Güler EKMEKÇİ, Zehra KARAKUZU, Habibe TEZCAN

Madde ve özellikleri konusunun kavratılmasında kavram haritaları destekli öğretimin öğrenci başarısına etkisi

Bu çalışmada, lise-1. sınıf öğrencilerine “Madde ve Özellikleri” konusunun kavratılmasında, “Kavram Haritaları Destekli” öğretim yöntemini kullanmanın öğrenci başarısına etkisi araştırıldı. Araştırma, Anadolu Teknik Lise birinci sınıflar arasından, rasgele seçilen iki grupla yapıldı. Sınıflardan biri kontrol grubu diğeri deney grubu olarak seçildi. Öğretimden önce her iki gruba, Bilimsel İşlem Beceri Testi, Mantıksal Düşünme Yetenek Testi, Madde ve Özellikleri Ön Bilgi Testi uygulandı. Ayrıca, madde ve özellikleri konusunda öğretilmesi amaçlanan bilgileri kapsayan bir “Madde ve Özellikleri kavram testi” hazırlanarak, öğretimden önce “İlk Test”, öğretimden sonra, öğrenci başarısını ölçmek ve her iki gruptaki başarıyı karşılaştırmak amacıyla “Son Test” olarak uygulandı. Araştırmanın sonucunda elde edilen veriler t- Testi ve ANCOVA analizi yöntemleri ile değerlendirildi ve anlamlılık düzeyi olarak 0.05 alındı. Araştırma sonuçları “Madde ve Özellikleri” konusunun kavratılmasında “Kavram Haritaları Destekli” öğretim yöntemi kullanmanın, öğrenci başarısını artırdığını gösterdi.

Effect on student success of concept mapping support teaching of matter and its properties

The aim of this study is to measure the effect of concept mapping as an educational tool on the perception of the concept matter and its properties of the high school first year students. The study was carried out on two classes arbitrarily selected in Anatolian Technical High School in Ankara. One of the classes was chosen as the control and the other as the experimental group. Both groups were subjected to a scientific process skill, logical thinking, and pre knowledge test on matter conceptual test as the pre test. The same matter tests were employed as the post test in order to assess the success rate of both approaches. The data obtained from these tests were evaluated by the t-test and ANCOVA analysis. Data were evaluated at 0.05 significance levels. The results revealed that the use of concept mapping is much more effective.

PDF

___

Bayramlı, D. Y. (2000). Kimya Eğitiminde Öğretmenin Ders Verme Teknikleri. Bilim Uzmanlığı Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B. ve Sılberstein, J. (1986). Is an Atom of Copper Mooleoble?. Journal of Chemical Education, 63(1), 64-66.
Burns, J.C., Okey J.R. ve Wise, K. C. (1985). Development, of an integrated process skill test: TIPSII. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 145-160.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal Bilgiler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı: İstatisitik, Araştırma Deseni, SPSS Uygulamaları ve Yorum. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
Chandran, S., Treagust, D.ve Tobin, K. (1987). The Role of Cognitive Factors in Chemistry Achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 145-160.
Clıburn, J. W. (1990). Concept Maps to Promate Meaningful Learning. Journal of College Science Teaching, 20 (1), 212-217.
Gabel, D. L., Samuel, K. V. ve Hunn D. (1987). Understanding the Particulade Nature of Matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 64(8), 695-697.
Gagne, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction, New York: Holt, R. And Winston.
Heinze-Fry, J. A. ve Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept Mapping Brings Long-Term Movement Toward Meaning Learning. Science Education, 74(4), 461-472.
Horton, P. B., Mcconnly, A. A., Gallo, M., Woods, A. I., Senn, G. J. ve Hamelin, D. (1993). An Investigation of the Effectiveness of Concept Mapping as an Instructional Tool. Science Education, 77(1), 95-111.
Krnel, D., Glazar, S. S. ve Watson, R. (2003). The Development of the Concept of “Matter”: A Cross-Age Study of How Children Classify Materials. Science Education, 87, 621-639.
Markham, M. K., Mintzes, J. J. ve Jones, M. G. (1994). The Concept Map As a Research and Evaluation Tool:Further Evidence of Validity. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 31, 91-101.
Markow, P. G. ve Lonning, R. A. (1998). Usefulness of Concept Maps In College Chemistry Laboratories: Students’ Perceptions and Effects on Achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(9), 1015-1029.
Mcclure, J. R., Sonak, B. ve Suen, H. K. (1999). Concept Map Assessment of Classroom Learning: Reliability, Validity and Logistical Practicality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(4), 475-492.
Nicoll, G., Francisco, J. ve Nakhleh, M. (2001). A Three Tier System for Assessing Concept Map Links: A Methodological Study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 863-875.
Nicoll, G., Francisco, J. ve Trautmann, M. (1998). Integrating Multiple Teaching Methods into a General Chemistry Classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(2), 210-213.
Novak, J. D., Gowin, B. D. ve Johansen, G. T. (1983). The Use of Concept Mapping and Knowledge and Mapping with Junior High School Students. Science Education, 67(5), 625-645.
Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept Mapping: A Useful Tool for Science Education. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 27(10), 937-949.
Onwuegbuzie. A. J. (2000). Science Process Skilland Achievement in Research Methodology Courses. Bowling Gren: Annual Meeting Of The Mid-South Educational Research Association.
Pankratius, W. J. (1990). Building and Organized Knowledge Base: Concept Mapping and Achievement in Secondary School Physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(4) 315-333.
Rosenshine, B. (1987). Explicit teaching, D.Berliner and B.Rosenshine. (Eds) Talks to Teachers, New york, Random House.
Regis, A. Albertazzi, P., G. and Roletto, E. (1996). Concept Maps in Chemistry Education. Journal of Chemical Education, 73,1084-1088.
Senemoğlu, N. (1998). Gelişim, Öğrenme ve Öğretim. Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
Slavin, R. E. (1984), Compenent Building: A Strategy for Research Based Instructional Improvement. Elementary School journal, 84, 255-269.
Sökmen, N. ve Bayram H.. (2000). Eğitimde Kavram Haritasının Önemi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 25(115), 39-42.
Starr, M. L. ve Krajcik, J. S. (1990). Concept Maps as a Heuristic for Science Cirriculum Development: Toward Improvement in Process and Product. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 987-1000.
Stavridou, H. ve Solomonidou, C. (1989). Physical Phenomena-Chemical Phenomena: Do Pupils Make Disctintion?. International Journal of Science Education, 11(1), 83-92.
Stensvold, M. S. ve Wılson, J. T. (1990). The Interaction of Verbal Ability with Concept Mapping In Learning from a Chermistry Laboratory Activity. Science Education, 74(4), 473-480.
Stuessy, C. (1984). Correlates of Scientific Reasoning in Adolescents: Experience, Locus of Control, Age, Field, Dependence-İndependence, Rigidity/ Flexibility, Iq and Gender. Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Tobın, K. ve Capie W. (1981). The Development and Validation of a Group Test of Logical Thinking. Educational and Phychological Measurement, 41(2), 413-423.
White, R. ve Gunstone, R. (1992). Propping Understanding. USA: Falmer Press.
Willermann, M. ve Mac-Harg, R.A. (1991). The Concept Map as an Advance Organizer. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(8), 705-711.
Zoller, U. (1990). Students Misunderstanding an Misconcoptions in College Freshman Chemistry (General and Organic). Journal Of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 1053-1065.