Mide Kanserli Olguların Geriye Dönük İncelenmesi

Amaç: Mide kanseri Avrupa’da kadınlarda ve erkeklerde görülme sıklığıaçısından beşinci sırada yer almaktadır. Erkek kadın oranı ise 1.6:1 olarakbelirlenmiştir. Mide kanseri, kansere bağlı ölümlerde ülkemizde erkeklerdeikinci, kadınlarda ise üçüncü sırada yer almaktadır. Mide kanserinin prognozugenellikle kötüdür. Bunun sebebi de tanıda gecikme ve tanı konan olgularınileri evrede olmasıdır.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi GenelCerrahi Anabilim Dalı 1995 -2009 yılları arasında mide kanseri tanısı ilecerrahi işlem yapılan 204 olgu geriye dönük olarak incelendi. Bu olgulardan131’ine küratif cerrahi rezeksiyon yapıldığı belirlendi. Olguların %80’i lokalileri evre olgulardı (evre IIIa, IIIb ve IV). Olguların yaş, cinsiyet, başvurusemptomları, tümör lokalizasyonu, T, N, M, evre, tümör diferansiyasyonu,histolojik tipleri, tümör çapı, vasküler ve perinöral invazyon varlığı, yapılancerrahi işlem, rezeksiyon tipi, diseksiyon tipi, diseke edilen toplam lenf nodusayısı, metastatik lenf nodu varlığı, metastatik lenf nodu sayısı ve toplam lenfnodu sayısına oranı, komplikasyonlar, cerrahi mortalite, adjuvan kemoterapi,adjuvan radyoterapi ve diğer adjuvan tedavileri ve sağkalım süreleribelirlendi. Bu verilerin sağkalım üzerine etkileri lojistik regresyon analizi iledeğerlendirildi. Sağkalım açısından 3 ve 5 yıllık sağkalım eğrileri Kaplan-Meieryöntemiyle çıkarıldıBulgular: Küratif rezeksiyon ve diseksiyon yapılan 131 olguda morbidite%15.2, mortalite ise %7.6 idi. Evre ve metastatik lenf nodlarının toplam lenfnodu sayısına oranı sağkalım üzerinde en önemli faktörler olarak bulundu(p

Objective: Gastric cancer is the fifth most commen neoplasm in terms of incidence in men and women in Europa. Male to female ratio was determined as 1.6:1. Gastric cancer is the second most commen neoplasm in men and third most commen neoplasm in female in deaths due to cancer in our country. Prognosis of gastric cancer is generally reserved. The low survival rate is due to the delay in diagnosis, most cases being diagnosed in an advanced stage. Material and Methods: Between 1995 and 2009, 204 gastric cancer patients were retrospectively evaluated who was treated surgically in Faculty of Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University. It was observed that tumors of the 131 patients were curatively resected. The great portion (80%) of these patients were in locally advanced stages (stage IIIa, IIIb and IV). Age, gender, symptoms, tumor localisation, T, N, M, stage, tumor differantiation, histologic type, occurence of vascular and perineural invasion, surgery type, resection type, dissection type, count of dissected lymph nodes, metastatic lymph nodes, ratio of metastatic lymph nodes, complications, morbidity and mortality, adjuvant chemotherapy schedules, adjuvant radiotherapy and other adjuvant therapies, and surviaval of these patients were analyzed. For detecting the effects of these factors upon survival, logictic regression analysis was performed. Survival times were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier method. Results: It was seen that surgical morbidity was 15.2%, and mortality was 7.6% in curatively resected 131 patients. Stage and the ratio of metastatic lymph nodes were evaluated as significantly important in survival (p

___

  • Lochhead P, El-Omar EM. Gastric cancer. Br Med Bull. 2008;85:87-100.
  • Catalano V, Labianca R, Beretta GD, Gatta G, de Braud F, Van Cutsem E. Gastric cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2005;54:209-241.
  • Yalcin S. Gastric cancer in Turkey-a bridge between west and East. Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2009;3:29-32.
  • Şahin M, Tanrıkulu Y, Erel S, Bayraktar K, Akkuş MA. Mide Kanserinde Gastrektomi Deneyimlerimiz. Bidder Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi 2010;2:20-26.
  • Xu DZ, Geng Q, Long ZJ, et al. Positive lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after D2 resection regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16:319-26.
  • Lazar D, Taban S, Sporea I, Dema A, Cornianu M, Lazar E, Goldiş A, Vernic C. Gastric cancer: correlation between clinicopathological factors and survival of patients (II). Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology 2009, 50(2):185-194.
  • Al-Refaic WB, Abdalla EK, Ahmed SA, Mansfield PF. Gastric cancer. In: Feig BW, Berger DH, Fuhrman GM, editors. M.D. Anderson Hand Book of Surgical Oncology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p.205-240.
  • Mercer DW, Robinson KE. Stomach. In: Courtney MT, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL, editors. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery 18th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsewier; 2008. p.1223-7.
  • Bertuccio P, Chatenoud L, Levi F, Praud D, Ferlay J, Negri E, Malvezzi M, La Vecchia C. Recent patterns in gastric cancer: A global overview. Int J Cancer. 2009;125(3):666-673.
  • Wilkinson NW, Howe J, Gay G, Patel-Parekh L, Scott-Conner C, Donohwe J. Differences in the pattern of presentation and treatment of proximal and distal gastric cancer: results of the 2001 gastric patient case evaluation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1644-50.
  • Gouzi JL, Huguier M, Fagniez Pl, Launois B, Flamant Y, Lacaine F, Paquet JC, Hay JM. Total versus subtotal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the gastric antrum. AFrench prospective controlled study. Ann Surg 1989; 209:162-6.
  • Robertson CS, Chung SC, Woods SD, Griffin SM, Raimes SA, Lau JT, Li AK. A prospective randomized trial comparing R1 subtotal gastrectomy with R3 total gastrectomy for antral cancer. Ann Surg 1994;220:176-82.
  • Bozzetti F, Marubini E, Bonfanti G, et al. Total versus subtotal gastrectomy: surgi cal morbidity and mortality rates in a multicenter Italian randomized trial. The Italian Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. Ann Surg 1997;226:613-20.
  • Karaayvaz M, Kocaoğlu H, Demirci S. Mide Kanserleri. In: Abdülmuttalip Ünal editor. Klinik Cerrahi Onkoloji. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri Yayınevi; 1997. p.468-78.
  • Sah BK, Zhu ZG, Chen MM, Yan M, Yin HR, Zhen LY. Gastric cancer surgery and its hazards: post operative infection is the most important complication. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008;55:2259-63.
  • Tsujimoto H, Ichikura T, Ono S, Sugasawa H, Hiraki S, Sakamoto N, Yaguchi Y, Yoshida K, Matsumoto Y, Hase K. Impact of postoperative infection on long-term survival after potentially curative resection for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:311-8.
  • Mohri Y, Tonouchi H, Miki C, Kobayashi M, Kusunoki M; Mie Surgical Infection Research Group. Incidence and risk factors for hospital-acquired pneumonia after surgery for gastric cancer: results of prospective surveillance. World J Surg. 2008;32:1045-50.
  • Lo CH, Chen JH, Wu CW, Lo SS, Hsieh MC, Lui WY. Risk factors and management of intra- abdominal infection after extended radical gastrectomy. Am J Surg. 2008;196:741-5.
  • Ozer I, Bostanci EB, Orug T, Ozogul YB, Ulas M, Ercan M, Kece C, Atalay F, Akoglu M. Surgical outcomes and survival after multiorgan resection for locally advanced gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 2009;198:25-30.
  • Li ZX, Kaminishi M. A comparison of gastric cancer between Japan and China. Gastric Cancer. 2009;12:5-53.
  • Rao S, Cunningham D. Survival from cancer of the stomach in England and Wales up to 2001. Br J Cancer. 2008;99 Suppl 1:S19-20.
  • Xu DZ, Geng QR, Long ZJ, Zhan YQ, Li W, Zhou ZW, Chen YB, Sun XW, Chen G, Liu Q. Positive lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after d2 resection regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:319-26.
  • Huang CM, Lin BJ, Lu HS, Zhang XF, Li P, Xie JW. Prognostic impact of metastatic lymph node ratio in advanced gastric cancer from cardia and fundus. World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jul 21;14:4383-8.
  • Ozgüç H, Sönmez Y, Yerci O. Metastatic/resected lymph nodes ratiobased classification in gastric cancer. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2008;19:2-7.
  • Saito H, Fukumoto Y, Osaki T, Yamada Y, Fukuda K, Tatebe S, Tsujitani S, Ikeguchi M. Prognostic significance of the ratio between metastatic and dissected lymph nodes (n ratio) in patients with advanced gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2008;97:132-5.
  • Liu C, Lu P, Lu Y, Xu H, Wang S, Chen J. Clinical implications of metastatic lymph node ratio in gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 2007;7:200.
  • Yu JW, Wu JG, Zheng LH, Zhang B, Ni XC, Li XQ, Jiang BJ. Influencing factors and clinical significance of the metastatic lymph nodes ratio in gastric adenocarcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2009;28:55.
  • van der Schoot J, Van Hee R, Philipsen T, De Bock D, Delvaux V, Weyler J. The prognosis of patients operated on for gastric cancer in relation to the percentage of lymph nodes invaded by tumour. Acta Chir Belg. 2008;108:308-12.
  • Yu J, Yang D, Wei F, Sui Y, Li H, Shao F, Li Y. The staging system of metastatic lymph node ratio in gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008;55:2287-90.
  • Hidaka H, Eto T, Maehara N, Jimi S, Hotokezaka M, Chijiiwa K. Comparative effect of lymph node metastasis classified by the anatomical site or by the number of nodes involved on prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008;55:2269-72.
  • Isik A, Okan I, Firat D, Yilmaz B, Akcakaya A, Sahin M. A new prognostic strategy for gastric carcinoma: albumin level and metastatic lymph node ratio. Minerva Chir. 2014;69:147-53
  • Isık A, Demiryilmaz I, Yılmaz İ, Firat D,Cimen O, Eken H Effectiveness of Manual Knotting at Laparoscopic Appendectomy Gazi Medical Journal 2016;27:19-20
  • Isik A, Eken H, Demiryilmaz İ,Yılmaz İ, Fırat D, Çimen P, Peker K, Güven H Rectal Lymphoma Kolon Rektum Hast Derg 2015;25:106-108
Gazi Medical Journal-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Gazi Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi