Pazarlanamayan kırık yumurtaların toklu besi rasyonlarında kullanılma olanakları

Bu çalışmada, pazar dışı kırık yumurtaların toklu rasyonlarma katılabilme olanağı araştırılmıştır. Bu amaçla, çalışmada yaklaşık 30 kg canlı ağırlıkta, 7-8 aylık 21 adet İvesi erkek toklu kullanılmıştır. Araştırma rasyonları izonitrojenik ve izokalorik olarak hazırlanmıştır. Rasyona kırık yumurtanın ilave şekli ise deneme gruplarını oluşturmuştur. Buna göre, rasyona yumurta ilave edilmeyen grup kontrol grubunu (K), soya küspesinden gelen proteininin %10'u yumurta proteininden gelecek şekilde işlenmemiş yumurta ilave edilen grup Yumurta (YUM grubu) grubunu, formaldehitle işlenmiş (Ham proteinin %0.6'sı) kırık yumurta ilave edilen de Yumurta+Formol (YUM+FORMOL grubu) grubunu oluşturmuştur. Ruminal amonyak düzeyi yemlemeden sonraki 1. ve 2. saatlerde K ve Yum gruplarında benzer, Yum+Formol grubunda daha düşük bulunmuştur (P

The potential use of unmarketable cracked eggs in rations of lambs

In this study, potential use of unmarketable cracked eggs in rations of lambs was investigated. A total of 21 male Avassi lambs at the age of 7-8 months (average of 30 kg body weight) were used. The rations were prepared isonitrogenic and isocaloric. Treatment groups were based on the method of addition of cracked eggs. According to this, the group without egg was control group (C), the group supplemented with untreated egg to compensate 10 % protein of soybean meal was Egg group (Egg) and the group supplemented with formaldhyde treated egg (0.6 % of crude protein) was Egg+formol (Egg+Formol). The ruminal ammonia level at the 1st and 2nd h after feeding was similar in Control and Egg groups, whereas it was lower in Egg+Formol group (P

PDF

___

1. Annino JS. Clinical Chemistry. Little Brown and Co, pp, 1964; 155.
2. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis Association of Agricultural Acedemy Press. Ninth Revised Ed. Washington DC. 1990.
3. Arnold GW. The special senses in grazing animals. 1. Sight and dietary habits in Sheep. Aust. J. of Agric. Res. 1966; 17: 521-529.
4. Cooper JDB and Kyriazakis I. The diet selection of lambs offered food choices of different nutrient density. Anim. Prod. 1993; 56: 469: 196 (Abstr).
5. Cooper JDB, Kyriazakis I, Anderson DH and Oldham JD. The effect of physiological state (late pregnancy) on the diet selection of ewes. Anim. Prod. 1993; 56: 469: 197 (Abstr).
6. Crampton EW and Maynard L. The Relation of cellulose and lignin chromatography method for the simultaneous analysis of plasma retinol, α-tocopherol and various carotenoids. Anal. Biochem. 1983; 138:340.
7. Crooker BA, Clark JH and Shanks RD. Effects of formaldehyde treated soybean meal on milk yield, milk composition and nutrient digestibility in the dairy Cow. J. Dairy Sci. 1983; 66: 492-504.
8. Deniz S, Çoşkun B, İnal S, Şeker E ve Işık K. Formaldehit ile muamele edilen soya fasülyesi küspesinin danalarda canlı ağırlık artışı ve yemden yararlanma ile bazı kan ve rumen sıvısı metabolitleri üzerine etkisi. Hayvancılık Araş. Derg. 1993; 3: 8-11.
9. Deniz S, Tuncer ŞD. Bitkisel protein kaynaklarının formaldehit ile muamele edilmesinin besin maddelerinin sindirilme dereceleri, azot birikimi ile süt verimi ve kompozisyonu üzerine etkisi. Doktora Tezi Selçuk Üniversitesi Sağlık Bil. Derg., 1993; Konya.
10. Derrig RG, Clark JH and Davis CL. Effect of abomasal infusion of sodium caseinate on milk yield, nitrogen utilization and amino acid nutrition of the dairy cow. J Nutr. 1974; 104: 151-159.
11. Ergün A, Tuncer ŞD, Çolpan İ, Yalçın S, Yıldız G, Küçükersan MK, Küçükersan S ve Şehu A. Hayvan Besleme ve Beslenme Hastalıkları. Ankara. Özkan Matbaacılık Ltd. Şti, 2001.
12. Faichney By GJ and Davies HL. The effect of formaldehyde treatment of peanut meal in concentrate diets on the performance of calves. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1972; 23: 167-175.
13. Faichney By GJ and Weston RH. Digestion by ruminant lambs of a diet containing formaldehydetreated casein. Aust. J. Agric. Res.1971; 22: 461-468.
14. Faichney GJ. The effect of formaldehyde-treated casein on the growth of ruminant lambs. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1971; 22: 453-460.
15. Hussein HS and Berger LL. Feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of holstein steers as affected by source of dietary protein and level of ruminally protected lysine and methionine. J. Anim. Sci. 1995; 73: 3503-3509.
16. Hussein HS and Jordan RM. Fish meal as protein supplement ın finishıng lamb diets. J. Anim. Sci. 1991; 69: 2115-2122.
17. Lough DS, Solomon MB, Rumsey TS, Elsasser TH, Slyter LL, Kahl S and Lynch GP. Effect of dietary canola seed and soy lecıthın in high-forage diets on performance, serum lıpıds and carcass characteristics of growing ram lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 1991; 69: 3292-3298.
18. Mc Carty FD, Wahlberg ML. and Mcclure WH. Supplementation of growing lambs with niacin response to differing protein levels and source. Appl. Agric. Res. 1987; 2: 170-174.
19. Orskov ER, Fraser C and Corse EL. The effect on protein utilization of feeding different protein supplements via the rumen or via the abomasum in young growing sheep. Br J Nutr. 1970; 24: 803-809.
20. Peter AP, Hatfield EE, Owens FN and Garrigus US. Effect of aldehyde treatments of soyabean meal on in vitro ammonia release, solubility and lamb performance. J. Nutr. 1971; 101: 605-612.
21. Petit HV, Veira DM and Yu Y. Growth and carcass characteristic of beef steers fed silage and different levels of energy with or without protein supplementation. J. Anim. Sci. 1994; 72: 3221-3229
22. Sahlu T, Fernandez JM, Lu CD and Potchoıba MJ. Influence of dietary protein on performance of dairy goats during pegnancy. J. Dairy Sci. 1992; 75: 220-227.
23. Sareen VK, Sudorshan S and Bhatiha IS. In vitro and ın vivo evaluation of formaldehyde-treated blood proteins in bufallo heifers. Ind. J. Anim. Sci. 1987; 57: 42-49.
24. Schmidet SP, Jorgensen NA, Benevenga NJ and Brungardet VH. Comparison of soyabean meal, formaldehyde treatment soyabean meal, urea and starea for steers. J. Anim. Sci. 1973; 37: 1233-1237.
25. Sommer W, Ulbrich M, Fix HP, Gruhn M und Hoffmann M. Untersuchungen zur Rezepturgestaltung von Fertigfuttermitteln für die Intensive Lammermast. “Untersuchungen Zum Einsatz Verschiedener Extraktionss Chrote” Lan. Zent. Blant. Heft. 1977; 1:52.
26. SPSS for Windows. Relased 6.0 June 17 1993 Copy right (c. Spss inc. 1989-1993).
27. Thomas E, Trenkle A and Burroughs W. Evaluation of protective agents applied to soyabean meal and fed to cattle. II. Feedlot trials. J. Anim Sci. 1979; 49: 1346-1355.
28. Tuncer ŞD, Deniz S, İnal S, Baytok E ve Sezen S. Formaldehit ile muamele edilen soya küspesinin kuzularda canlı ağırlık artışı ve yemden yararlanma ile bazı kan ve rumen sıvısı metabolitleri üzerine etkisi. Hayvancılık Araştırma Dergisi. 1993; 3: 75-78.
29. Varvikko T, Lindberg JE, Setala J and Liisa Syrjalaqvist. The effect of formaldehyde treatment of soyabean meal and rapeseed meal on the amino asit profils and acid-pepsin solubility of rumen undegraded protein. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 1983; 101: 603-612.
30. Vik-Mo L, Emery RS and Huber JT. Milk protein production in cows abomasally ınfused with casein or glucose. J Dairy Sci. 1974; 57: 869-877
31. Wachira JD, Satter LD, Brooke GP and Pope AL. Evaluation on formaldehyde-treated protein for growing lambs and lactating cows. J. Anim. Sci. 1974; 39: 796-807.