Sentetik misk kalıntıları

Deterjan, çamaşır yumuşatıcıları, temizlik malzemeleri, sabun, şampuan ve parfümler gibi çeşitli kozmetik ürünlerinde koku vermek amacıyla kullanılan nitro misk ve polisiklik misklerin karsinojenik, endokrin bozucu (östrojenik), deri hassasiyetini arttırıcı, hücresel ksenobiyotik savunma sistemi bozucu etkileri bulunmaktadır. Yaygın kullanılan nitro misk bileşiklerinden misk ksilen ve misk keton bileşikleri ile polisiklik misklerden galaksolid (HHCB), tonalid (AHTN), celestolid (ADBI), fantolid (AHDI), traseolid (ATII); yerel atık ünitelerinden kanalizasyonlara ve kanalizasyon arıtma tesislerine ulaşmakta, buradan nehir ve denizlere geçebilmektedir. Lipofilik özelliği nedeniyle biyoakümülasyona uğrayabilen bu bileşikler hem akvatik ekosistemi, hem de nihai tüketici konumundaki insanları etkilemektedir. Hayvansal kaynaklı gıdalarda da bu kirleticilere rastlanmıştır; ancak ülkemizde henüz bir çalışma bulunmamaktadır. Ulusal gıda ve çevre kontrol programları içerisinde bu bileşenler henüz değerlendirilmemektedir. Bu yazıda misk bileşikleri ve etkileri ile hayvansal besinlerdeki kalıntı riski konusu derlenmiştir.

Synthetic musk residues

Synthetic musk compounds including nitro musk and polycyclic musks, used in most fragrances used in detergents, fabric softeners, cleaning agents and cosmetic products such as soaps, shampoo and perfumes are known to cause carcinogenity, endocrine distruption (oestrogenic), skin sensitization and distruption on cellular xenobiotic defense systems. Musk xylene and musk ketone as common nitro musk compounds; and galaxolide (HHCB), tonalide (AHTN), celestolide (ADBI), phantolide (AHDI), traseolide (ATII) as common polycyclic musk compounds, are discharged after use via domestic wastewater and sewage treatment plants to the aquatic environment. Since musk compounds are lipophilic, they have higher tendency to bioaccumulate; which effects the aquatic ecosystem and human as the final consumer. These compounds were also found in animal originated food; however there are no current studies conducted in Turkey and this issue is still not considered in national food and environmental control programs. In this review, musk compounds, their effects and residual risk are summarized.

PDF

___

1. Duedahl-Olesen L, Cederberg T, Pedersen KH, et al. Synthetic musk fragrances in trout from Danish fish farms and human milk. Chemosphere 2005; 61: 422-431.
2. OSPAR. “Musk xylene and other musks” http://www.ospar.org/documents/dbase/publications/p0020 0_bd%20on%20musk%20xylene.pdf/ 07.05.2013.
3. European Union Commission Directive. “Twenty-sixth Commission Directive 2002/34/EC of 15 April 2002 adapting to technical progress Annexes II, III and VII to Council Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products.2002" http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/Lex UriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32003L0034:en:NOT/28.05.2013.
4. European Commission. “Scientific Committee on Toxicity, Ecotoxicity and the Environment (CSTEE). Opinion on the results of the Risk Assessment of: Musk Xylene- Human Helath Part. Brussels, C7/VR/csteeop/musk xyl hh/080104 D(04), 2004” http://ec.europa.eu/health/archive/ph_risk/ committees/sct/.../out219_en.pdf/28.05.2013.
5. Canadian Environment-Defense. “Not So Sexy: The Health Risks of Secret Chemicals in Fragnance. Breast Cancer Fund, Commonweal and Environment Group, 2010” http://safecosmetics.org/downloads/NotSoSexy_report_Ma y2010.pdf/ 08.05.2013.
6. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). “Background document for 5-tert-butyl-2,4,6-trinitro-m-xylene (musk xylene)” http://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13640/ musk_xylene_en.pdf/ 07.05.2013.
7. Yamagishi T, Miyazaki T, Horii S, et al. Identification of musk xylene and musk ketone in freshwater fish collected from the Tama river, Tokyo. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 1981; 26: 656-662.
8. Yamagishi T, Miyazaki T, Horii S, Akiyama K. Synthetic musk residues in biota and water from Tama River and Tokyo Bay (Japan). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 1983; 12: 83-89.
9. Moldovan Z. Occurrences of pharmaceutical and personal care products as micropollutants in rivers from Romania. Chemosphere 2006; 64: 1808-1817.
10. Peck AM, Hornbuckle KC. Synthetic musk fragrances in urban and rural air of Iowa and the Great Lakes. Atmos Environ 2006; 40: 6101-6111.
11. Artola-Garicano E, Borkent I, Hermens JL, et al. Removal of two polycyclic musks in sewage treatment plants: freely dissolved and total concentrations. Environ Sci Technol 2003; 37: 3111-3116.
12. Horii Y, Reiner JL, Loganathan BG, et al. Occurrence and fate of polycyclic musks in wastewater treatment plants in Kentucky and Georgia, USA. Chemosphere 2007; 68: 2011-2020.
13. Schiavone A, Kannan K, Horii Y, et al. Polybrominated diphenyl ethers, polychlorinated naphthalenes and polycyclic musks in human fat from Italy: Comparison to polychlorinated biphenyls and organochlorine pesticides. Environ Pollut 2010; 158: 599-606.
14. Hutter H-P, Wallner P, Moshammer H, et al. Blood concentrations of polycyclic musks in healthy young adults. Chemosphere 2005; 59: 487-492.
15. Raab U, Preiss U, Albrecht M, et al. Concentrations of polybrominated diphenyl ethers, organochlorine compounds and nitro musks in mother’s milk from Germany (Bavaria). Chemosphere 2008; 72: 87-94.
16. Reiner JL, Wong CM, Arcaro KF, et al. Synthetic musk fragrances in human milk from the United States. Environ Sci Technol 2007; 41: 3815-3820.
17. Yin J, Wang H, Zhang J, et al. The occurrence of synthetic musks in human breast milk in Sichuan, China. Chemosphere 2012; 87: 1018-1023.
18. Wang H, Zhang J, Gao F, et al. Simultaneous analysis of synthetic musks and triclosan in human breast milk by gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2011; 879: 1861-1869.
19. Zhou J, Zeng X, Zheng K, et al. Musks and organochlorine pesticides in breast milk from Shanghai, China: levels, temporal trends and exposure assessment. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2012; 84: 325-333.
20. Hutter HP, Wallner P, Moshammer H, et al. Synthetic musks in blood of healthy young adults: Relationship to cosmetics use. Sci Total Environ 2009; 407: 4821-4825.
21. Human Toxome Project. “Pollution in Minority Newborns, Summary of Chemicals Found in Pollution in Minority Newborns”. http://www.ewg.org/sites/humantoxome/ participants/participantgroup.php?group=mcb/13.05.2013.
22. Apostolidis S, Chandra T, Demirhan I, et al. Evaluation of carcinogenic potential of two nitro-musk derivatives, musk xylene and musk tibetene in a host-mediated in vivo/in vitro assay system. Anticancer Res 2002; 22: 2657-2662.
23. Maekawa A, Matsushima Y, Onodera H, et al. Long-term toxicity/carcinogenicity of musk xylol in B6C3F1 mice. Food Chem Toxicol 1990; 28: 581-586.
24. Bitsch N, Dudas C, Körner W, et al. Estrogenic activity of musk fragrances detected by the E-screen assay using human mcf-7 cells. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 2002; 43: 257-264.
25. Chou YJ, Dietrich DR. Interactions of nitromusk parent compounds and their amino-metabolites with the estrogen receptors of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and the South African clawed frog (Xenopus laevis). Toxicol Lett 1999; 111: 27-36.
26. Parker RD, Buehler EV, Newmann EA. Phototoxicity, photoallergy, and contact sensitization of nitro musk perfume raw materials. Contact Dermatitis 1986; 14: 103- 109.
27. Luckenbach, T, Epel D. Nitromusk and polycyclic musk compounds as long-term inhibitors of cellular xenobiotic defense systems mediated by multidrug transporters. Environ Health Perspect 2005; 113: 17-24.
28. Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, European Chemicals Bureau. 5-tert-butyl-2,4,6-trinitro-m-xylene (musk xylene). European Union Risk Assessment Report, 3rd Priority List, CAS No: 81-15-2, EINECS No: 201-329- 94 2005.
29. Helbling KS, Schmid P, Schlatter C. The trace analysis of musk xylene in biological samples: Problems associated with its ubiquitous occurrence. Chemosphere 1994; 29: 477-484.
30. Minegishi K, Nambaru S, Fukuoka M, et al. Distribution, metabolism, and excretion of musk xylene in rats. Arch Toxicol 1991; 65: 273-282.
31. Mottaleb MA, Zhao X, Curtis LR, et al. Formation of nitro musk adducts of rainbow trout hemoglobin for potential use as biomarkers of exposure. Aquat Toxicol 2004; 67: 315- 324.
32. Fromme H, Otto T, Pilz K. Polycyclic musk fragnances in water and fish samples from Berlin. Food Addit Contam 2001; 18: 937-944.
33. Gatermann R, Biselli S, Hühnerfuss H, et al. Synthetic musks in the environment. Part 1: Species-dependent bioaccumulation of polycyclic and nitro musk fragrances in freshwater fish and mussels. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 2002; 42: 437-46.
34. Blüthgen A, Ruoff U. Carry-over of diethylhexylphthalate and aromatic nitro compounds into the milk of lactating cows. 3rd Karlsruhe Nutrition Symposium European Research Towards Safer and Better Food Review and Transfer Congress, Karlsruhe, Germany, 18-20 October 1998, Proceedings Part 2: Poster Presentation.
35. Kypke K, Zachariae W. “Residues of pesticides and contaminants in food of animal origin: Comparison of products from different countries of origin. European Pesticide Residue Workshop 20-23 June 2010, Strasbourg, Fransa. Poster Presentation” http://www.eprw2010.com/download/Poster%20Monitoring/ PM%20029%20Kypke/PM%20029%20Kypke.pdf/10.05.20 13.
36. Lippold R. “Update on Pesticide Residues Analytical Tools to Improve Food Control. INTI-Workshop, 16 May 2011, Buenos Aires, Argentina” http://www.inti.gob.ar/lacteos/ pdf/SeminarioPesticidas16-05-11/RalfLippoldOverview. pdf/12.05.2013.
37. FOCPFS - Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety. “Reports on the National Food Monitoring” http://www.bvl.bund.de/EN/01_Food/05_LM_Monitoring_en /01_Reports_LM_Monitoring/lm_monitoring_abstract_repor t2009_basepage.html?nn=1408636/13.05.2013.
38. Şahan A. Farmosetik Maddelerin Aktif Çamur Arıtma Prosesinde Abiyotik Gideriminin İncelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Adana: Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Çevre Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı, 2007.