. (1997), 24 Aralık 1995 Genel Seçimleri Demokratik Sol Parti’nin Siyasal Iletisim Stratejileri (The Political Communication Strategies of Democratic Left Party in 24th December 1995 Parliamentary Elections). Ankara: A. Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • Huggins, R. (2001). “The Transformation of Political Audience” in Axford, B. and Huggins, R. (eds), New Media and Politics, pp. 127-150. London: Sage.
  • Jackson, N. A. (2006). “Banking Online: The use of internet by political parties to build relationships with others” in Jackson, N. A., Scullion, R. and Lilleker, D. G. (eds), The Marketing of political parties, pp. 157-182. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Jackson, N. A., Scullion, R. and Lilleker, D. G. (2006). The Marketing of political parties. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Kavanagh, D. (1992). “The United Kingdom”, in Butler, D. and Ranney, A. (eds), Electioneering, pp. 70-87. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Kenski, K., & Jamieson, K. (2017). The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kentel, F. (1991). “Demokrasi, Kamuoyu ve Iletisime Dair (About Democracy, public opinion and communication)”, Birikim, 30. pp. 35-55.
  • Kilicaslan, E. C. (2008). Siyasal Iletisim Ideoloji ve Medya Iliskisi (Political Communication, Ideology and Media Relation). Istanbul: Kriter.
  • Knuckey, J. and Marshment, J. (2005). “American Political Marketing: George W. Bush and the Republican Party”, in Lilleker, D. G. and Marshment, J. (eds), Political Marketing, pp. 39-58. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Lees-Marshment, J. (2012). Routledge Handbook of Political Marketing. New York: Routledge.
  • Lees-Marshment, J. (2014). Political Marketing: Principles and Applications. London: Routledge.
  • Lees-Marshment, J., & Cosgrove, K. (2014). Political Marketing in the United States. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Lilleker, D. G. (2006). Key Concepts in Political Communication. London: Sage.
  • Lilleker, D. G. and Marshment, J. (2005). Political Marketing. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Maarek, P. J. (1995). Political Marketing and Communication. London: John Libbey.
  • Mayhew, L. (2007). “The New Public”, in Negrine, R. and Stanyer, J. (eds), The Political Communication Reader, pp. 119-123. London: Routledge.
  • McNair, B. (1995). An Introduction to Political Communication. London: Routledge.
  • McNair, B. (2017). An Introduction to Political Communication. New York: Routledge.
  • Moog, S. and Beltrao, J. (2001). “The Transformation of Political Communication”, in Axford, B. and Huggins, R. (eds), New Media and Politics, pp. 30-63. London: Sage.
  • Negrine, R. (2007). “Professionalization in the British Electoral and Political Context”, in Negrine, R., Mancini, P., Holtz-Bacha, C. and Papathanassopoulos, S. (eds), The Professionalization of Political Communication, pp. 47-62. Bristol: Intellect.
  • Negrine, R. and Stylianos, P. (2007). “The ‘Americanization’ of Political Communication” in Negrine, R. and Stanyer, J. (eds), The Political Communication Reader, pp. 102-105. London: Routledge.
  • Plasser, F. and Plasser G. (2002). Global Political Campaign. London: Praeger.
  • Plasser, F. and Plasser G. (2007). “Global Political Campaign”, in Negrine, R. and Stanyer, J. (eds), The Political Communication Reader, pp. 138-143. London: Routledge.
  • Rawsley, G. D. (2005). Political Communication and Democracy. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Savigny, H. (2006). “Political marketing and the 2005 election”, in Jackson, N. A., Scullion, R. and Lilleker, D. G. (eds), The Marketing of political parties, pp. 81-97. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Savigny, H. (2011). The Problem of Political Marketing. New York: Continuum.
  • Scammel, M. (2007). “Political Marketing” in Negrine, R. and Stanyer, J. (eds), The Political Communication Reader, pp. 150-156. London: Routledge.
  • Schafferer, C. (2006). Election Campaigning in East and Southeast Asia. Hampshire: Ashgate.
  • Sobaci, M. Z. (2015). Social Media and Local Governments: Theory and Practice. London: Springer.
  • Stanyer, J. (2007). Modern Political Communication. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Steger, W., Sean, K., & Wrighton, M. (2013). Campaigns and Political Marketing. New York: Routledge.
  • Stepan, A. and Kuru, A. (2012). Democracy, Islam, and Secularism in Turkey. New York: Colombia University Press.
  • Stromer-Galley, J. and Jemieson, K. H. (2001). “The Transformation of Political Leadership” in Axford, B. and Huggins, R. (eds), New Media and Politics, pp. 172-190. London: Sage.
  • Surowiec, P., & Stetka, V. (2018). Social Media and Politics in Central and Eastern Europe. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Tan, A. (2002). Politik Pazarlama (Political Marketing). Istanbul: Papatya.
  • Tan, A. (1998). “Liderler neyi pazarliyor (What leaders marketing)”, Aksiyon, Issue: 193, pp. 15-18. Tokgoz, O. (2010). Seçimler siyasal reklamlar ve siyasal iletişim (Elections, Political Advertisement and Political Communication). Istanbul: Imge.
  • Topuz, H. (1977). Televizyon, Radyo, Basın ve Afiste Seçim Savasları (Election Wars on Television, Press and posters). Istanbul: Milliyet.
  • Wring, D. (2005) The Politics of Marketing the Labour Party. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Wring, D. and Horrocks, I. (2001). “Vitual Hype? The Transformation of Political Parties” in Axford, B. and Huggins, R. (eds), New Media and Politics, pp. 191-210. London: Sage.
  • Wring, D., Atkinson, S., & Mortimore, R. (2017). Political Communication in Britain: Polling, Campaigning and Media in the 2015 General Election. Cham: Palgrave.
Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2146-3301
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2011
  • Yayıncı: Mustafa Cankut
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

ORYANTALİST BAKIŞ AÇISININ SİNEMAYA YANSIMASI: THE PHYSCIAN (2013) FİLMİ ÖRNEĞİ

Mehmet Emin SATIR, Nuri Paşa Özer

ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN İLETİŞİM BECERİLERİNİN SOSYAL MEDYAYI KULLANIM ÖZELLİKLERİ BAĞLAMINDA İNCELENMESİ: BİR VAKIF ÜNİVERSİTESİNDEKİ SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÖĞRENCİLERİ ÜZERİNDE DEĞERLENDİRME

Başak MENDİ, Gamze OĞUZ

SMS REKLAMLARININ MARKA TUTUMU VE SATIN ALMA DAVRANIŞI ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİ BAĞLAMINDA DENEYSEL BİR ÇALIŞMA

A. Mücahid ZENGİN

FUTBOLDA İMPARATORLUK VE GÜÇ TAHAYYÜLÜ: OSMANLISPOR’UN TWİTTER PAYLAŞIMLARI ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME

Ceren YEGEN

“İZLEDİM, ETKİLENDİM, ETKİLEDİM (Mİ?)”: ÇEŞİTLİLİĞE ODAKLANAN FİLMLERLE İLGİLİ ÖĞRETMEN GÖRÜŞLERİ

Cemile Kara Eren, Neslihan Avcı

İSLAMİ İNANÇ DESTİNASYONLARININ TANITIMINDA YOUTUBE VİDEOLARININ KULLANIMI

Salih GÜRBÜZ, Bayram Oğuz AYDIN

ÜNİVERSİTE GENÇLİĞİNİN RADYO DİNLEME EĞİLİMLERİ: KARADENİZ TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ ÖĞRENCİLERİ ÜZERİNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Bahar YALIN, Sibel AK

TÜRK BASININDA LİDERLERİN 16 MAYIS 2017 REFERANDUM HABERLERİNİN ÇERÇEVELENMESİ

Gülsüm ŞİMŞEK

“KAŞAĞI” ADLI HİKÂYENİN AİLE İÇİ İLETİŞİM VE İLETİŞİM ÇATIŞMALARI AÇISINDAN İNCELENMESİ

Ali Can BAŞAY, Ayşe Dilek ÖĞRETİR-ÖZÇELİK

TELEVİZYON REKLAMLARINDAKİ ÇOCUK KARAKTERLER ve STEREOTİPLERİN TEMSİLİ

Mehmet Safa ÇAM, Aşina GÜLERARSLAN ÖZDENGÜL